Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2306 on September 15 2008

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jakacki, R. I. Articles by Adamson, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jakacki, R. I. Articles by Adamson, P. C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Pediatric Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Erlotinib Followed by the Combination of Erlotinib and Temozolomide: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study

Regina I. Jakacki, Marta Hamilton, Richard J. Gilbertson, Susan M. Blaney, Jean Tersak, Mark D. Krailo, Ashish M. Ingle, Stephan D. Voss, Janet E. Dancey, Peter C. Adamson

From the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA; Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Children's Oncology Group, Arcadia, CA

Corresponding author: Regina I. Jakacki, MD, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail: regina.jakacki{at}chp.edu

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
Purpose We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors.

Patients and Methods Erlotinib was administered orally once daily to cohorts of three to six children for a single 28-day course. Patients then received the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide daily for 5 days for all subsequent 28-day courses. An oral erlotinib solution was administered during the dose-finding phase and a tablet formulation was subsequently studied at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed.

Results Forty-six patients, median age 11.5 years, received erlotinib at doses of 35, 50, 65, 85, or 110 mg/m²/d. At 110 mg/m²/d, two of four patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of rash and hyperbilirubinemia, whereas one of six patients developed dose-limiting rash at 85 mg/m²/d. The most frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, rash, and hyperbilirubinemia. The combination of erlotinib and temozolomide was well tolerated. The median apparent erlotinib clearance was 3.1 L/h/m² and the median terminal half-life was 8.7 hours. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months, two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months, and one patient with myoepithelioma had a mixed response.

Conclusion The recommended phase II dose of erlotinib in recurrent pediatric solid tumors is 85 mg/m²/d, either alone or in combination with temozolomide.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, ERBB1) is a membrane-anchored protein tyrosine kinase that, when phosphorylated, activates a variety of downstream effector molecules regulating cell proliferation and differentiation. Aberrant cell signaling via the EGFR family has been implicated in the development or progression of several human cancers, including certain pediatric solid tumors.^1-4 Drugs that inhibit EGFR signaling may disrupt critical cellular functions⁵ and potentiate the effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation therapy.^6,7 EGFR inhibition can be achieved either with monoclonal antibodies or with small-molecule inhibitors. Erlotinib, a highly potent oral inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase⁸ with significant but lesser inhibitory activity against ERBB2,⁹ has been US Food and Drug Administration approved for adults with recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and advanced pancreatic cancer.

The addition of an EGFR pathway inhibitor to cytotoxic chemotherapy is a strategy being pursued for a number of adult malignancies.^10,11 Preclinical xenograft models suggest that combining erlotinib with active chemotherapeutic agents leads to incremental improvements in outcome. Inhibition of tumor growth was significantly greater when erlotinib was combined with gemcitabine or cisplatin in NSCLC tumor models compared with erlotinib alone.¹² A phase III trial in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed a 23.5% improvement in survival when erlotinib was administered in combination with gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone.¹³

Temozolomide is an oral alkylating agent that has shown a broad spectrum of activity both in the preclinical^14-16 and clinical settings^17,18 in pediatric tumors. The combination of temozolomide and an EGFR inhibitor produced at least additive effects in human tumor xenograft models.¹⁹ We therefore performed a phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of erlotinib administered orally for 28 consecutive days, followed by the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide administered daily for 5 days every 28 days in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors.

	PATIENTS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
Institutional review boards at participating institutions approved the study. Informed consent was obtained from patients aged 18 years or from parents/legal guardians of children aged less than 18 years, with child assent when appropriate, according to individual institutional policies.

