<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology Early Release</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed - Early Release</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.26.6171v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8632v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8319v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6669v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6156v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.5091v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4342v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3765v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3716v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1173v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0670v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7353v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5985v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5647v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3238v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1034v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8527v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7958v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7511v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7503v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6976v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6497v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5101v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3890v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2793v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0169v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3354v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2273v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1077v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2679v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7166v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.4156v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2952v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2655v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6261v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4326v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4300v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4292v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4144v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4110v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4078v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3914v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3757v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1918v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0779v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8013v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7767v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6918v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6009v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5993v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5837v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5217v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4822v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4277v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4137v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3675v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2222v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0317v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0036v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9020v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8592v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8436v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5408v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4252v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2025v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1670v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1613v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8239v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7041v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5151v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4295v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3693v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3370v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1507v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0962v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9766v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1763v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7588v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6796v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4577v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8306v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.18.8821v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4284v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3963v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1652v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1371v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0860v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8542v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6744v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6454v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6033v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5456v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5233v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3808v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3485v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2446v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9798v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9467v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7545v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7461v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7420v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6901v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6067v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4468v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3098v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2280v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9054v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7942v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7504v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6258v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2547v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2232v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1614v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1309v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9022v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6283v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5384v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8876v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.9430v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6931v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6147v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2544v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2221v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0969v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0522v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0282v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9995v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6736v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4004v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3253v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2461v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6406v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4450v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2801v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2470v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8635v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2950v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8784v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8032v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4684v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8199v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4525v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3311v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6018v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2777v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1738v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0250v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9799v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7769v