Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8874 on February 19 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 9 (March 20), 2008: pp. 1511-1518
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kapp, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kapp, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Analysis of Phase II Studies on Targeted Agents and Subsequent Phase III Trials: What Are the Predictors for Success?

John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Branimir I. Sikic, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp

From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA

Corresponding author: John K. Chan, MD, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero St, Room A747, Box 1702, San Francisco, CA 94143-1702; e-mail: chanjohn{at}obgyn.ucsf.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose To identify the characteristics of phase II studies that predict for subsequent "positive" phase III trials (those that reached the proposed primary end points of study or those wherein the study drug was superior to the standard regimen investigating targeted agents in advanced tumors.

Methods We identified all phase III clinical trials of targeted therapies against advanced cancers published from 1985 to 2005. Characteristics of the preceding phase II studies were reviewed to identify predictive factors for success of the subsequent phase III trial. Data were analyzed using the {chi}2 test and logistic regression models.

Results Of 351 phase II studies, 167 (47.6%) subsequent phase III trials were positive and 184 (52.4%) negative. Phase II studies from multiple rather than single institutions were more likely to precede a successful trial (60.4% v 39.4%; P < .001). Positive phase II results were more likely to lead to a successful phase III trial (50.8% v 22.5%; P = .003). The percentage of successful trials from pharmaceutical companies was significantly higher compared with academic, cooperative groups, and research institutes (89.5% v 44.2%, 45.2%, and 46.3%, respectively; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, these factors and shorter time interval between publication of phase II results and III study publication were independent predictive factors for a positive phase III trial.

Conclusion In phase II studies of targeted agents, multiple- versus single-institution participation, positive phase II trial, pharmaceutical company-based trials, and shorter time period between publication of phase II to phase III trial were independent predictive factors of success in a phase III trial. Investigators should be cognizant of these factors in phase II studies before designing phase III trials.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Targeted therapies have become an important modality in cancer treatment. The development of novel cancer therapies after preclinical evaluation follows a continuum from phase I to phase II to phase III studies. After analyzing the safety and dose from phase I studies, phase II studies are employed to show antitumor activity in patients.1-4 Phase III randomized clinical trials compare the new therapeutic regimen with standard treatment to determine the efficacy of cancer therapies and form the foundation for evidence-based medicine. Phase III trials are typically required for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of novel treatment regimens that may become new standards of care.

Clearly, it is not possible to evaluate all novel agents in randomized trials because of ethical and cost considerations. These phase III studies are laborious, time consuming, and costly.5 The average time spent by clinical personnel per patient is 200 hours and duration per trial is approximately 4.5 years, with an estimated cost of more than $10 million per trial.6,7 Despite the extensive resources utilized, only 2% to 24% of these randomized clinical trials have demonstrated significant survival advantages associated with the experimental therapy.8-10 Given the poor success rates of these phase III trials, it is important to identify factors of phase II studies that can predict success in randomized clinical trials (or "positive" trials). Such factors can ultimately be used to prioritize various novel agents for rapid testing in phase III trials. Moreover, in life-threatening cancers where there is an unmet medical need, these predictive factors can be implemented to form a basis for accelerated drug approval by the FDA.

Limited reports have evaluated the characteristics of phase II studies of chemotherapy that may predict for a subsequent success in phase III clinical trial. A prior study compared the outcomes of phase II studies and subsequent randomized controlled trials testing chemotherapeutic regimens and found that the sample size of phase II studies demonstrated a trend toward being predictive for positive phase III studies (P = 0.083).11 However, there are no studies that have analyzed the characteristics of phase II studies on targeted therapies to prioritize these novel compounds for phase III testing. In this current report, we proposed to identify the characteristics of phase II studies that predict for subsequent positive phase III trials on targeted therapies for cancer.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
We identified phase III trials and their precedent phase II studies on targeted therapies in advanced cancers published in the English language between 1985 and 2005 (Appendix, online only). To retrieve all phase III clinical trials, systematic searches were made of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and BIOSIS. Search terms included: "biologics," "biologic therapy," "targeted therapy," "gene therapy," "immunotherapy," "oncolytic virotherapy," "monoclonal antibodies," "angiogenesis inhibitors," and "biologic response modifiers." We included studies that used targeted therapies alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Trials involving radiation therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from our study.

All phase III studies were retrieved by a medical research librarian (C.S.). Each study was reviewed by the other investigators. On the basis of the information from the phase III trial, the preceding phase II study that led to the randomized clinical trial was retrieved. The biologic regimens from both the phase II and III studies were then compared to ensure similar administration schedule and dose. We defined a trial as positive if the proposed primary end points of the study were reached based on the original trial design. If these primary objectives were not stated, a phase III clinical trial was considered positive if the study drug was superior to the standard regimen or best supportive care. A positive phase II trial is determined by what the author defined as positive in the publication of the phase II trial. All data were analyzed using SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and SAS (version 6.12; SAS Inc, Cary, NC). Statistical analyses were conducted using Pearson {chi}2 tests (univariable comparisons) and logistic regression (multivariable comparisons). The dependent variable of interest was phase III trial result (positive v negative). Independent predictive factors examined include factors such as study design (randomized, number of patients, median follow-up), cancer type, institution, year of phase II study, time to phase III trial, positive response rate, and journal impact factor. Independent variables that were significantly associated with phase III trial outcome in univariable analyses were subsequently included in multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the best predictive model. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated from logistic regression model coefficients.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Characteristics of Phase II Studies
A total of 351 phase III clinical trials using biologic agents and their preceding phase II studies were identified from 1985 to 2005. The characteristics of these phase II studies are shown in Table 1. Two hundred three trials (57.8%) used targeted therapy alone, and 148 (42.2%) used a combination of targeted therapy and chemotherapy. Solid tumors were studied in 270 trials (77%) and the remaining 81 studies (23%) treated hematologic malignancies. The most common primary sites of cancer were genitourinary (17.9%), skin (17.9%), GI (14%), and breast (12.5%). More than half (53.8%) of the studies were performed in the United States, 32.8% in Europe, and 3.4% in Asia. The majority (56.4%) of these studies were reported from single rather than multiple institutions. Academic centers, research institutes, cooperative groups, pharmaceutical companies, and others were involved in 58.7%, 19.1%, 12.0%, 5.4%, and 4.8% of the phase II studies, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of the phase II studies had 50 patients or fewer. Other detailed characteristics of the phase II studies including type of study, number of patients, median age, performance status, attrition rate, and median follow-up are summarized in Table 2. The outcomes of the phase II studies including response rate, journal impact factor, time interval between phase II to III trials, year, and result of the subsequent phase III study are also presented. Response rates varied from 0% (1.1% of the phase II trials) to 100% (24% of the trials). For 27% of the trials, the response rates ranged between 21% and 40%. "Positive" outcomes were reported in 167 (47.6%) phase III trials and 184 (52.4%) were "negative" (ie, they did not meet the criteria for positive).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of Phase II Studies (n = 351)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Outcomes of Phase II and III Studies (n = 351)

 
Correlation With Phase III Studies
We identified factors involving study design, patient characteristics, and outcomes of phase II studies that may predict for subsequent positive (successful) phase III trials. A higher number of assessable patients in the phase II trial correlated with a higher percentage of positive phase III studies compared with a lower number of subjects, though the difference was not statistically significant (P = .081; Table 3). Phase II studies from multiple rather than single institutions were more likely to have a successful trial (60.4% v 39.4%; P < .001; Table 4). The percent of successful trials from pharmaceutical companies was significantly higher compared to academic, cooperative groups, and research institutes (89.5% v 44.2% v 45.2% v 46.3%; P = .002). Over the study periods of 1985 to 1990, 1991 to 1995, 1996 to 2000, 2001 to 2005, the percentage of phase II studies that led to positive phase III trials increased from 37.7% to 33.3% to 56.0% to 76.8% (P < .001). Similarly, more successful phase III studies were associated with a higher response rate in the phase II report (P = .093). There was agreement between the mean response rates of the phase II and the subsequent phase III trials (41.5% v 40.8%; P = .80). The publication of the phase II studies in journals with an impact factor greater than 10 showed a trend toward greater positivity in phase III clinical trials compared with journals with an impact factor of 10 or lower (52.6% v 43.6%; P = .098). The shorter interval between the publication of phase II and III studies (0.5 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, and 16 to 20 years), was also correlated with the success of phase III trials (55.6%, 42.2%, 32.6%, and 10.0%, respectively; P < .001). Positive phase II results were more likely to lead to a successful phase III trial (50.8% v 22.5%; P = .003; Fig 1A-1C). Of the targeted agents–only trials (n = 168), 66.7% of studies that used "disease progression" as an end point predicted for a positive phase III trial compared with 43.5% of phase II studies using "response" as an end point (P = .086; Table 4). However, factors of phase II trials such as the testing of a targeted therapy alone versus targeted therapy with chemotherapy, hematologic versus solid tumors, randomized versus nonrandomized phase II studies, median age of study participants, performance status, length of accrual, and median follow-up were not predictive for a successful phase III study (Tables 3-4). On multivariate analysis, multiple versus single institutional studies, phase II result, pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials, and shorter time interval between phase II to III study publication were independent predictive factors for a positive phase III trial (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Characteristics of Patients in Phase II Studies and Subsequent Result of Phase III Trial (n = 351)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Characteristics of Phase II Studies and Subsequent Result of Phase III Trial (n = 351)

 

Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 1. Characteristics of phase II study and percentage of phase III trials with positive results (n = 351). (A) Institutions and locations, (B) year of phase II trial and time interval between publications, and (C) number of patients, results, and end points.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Multvariate Analysis for Factors of Phase II Study Predictive of Positive Phase III Trial (n = 351)

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Because of the low success rates of costly randomized phase III clinical trials, it is important to identify potential factors of the preceding phase II clinical trials that can predict for success in the phase III trial. Such factors can ultimately be used to design better phase II trials and to prioritize various novel agents for rapid testing in phase III trials. In this current study, our results showed that multi-institutional trials, positive phase II results, pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials, and shorter time interval between phase II to III study publication were independent predictive factors for a positive phase III trial.

