Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7967 on August 3 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 26 (September 10), 2009: pp. e108-e109
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tinat, J.
Right arrow Articles by Frébourg, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tinat, J.
Right arrow Articles by Frébourg, T.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

2009 Version of the Chompret Criteria for Li Fraumeni Syndrome

Julie Tinat, Gaelle Bougeard, Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont, Stéphanie Vasseur, Cosette Martin, Emilie Bouvignies

Inserm U614, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rouen; and Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Research, Rouen, France

Olivier Caron

Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets

Department of Genetics, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Pascaline Berthet

Department of Genetics, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France

Catherine Dugast

Department of Genetics, University Hospital and Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France

Catherine Bonaïti-Pellié

Inserm U535, Villejuif, France

Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet

Department of Genetics, Institut Curie; and University Paris Descartes, Paris, France

Thierry Frébourg

Inserm U614, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rouen; and Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Research, Rouen, France

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Gonzalez et al1 published in Journal of Clinical Oncology. This study confirms the clinical utility of the Chompret criteria, which the French Li Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) working group elaborated in 2001 to facilitate diagnosis of LFS.2 Gonzalez et al performed TP53 analysis in 341 clinically informative families, including 195 families fulfilling the Chompret criteria; obtained a mutation detection rate of 35% (69 of 195 families); and estimated the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria to be 92% and 53%, respectively. The authors were seemingly not aware of our study3 published last year, which had already validated the clinical utility of these criteria. We analyzed TP53 in 474 French families suggestive of LFS, including 232 families fulfilling the Chompret criteria; obtained a mutation detection rate of 29% (67 of 232 families); and estimated the sensitivity and specificity of the Chompret criteria to be 82% and 58%, respectively. We also proposed extending the Chompret criteria to cover the clinical presentation of the 82 families in which we identified germline TP53 mutations. The extended criteria would include the following: A proband with a tumor belonging to the narrow LFS tumor spectrum (eg, soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, brain tumor, premenopausal breast cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, leukemia, and lung bronchoalveolar cancer) diagnosed before age 46 years, with at least one first- or second-degree relative with an LFS tumor (except breast cancer, if proband is affected by breast cancer) before age 56 years or with multiple tumors; or a proband with multiple tumors, two of which belong to the narrow LFS tumor spectrum (except multiple primary breast cancers) and the first of which occurred before age 46 years; or a patient with adrenocortical carcinoma or a choroid plexus carcinoma or a patient diagnosed with breast cancer before age 36 years without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, irrespective of family history.

Gonzalez et al1 indicated that patients with breast cancer younger than age 30 years with no first- or second-degree relative with cancer have a 7% chance of having a TP53 mutation. Therefore, we would like to highlight our recent experience of TP53 testing in patients with early-onset breast cancer. Our group has now performed a complete analysis of TP53—on the basis of sequencing the 11 exons and screening for genomic rearrangements using quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction of short fluorescent fragments—in 161 female patients presenting with breast cancer before age 36 years without detectable BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In this group of patients, we identified 12 deleterious mutations and one unclassified variant (a translationally silent exonic variation) corresponding with a mutation detection rate of 7% to 8%. Among the 161 patients with breast cancer analyzed, 25 belonged to families fulfilling the familial LFS Chompret criteria; we identified a TP53 mutation in four (16%) of the 25. Eight patients without familial history suggestive of LFS presented not only with breast cancer but also with other LFS-related tumors; three (38%) of the eight were found to have a TP53 mutation. The 128 remaining patients were selected for TP53 analysis only on the basis of the development of breast cancer before age 36 years and absence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation; a TP53 mutation or unclassified variant was detected in only five (4%) of the 128.

We conclude that the TP53 mutation detection rate in patients with early-onset breast cancer without familial history of cancer or multiple primary tumors is less than 5%. Considering this low mutation detection rate with regard to the psychologic distress induced by TP53 genetic testing, we think that avoidance of TP53 testing in patients with early-onset breast cancer without familial history of cancer or multiple primary tumors would be appropriate. On the basis of our experience in TP53 testing and the study by Gonzalez et al,1 highlighting in particular the predictive value of choroid plexus tumors, we propose a 2009 version of the Chompret criteria to help clinicians to recognize Li Fraumeni syndrome (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. 2009 Chompret Criteria for Germline TP53 Mutation Screening

 
AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank the members of the Groupe Génétique et Cancer for fruitful discussion and Mario Tosi for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by the French National Cancer Institute.

REFERENCES

1. Gonzalez KD, Noltner KA, Buzin CH, et al: Beyond Li Fraumeni syndrome: Clinical characteristics of families with p53 germline mutations. J Clin Oncol 27:1250–1256, 2009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Chompret A, Abel A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, et al: Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53 germline mutation screening. J Med Genet 38:43–47, 2001.[Free Full Text]

3. Bougeard G, Sesboüé R, Baert-Desurmont S, et al: Molecular basis of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome: An update from the French LFS families. J Med Genet 45:535–538, 2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Reply to J. Tinat et al
    Kelly D.F. Gonzalez, Carolyn H. Buzin, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, and Steve S. Sommer
    JCO 2009 27: 110 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
K. D.F. Gonzalez, C. H. Buzin, J. N. Weitzel, and S. S. Sommer
Reply to J. Tinat et al
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2009; 27(26): e110 - e110.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tinat, J.
Right arrow Articles by Frébourg, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tinat, J.
Right arrow Articles by Frébourg, T.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online