|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 16 (June 1), 2008: pp. 2788 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2478
In ReplyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN We appreciate Pater et al's interest in our recently published review of oncology trials stopped early for benefit.1 Their letter underscores how important it is for clinical trialists and members of data monitoring boards to become aware of the potential dangers involved in interim analyses and early trial termination. We agree with Pater et al that early interim analyses may estimate large treatment effects after observing only a few events. In fact, the implausibility of such large treatment effects observed after few events may lead trial investigators to continue a trial despite the results satisfying a stopping rule, as occurred in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council's 12th acute myeloid leukemia trial.2 The degree to which these trials overestimate the true treatment effect is unknown but may be small in some cases (perhaps those in which trialists looked infrequently, late, using stringent criteria, and confirming trends with subsequent observations). Of course, this uncertainty may be avoided altogether if trials are allowed to proceed to completion. Granted, one must weigh the potential harms and benefits of continuing a trial despite an apparently large treatment effect at an interim analysis, including the costs of any future trials that may become necessary to address the uncertainty that remains after premature termination of any earlier trial.3 With the increasing prevalence of trials stopped early for benefit, it is important to identify predictors of the magnitude of bias introduced by early termination, a question our group is actively investigating. In the meantime, clinicians should interpret trials stopped early for benefit with caution, recognizing that such trials may significantly overestimate the true treatment effect. AUTHORS DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest. REFERENCES
1. Wilcox RA, Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH, et al: Randomized trials in oncology stopped early for benefit. J Clin Oncol 26:18-19, 2008 2. Wheatley K, Clayton D: Be skeptical about unexpected large apparent treatment effects: The case of an MRC AML12 randomization. Control Clin Trials 24:66-70, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 3. Mueller PS, Montori VM, Bassler D, et al: Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit. Ann Intern Med 146:878-881, 2007
Related Correspondence
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|