Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 5 (February 10), 2007: pp. 605
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.4755

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Olopade, O. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Olopade, O. I.

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Angela R. Bradbury, Olufunmilyo I. Olopade

Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

We agree with Dr Atkin's description of the conclusions from the report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. 1 The statement reporting a mortality benefit described for women older than age 40 years is supported by a meta-analysis that included several randomized trials and specifically evaluated benefits for women age 40 to 49 years.2 We regret that this additional reference was not attached to this statement. We agree with Dr Atkins that there remains uncertainty regarding long-term radiation exposure from mammography, particularly in high-risk women who begin screening earlier than age 40 years. As we hoped to convey, we feel that alternative imaging modalities, such as breast magnetic resonance imaging, which do not involve radiation exposure may ultimately replace mammography in individualized programs for breast cancer prevention.3

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Fletcher SW, Vlack W, Harris R, et al: Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1644-1656, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH III, et al: Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: A new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22:87-92, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Bradbury A, Olopade OI: The case for individualized screening recommendations for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3328-3329, 2006[Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Olopade, O. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Olopade, O. I.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online