Patients and Eligibility
Eligible patients were younger than 22 years with a recurrent or refractory CNS tumor, osteogenic sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, neuroblastoma, or germ cell tumor. Patients were required to have a Karnofsky or Lansky performance score of at least 50 for those older than or 10 years old and younger, respectively, and a life expectancy of more than 8 weeks. Adequate bone marrow (absolute neutrophil count 1000/µL, platelet count 100,000/µL, hemoglobin 8 gm/dL), renal (normal serum creatinine for age) and hepatic (total bilirubin < 1.5x normal and ALT < 2.5x upper limit of normal) function was required. Patients were required to have recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior treatment and could not have received myelosuppressive chemotherapy within 2 weeks of study entry; palliative radiation within 2 weeks or radiation to more than 50% of the pelvis or craniospinal axis within 6 months; or biologic therapy or growth factors within 7 days or stem-cell transplantation within 3 months. Exclusion criteria included uncontrolled infection, pregnancy or lactation, any previous erlotinib exposure, concurrent administration of an enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant, use of a proton pump inhibitor within 5 days or H₂ blocker within 2 days of study entry, and use of a CYP3A4 inducer within 4 weeks or a CYP3A4 inhibitor within 1 week of study entry.

Study Design
Erlotinib was administered orally once daily in the morning, either at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after breakfast, without interruption. A course was defined as 28 consecutive days of drug administration. The erlotinib dose was escalated in cohorts of three to six patients. Because the bioavailability of the solution was undefined, 35 mg/m²/d was selected as the starting dose level with subsequent escalations to 50, 65, 85, and 110 mg/m²/d. A minimum of three patients assessable for toxicity were treated at each dose level. If one of the first three patients treated at any dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first course of treatment, up to three additional patients were treated at that dose level. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level immediately below that at which two or more patients in a cohort of up to six experienced DLT. Only course 1 (single-agent erlotinib) DLTs were used to guide dose escalation and define the MTD.

Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v3.0 (http://ctep.cancer.gov/forms/CTCAEv3.pdf). DLTs were defined as any grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 4 neutropenia, any grade 2 nonhematologic toxicity that persisted for more than 7 days and was considered sufficiently severe to warrant treatment interruption, and any grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity attributable to erlotinib with the specific exceptions of weight loss, grade 3 nausea and vomiting which responded to antiemetics, grade 3 transaminases that return to grade 1 or better within 7 days of discontinuing erlotinib, or infection without neutropenia. Erlotinib treatment was interrupted if the patient experienced a DLT and restarted at the next lowest dose level as long as the toxicity resolved to grade 1 or better within 7 days. If grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (NHT) took longer than 7 days to resolve or recurred after one dose reduction, the patient was removed from protocol therapy. Patients with grade 2 NHT were allowed up to two dose reductions.

Erlotinib was continued after the first course as long as there was no irreversible toxicity. After course 1, temozolomide 180 mg/m²/d (and, if tolerated, escalating in subsequent courses to 200 mg/m²/d) was administered concomitantly on days 1 through 5 of each 28-day erlotinib course. The definition of a hematologic DLT for courses 2 and later included grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 days or hematologic toxicity causing a delay of more than 7 days between courses. Response, assessed after course 1 and every other course thereafter, used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria²⁰ for patients with non-CNS tumors and criteria described by Gnekow et al²¹ for patients with CNS tumors.

The dose escalation component of the trial used an oral erlotinib solution because this initially was the only formulation that would allow for accurate pediatric body-surface area–based dosing. After the MTD of erlotinib in oral solution was determined, the tolerability and PK of tablet formulations of erlotinib (25, 100, and 150 mg) was studied at the MTD (Part B).

Drug Formulation and Administration
For the dose-escalation part of the study, the institutional pharmacy provided each patient with two sets of prefilled oral syringes: a single daily dose of erlotinib (10 mg/mL in 6% Captisol [CyDex, Lenexa, KS]) and a single dose of Ora-Sweet (Paddock Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN) at the same volume as the erlotinib. Syringes were refrigerated until just before administration, at which point parents were instructed to transfer the Ora-Sweet into a small medicine cup and add the erlotinib. The patient could either drink the solution directly from the cup or the contents could be drawn back up into a syringe and administered. For Part B of the study, the tablet dose was rounded either up or down to the nearest 25 mg.