One prior study has compared the characteristics of phase II studies and the subsequent outcomes of randomized controlled studies for chemotherapeutic regimens.11 In the 43 phase III studies identified, only 12 phase III studies (28%) were positive. These authors did find that the sample size of phase II studies demonstrated a trend toward being predictive for positive phase III studies (P = .083). Nonetheless, other characteristics of the phase II study such as multicentricity, randomization, response rate, and journal impact factor were not found to be predictive for success in phase III study. However, analyses have not been performed to evaluate novel targeted agents using a large number of studies. In this current report of 351 studies, we identified several characteristics of the phase II studies on cancer targeted agents that predicted for subsequent positive phase III clinical trials.

Studies involving cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents typically evaluate the efficacy of these drugs based on response rates from the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as a surrogate for clinical benefit.1-4 Response rates characterized by tumor shrinkage may translate to increased survival and/or improved quality of life.12 However, response rates alone may not apply in the setting of novel cytostatic targeted agents. Prior phase III studies on targeted therapy have failed to demonstrate a correlation between response rates and improved survival.13-16 As such, other surrogate end points such as time to progression may be a more applicable end point for these targeted agents. This current study found that 67% of trials on targeted agents that used "disease progression" as an end point predicted for a successful phase III trial compared to only 43.5% of studies employing "response" as an end point. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .086). In addition, our data did not identify an independent association between a higher response rate in phase II study and the likelihood of success in a phase III trial. Our results suggest that newer approaches in clinical trial design may be warranted in the evaluation of cytostatic agents. Clearly, the ability to predict success in phase III trial on the basis of response rates reported in the phase II trial is complex; for, it not only depends on the type of cancer but also the percentage of overall response, number of complete responses, duration of responses, and reproducibility of response rate in multiple clinical trials.17 In addition, given the limited studies on evaluating end points for targeted therapies, future correlative studies are warranted to investigate novel tests involving molecular diagnostics and/or pharmacogenomics to identify more accurate biologic end points even if it is only in a subgroup of target-enriched patients. In this manner, translational investigations from phase II studies can potentially select novel biologic agents for development in smaller and less costly phase III studies.

Single-institution studies may be fraught with significant selection bias. These biases may lead to overly promising results by including patients with favorable prognostic factors such as younger age, better performance, and socioeconomic status.18-20 Furthermore, there may exist other undetermined factors that may also influence the results of smaller phase II studies. For example, in a recent phase III study on head and neck cancer, there was an improved survival correlated with the distance that the patient lived from the treatment center.21 In this current study, we found that the results of phase II studies from multiple rather than single institutions more frequently predicted a positive result in the subsequent phase III clinical trial, suggesting that the enrollment of patients from multiple centers may decrease potential selection biases and lead to more accurate results in future trials.

In this current analysis, our data showed that pharmaceutical company-sponsored phase II trials resulted in a significantly higher percentage of successful phase III clinical trials compared to other institutions. These results suggest that there may exist a selection bias toward publishing positive outcomes of pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials. Alternatively, the pharmaceutical companies may be better able to design and support clinical trials.

The interval between the publication of phase II and III studies was also associated with the success of phase III trial. This finding supports the well-known publication bias in clinical trials.22 A prior study by Ioannidis23 demonstrated that the median time from the beginning of enrollment to publication was significantly shorter for positive compared to negative studies (4.3 v 6.5 years, respectively). Likewise, Stern et al24 found that clinical trials with negative results had a significantly longer time to publications: 8.0 versus 4.8 years, respectively. Thus, the results of this current study support that of other studies showing a time lag in publication is associated with negative findings and less promising results in subsequent phase III trials.

In this retrospective review of the literature, our analyses were limited by a potential bias in the search criteria. For example, we may not have covered a comprehensive review of all clinical trials and only selected those that were published in English language. In addition, no attempt was made to validate the quality of the reported results or obtain any updated unpublished analyses from the authors of the publication. Furthermore, because negative trials are less likely to be published, this publication bias can lead to an overestimation of the number of positive phase III trials and treatment effect of targeted therapies.25 Krzyzanowska et al26 evaluated 510 abstracts from large phase III, randomized controlled trials presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and found that 81% of studies with significant results had been published within a 5-year period compared with only 68% of the studies with results that were not statistically significant. In addition, these authors showed that studies with pharmaceutical sponsorship were published sooner than those with cooperative group involvement. Thus, publication bias may also be confounded by the potential influence of pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials, which are more likely to publish positive trials.27-32 Furthermore, the nondissemination of negative results can significantly impact on clinical practice. To minimize the problem of publication bias, there needs to be registration of all clinical trials and support for publishing those with nonsignificant results.22,24,25,33

In addition, there are multiple factors that our study was not able to analyze that may contribute to the success of a phase III study. Other critical factors for advancing drugs to phase III study include the novelty and unique target of the drug, favorable pharmacokinetic profile, biologic activity in phase I and II trials, clinical demand for new therapies in specific diseases, market demand, and financial return on investment.34 With respect to the financial implications of drug development, it is estimated that more than 30% of the drugs entering clinical trials are abandoned because of economic concerns.35 Nevertheless, it is important to identify factors predictive of success in phase III trials that should be considered in the prioritization of various novel agents for rapid development into phase III trials. Moreover, in life-threatening cancers where there is an unmet medical need, these predictive factors may be of use to form a foundation for accelerated FDA approval.

In summary, our review of the reported clinical trials showed that, for phase II studies on targeted agents, multiple versus single institution participation, positive phase II trials, pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials, and shorter time period between publication of phase II to phase III trial were independent predictive factors of success in a phase III trial on targeted agents. These factors should be studied prospectively to confirm their potential value in predicting positive phase III trials. These findings also suggest the need to increase the quality of phase II studies of targeted agents to obtain the critical information required for better planning of phase III clinical trials. On the basis of our results, we need to encourage multi-institutional testing to minimize selection bias. Furthermore, additional studies are warranted to improve our understanding of the reasons for the higher yield of positive phase III trials by pharmaceutical companies. Investigators need to be cognizant of these factors in phase II studies before designing future phase III trials.


    AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Conception and design: John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Branimir I. Sikic, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp

Administrative support: John K. Chan, Jacob Y. Shin

Provision of study materials or patients: John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Branimir I. Sikic, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp

Collection and assembly of data: John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp

Data analysis and interpretation: John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Branimir I. Sikic, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp

Manuscript writing: John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Branimir I. Sikic, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp

Final approval of manuscript: John K. Chan, Stefanie M. Ueda, Valerie E. Sugiyama, Christopher D. Stave, Jacob Y. Shin, Bradley J. Monk, Branimir I. Sikic, Kathryn Osann, Daniel S. Kapp


    Appendix
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
1. Advani R, Saba HI, Tallman MS, et al: Treatment of refractory and relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia with combination chemotherapy plus the multidrug resistance modulator PSC 833. Blood 93:787-795, 1999

2. Aisner J, Wiernik PH: Chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy for small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the lung. Cancer 46:2543-2549, 1980

3. Alberts DS, Moon TE, Stephens RA, et al: Randomized study of chemoimmunotherapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma: A preliminary report of a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Treat Rep 63:325-331, 1979

4. Alimena G, Morra E, Lazzarino M, et al: Interferon alfa-2b as therapy for ph positive chronic myelogenous leukemia: A study of 82 patients treated with intermittent or daily administration. Blood 72:642-647, 1988

5. Phase II study of recombinant human interferon gamma (S-6810) on renal cell carcinoma: Summary of two collaborative studies: Recombinant Human Interferon Gamma (S-6810) Research Group on Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancer 60:929-933, 1987

6. Phase II study of interferon alfa-2a and dacarbazine in advanced melanoma: Biologic Response Modifiers in Melanoma (BREMIM) Italian Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 28A:1719-1720, 1992

7. Aranda E, Cervantes A, Carrato A, et al: Outpatient weekly high-dose continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorine in advanced colorectal cancer: A phase II trial (Spanish Cooperative Group of Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy). Ann Oncol 7:581-585, 1996

