Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3388 on May 4 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 17 (June 10), 2009: pp. 2890
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, B.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

Lymphedema Following Breast Cancer

Sandra C. Hayes, Monika Janda, Bruce Cornish, Beth Newman

Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia

To the Editor:

Lymphedema—a chronic, disabling sequela of breast cancer treatment—is finally receiving the research attention it deserves. The work published by Norman et al1 in the January issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology supports the findings of this emerging literature, which demonstrates that lymphedema is common following breast cancer treatment, but that higher estimates are observed when self-report is used to assess lymphedema status compared with other measures such as circumferences, perometry, or bio-impedance spectroscopy. While Norman et al reported that the majority of cases occur within 2 years of diagnosis, work by us2 and others3 have demonstrated that the majority of cases (70% to 80%) occur within the first 12 months after diagnosis. Collectively, this work advocates for the measurement of lymphedema being included within routine presurgical and postsurgical care. However, until we know more about the effectiveness of lymphedema treatment, clinicians may remain skeptical about active screening for lymphedema.

Anecdotally, the intermittent and fluctuating nature of lymphedema exemplified in the self-reports within the study sample by Norman et al1 has been known, but lacks scientific documentation. Using bio-impedance spectroscopy,2 we demonstrated that 60% of women with lymphedema between 6 and 18 months after diagnosis experienced transitory symptoms, whereby the lymphedema dissipated with or without treatment. However, in 40% of those who ever experienced lymphedema the symptoms were chronic, lasting for longer than 3 months with or without intermittent periods of relief. Unfortunately, our data collection methods did not capture lymphedema treatment, and we were therefore unable to assess the relationship between receipt of treatment and the fluctuation in lymphedema. The work by Norman et al1 is particularly exciting because they appear to have adequate numbers and appropriate data to allow for relevant extension of their analyses on duration, severity, and progression of lymphedema. Of particular clinical interest is whether those women who received treatment were more likely to experience improvements in their lymphedema or whether fluctuations in lymphedema status (improvement or worsening) occurred irrespective of treatment. For example, Norman et al1 indicated that those with mild lymphedema were three times more likely to develop moderate/severe lymphedema when compared with women without lymphedema. Was this relationship attenuated when treatment was received, or alternatively, was risk of progression exacerbated when treatment was not received? The results of such additional analyses will be of significant benefit to breast cancer clinicians, lymphedema therapists, and researchers, and we look forward to hearing a response from Norman et al.1

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Norman SA, Localio AR, Potashnik SL, et al: Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: Incidence, degree, time-course, treatment, and symptoms. J Clin Oncol 27:390–397, 2009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Battistutta D, et al: Lymphedema following breast cancer: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper-body function. J Clin Oncol 26:3536–3542, 2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Clark B, Sitzia J, Harlow W: Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: A three-year follow-up study. QJM 98:343–348, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Articles

  • Lymphedema Following Breast Cancer
    Sandra C. Hayes, Monika Janda, Bruce Cornish, and Beth Newman
    JCO 2009 27: 2890 [Full Text]
  • Reply to S.C. Hayes et al
    Sandra A. Norman, A. Russell Localio, Sheryl L. Potashnik, Heather A. Simoes Torpey, Michael J. Kallan, Anita L. Weber, Linda T. Miller, Angela DeMichele, and Lawrence J. Solin
    JCO 2009 27: 2890-2891 [Full Text]
  • Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Survivors: Incidence, Degree, Time Course, Treatment, and Symptoms
    Sandra A. Norman, A. Russell Localio, Sheryl L. Potashnik, Heather A. Simoes Torpey, Michael J. Kallan, Anita L. Weber, Linda T. Miller, Angela DeMichele, and Lawrence J. Solin
    JCO 2009 27: 390-397 [Abstract] [Full Text]

Related Reply

  • Reply to S.C. Hayes et al
    Sandra A. Norman, A. Russell Localio, Sheryl L. Potashnik, Heather A. Simoes Torpey, Michael J. Kallan, Anita L. Weber, Linda T. Miller, Angela DeMichele, and Lawrence J. Solin
    JCO 2009 27: 2890-2891 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Norman, A. R. Localio, S. L. Potashnik, H. A. S. Torpey, M. J. Kallan, A. L. Weber, L. T. Miller, A. DeMichele, and L. J. Solin
Reply to S.C. Hayes et al
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2009; 27(17): 2890 - 2891.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, B.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online