Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1548 on August 31 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 28 (October 1), 2009: pp. 4787-4792
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Socinski, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Thatcher, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Socinski, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Thatcher, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Study of Pemetrexed Plus Carboplatin Compared With Etoposide Plus Carboplatin in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Mark A. Socinski, Egbert F. Smit, Paul Lorigan, Kartik Konduri, Martin Reck, Aleksandra Szczesna, Johnetta Blakely, Piotr Serwatowski, Nina A. Karaseva, Tudor Ciuleanu, Jacek Jassem, Mircea Dediu, Shengyan Hong, Carla Visseren-Grul, Axel-Rainer Hanauske, Coleman K. Obasaju, Susan C. Guba, Nick Thatcher

From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Eli Lilly Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; US Oncology, Houston, TX; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Department of Medicine and Medical Oncology, St Georg Hospital, Hamburg, Germany; Mazovian Center of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Otwock; Sokolowski Specialist Hospital in Szczecin-Zdunowo; Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; St Petersburg Oncology Center, St Petersburg, Russian Federation; Cancer Institute "Ion Chiricuta," Cluj-Napoca; "A. Trestioreanu" Oncology Institute, Bucharest University, Bucharest, Romania; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.

Corresponding author: Mark A. Socinski, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Physician's Office Bldg, 3rd Floor, 170 Manning Dr, CB# 7305, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; e-mail: socinski{at}med.unc.edu.

Purpose Following a phase II trial in which pemetrexed-platinum demonstrated similar activity to that of historical etoposide-platinum controls, a phase III study was conducted to compare pemetrexed-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with ES-SCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to 2 were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed-carboplatin (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on day 1; carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] 5 on day 1) or etoposide-carboplatin (etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3; carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary objective of the study was noninferiority of pemetrexed-carboplatin overall survival with a 15% margin.

Results Accrual was terminated with 908 of 1,820 patients enrolled after results of a planned interim analysis. In the final analysis, pemetrexed-carboplatin was inferior to etoposide-carboplatin for overall survival (median, 8.1 v 10.6 months; hazard ratio [HR],1.56; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.92; log-rank P < .01) and progression-free survival (median, 3.8 v 5.4 months; HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.17; log-rank P < .01). Objective response rates were also significantly lower for pemetrexed-carboplatin (31% v 52%; P < .001). Pemetrexed-carboplatin had lower grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and leukopenia than etoposide-carboplatin; grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was comparable between arms and anemia was higher in the pemetrexed-carboplatin arm.

Conclusion Pemetrexed-carboplatin is inferior for the treatment of ES-SCLC. Planned translational research and pharmacogenomic analyses of tumor and blood samples may help explain the study results and provide insight into new treatment strategies.

Supported by Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN.

Presented in part as an oral presentation at the 44th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 30-June 3, 2008, Chicago, IL, and the 8th Annual Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Lung Cancer Meeting, February 20-23, 2008, Santa Monica, CA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical Trials repository link available on JCO.org.

Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT00363415 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online