Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 16 (June 1), 2008: pp. 2788
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2478

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montori, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montori, V. M.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Ryan A. Wilcox

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Benjamin Djulbegovic

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Gordon H. Guyatt

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Victor M. Montori

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

We appreciate Pater et al's interest in our recently published review of oncology trials stopped early for benefit.1 Their letter underscores how important it is for clinical trialists and members of data monitoring boards to become aware of the potential dangers involved in interim analyses and early trial termination. We agree with Pater et al that early interim analyses may estimate large treatment effects after observing only a few events. In fact, the implausibility of such large treatment effects observed after few events may lead trial investigators to continue a trial despite the results satisfying a stopping rule, as occurred in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council's 12th acute myeloid leukemia trial.2

The degree to which these trials overestimate the true treatment effect is unknown but may be small in some cases (perhaps those in which trialists looked infrequently, late, using stringent criteria, and confirming trends with subsequent observations). Of course, this uncertainty may be avoided altogether if trials are allowed to proceed to completion. Granted, one must weigh the potential harms and benefits of continuing a trial despite an apparently large treatment effect at an interim analysis, including the costs of any future trials that may become necessary to address the uncertainty that remains after premature termination of any earlier trial.3 With the increasing prevalence of trials stopped early for benefit, it is important to identify predictors of the magnitude of bias introduced by early termination, a question our group is actively investigating. In the meantime, clinicians should interpret trials stopped early for benefit with caution, recognizing that such trials may significantly overestimate the true treatment effect.

AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Wilcox RA, Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH, et al: Randomized trials in oncology stopped early for benefit. J Clin Oncol 26:18-19, 2008[Free Full Text]

2. Wheatley K, Clayton D: Be skeptical about unexpected large apparent treatment effects: The case of an MRC AML12 randomization. Control Clin Trials 24:66-70, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Mueller PS, Montori VM, Bassler D, et al: Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit. Ann Intern Med 146:878-881, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Stopping Trials for Benefit Can (Sometimes) Benefit Patients
    Joseph L. Pater, Paul Goss, and Ralph Meyer
    JCO 2008 26: 2787-2788 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montori, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montori, V. M.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online