8. Ardizzoni A, Venturini M, Sertoli MR, et al: Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) allows acceleration and dose intensity increase of CEF chemotherapy: A randomized study in patients with advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 69:385-391, 1994

9. Ariyan S, Kirkwood JM, Mitchell MS, et al: Intralymphatic and regional surgical adjuvant immunotherapy in high risk melanoma of the extremities. Surgery 92:459-463, 1982

10. Assersohn L, Souberbielle BE, O'Brien MER, et al: A randomized pilot study of SRL172 (Mycobacterium vaccae) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with chemotherapy. Clin Oncol 14:23-27, 2002

11. Atkins MB, Sparano J, Fisher RI, et al: Randomized phase II trial of high-dose interleukin 2 either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 11:661-670, 1993

12. Aviles A, Duque G, Talavera A, et al: Interferon alfa 2b as maintenance therapy in low grade malignant lymphoma improves duration of remission and survival. Leuk Lymphoma 20:495-499, 1996

13. Baars A, Claessen AME, Wagstaff J, et al: A phase II study of active specific immunotherapy and 5-FU/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon carcinoma. Br J Cancer 86:1230-1234, 2002

14. Baccarani M, Martinelli G, Rosti G, et al: Imatinib and pegylated human recombinant interferon alpha2b in early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 104:4245-4251, 2004

15. Baer MR, Christiansen NP, Frankel SR, et al: High-dose cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte stimulating factor remission induction therapy for previously untreated de novo and secondary adult acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Oncol 20:6-12, 1993

16. Bajetta E, Negretti E, Giannotti B, et al: Phase II study of interferon alfa-2a and dacarbazine in advanced melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 13:405-409, 1990

17. Baselga J, Trigo JM, Bourhis J, et al: Phase II multicenter study of antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum based chemotherapy in patients with platinum refractory metastatic and or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 23:5568-5577, 2005

18. Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, et al: Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized antip185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:737-744, 1996

19. Bensmaine ME, Azli N, Domenge C, et al: Phase I-II trial of recombinant interferon alfa-2b with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in recurrent and/or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol 19:249-254, 1996

20. Berd D, Maguire HCJ, Mastrangelo MJ: Induction of cell-mediated immunity to autologous melanoma cells and regression of metastases after treatment with a melanoma vaccine preceded by cyclophosphamide. Cancer Res 46:2572-2577, 1986

21. Berek JS, Hacker NF,Lichtenstein A, et al: Intraperitoneal recombinant alpha-interferon for "salvage" immunotherapy in stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Res 45:4447-4453, 1985

22. Berek JS, Markman M, Stonebraker B, et al: Intraperitoneal interferon alfa in residual ovarian carcinoma: A phase II Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 75:19-24, 1999

23. Bergerat JP, Herbrecht R, Dufour P, et al: Combination of recombinant interferon alfa-2a and vinblastine in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 62:2320-2324, 1988

24. Bertrand M, Doroshow JH, Multhauf P, et al: High-dose continuous infusion folinic acid and bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A phase II study. J Clin Oncol 4:1058-1061, 1986

25. Bettelheim P, Valent P, Andreeff M, et al: Recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in combination with standard induction chemotherapy in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 77:700-711, 1991

26. Betticher DC, Lee SM, Morris C, et al: Dacarbazine and interferon alpha 2a in advanced malignant melanoma: High response rate and prolongation of response duration occur in different patient subpopulations. Melanoma Res 5:277-782, 1995

27. Beutner KR, Geisse JK, Helman D, et al: Therapeutic response of basal cell carcinoma to the immune response modifier imiquimod 5% cream. J Am Acad Dermatol 41:1002-1007, 1999

28. Bitran JD, Green M, Perry M, et al: A phase II study of recombinant interferon gamma following combination chemotherapy for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 18:67-70, 1995

29. Blanke CD, Kasimis B, Schein P, et al: Phase II study of trimetrexate, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:915-920, 1997

30. Boussiotis VA, Pangalis GA: Interferon alfa-2b therapy in untreated early stage, B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients: One year follow-up. Br J Hematology 79:30-33, 1991

31. Bronchud MH, Scarffe JH, Thatcher N, et al: Phase I/II study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 56:809-813, 1987

32. Bruntsch U, de Mulder PH, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al: Phase II study of recombinant human interferon gamma in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Biol Resp Mod 9:335-338, 1990

33. Buchner T, Hiddemann W, Koenigsmann M, et al: Recombinant granulocyte macrophage stimulating factor after chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at higher age or after relapse. Blood 78:1190-1197, 1991

34. Buckner JC, Brown LD, Kugler JW, et al: Phase II evaluation of recombinant interferon alfa and BCNU in recurrent glioma. J Neurosurg 82:430-435, 1995

35. Bukowski RM, Goodman P, Crawford ED, et al: Phase II trial of high-dose intermittent interleukin 2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A Southwest Oncology Group study. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:143-146, 1990

36. Buzaid AC, Robertone A, Kisala C, et al: Phase II study of interferon alfa-2a recombinant (Roferon A) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 5:1083-1089, 1987

37. Cameron DA, Cornbleet MC, Mackie RM, et al: Adjuvant interferon alfa in high risk melanoma: The Scottish study. Br J Cancer 84:1146-1149, 2001

38. Cassel WA, Murray DR, Phillips HS: A phase II study on the postsurgical management of stage II malignant melanoma with a Newcastle disease virus oncolysate. Cancer 52:856-860, 1983

39. Cetto GL, Franceschi T, Turrina G, et al: Recombinant alpha-interferon and vinblastine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Efficacy of low doses. Semin Surg Oncol 4:184-190, 1988

40. Chahinian AP, Goldberg J, Holland JF, et al: Chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy with levamisole or Corynebacterium parvum in advanced lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 66:1291-1297, 1982

41. Chisesi T, Capnist G, Vespignani M, et al: Interferon alfa-2b and chlorambucil in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Invest New Drugs 5:S35-S40, 1987

42. Citrin DL, Kies MS, Wallemark CB, et al: A phase II study of high-dose estrogens (diethylstilbestrol diphosphate) in prostate cancer. Cancer 56:457-460, 1985

43. Clark JW, Smith JW, Steis RG, et al: Interleukin 2 and lymphokine activated killer cell therapy: Analysis of a bolus interleukin 2 and a continuous infusion interleukin 2 regimen. Cancer Res 50:7343-7350, 1990

44. Clark PI, Slevin ML, Reznek RH, et al: Two randomized phase II trials of intermittent intravenous versus subcutaneous alpha-2 interferon alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:26-29, 1987

45. Clark RH, Dimitrov NV, Axelson JA, et al: A phase II trial of intermittent leukocyte interferon and high-dose chlorambucil in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma resistant to conventional therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 12:75-77, 1989

46. Cobleigh M, VK. L, GW. S, et al: A phase II dose escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 30:117-124, 2003

47. Coiffier B, Haioun C, Ketterer N, et al: Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) for the treatment of patients with relapsing or refractory aggressive lymphoma: A multicenter phase II study. Blood 92:1927-1932, 1998

48. Colombat P, Salles G, Brousse N, et al: Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) as single first line therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma with a low tumor burden: Clinical and molecular evaluation. Blood 97:101-106, 2001

49. Conte PF, Pronzato P, Rubagotti A, et al: Conventional versus cytokinetic polychemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized cooperative trial. J Clin Oncol 5:339-347, 1987

50. Cooper MR, Fefer A, Thompson J, et al: Alpha2 interferon/melphalan/prednisone in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: A phase I-II trial. Cancer Treat Rep 70:473-476, 1986

51. Cortesi E, Aschelter AM, Gioacchini N, et al: Efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil and folates in advance colon cancer. J Chemo 2:47-50, 1990 (suppl)

52. Cortesina G, De Stefani A, Galeazzi E, et al: Temporary regression of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck achieved with low but no with high-dose of recombinant interleukin 2 injected perilymphatically. Br J Cancer 69:572-576, 1994

53. Cortesina G, De Stefani A, Galeazzi E, et al: Interleukin 2 injected around tumor draining lymph nodes in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 13:125-131, 1991

54. Cortesina G, De Stefani A, Giovarelli M, et al: Treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with low doses of interleukin 2 injected perilymphatically. Cancer 62:2482-2485, 1988

55. Costanzi JJ, Cooper MR, Scarffe JH, et al: Phase II study of recombinant alpha 2 interferon in resistant multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 3:654-659, 1985

56. Creasman WT, Gall SA, Blessing JA, et al: Chemoimmunotherapy in the management of primary stage III carcinoma of the ovary (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). Cancer Treat Rep 63:319-323, 1979

57. Czuczman MS, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, et al: Treatment of patients with low-grade b-cell lymphoma with the combination of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and CHOP chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:268-276, 1999

58. Danson S, Lorigan P, Arance A, et al: Randomized phase II study of temozolomide given every 8 hours or daily with either interferon alfa-2b or thalidomide in metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 21:2251-2257, 2003

59. Davis TA, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, et al: Rituximab anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Safety and efficacy of re-treatment. J Clin Oncol 18:3135-3143, 2000