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6944v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6852v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4329v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4162v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1846v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9139v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6366v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4809v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1060v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2206v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8295v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3494v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1860v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1282v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0805v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4733v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4436v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3685v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0392v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6473v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5756v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5079v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.0204v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5209v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3683v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8089v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6745v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6000v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5341v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4344v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3734v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3601v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1431v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8833v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7868v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7793v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7058v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4931v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4386v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4924v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4882v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.6847v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4681v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8429v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.26.6171v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Advances 2009: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening--A Report From the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO Special Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.26.6171v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petrelli, Winer, Brahmer, Dubey, Smith, Thomas, Vahdat, Obel, Vogelzang, Markman, Sweetenham, Pfister, Kris, Schuchter, Sawaya, Raghavan, Ganz, Kramer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:50 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.6171</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Advances 2009: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening--A Report From the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO Special Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>ASCO Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8632v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to C. Kollmannsberger et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8632v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, Saigal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to C. Kollmannsberger et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8319v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Claims From Claims-Based Data [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8319v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nichols, Kollmannsberger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8319</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Claims From Claims-Based Data [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6669v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to M. Chao et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6669v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson, Sargent, Tsikitis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6669</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to M. Chao et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6156v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Caution Is Required Before Recommending Routine Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Imaging Follow-Up for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6156v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chao, Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Caution Is Required Before Recommending Routine Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Imaging Follow-Up for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.5091v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Cardiac Safety of Dose-Dense Anthracycline Therapy Cannot Be Predicted From Early Ejection Fraction Data [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.5091v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ewer, Ewer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:47 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Cardiac Safety of Dose-Dense Anthracycline Therapy Cannot Be Predicted From Early Ejection Fraction Data [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4342v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to D.L. Raunig [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4342v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodd, Korn, Freidlin, Rubinstein, Dancey, Jaffe, Mooney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:38 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4342</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to D.L. Raunig [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3765v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Balancing Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Adolescents With Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3765v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Metzger, Hudson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3765</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Balancing Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Adolescents With Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3716v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are Onsite Image Evaluations the Solution or Are We Trading One Problem for Another? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3716v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raunig]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:16 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are Onsite Image Evaluations the Solution or Are We Trading One Problem for Another? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1173v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S.J. Faivre et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1173v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhu, Sahani, Duda, Jain]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1173</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S.J. Faivre et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0670v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sunitinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Redefining Appropriate Dosing, Schedule, and Activity End Points [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0670v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faivre, Bouattour, Dreyer, Raymond]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sunitinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Redefining Appropriate Dosing, Schedule, and Activity End Points [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7353v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tracheoesophageal Fistula Formation in Patients With Lung Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Bevacizumab [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7353v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Tracheoesophageal fistulae are rare complications of thoracic cancers and their treatments. Novel antiangiogenic agents in cancer treatment such as bevacizumab potentially impact wound healing and may contribute to tracheoesophageal fistula development.