Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 3 (January 20), 2008: pp. 510-511
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0730

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riechelmann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krzyzanowska, M. K.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Riechelmann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krzyzanowska, M. K.

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Rachel P. Riechelmann

Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Monika K. Krzyzanowska

Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

We appreciate the comments of Dr Go and colleagues regarding our recently published article about financial conflict of interest (FCOI) disclosure by authors of clinical trials and editorials published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO).1 Go et al present information from their own work on the epidemiology of FCOI disclosure by authors publishing in JCO,2 and their study both confirms and complements our findings that financial relationships between investigators and the pharmaceutical industry are common, often involve funds not directly relevant to the conduct of research, and that the frequency of disclosure varies by type of article. Similar findings have recently been reported for research presented at ASCO meetings.3 What neither our study nor the work by Go et al can answer is whether different types of research (ie, clinical trials v other types of research) lead to different relationships with industry or whether authors disclose differently depending on the type of study.

An important point brought up by Go and colleagues is the variability in and often complete lack of disclosure of monetary values of FCOI in medical journals. While it has become fairly standard for most medical journals to collect some type of information regarding conflicts of interest for all submitted articles, the type of information collected varies across journals, and many journals do not share this information with their readers either at all or in limited format. We were disappointed when JCO had stopped publishing the detailed COI disclosure information that made our study and the study by Dr Go possible. We echo the recommendations of Go et al that this information should be presented to the readers. Ideally, all medical journals should adopt more standardized methods of eliciting and publishing of this information.

Lastly, we concur with Go et al that further research is needed to evaluate how FCOI affects the conduct and interpretation of cancer research. We have recently initiated a study to look at the impact of FCOI on the interpretation of clinical trials. The preliminary results were presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting in 20074 and suggest that personal financial relationships between investigators and the pharmaceutical industry may affect how study results are interpreted. Specifically, we found that articles with authors that declare FCOI were more likely to have highly positive conclusions that used superlatives to promote the experimental arm. However, as Dr Go indicates, such studies will not be possible without full disclosure from authors and cooperation from journals in sharing this information with the readership. Since research integrity is at stake, we believe this is an important line of investigation, and we encourage all journals to adopt more open publication policies regarding authors’ conflicts of interest.

AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Riechelmann RP, Wang L, O'Carroll A, et al: Disclosure of conflicts of interest by authors of clinical trials and editorials in oncology. J Clin Oncol 25:4642-4647, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. George B, Simhan S, Lee JA, et al: Conflicts of interest among articles published in the J Clin Oncol. J Clin Oncol 25:18s, 2007 (suppl; abstr 6633)

3. Hampson LA, Joffe S, Fowler R, et al: Frequency, type, and monetary value of financial conflicts of interest in cancer clinical research. J Clin Oncol 25:3609-3614, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Riechelmann RP, Dounaevskaia VD, Taback N, et al: Source of funding, conflict of interest (COI) and the interpretation of cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 25:18s, 2007 (suppl; abstr 6530)





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riechelmann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krzyzanowska, M. K.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Riechelmann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krzyzanowska, M. K.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online