60. deKernion JB, Sarna G, Figlin R, et al: The treatment of renal cell carcinoma with human leukocyte alpha interferon. J Urology 130:1063-1066, 1983

61. Del Prete SA, Maurer LH, O'Donnell J, et al: Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, carmustine, dacarbazine, and tamoxifen in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Treat Rep 68:1403-1405, 1984

62. Delozier T, Julien JP, Juret P, et al: Adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 7:105-109, 1986

63. Demchak PA, Mier JW, Robert NJ, et al: Interleukin-2 and high-dose cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma: A pilot study. J Clin Oncol 9:1821-1830, 1991

64. Dillman RO, Barth NM, VanderMolen LA, et al: Treatment of kidney cancer with autologous tumor cell vaccines of short term cell lines derived from renal cell cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 16:47-54, 2001

65. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Bellamy C, et al: The effects of neoadjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) on tumor volume in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: A randomized, double blind, single center study. Clin Cancer Res 6:2229-2235, 2000

66. Dombernowsky P, Smith I, Falkson G, et al: Letrozole, a new oral aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer: Double-blind randomized trial showing a dose effect and improved efficacy and tolerability compared with megestrol acetate. J Clin Oncol 16:453-461, 1998

67. Donskov F, von der Maase H, Henriksson R, et al: Outpatient treatment with subcutaneous histamine dihydrochloride in combination with interleukin 2 and interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results of an open single-armed multicenter phase II study. Ann Oncol 13:441-449, 2002

68. Doroshow JH, Multhauf P, Leong L, et al: Prospective randomized comparison of fluorouracil versus fluorouracil and high-dose continuous infusion leucovorin calcium for the treatment of advanced measurable colorectal cancer in patients previously unexposed to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 8:491-501, 1990

69. Douillard JY, Peschel C, Shepherd F, et al: Randomized phase II feasibility study of combining the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BMS-275291 with paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 46:361-368, 2004

70. Dummer R, Gore ME, Hancock BW, et al: A multicenter phase II clinical trial using dacarbazine and continuous infusion of interleukin-2 in metastatic melanoma: Clinical data and immunomonitoring. Cancer 75:1038-1044, 1995

71. Dutcher JP, Creekmore S, Weiss GR, et al: A phase II study of interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 7:477-485, 1989

72. Dutcher JP, Fisher RI, Weiss G, et al: Outpatient subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon alfa for metastatic renal cell cancer: Five year followup of the Cytokine Working Group Study. Cancer J Sci Am 3:157-162, 1997

73. Einhorn N, Ling P, Einhorn S, et al: A phase II study on escalating interferon doses in advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 11:3-6, 1988

74. Elliott GT, McLeod RA, Perez J, et al: Interim results of a phase II multicenter clinical trial evaluating the activity of a therapeutic allogeneic melanoma vaccine (theraccine) in the treatment of disseminated malignant melanoma. Semin Surg Oncol 9:264-272, 1993

75. Estey E, Thall P, FJ. G, et al: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin with or without interleukin 11 in patients 65 years of age or older with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Comparison with idarubicin plus continuous infusion, high-dose cytarabine. Blood 99:4343-4349, 2002

76. Estey EH, Dixon D, Kantarjian HM, et al: Treatment of poor-prognosis, newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with ara-c and recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor. Blood 75:1766-1769, 1990

77. Eton O, Talpaz M, Lee KH, et al: Phase II trial of recombinant human interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2a: Implications for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer 77:893-899, 1996

78. Evans JD, Stark A, Johnson CD, et al: A phase II trial of marimastat in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 85:1865-1870, 2001

79. Falkson CI, Falkson G, Falkson HC: Improved results with the addition of interferon alfa-2b to dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 9:1403-1408, 1991

80. Falkson CI, Falkson HC: A randomized study of CGS16949A (fadrozole) versus tamoxifen in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 7:465-469, 1996

81. Falkson G, Vorobiof DA, Lerner HJ: A phase II study of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 11:94-97, 1983

82. Falkson HC, Falkson G, Portugal MA, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer in premenopausal women. S Afr Med J 61:651-655, 1982

83. Feldman E, Kalaycio M, Weiner G, et al: Treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody HuM195. Leukemia 17:314-318, 2003

84. Feliu J, Gonzalez Baron M, Espinosa E, et al: Uracil and tegafur modulated with leucovorin: An effective regimen with low toxicity for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Cancer 79:1884-1889, 1997

85. Feuring-Buske M, Kneba M, Unterhalt M, et al: IDEC-C2B8 anti-CD20 antibody treatment in relapsed advanced stage follicular lymphomas: Results of a phase II study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Hematol 79:493-500, 2000

86. Figlin RA, Pierce WC, Kaboo R, et al: Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with nephrectomy, interleukin2 and cytokine primed or cd8+ selected tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from primary tumor. J Urology 158:740-745, 1997

87. Fisher RI, Coltman CAJ, Doroshow JH, et al: Metastatic renal cancer treated with interleukin2 and lymphokine activated killer cells: A phase II clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 108:518-523, 1988

88. Flaherty LE, Robinson W, Redman BG, et al: A phase II study of dacarbazine and cisplatin in combination with outpatient administered interleukin 2 in metastatic malignant melanoma. Cancer 71:3520-3525, 1993

89. Foa R, Meloni G, Tosti S, et al: Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients with recombinant interleukin 2: A pilot study. Br J Hematology 77:491-496, 1991

90. Foon KA, Sherwin SA, Abrams PG, et al: Treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with recombinant leukocyte A interferon. N Engl J Med 311:1148-1152, 1984

91. Foran JM, Rohatiner AZ, Cunningham D, et al: European phase II study of rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) for patients with newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma and previously treated mantle-cell lymphoma, immunocytoma, and small B-cell lymphocytic lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 18:317-324, 2000

92. Fossa SD, De Garis ST: Further experience with recombinant interferon alfa-2a with vinblastine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 36-40, 1987 (suppl)

93. Fossa SD, de Garis ST, Heier MS, et al: Recombinant interferon alfa-2a with or without vinblastine in metastatic renal carcinoma. Cancer 57:1700-1704, 1986

94. Fossa SD, Raabe N, Moe B: Recombinant interferon alfa with or without vinblastine in metastatic renal carcinoma: Results of a randomized phase II study. Br J Urol 64:468-471, 1989

95. Freedman RS, Gutterman JU, Wharton JT, et al: Leukocyte interferon in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. J Biol Response Modif 22:133-138, 1983

96. Friess H, Buchler M, Beglinger C, et al: Low-dose octreotide treatment is not effective in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 8:540-545, 1993

97. Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, et al: Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:2237-2246, 2003 [Erratum: J Clin Oncol 22:4811, 2004]

98. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Hank JA, Albertini MR, et al: A pilot phase II trial of continuous infusion interleukin2 followed by lymphokine activated killer cell therapy and bolus infusion interleukin2 in renal cell cancer. J Immunother 13:43-48, 1993

99. Ganser A, Volkers B, Greher J, et al: Recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A phase I/II trial. Blood 73:31-37, 1989

100. Garaci E, Lopez M, Bonsignore G, et al: Sequential chemoimmunotherapy for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer using cisplatin, etoposide, thymosin alpha 1 and interferon alfa 2a. Eur J Cancer 31A:2403-2405, 1995

101. Geisse J, Caro I, Lindholm J, et al: Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma: A double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol 47:390-398, 2002

102. Gerhartz HH, Marcus R, Delmer A, et al: A randomized phase II study of low-dose cytarabine plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in myelodysplastic syndromes with a high risk of developing leukemia: EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group. Leukemia 8:16-23, 1994

103. Gheilmini M, Pettengell R, Coutinho LH, et al: The effect of the GM-CSF/IL-3 fusion protein PIXY321 on bone marrow and circulating hematopoietic cells of previously untreated patients with cancer. Br J Hemotol 93:6-12, 1996

104. Gonzales-de Leon C, Lippman SM, Kudelka AP, et al: Phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and interferon alfa in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Invest New Drugs 13:73-76, 1995

105. Gonzalez Baron M, Feliu J, Garcia Giron C, et al: UFT modulated with leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: Oncopaz experience. Oncology 54:24-29, 1997

106. Gonzalez-Baron M, Feliu J, de la Gandara I, et al: Efficacy of oral tegafur modulation by uracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: A phase II study. Eur J Cancer 31A:2215-2219, 1995

107. Gordon LI, Molina A, Witzig T, et al: Durable responses after ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy for CD20+ B cell lymphoma: Long-term follow-up of a phase 1/2 study. Blood 103:4429-4431, 2004

108. Grant SC, Kris MG, Houghton AN, et al: Long survival of patients with small cell lung cancer after adjuvant treatment with anti-idiotypic antibody BEC2 plus Bacillus Calmette- Guérin. Clin Cancer Res 5:1319-1323, 1999

109. Gruber R, van Haarlem LJ, Warnaar SO, et al: The human antimouse immunoglobulin response and ant-idiotypic network have no influence on clinical outcome in patients with minimal residual colorectal cancer treated with monoclonal CO17-1A. Cancer Res 60:1921-1926, 2000