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We conducted two independent phase II clinical trials in small-cell lung cancer and non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer using bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy and radiation. Both trials were intended to assess preliminary efficacy and safety outcomes.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: For the limited-stage small-cell lung cancer trial, 29 patients were enrolled beginning April 2006, and closed early due to toxicity in March 2007 (14-month median follow-up). The locally advanced, non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer trial opened with enrollment limited to five patients in February 2007, and closed early due to safety in December 2007. In each trial, we observed tracheoesophageal fistulae development and related morbidity and mortality, prompting early trial closures, US Food and Drug Administration warnings, and a change in bevacizumab labeling.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The current data from the final reports from these two trials suggest bevacizumab and chemoradiotherapy are associated with a relatively high incidence of tracheoesophageal fistulae formation in both small-cell lung cancer and non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer settings. Strategies to safely incorporate novel antiangiogenic agents into combined-modality therapy in lung cancer are needed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spigel, Hainsworth, Yardley, Raefsky, Patton, Peacock, Farley, Burris, Greco]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7353</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tracheoesophageal Fistula Formation in Patients With Lung Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Bevacizumab [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5985v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anaplastic Gliomas [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5985v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeAngelis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:42 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5985</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anaplastic Gliomas [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5647v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Pregabalin for Alleviating Hot Flashes, N07C1 [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5647v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Hot flashes are a common problem for which effective and safe treatments are needed. The current trial was conducted on the basis of preliminary promising data that pregabalin decreased hot flashes.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial design was used to compare pregabalin at target doses of 75 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily with a placebo. Hot flash frequencies and scores (frequency times mean severity) were recorded daily during a baseline week and for six treatment weeks. The primary end point for this study was the change-from-baseline hot flash score during treatment week 6 between the 150 mg twice daily target pregabalin treatment and placebo. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests, two-sample <I>t</I> tests, and <SUP>2</SUP> tests were used to compare the primary and secondary hot flash efficacy end points between pregabalin treatments and placebo.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Hot flash score changes available for 163 patients during the sixth treatment week compared with a baseline week decreased by 50%, 65%, and 71% in the placebo, and target 75 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily pregabalin arms, respectively (<I>P</I> = .009 and <I>P</I> = .007, comparing respective pregabalin arms to the placebo arm). While some toxicities were significantly more common in the pregabalin arms, being more evident with the higher dose, pregabalin was generally well tolerated by most patients.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Pregabalin decreases hot flashes and is reasonably well tolerated. A target dose of 75 mg twice daily is recommended. Its effects appear to be roughly comparable to what has been reported with gabapentin and with some newer antidepressants.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loprinzi, Qin, Baclueva, Flynn, Rowland, Graham, Erwin, Dakhil, Jurgens, Burger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5647</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Pregabalin for Alleviating Hot Flashes, N07C1 [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3238v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Esophageal Carcinoma in a 16-Year-Old Girl 8 Years After Gastrotomy [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3238v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, Gupta, Baghel, Shukla, Paramhans, Mathur]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3238</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Esophageal Carcinoma in a 16-Year-Old Girl 8 Years After Gastrotomy [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1034v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MGMT Promoter Methylation Is Prognostic but Not Predictive for Outcome to Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors: A Report From EORTC Brain Tumor Group Study 26951 [Neurooncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1034v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I><I>)</I> promoter methylation has been shown to predict survival of patients with glioblastomas if temozolomide is added to radiotherapy (RT). It is unknown if <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation is also predictive to outcome to RT followed by adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors (AOT).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer study 26951, 368 patients with AOT were randomly assigned to either RT alone or to RT followed by adjuvant PCV. From 165 patients of this study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was available for <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation analysis. This was investigated with methylation specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In 152 cases, an MGMT result was obtained, in 121 (80%) cases <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was observed. Methylation strongly correlated with combined loss of chromosome 1p and 19q loss (<I>P</I> = .00043). In multivariate analysis, <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation, 1p/19q codeletion, tumor necrosis, and extent of resection were independent prognostic factors. The prognostic significance of <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was equally strong in the RT arm and the RT/PCV arm for both progression-free survival and overall survival. In tumors diagnosed at central pathology review as glioblastoma, no prognostic effect of <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In this study, on patients with AOT <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was of prognostic significance and did not have predictive significance for outcome to adjuvant PCV chemotherapy. The biologic effect of <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation or pathogenetic features associated with <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation may be different for AOT compared with glioblastoma.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Bent, Dubbink, Sanson, van der Lee-Haarloo, Hegi, Jeuken, Ibdaih, Brandes, Taphoorn, Frenay, Lacombe, Gorlia, Dinjens, Kros]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:17 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MGMT Promoter Methylation Is Prognostic but Not Predictive for Outcome to Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors: A Report From EORTC Brain Tumor Group Study 26951 [Neurooncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8527v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aortic Stiffness Increases Upon Receipt of Anthracycline Chemotherapy [Cancer Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8527v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cancer survivors exposed to anthracyclines experience an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. We hypothesized that anthracycline use may increase aortic stiffness, a known predictor of CV events.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a prospective, case-control study involving 53 patients: 40 individuals who received an anthracycline for the treatment of breast cancer, lymphoma, or leukemia (cases), and 13 age- and sex-matched controls. Each participant underwent phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of pulse wave velocity (PWV) and aortic distensibility (AoD) in the thoracic aorta at baseline, and 4 months after initiation of chemotherapy. Four one-way analyses of covariance models were fit in which factors known to influence thoracic aortic stiffness were included as covariates in the models.