Pharmacokinetic Studies
Erlotinib single dose PK, steady-state PK, and steady-state PK when administered concurrently with temozolomide were studied. Blood was obtained pretreatment and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 10 to 12, 24, 26, 30, 48 and 50 hours after the first erlotinib dose. Patients who chose to participate in PK studies did not receive the course-1, day-2 dose; the day-3 dose was delayed until after PK sampling. Steady-state sampling was performed on day 10 of single-agent erlotinib and on day 5 of the combination phase. Blood samples were collected in sodium heparin, immediately refrigerated or stored on wet ice, centrifuged ( 15 minutes, 2,000 x g at 4°C), and separated plasma stored at –20°C until being shipped on dry ice to a central laboratory for analysis.

Plasma samples were analyzed for erlotinib and its O-demethylated active metabolite OSI-420 at MDS PharmaServices (St Laurent, Quebec) using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods. Briefly, aliquots of the thawed samples were mixed with an internal standard and water and extracted into t-butyl methyl ether. The organic layer was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen and the residue reconstituted in mobile phase for analysis. Separation of analytes was by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometric single-reaction monitoring. The lower limit of quantitation was 1.1 and 1.0 ng/mL for erlotinib and OSI-420, respectively. This methodology does not separate OSI-420 from its positional isomer, OSI-413, but on the basis of data from a prior adult study, the latter is not detected in plasma.²²

Data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods with WINNonlin (Scientific Consultant, Apex, NC) Enterprise, Version 4.1 software (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA). The terminal rate constant z was calculated using at least three quantifiable time points in each plasma profile obtained at approximately 24 hours following the dose or thereafter. Area under the concentration-time curve from baseline to infinity (AUC_0-inf) was calculated after a single dose of erlotinib using the log linear trapezoidal method and extrapolated to infinite time: AUC extrapolated = plasma concentration of the last time period (C_last)/z.

Alpha-1 Acid Glycoprotein Determination
Erlotinib is approximately 95% bound to plasma proteins, with alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAGP) as the second most important binding protein following albumin. Plasma samples for the determination of AAGP were therefore obtained before the first erlotinib dose of courses 1, 3, and 5 and analyzed by Clinical Reference Laboratory Inc (Lenexa, KS) using a validated turbidimetric assay (limit of quantitation = 0.1 g/L).

ERBB Receptor Expression and Signal Activity
Retrospectively collected fixed tumor samples were obtained from study patients and analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine the expression of total ERBB1 and ERBB2, active phosphorylated (p-)ERBB2^Y1248, pAKT1^S473, pERK1/2 and pS6^S235/236. To remove observer bias, IHC staining of tumors was scored blind to histologic diagnosis and treatment response using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) analysis as described previously.²³ The IHC score provides a measure of the mean percentage of immunopositivity that is detected in each x200 field.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
Forty-six patients, (median age, 11.5 years; range, 3 to 20 years) were enrolled onto the study from March 2004 to December 2005 (Table 1). Ten patients were not fully assessable for toxicity: three patients never started treatment and seven developed progressive disease before completion of the first course.

PK
The PK results for patients studied at steady-state, including both the oral solution and tablet formulation, are shown in Figure 1 and Table 4. Significant interpatient variability in erlotinib disposition was observed at all dose levels. There were no significant correlations between patient age and apparent drug clearance (Cl_ss/F) or dose-normalized maximum serum concentration (C_max), and no apparent effect of temozolomide on erlotinib drug disposition (Appendix Table A1, online only). The mean AAGP concentration obtained in 18 subjects was 1.03 g/L (standard deviation, 0.2 g/L). AAGP concentrations did not correlate with Cl_ss/F (Spearman r = –0.27; P = .29). A population PK model incorporating initial dose PK findings will be reported separately.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 1. Erlotinib plasma concentration-time curves at steady-state. Median values are shown. Monoexponential absorption –biexponential elimination equations were fit to the data using Kaleidgraph (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). (A) After administration of the liquid formulation. (B) Comparison of the liquid with the tablet formulation at the 85 mg/m2/d dose level.