110. Hainsworth JD, Litchy S, Burris HA III, et al: Rituximab as first-line and maintenance therapy for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 20:4261-4267, 2002

111. Hainsworth JD: Rituximab as first line systemic therapy for patients with low grade lymphoma. Semin Oncol 27:25-29, 2000

112. Halme M, Maasilta PK, Pyrhonen SO, et al: Interferons combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III-IV non–small-cell lung cancer: A randomized study. Eur J Cancer 40A, 1994

113. Hamblin TJ, Inzani V, Sadullah S, et al: A phase II trial of recombinant interleukin-2 and 5-FU chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 16:163-167, 1989

114. Hasturk S, Kurt B, Kocaba A, et al: Combination of chemotherapy and recombinant interferon alfa in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett 112:17-22, 1997

115. Hellstrand K, Naredi P, Lindner P, et al: Histamine in immunotherapy of advanced melanoma: A pilot study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 39:416-419, 1994

116. Herbst RS, Arquette M, Shin DM, et al: Phase II multicenter study of the epidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab and cisplatin for recurrent and refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 23:5578-5587, 2005

117. Hersey P, Edwards A, Coates A, et al: Evidence that treatment with vaccinia melanoma cell lysates (VMCL) may improve survival of patients with stage II melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 25:257-265, 1987

118. Hiddemann W, Unterhalt M, Koch P, et al: Alpha interferon maintenance therapy in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas after cytoreductive chemotherapy with prednimustine and mitoxantrone. Eur J Cancer 27:S37-S39, 1991

119. Hird V, Maraveyas A, Snook D, et al: Adjuvant therapy of ovarian cancer with radioactive monoclonal antibody. Br J Cancer 68:403-406, 1993

120. Hoover HCJ, Surdyke MG, Dangel RB, et al: Prospectively randomized trial of adjuvant active-specific immunotherapy for human colorectal cancer. Cancer 55:1236-1243, 1985

121. Horning SJ, Merigan TC, Krown SE, et al: Human interferon alfa in malignant lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease: Results of the American Cancer Society trial. Cancer 56:1305-1310, 1985

122. Hudes GR, Greenberg R, Krigel RL, et al: Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:1754-1761, 1992

123. Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, et al: Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 349:1423-1432, 2003

124. Hurle RL, Ranieri A, Graziotti A, et al: Low-dose Pasteur Bacillus Calmette Guerin regimen in stage T1 grade3 bladder cancer therapy. J Urology 156:1602-1605, 1996

125. Ingle JN, Johnson PA, Suman VJ, et al: A randomized phase II trial of two dosage levels of letrozole as third line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 80:218-224, 1997

126. Jakse G, Hall R, Bono A, et al: Intravesical BCG in patients with carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder: Long-term results of EORTC GU Group phase II protocol 30,861. Eur Urol 40:144-150, 2001

127. Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L, et al: Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:60-65, 2003

128. Kabbinavar FF, Schulz J, McCleod M, et al: Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first line metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 23:3697-3705, 2005

129. Kaminski MS, Zasadny KR, Francis IR, et al: Radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma with 131I anti-B1 (anti-CD20) antibody. N Engl J Med 329:459-465, 1993

130. Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A, et al: Hematologic and cytogenetic response to imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 346:645-652, 2002

131. Kantarjian H, Estey EH, O'Brien S, et al: Intensive chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and high-dose cytarabine followed by granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in the treatment of patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 79:876-881, 1992

132. Keilholz U, Scheibenbogen C, Tilgen W, et al: Interferon alfa and interleukin 2 in the treatment of malignant melanoma: A comparison of two phase II trials. Cancer 72:607-614, 1993

133. Kemeny N, Yagoda A, Wang Y, et al: Randomized trial of standard therapy with or without poly I:C in patients with superificial bladder cancer. Cancer 48:2154-2157, 1981

134. Kemeny N, Younes A, Seiter K, et al: Interferon alfa-2a and 5-fluorouracil for advanced colorectal carcinoma: assessment of activity and toxicity. Cancer 66:2470-2475, 1990

135. Khayat D, Borel C, Tourani JM, et al: Sequential chemoimmunotherapy with cisplatin, interleukin 2, and interferon alfa-2a for metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 11:2173-2180, 1993

136. Kimura H, Yamaguchi Y: Adjuvant immunotherapy with interleukin 2 and lymphokine activated killer cells after noncurative resection of primary lung cancer. Lung Cancer 13:31-44, 1995

137. Kirkwood JM, Ernstoff MS, Davis CA, et al: Comparison of intravascular and intravenous recombinant alfa-2 interferon in melanoma and other cancers. Ann Intern Med 103:32-36, 1985

138. Klijn JG, Hoff AM, Planting AS, et al: Treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic and gastrointestinal tumors with the somatostatin analog Sandostatin: A phase II study including endocrine effects. Br J Cancer 62:627-630, 1990

139. Knox SJ, Goris ML, Trisler K, et al: Yttrium 90 labeled anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody therapy of recurrent B cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2:457-470, 1996

140. Koretz MJ, Lawson DH, York RM, et al: Randomized study of interluekin-2 (IL-2) alone versus IL-2 plus lymphokine activated killer cells for treatment of melanoma and renal cell cancer. Arch Surg 126:898-903, 1991

141. Krane RJ, Carpinito GA, Ross SD, et al: Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with autolymphocyte therapy: Low toxicity outpatient approach to adoptive immunotherapy without use of in vivo interleukin2. Urology 35:417-422, 1990

142. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, et al: Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. JAMA 290:2149-2158, 2003

143. Krook JE, Ingle JN, Green SJ, et al: Randomized clinical trial of cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, and prednisone with or without tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 69:355-361, 1985

144. Kruit WH, Punt CJ, Goey SH, et al: Dose efficacy study of two schedules of high-dose bolus administration of interleukin 2 and interferon alfa in metastatic melanoma. Br J Cancer 74:951-955, 1996

145. Landys KE: Mtoxantrone in combination with sterecyte (NOSTE) in treatment of unfavorable non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Invest New Drugs 6:105-113, 1988

146. Lattanzi SC, Tosteson T, Chertoff J, et al: Dacarbazine, cisplatin and carmustine, with or without tamoxifen, for metastatic melanoma: A 5 year follow-up. Melanoma Res 5:365-369, 1995

147. Legha SS, Ring S, Bedikian A, et al: Treatment of metastatic melanoma with combined chemotherapy containing cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine and biotherapy using interleukin-2 and interferon alfa. Ann Oncol 7:827-835, 1996

148. Legha SS, Ring S, Eton O, et al: Development of a biochemotherapy regimen with concurrent administration of cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interferon alfa, and interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 16:1752-1759, 1998

149. Leichman CG, Fleming TR, Muggia FM, et al: Phase II study of fluorouracil and its modulation in advanced colorectal cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 13:1303-1311, 1995

150. Leung TW, Patt YZ, Lau WY, et al: Complete pathologic remission is possible with systemic combination chemotherapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 5:1676-1681, 1999

151. Lindauer M, Domkin D, Dohner H, et al: Efficacy and toxicity of IFN-alpha2b combine with cytarabine in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Br J Hemotol 106:1013-1019, 1999

152. Lippman ME, Cassidy J, Wesley M, et al: A randomized attempt to increase the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer by hormonal synchronization. J Clin Oncol 2:28-36, 1984

153. Lippman SM, Parkinson DR, Itri LM, et al: 13 cis-retinoic acid plus interferon alfa-2a, highly active systemic therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:235-241, 1992

154. Livingston PO, Ritter G, Srivastava P, et al: Characterization of IgG and IgM antibodies induced in melanoma patients by immunization with purified GM2 ganglioside. Cancer Res 49:7045-7050, 1989

155. Loehrer PJS, Elson P, Dreicer R, et al: Escalated dosages of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in advanced urothelial carcinoma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol 12:483-488, 1994

156. Logothetis CJ, Hossan E, Recondo G, et al: 5-Fluorouracil and interferon alfa in chemotherapy refractory bladder carcinoma: an effective regimen. Anticancer Res 14:1265-1269, 1990

157. Losa A, Hurle R, Lembo A: Low-dose Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for carcinoma in situ of the bladder: Long-term results. J Urology 163:79-80, 2000

158. Louie AC, Gallagher JG, Sikora K, et al: Follow-up observation on the effect of human leukocyte interferon in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 58:712-718, 1981

159. Loutfi A, Shakr A, Jerry M, et al: Double blind randomized prospective trial of levamisole/placebo in stage I cutaneous malignant melanomas. Clin Invest Med 10:325-328, 1987

160. Lu W, Zheng S, Li XF, et al: Intratumor injection of H101, a recombinant adenovirus, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancers: A pilot phase II clinical trial. World J Gastro 10:3634-3638, 2004

161. Ludwig H, Cortelezzi A, Scheithauer W, et al: Recombinant interferon alfa-2c versus polychemotherapy (VMCP) for treatment of multiple myeloma: A prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 22:1111-1116, 1986

162. Machover D, Grison X, Goldschmidt E, et al: Fluorouracil combined with the pure (6S) stereoisomer of folinic acid in high-doses for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: A phase I-II study. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:321-327, 1992

