Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.2779 on January 26 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 7 (March 1), 2009: pp. 1149-1150
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machiels, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Machiels, J.-P.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Jean-Pascal Machiels

Centre du Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

We thank Oudard et al for pushing the discussion further regarding the utility of adding estramustine phosphate to docetaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We agree, as already acknowledged in the discussion of our manuscript, that "our study was not powered to detect a survival advantage."1 However, Oudard et al suggested that our study was a randomized phase II trial, which was not the case (see statistical methods section in the manuscript).1 The intention was clearly to perform a comparison between the two arms, and the study was powered to test the assumption that the addition of estramustine to docetaxel would improve the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate.1

The arguments to support the hypothesis that estramustine, when added to docetaxel, could improve the outcome of CRPC are weak. First, they are mainly based on randomized phase II trials that do not allow reliable comparison between arms, even for PSA response as suggested by Oudard et al.2,3 Second, in the meta-analysis performed by Fizazi et al,4 only a limited number of patients (n = 92) treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen were included. Moreover, all these patients came from the same study where a low PSA response rate was observed in the docetaxel arm: 30% versus 45% in larger TAX 327 phase III trial despite using the same docetaxel regimen (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks).2,5 This last point precludes any definitive conclusions regarding the interest of adding estramustine to docetaxel, the only drug that increases survival of patients with CRPC. Finally, indirect comparisons between the Southwest Oncology Group 99-16 and the TAX 327 studies also suggest that docetaxel monotherapy offers similar improvements in survival and PSA response rate as the docetaxel/estramustine combination.5,6

One of the key messages of our trial is that estramustine phosphate significantly increases toxicity: more patients in the docetaxel/estramustine group (45%) had at least one grade 3/4 toxicity compared with those who received docetaxel alone (21%; P = .005).1 The increase in toxicity is also suggested by the Fizazi et al4 meta-analysis and the indirect comparisons between the Southwest Oncology Group 99-16 and the TAX 327 studies.5,6 Although, we all believe in what we are doing for the patients with CRPC, we should not forget that we are dealing with palliative patients. These patients are old, with frequent comorbidities. The survival benefit provides by docetaxel remains modest.5,6 "Primum non nocere" is one of the most important principle of antic and modern medicine, particularly in the case of palliative disease. In this context, we strongly believe that estramustine should not be used in combination with chemotherapy, based on the available data. Only a large randomized trial including several hundreds of patients could, maybe, show a small clinical benefit in favor of estramustine-based chemotherapy. Would it be relevant in regard of the quality of life of our patients?

AUTHOR'S DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Machiels JP, Mazzeo F, Clausse M: Prospective randomized study comparing docetaxel, estramustine, prednisone with docetaxel and prednisone in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:5261–5268, 2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Eymard JC, Priou F, Zannetti A, et al: Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 18:1064–1070, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Caffo O, Sava T, Comploj E, et al: Docetaxel and estramustine as first-line chemotherapy for patients with hormone-refractory advanced prostate cancer: Final results of a multicentric phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 25:18s; 2007 (suppl) abstr 15552.

4. Fizazi K, Le Maitre A, Hudes G, et al: Meta-analysis of estramustine in prostate cancer (MECaP) Trialists' Collaborative Group: Addition of estramustine to chemotherapy and survival of patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer—A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 8:994–1000, 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al: Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 35:1502–1512, 2004.

6. Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al: Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 35:1513–1520, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Combining Docetaxel With Estramustine: Back to the Future?
    Stéphane Oudard, Jean Christophe Eymard, and Karim Fizazi
    JCO 2009 27: 1148-1149 [Full Text]

Related Correspondence

  • Combining Docetaxel With Estramustine: Back to the Future?
    Stéphane Oudard, Jean Christophe Eymard, and Karim Fizazi
    JCO 2009 27: 1148-1149 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machiels, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Machiels, J.-P.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online