0-

0-

0-

Antitumor Activity
Seventeen of 43 response-assessable patients had stable disease after the first course of single-agent erlotinib. One patient with metastatic myoepithelioma had a mixed response, with resolution of pulmonary nodules but progression of a pleural-based mass. One patient with a medulloblastoma had progressive disease after the first course and a partial response after the first combination course, but came off study after the third course because of a dose-limiting rash. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months. Two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months; the longest-responding patient with neuroblastoma (bone marrow disease, positive [¹²⁵I]Metaiodobenzylguanidine scan) had a complete response to the combination therapy after developing progressive disease with single-agent erlotinib.

ERBB Receptor Expression and Signal Activity
Twenty-four samples of fixed tumor material were available from 20 patients, including three cases with consecutive (relapsed) samples. Variable expression of the EGFR or ERBB2 receptors was detected in the great majority of tumor samples (Fig 2). The highest levels of EGFR and ERBB2 were observed in medulloblastoma and ependymoma, tumors that have been shown previously to express these receptors.⁴ Variable but significant levels of expression of phosphorylated cell signal intermediates were observed. Of particular note, we observed a highly-significant correlation between the expression levels of pERBB2^Y1248 and pAKT^S473 in tumor samples (P < .0001), suggesting that ERBB2 might promote activation of AKT in pediatric tumors, as has been shown in cells in culture.²⁴ Retrospective samples of tumors were available from four patients who demonstrated a response to the study protocol. Each of these tumor samples expressed EGFR and ERBB2 receptors and active signal intermediates, although expression levels were not significantly higher than those found in tumors obtained from nonresponding patients.

View larger version (42K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 2. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression scores of ERBB proteins and signal intermediates in 24 CNS-derived and other tumors. Samples from responding patients are indicated. Consecutive recurrent tumor samples from the same patients are shown together and numbered chronologically. NB, neuroblastoma; OST, osteosarcoma; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; STS, soft tissue sarcoma; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; MR, mixed response; p-, phosphorylated.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

The median apparent clearance of 3.1 L/h/m² in children is similar to the apparent clearance of 6.3 ± 6.1 L/h (approximately 3.6 ± 3.7 L/h/m²) in adult cancer patients.²⁵ The median terminal half-life of 8.7 hours in children after the first oral dose is similar to the half-life of 7 to 13 hours observed in healthy adult volunteers²⁸ but shorter than the more than 30-hours half-life observed in adult cancer patients.²⁶ This may be related in part to AAGP, the most important covariate for erlotinib clearance in adult patients with NSCLC.²⁶ The levels of AAGP in children was lower than in adult NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib (1.03 ± 0.2 v 1.43 ± 0.5 g/L) but within the range of what is seen in healthy adults (0.50 to 1.20 g/L).²⁹ Despite the difference in terminal half-life, the AUCs and C_max observed in children were consistent with those observed in adult cancer patients.

The combination of temozolomide and erlotinib was well tolerated, and the PK of erlotinib did not appear to be affected by concomitant administration of temozolomide. This differs from the conclusion of a study in adults with malignant gliomas³⁰ where a "modest interaction" was suggested. However, the adult study compared PK results between groups of patients; the current study compared effects within each patient.

The patient with metastatic myoepithelioma who experienced a mixed response had a tumor that expressed significant levels of EGFR and ERBB2. However, there were no differences between levels of EGFR expression in disease responding or not responding to the combination of erlotinib and temozolomide. Patients whose disease responded or who had prolonged stable disease with the combination included two patients with neuroblastoma and one each with a medulloblastoma and neurocytoma. The contribution of erlotinib to clinical activity, however, is not known because temozolomide has single-agent activity in these tumor types.^17,18

In conclusion, children appear to tolerate erlotinib similarly to adult patients, and drug disposition is similar between these populations. The combination of temozolomide and erlotinib is well tolerated and warrants further study.

	AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following author(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked with a "U" are those for which no compensation was received; those relationships marked with a "C" were compensated. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

Employment or Leadership Position: Marta Hamilton, OSI Pharmaceuticals (C) Consultant or Advisory Role: Regina I. Jakacki, OSI Pharmaceuticals (C), Roche Pharmaceuticals (C) Stock Ownership: Marta Hamilton, OSI Pharmaceuticals Honoraria: Regina I. Jakacki, OSI Pharmaceuticals, Roche Pharmaceuticals Research Funding: None Expert Testimony: None Other Remuneration: None

	AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
Conception and design: Regina I. Jakacki, Marta Hamilton, Richard J. Gilbertson, Jean Tersak, Mark D. Krailo, Ashish M. Ingle, Janet E. Dancey, Peter C. Adamson

Administrative support: Janet E. Dancey

Provision of study materials or patients: Jean Tersak, Janet E. Dancey

Collection and assembly of data: Regina I. Jakacki, Marta Hamilton, Richard J. Gilbertson, Jean Tersak, Mark D. Krailo, Ashish M. Ingle, Stephan D. Voss

Data analysis and interpretation: Regina I. Jakacki, Marta Hamilton, Richard J. Gilbertson, Susan M. Blaney, Mark D. Krailo, Ashish M. Ingle, Stephan D. Voss, Peter C. Adamson

Manuscript writing: Marta Hamilton, Richard J. Gilbertson, Mark D. Krailo, Ashish M. Ingle, Janet E. Dancey, Peter C. Adamson

Final approval of manuscript: Regina I. Jakacki, Marta Hamilton, Susan M. Blaney, Jean Tersak, Mark D. Krailo, Ashish M. Ingle, Stephan D. Voss, Janet E. Dancey, Peter C. Adamson

	Appendix

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig A1. Comparison of the apparent erlotinib clearance for the oral solution versus the tablet formulation. With the same dose there was no difference in overall drug exposure as measured by areaunder the concentration-time curve. Cl/Fss, apparent clearance at steady state.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Elizabeth O'Connor and Carrianne Hanson of the COG phase I/Pilot Consortium Coordinating Center for outstanding administrative support throughout the development and conduct of this clinical trial and Inga Luckett for excellent technical assistance with the ERBB receptor assays.

	NOTES

 
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on September 15, 2008.

Supported in part by Grant No. CA97452 from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; the Molecular Clinical Trials Core at St Jude's is supported by the St Jude Cancer Center Core Grant No. (P30CA021765) and the American Lebanese and Syrian Associated Charities.

Presented at 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 2-6, 2006, Atlanta, GA.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF... AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Appendix REFERENCES

 
1. Bredel M, Pollack IF, Hamilton RL, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor expression and gene amplification in high-grade non-brainstem gliomas of childhood. Clin Cancer Res 5:1786-1792, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Zhang L, Jope RS: Muscarinic M3 and epidermal growth factor receptors activate mutually inhibitory signaling cascades in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 255:774-777, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