163. Machover D, Schwarzenberg L, Goldschmidt E, et al: Treatment of advanced colorectal and gastric adenocarcinomas with 5-FU combined with high-dose folinic acid: A pilot study. Cancer Treat Rep 66:1803-1807, 1982

164. Madajewicz S, Petrelli N, Rustum YM, et al: Phase I-II trial of high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 44:4667-4669, 1984

165. Maloney DG, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, et al: IDEC-c2B8 antiCD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with relapsed low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 90:2188-2195, 1997

166. Mandelli F, Avvisati G, Amadori S, et al: Maintenance treatment with recombinant interferon alfa-2b in patients with multiple myeloma responding to conventional induction chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 322:1430-1434, 1990

167. Margreiter R, Wiegele J: Nolvadex for premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 4:45-48, 1984

168. Marks R, Gebauer K, Shumack S, et al: Imiquimod 5% cream in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma: Results of a multicenter 6 week dose response trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 44:807-813, 2001

169. Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, et al: Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first line treatment: The M77001 [GenBank] Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23:4265-4274, 2005

170. Mattson K, Holsti LR, Niiranen A, et al: Human leukocyte interferon as part of a combined treatment for previously untreated small cell lung cancer. J Biol Resp Mod 4:8-17, 1985

171. McClay EF, Mastrangelo MJ, Bellet RE, et al: Combination chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Cancer Treat Rep 71:465-469, 1987

172. McClay EF, Mastrangelo MJ, Berd D, et al: Effective combination chem/hormonal therapy for malignant melanoma: Experience with three consecutive trials. Int J Cancer 50:553-556, 1992

173. McClay EF, Mastrangelo MJ, Sprandio JD, et al: The importance of tamoxifen to a cisplatin-containing regimen in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Cancer 63:1292-1295, 1989

174. McDonald S, Chang AY, Rubin P, et al: Combined betaseron R (recombinant human interferon beta) and radiation for inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:613-619, 1993

175. McLaughlin P, Grillo-López AJ, Link BK, et al: Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: Half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol 16:2825-2833, 1998

176. McLeod GR, Thomson DB, Hersey P: Recombinant interferon alfa-2a in advanced malignant melanoma: A phase I-II study in combination with DTIC. Int J Cancer 1:31-35, 1987

177. Meehan KR, Arun B, Gehan EA, et al: Immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and alpha-interferon after IL-2 activated hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer. Bone Marrow Transplant 23:667-673, 1999

178. Miller KD, Gradishar W, Schuchter L, et al: A randomized phase II pilot trial of adjuvant marimastat in patients with early stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 13:1220-1224, 2002

179. Mitchell MS, Harel W, Groshen S: Association of HLA phenotype with response to active specific immunotherapy of melanoma. J Clin Oncol 10:1158-1164, 1992

180. Mitchell MS, Harel W, Kempf RA, et al: Active specific immunotherapy for melanoma. J Clin Oncol 8:856-869, 1990

181. Mittelman A, Savona S, Gafney E, et al: Treatment of patients with advanced cancer using multiple long-term cultured lymphokine activated killer cell infusions and recombinant interleukin 2. J Biol Resp Mod 8:468-478, 1989

182. Molica S, Alberti A: Recombinant alpha-2a interferon in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia preliminary report with emphasis on previously untreated patients in early stage of disease. Hematologica (Pavia) 75:75-78, 1990

183. Moore MJ, Kaizer L, Erlichman C, et al: A clinical and pharmacologic study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and interferon alfa in advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:86-90, 1995

184. Morabito F, Callea V, Oliva B, et al: Alpha 2-interferon in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Clinical response, serum cytokine levels, and immunophenotype modulation. Leukemia 7:366-371, 1993

185. Motzer RJ, Schwartz L, Law TM, et al: Interferon alfa-2a and 13 cis retinoic acid in renal cell carcinoma: Antitumor activity in a phase II trial and interactions in vitro. J Clin Oncol 13:1950-1957, 1995

186. Mukai M, Ryu S, Kikuchi T, et al: Preoperative combination therapy involving local administration of a nonspecific immunoactivated prepartion (O-432) and chemotherapeutic preparation for patients with stomach cancer. Gan To Kagaku Rhoho 12:880-886, 1985

187. Muss HB, Costanzi JJ, Leavitt R, et al: Recombinant alfa interferon in renal cell carcinoma: A randomized trial of two routes of administration. J Clin Oncol 5:286-291, 1987

188. Neefe JR, Legha SS, Markowitz A, et al: Phase II study of recombinant alpha-interferon in malignant melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 13:472-476, 1990

189. Newman HF, Bleehen NM, Galazka AS, E: Small cell lung carcinoma: A phase II evaluation of r-interferon gamma. Cancer 60:2938-2940, 1987

190. Nicoletto MO, Fiorentino MV, Vinante O, et al: Experience with intraperitoneal alpha-2a interferon. Oncology 49:467-473, 1992

191. Niloff JM, Knapp RC, Jones G, et al: Recombinant leukocyte alpha interferon in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep 69:895-896, 1985

192. O'Brien ME, Saini A, Smith IE, et al: A randomized phase II study of SRL172 (Mycobacterium vaccae) combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. Br J Cancer 83:853-857, 2000

193. O'Connell MJ, Colgan JP, Oken MM, et al: Clinical trial of recombinant leukocyte A interferon as initial therapy for favorable histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group pilot study. J Clin Oncol 4:128-136, 1986

194. O'Shaughnessy JA, Denicoff AM, Venzon DJ, et al: A dose intensity study of FLAC (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy and Escherichia coli-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in advanced breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 5:709-716, 1994

195. Ohno R, Naoe T, Kanamaru A, et al: A double blind controlled study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor started two days before induction chemotherapy in refractory myeloid leukemia. Blood 83:2086-2092, 1994

196. Ohno R, Tomonaga M, Kobayashi T, et al: Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction therapy in relapsed or refractory acute leukemia. N Engl J Med 323:871-877, 1990

197. Okawa T, Kita M, Arai T, et al: Phase II randomized clinical trial of LC9018 concurrently used with radiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Its effect on tumor reduction and histology. Cancer 64:1769-1776, 1989

198. Oken MM, Kyle RA, Greipp PR, et al: Complete remission induction with combined VBMCP chemotherapy and interferon alpha2b in patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 20:447-452, 1996

199. Olesen BK, Ernst P, Nissen MH, et al: Recombinant inteferon A therapy of small cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: A phase II study. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:987-989, 1987

200. Orsola A, Palou J, Xavier B, et al: Primary bladder carcinoma in situ: Assessment of early BCG response as a prognostic factor. Eur Urol 33:457-463, 1998

201. Osband ME, Lavin PT, Babayan RK, et al: Effect of autolymphocyte therapy on survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Lancet 335:994-998, 1990

202. Osterborg A, Bjorkholm M, Bjoreman M, et al: Natural interferon-alfa in combination with melphalan/prednisone versus melphalan/prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma stages II and III: A randomized study from the Myeloma Group of Central Sweden. Blood 81:1428-1434, 1993

203. Otto U, Conrad S, Schneider AW, et al: Recombinant interferon gamma in the treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma: Results of a phase II trial. Arzneim Forsh 38:1658-1660, 1988

204. Pagano F, Bassi P, Milani C, et al: A low-dose Bacillus Calmette Guerin regimen in superficial bladder cancer therapy: Is it effective? J Urology 146:32-35, 1991

205. Pangalis GA, Griva E: Recombinant alfa-2b interferon therapy in untreated stages A and B chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 61:869-872, 1988

206. Paridaens R, Van der Wijst JB, Julien JP, et al: Aminoglutethimide and estrogenic stimulation before chemotherapy for treatment of advanced breast cancer: preliminary results of a phase II study conducted by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Steroid Biochem 23:1181-1183, 1985

207. Parkinson DR, Abrams JS, Wiernik PH, et al: Interleukin 2 therapy in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: A phase II study. J Clin Oncol 8:1650-1656, 1990

208. Paule B, Bonhomme-Faivre L, Rudant E, et al: Interferon alfa-2a plus tretinoin in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A pilot study. Am J Health Sys 54:190-192, 1997

209. Pazdur R, Ajani JA, Patt YZ, et al: Phase II study of fluorouracil and recombinant interferon alfa-2a in previously untreated advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 8:2027-2031, 1990

210. Pazdur R, Lassere Y, Rhodes V, et al: Phase II study of uracil and tegafur plus oral leucovorin: An effective oral regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:2296-2300, 1994

211. Peest D, Deicher H, Coldewey R, et al: A comparison of polychemotherapy and melphalan/prednisone for primary remission induction, and interferon-alfa for maintenance treatment, in multiple myeloma: A prospective trial of the German Myeloma Treatment Group. Eur J Cancer 31A:146-151, 1995

212. Pegram MD, Lipton A, Hayes DF, et al: Phase II study of receptor enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER-2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J Clin Oncol 16:2659-2671, 1998

213. Petrelli N, Herrera L, Rustum Y, et al: A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 5:1559-1565, 1987

214. Price CG, Rohatiner AZ, Steward W, et al: Interferon-alfa 2b in the treatment of follicular lymphoma: Preliminary results of a trial in progress. Ann Oncol 2:141-145, 1991

215. Proebstle TM, Scheibenbogen C, Sterry W, et al: A phase II study of dacarbazine, cisplatin, interferon-alfa, and high-dose IL-2 in poor risk metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 32A:1530-1533, 1996

216. Pujade-Lauraine E, Guastalla JP, Colombo N, et al: Intraperitoneal recombinant interferon gamma in ovarian cancer patients with residual disease at second look laparotomy. J Clin Oncol 14:343-350, 1996

217. Quesada JR, Kurzrock R, Sherwin SA, et al: Phase II studies of recombinant human interferon gamma in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Biol Resp Mod 6, 1987

218. Quesada JR, Swanson DA, Gutterman JU: Phase II study of interferon alfa in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A progress report. J Clin Oncol 3:1086-1092, 1985

219. Reid I, Sharpe I, Maxwell W, et al: A phase 2 trial of recombinant interleukin-2 and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 18:591-598, 1992

220. Repmann R, Wagner S, Richter A: Adjuvant therapy of renal cell carcinoma with active specific immunotherapy (ASI) using autologous tumor vaccine. Anticancer Res 17:2879-2882, 1997

221. Richards FN, Howard V, Shore A, et al: Combination chemotherapy with and without the methanol extract residue of Bacillus Calmette Guerin (MER) in extensive non–small-cell lung cancer: A prospective study for the Piedmont Oncology Association. Cancer 47:2827-2832, 1981

222. Richards JM, Gale D, Mehta N, et al: Combination of chemotherapy with interleukin-2 and interferon alfa for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 17:651-657, 1999

223. Richards JM, Mehta N, Ramming K, et al: Sequential chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 10:1338-1343, 1992

224. Ridolfi R, Romanini A, Sileni VC, et al: Temozolomide and IFN-alpha in metastatic melanoma: A phase II study of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup. Melanoma Res 14:295-299, 2004

225. Rintala E, Jauhiainen K, Rajala P, et al: Alternating mitomycin C and Bacillus Calmette Guerin instillation therapy for carcinoma in situ of the bladder. J Urology 154:2050-2053, 1995

226. Ron IG, Inbar MJ, Gutman M, et al: Recombinant interferon alpha-2a in combination with dacarbazine in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma: Analysis of long-term responding patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 37:61-66, 1993

227. Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Yang JC, et al: Combination therapy with interleukin 2 and alpha interferon for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 7:1863-1874, 1989

228. Rosso R, Mazzei T, Sobrero A, et al: Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and the natural l isomer of folinic acid in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 30A:338-343, 1994

229. Rozman C, Montserrat E, Vinolas N, et al: Recombinant alpha 2-interferon in the treatment of B chronic lymphocytic leukemia in early stages. Blood 71:1295-1298, 1988

230. Saba HI, Cruse CW, Wells KE, et al: Treatment of stage IV malignant melanoma with dacarbazine, carmustine, cisplatin, and tamoxifen regimens: A University of South Florida and H. Lee Moffitt Melanoma Center Study. Ann Plast Surg 28:65-69, 1992

231. Saint F, Irani J, Patard JJ, et al: Tolerability of Bacille Calmette-Guerin maintenance therapy for superficial bladder cancer. Urology 57:883-888, 2001

232. Saleh MN, LeMaistre CF, Kuzel TM, et al: Antitumor activity of DAB389IL2 fusion toxin in mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 39:63-73, 1998

233. Salmon SE, Crowley JJ, Grogan TM, et al: Combination chemotherapy, glucocorticosteroids, and interferon alfa in the treatment of multiple myeloma: A Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 12:2405-2414, 1994

234. Saltz LB, Leichman CG, Young CW, et al: A fixed ratio combination of uracil and ftorafur with low-dose leucovorin: An active oral regimen for advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 75:782-785, 1995

235. Savarese DM, Halabi S, Hars V, et al: Phase II study of docetaxel, estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer: A final report of CALGB 9780. J Clin Oncol 19:2509-2516, 2001

236. Schantz SP, Dimery I, Lippman SM, et al: A phase II study of interleukin 2 and interferon alfa in head and neck cancer. Invest New Drugs 10:217-223, 1992

237. Schilder R, Molina A, Bartlett N, et al: Follow-up results of a phase II study of ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory low grade, follicular, or transformed B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mild thrombocytopenia. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 19:478-481, 2004

238. Schutte J, Mouridsen HT, Stewart W, et al: Ifosfamide plus adriamycin in previously untreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: Final results of a phase II trial of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Group. Eur J Cancer 26:558-561, 1990

239. Seidman AD, Scher HI, Gabrilove JL, et al: Dose intensification of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as initial therapy in advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 11:408-414, 1993

240. Seidman AD, Scher HI, Petrylak D, et al: Estramustine and vinblastine: use of prostate specific antigen as a clinical trial end point for hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Urology 147:931-934, 1992

241. Shand N, Weber F, Mariani L, et al: A phase 1 to 2 clinical trial of gene therapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme by tumor transduction with the herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene followed by ganciclovir: GLI328 European Canadian Study Group. Hum Gene Ther 10:2325-2335, 1999

242. Shin DM, Donato NJ, Perez-Soler R, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy with C225 and cisplatin in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7:1204-1213, 2001

243. Shumack S, Robinson J, Kossard S, et al: Efficacy of topical 5% imiquimod cream for the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma: Comparison of dosing regimens. Arch Dermatol 138:1165-1171, 2002

244. Sievers EL, Larson RA, Stadtmauer EA, et al: Efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with CD-33 positive acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. J Clin Oncol 19:3244-3254, 2001

245. Silgals RM, Ahlgren JD, Neefe JR, et al: A phase II trial of high-dose intravenous interferon alfa-2a in advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 54:2257-2261, 1984

246. Sinibaldi VJ, Carducci MA, Moore-Cooper S, et al: Phase II evaluation of docetaxel plus one-day oral estramustine phosphate in the treatment of patients with androgen indent prostate carcinoma. Cancer 94:1457-1465, 2002

247. Slack NH, Wajsman Z, Mittelman A, et al: Relationship of prior hormonal therapy-subsequent estramustine phosphate treatment in advanced prostatic cancer. Urology 14:549-554, 1979

248. Small EJ, Fratesi P, Reese DM, et al: Immunotherapy of hormone refractory prostate cancer with antigen-loaded dendritic cells. J Clin Oncol 18:3894-3903, 2000

249. Soloway MS, Chodak G, Vogelzang NJ, et al: Zoladex versus orchiectomy in treatment of advanced prostate cancer: a randomized trial (Zoladex Prostate Study Group). Urology 37:46-51, 1991

250. Soulieres D, Senzer NN, Vokes EE, et al: Multicenter phase II study of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 22:77-85, 2004

251. Spitler LE, Sagebiel R: A randomized trial of levamisole versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med 303:1143-1147, 1980

252. Stadler WM, Kuzel T, Dumas M, et al: Multicenter phase II trial of interleukin-2, interferon alfa, and 13 cis retinoic acid in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 16:1820-1825, 1998

253. Sterchi JM, Wells HB, Case LD, et al: A randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in stage I and stage II cutaneous melanoma: An interim report. Cancer 55:707-712, 1985

254. Sternberg CN, de Mulder PH, van Oosterom AT, et al: Escalated M-VAC chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) in patients with urothelial tract tumors. Ann Oncol 4:403-407, 1993

255. Steward WP, Verweij J, Somers R, et al: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor allows safe escalation of dose-intensity of chemotherapy in metastatic adult soft tissue sarcomas: A study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol 11:15-21, 1993

256. Stewart TH, Hollinshead AC, Harris JE, et al: Immunochemotherapy of lung cancer. Annals NY Acad Sci 277:463-466, 1976

257. Stoter G, Shiloni E, Aamdal S, et al: Sequential administration of recombinant human interleukin 2 and dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: A multicenter phase II study. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:S41-S43, 1989

258. Szelenyi H, Hohenberger P, Lochs H, et al: Sequential trimetrexate, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid are effective and well tolerated in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The phase II study group of AIO. Oncology 58:273-279, 2000

259. Talpaz M, Guilhot F, Deininger MW, et al: Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: Results from a phase 2 study. Blood 99:3530-3539, 2002

260. Talpaz M, Rosenblum M, Kurzrock R, et al: Clinical and laboratory changes induced by alfa interferon in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A pilot study. Am J Hematology 24:341-350, 1987

261. Tannock I, Gospodarowicz M, Meakin W, et al: Treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with low-dose prednisone: Evaluation of pain and quality of life as pragmatic indices of response. J Clin Oncol 7:590-597, 1989

262. Thatcher N, Anderson H, Bleehen NM, et al: The feasibility of using glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to increase the planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (ACE) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A:152-156, 1995

263. Thatcher N, Clark PI, Smith DB, et al: Increasing and planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocytes colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Clin Oncol 7:293-299, 1995