3. De Giovanni C, Landuzzi L, Frabetti F, et al: Antisense epidermal growth factor receptor transfection impairs the proliferative ability of human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Cancer Res 56:3898-3901, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Gilbertson RJ: ERBB2 in pediatric cancer: Innocent until proven guilty. Oncologist 10:508-517, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Woodburn JR: The epidermal growth factor receptor and its inhibition in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 82:241-250, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Raben D, Helfrich B, Chan DC, et al: The effects of cetuximab alone and in conjunction with radiation and/or chemotherapy in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:795-805, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Ciardiello F, Caputo R, Bianco R, et al: Antitumor effect and potentiation of cytotoxic drugs activity in human cancer cells by ZD-1839 (Iressa), an epidermal growth factor receptor-selective tyrosine kinas inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 6:2053-2063, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Moyer JD, Barbacci EG, Iwata KK, et al: Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by CP- 358,774, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Cancer Res 57:4838-4848, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Schaefer G, Shao L, Totpal K, et al: Erlotinib directly inhibits HER2 kinase activation and downstream signaling events in intact cells lacking epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Cancer Res 67:1228-1238, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, et al: TRIBUTE: A phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5892-5899, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Krempien R, Muenter MW, Huber PE, et al: Randomized phase II study evaluating EGFR targeting therapy with cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: PARC—Study protocol [ISRCTN56652283]. BMC Cancer 5:131, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Higgins B, Kolinsky K, Smith M, et al: Antitumor activity of erlotinib (OSI-774, Tarceva) alone or in combination in human non-small cell lung cancer tumor xenograft models. Anticancer Drugs 15:503-512, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al: Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960-1966, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Friedman HS, Dolan ME, Pegg AE, et al: Activity of temozolomide in the treatment of central nervous system tumor xenografts. Cancer Res 55:2853-2857, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Middlemas DS, Stewart CF, Kirstein MN, et al: Biochemical correlates of temozolomide sensitivity in pediatric solid tumor xenograft models. Clin Cancer Res 6:998-1007, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Vassal G, Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Willington MA, et al: Antitumor activity of temozolomide in relation to DNA repair activity in neuroblastoma. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 42:324, 2001 (abstr)

17. Rubie H, Chisholm J, DeFachelles AS, et al: Phase II study of temozolomide in relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: A joint Societe Francaise des Cancers de l'enfant and United Kingdom Children Cancer Study Group New Agents Group study. J Clin Oncol 24:5259-5264, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Nicholson HS, Kretschmar CS, Krailo M, et al: Phase 2 study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent central nervous system tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer 110:1542-1550, 2007[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Hwang E, Rich JN, Friedman HS, et al: Antitumor activity of ZD1839 (Iressa), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), in combination with temozolomide in human cancer xenografts. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 43:787-788, 2002

20. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205-216, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Gnekow AK: Recommendations of the Brain Tumor Subcommittee for the Reporting of Trials: SIOP Brain Tumor Subcommittee—International Society of Pediatric Oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol 24:104-108, 1995[Medline]

22. Ling J, Johnson KA, Miao Z, et al: Metabolism and excretion of erlotinib, a small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in healthy male volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos 34:420-426, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, et al: A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 11:69-82, 2007[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Wen Y, Hu M, Makino K, et al: HER-2/neu promotes androgen-independent survival and growth of prostate cancer cells through the AKT pathway. Cancer Res 60:6841-6845, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemaunatis J, et al: Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 19:3267-3279, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Lu JF, Eppler SM, Wolf J, et al: Clinical pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in patients with solid tumors and exposure-safety relationships in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 80:136-145, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Wacker B, Nagrani T, Weinberg J, et al: Correlation between development of rash and efficacy in patients treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in two large phase III studies. Clin Cancer Res 13:3913-3921, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. -1 Acid Glycoprotein [Package Insert V4]. Indianapolis, IN, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, 2003-2006

29. Abbas R, Fettner S, Riek M, et al: A drug-drug interaction to evaluate the effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib, in healthy subjects. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:137, 2003 (abstr 548)

30. Prados MD, Lamborn KR, Chang S, et al: Phase I study of erlotinib HCl alone and combined with temozolomide in patients with stable or recurrent malignant glioma. Neuro-Oncol 8:67-78, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Submitted November 15, 2007; accepted June 5, 2008.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jakacki, R. I. Articles by Adamson, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jakacki, R. I. Articles by Adamson, P. C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?