264. Thurlimann B, Paridaens R, Serin D, et al: Third-line hormonal treatment with exemestane in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer progressive on aminoglutethimide: A phase II multicenter multinational study. Eur J Cancer 33:1767-1773, 1997

265. Tominaga T, Abe O, Asaishi K, et al: Phase II study of CGS16949A, a new aromatase inhibitor dose finding study. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 21:465-475, 1994

266. Torti FM, Shortliffe LD, Williams RD, et al: Alpha interferon in superficial bladder cancer: A Northern California Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 6:476-483, 1988

267. Trump DL, Elson PJ, Borden EC, et al: High-dose lymphoblastoid interferon in advanced renal cell carcinoma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Cancer Treat Rep 71:165-159, 1987

268. Tulpule A, Scadden DT, Espina BM, et al: Results of a randomized study of IM862 nasal solution in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 18:716-723, 2000

269. Ueno K, Ogawa M, Horikoshi N, et al: Phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced breast cancer. Gan To Kagaku Rhoho 13:3198-3202, 1986

270. Valone FH, Gandara DR, Deisseroth AB, et al: Interleukin2, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for patients with non small cell lung and head/neck carcinomas. J Immunother 10:207-213, 1991

271. Van Houtte P, Bondue H, Rocmans P, et al: Adjuvant immunotherapy by levamisole in resectable lung cancer: A control study. Eur J Cancer 16:1597-1601, 1980

272. Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, et al: Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:719-726, 2002

273. Vogelzang NJ, Lipton A, Figlin RA: Subcutaneous interleukin 2 plus interferon alfa-2a in metastatic renal cancer: An outpatient multicent trial. J Clin Oncol 11:1809-1816, 1993

274. Vose JM, Link BK, Grossbard ML, et al: Phase II study of rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 19:389-397, 2001

275. Vose JM, Wahl RL, Saleh M, et al: Multicenter phase II study of iodine I131 tositumomab for chemotherapy relapsed/refractor low grade B cell nonhodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 18:1316-1323, 2000

276. Wadler S, Lembersky B, Atkins M, et al: Phase II trial of fluorouracil and recombinant interferon alfa-2a in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 9:1806-1810, 1991

277. Wadler S, Schwartz EL, Goldman M, et al: Fluorouracil and recombinant alfa-2a-interferon: An active regimen against advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 7:1769-1775, 1989

278. Wagstaff J, Loynds P, Crowther D: A phase II study of human rDNA alfa-2 interferon in patients with low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 18:54-58, 1986

279. Wallack MK, Bash JA, Leftheriotis E, et al: Positive relationship of clinical and serologic responses to vaccinia melanoma oncolysate. Arch Surg 122:1460-1463, 1987

280. Wallack MK, McNally KR, Leftheriotis E, et al: A Southeastern Cancer Study Group phase I/II trial with vaccinia melanoma oncolysates. Cancer 57:649-655, 1986

281. Walsh PC: Prospective, multicenter randomized phase II trial of herbal supplement, PC-SPES, and diethylstilbestrol in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer. J Urology 173:1966-1967, 2005

282. Weiden PL, Breitz HB, Press O, et al: Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) for treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): Initial phase I/II study results. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 15:15-29, 2000

283. Weiss GR, Liu PY, Alberts DS, et al: 13-cis retinoic acid or all trans-retinoic acid plus interferon alfa in recurrent cervical cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group phase II randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 71:386-390, 1998

284. Weiss GR, Margolin KA, Aronson FR, et al: A randomized phase II trial of continuous infusion interleukin 2 or bolus injection interleukin 2 plus lymphokine activated killer cells for advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10:275-281, 1992

285. Welander CE, Homesley HD, Reich SD, et al: A phase II study of the efficacy of recombinant interferon gamma in relapsing ovarian adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 11:465-469, 1988

286. White JE, Chen T, Reed R, et al: Limited squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a Southwest Oncology Group randomized study of radiation with or without doxorubicin chemotherapy and with or without levamisole immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 66:1113-1120, 1982

287. Willemse PH, de Vries EG, Mulder NH, et al: Intraperitoneal human recombinant interferon alfa-2b in minimal residual ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 26:353-358, 1990

288. Wiseman GA, Gordon LI, Multani PS, et al: Ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mild thrombocytopenia: A phase II multicenter trial. Blood 99:4336-4342, 2002

289. Wiseman GA, White CA, Stabin M, et al: Phase I/II 90Y Zevalin (yttrium 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-y2B8) radioimmunotherapy dosimetry results in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eur J Nuc Med 27:766-777, 2000

290. Witzig TE, White CA, Wiseman GA, et al: Phase I-II trial of IDEC-Y2B8 radioimmunotherapy for treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20+ B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 17:3793-3803, 1999

291. Yang JC, Shlasko E, Ritchey JL, et al: Combination chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer using 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and interleukin-2. Eur J Cancer 29A:355-359, 1993

292. Yoshimoto J, Tsushima T, Matsumura Y, et al: Phase II study of recombinant human leukocyte A interferon on urogenital cancer patients. Gan To Kagaku Rhoho 12:465-470, 1985

293. Zinzani PL, Martelli M, Tura S, et al: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as adjunct therapy in relapsed resistant high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Hematologica (Pavia) 78:40-43, 1993


    NOTES
 
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on February 19, 2008.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205-216, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207-214, 1981[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Therasse P: Measuring the clinical response. What does it mean? Eur J Cancer 38:1817-1823, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Fleming TR, DeMets DL: Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? Ann Intern Med 125:605-613, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Nottage M, Siu LL: Principles of clinical trial design. J Clin Oncol 20:42S–46S, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Van Cutsem E, Findlay M, Osterwalder B, et al: Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate with substantial activity in advanced colorectal cancer: Results of a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 18:1337-1345, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, et al: Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282-2292, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Roszkowski K, Pluzanska A, Krzakowski M, et al: A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 27:145-157, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Mattson K, Bosquee L, Dabouis G, et al: Phase II study of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in routine daily practice. Lung Cancer 29:205-216, 2000[Medline]

10. Fossella FV, Lee JS, Murphy WK, et al: Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:1238-1244, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Zia MI, Siu LL, Pond GR, et al: Comparison of outcomes of phase II studies and subsequent randomized control studies using identical chemotherapeutic regimens. J Clin Oncol 23:6982-6991, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Korn EL, Arbuck SG, Pluda JM, et al: Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: Are new approaches needed? J Clin Oncol 19:265-272, 2001

13. Roberts TG Jr, Goulart BH, Squitieri L, et al: Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials. JAMA 292:2130-2140, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Chen EX, Tannock IF: Risks and benefits of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating new anticancer agents: A case for more innovation. JAMA 292:2150-2151, 2004[Free Full Text]

15. Freidlin B, Breathnach OS, Johnson BE: A model to select regimens for phase III trials for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:917-922, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Buyse M, Thirion P, Carlson RW, et al: Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis—Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Lancet 356:373-378, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Pazdur R: Response rates, survival, and chemotherapy trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1552-1553, 2000[Free Full Text]

18. Fazzari M, Heller G, Scher HI: The phase II/III transition: Toward the proof of efficacy in cancer clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 21:360-368, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

19. George SL: Selection bias, phase II trials, and the FDA accelerated approval process. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1351-1352, 2003[Free Full Text]

20. Bajorin D: The phase III candidate: Can we improve the science of selection? J Clin Oncol 22:211-213, 2004[Free Full Text]

21. Lamont EB, Hayreh D, Pickett KE, et al: Is patient travel distance associated with survival on phase II clinical trials in oncology? J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1370-1375, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, et al: Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337:867-872, 1991[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Ioannidis JP: Journals should publish all "null" results and should sparingly publish "positive" results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:186, 2006[Free Full Text]

24. Stern JM, Simes RJ: Publication bias: Evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 315:640-645, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Dickersin K: How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev 9:15-21, 1997[Medline]

26. Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Tannock IF: Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA 290:495-501, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Kelly RE Jr, Cohen LJ, Semple RJ, et al: Relationship between drug company funding and outcomes of clinical psychiatric research. Psychol Med 36:1647-1656, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

28. Brown A, Kraft D, Schmitz SM, et al: Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1445-1451, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

29. Rennie D: Fair conduct and fair reporting of clinical trials. JAMA 282:1766-1768, 1999[Free Full Text]

30. Friedberg M, Saffran B, Stinson TJ, et al: Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. JAMA 282:1453-1457, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Rennie D: Thyroid storm. JAMA 277:1238-1243, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Perlis RH, Perlis CS, Wu Y, et al: Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 162:1957-1960, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Horton R: Medical editors trial amnesty. Lancet 350:756, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

34. Roberts TG Jr, Lynch TJ Jr, Chabner BA: The phase III trial in the era of targeted therapy: Unraveling the "go or no go" decision. J Clin Oncol 21:3683-3695, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Dimasi JA: Risks in new drug development: Approval success rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:297-307, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted October 11, 2007; accepted December 3, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Dhani, D. Tu, D. J. Sargent, L. Seymour, and M. J. Moore
Alternate Endpoints for Screening Phase II Studies
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 15(6): 1873 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kapp, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kapp, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online