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At the 4-month follow-up visit, aortic stiffness remained similar to baseline in the control participants. However, in the participants receiving anthracyclines, aortic stiffness increased markedly (relative to baseline), as evidenced by a decrease in AoD (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) and an increase in PWV (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). These changes in aortic stiffness persisted after accounting for age, sex, cardiac output, administered cardioactive medications, and underlying clinical conditions known to influence aortic stiffness, such as hypertension or diabetes (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A significant increase in aortic stiffness occurs within 4 months of exposure to an anthracycline which was not seen in an untreated control group. These results indicate that previously regarded cardiotoxic cancer therapy adversely increases thoracic aortic stiffness, a known independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaosuwannakit, D'Agostino, Hamilton, Lane, Ntim, Lawrence, Melin, Ellis, Torti, Little, Hundley]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8527</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aortic Stiffness Increases Upon Receipt of Anthracycline Chemotherapy [Cancer Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cancer Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7958v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nodal Staging Score: A Tool to Assess Adequate Staging of Node-Negative Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7958v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Adequate nodal staging of colon cancer has been defined as pathologic examination of at least 12 lymph nodes. We sought to refine this definition by quantifying the likelihood that a pathologically node-negative patient has, indeed, no positive nodes.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the colon between 1994 and 2005 and had at least one lymph node pathologically examined were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n = 131,953). We estimated the sensitivity of the pathologic staging of locoregional spread using a beta-binomial model and developed the nodal staging score (NSS), which is the probability that a patient is correctly staged as node negative. NSS is a function of T stage and the number of examined nodes.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The probability of missing a positive node that is in fact truly present is 29.7% if five nodes are examined, 20.0% if eight are examined, and drops to 13.6% for 12 nodes are examined. An NSS of 90% can be achieved by examining a single node for T1 and four nodes for T2 tumors. To maintain similar levels of NSS for T3, 13 nodes need to be examined and for T4 lesions, 21 nodes need to be examined. Graphical and tabular tools are provided to facilitate calculation of NSS and treatment decision making in practice.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The minimum number of examined nodes for adequate staging depends on the T stage. The score we developed indicates the adequacy of nodal staging for patients with no positive nodes and can assist clinical decision making in the patient without nodal metastasis.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonen, Schrag, Weiser]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7958</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nodal Staging Score: A Tool to Assess Adequate Staging of Node-Negative Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7511v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Factors Influencing Outcome in Patients With In-Transit Malignant Melanoma Undergoing Isolated Limb Perfusion Using Modern Treatment Parameters [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7511v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: In-transit disease afflicts approximately 10% of patients with extremity melanoma; no single treatment approach has been uniformly accepted as the most effective. We report long-term outcomes in patients with in-transit extremity melanoma who underwent isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in an era of increasingly accurate staging, uniform operative and treatment conditions, and regular long-term follow-up.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Between May 1992 and February 2005, 91 patients (median age, 57 years; 50 women, 41 men) underwent a 90-minute hyperthermic ILP (melphalan, 10 to 13 mg/L limb volume, tumor necrosis factor [TNF; n = 44], or interferon [n = 38]) using uniform operative technique and intraoperative leak monitoring. Patients were prospectively followed for response, in-field progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Parameters associated with in-field PFS and OS were analyzed by standard statistical methods.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There was one operative death (1.1%). There were 62 complete responses (69%) and 23 partial responses (26%) in 90 assessable patients. At a median potential follow-up of 11 years, median in-field PFS was 12.4 months and median OS was 47.4 months; 5 and 10-year actuarial OS probabilities were 43% and 34%, respectively. Female sex and low tumor burden (&le; 20 lesions) were associated with prolonged in-field PFS (male:female hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.38; 21+ <I>v</I> &le; 20 tumors HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.34; <I>P</I> &lt; .011 for both). Female sex was associated with improved OS (<I>P</I> = .027; male:female HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.09).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In appropriately selected patients, ILP has clinical benefit. The use of TNF was not associated with improved in-field PFS, while female sex was associated with better survival.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander, Fraker, Bartlett, Libutti, Steinberg, Soriano, Beresnev]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:42 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Factors Influencing Outcome in Patients With In-Transit Malignant Melanoma Undergoing Isolated Limb Perfusion Using Modern Treatment Parameters [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7503v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mutations of E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl Family Members Constitute a Novel Common Pathogenic Lesion in Myeloid Malignancies [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7503v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Acquired somatic uniparental disomy (UPD) is commonly observed in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), or secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML) and may point toward genes harboring mutations. Recurrent UPD11q led to identification of homozygous mutations in <I>c-Cbl</I>, an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in attenuation of proliferative signals transduced by activated receptor tyrosine kinases. We examined the role and frequency of <I>Cbl</I> gene family mutations in MPN and related conditions.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We applied high-density SNP-A karyotyping to identify loss of heterozygosity of 11q in 442 patients with MDS, MDS/MPN, MPN, sAML evolved from these conditions, and primary AML. We sequenced <I>c-Cbl</I>, <I>Cbl-b</I>, and <I>Cbl-c</I> in patients with or without corresponding UPD or deletions and correlated mutational status with clinical features and outcomes.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: We identified <I>c-Cbl</I> mutations in 5% and 9% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and sAML, and also in CML blast crisis and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). Most mutations were homozygous and affected <I>c-Cbl</I>; mutations in <I>Cbl-b</I> were also found in patients with similar clinical features. Patients with <I>Cbl</I> family mutations showed poor prognosis, with a median survival of 5 months. Pathomorphologic features included monocytosis, monocytoid blasts, aberrant expression of phosphoSTAT5, and c-kit overexpression. Serial studies showed acquisition of <I>c-Cbl</I> mutations during malignant evolution.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Mutations in the <I>Cbl</I> family RING finger domain or linker sequence constitute important pathogenic lesions associated with not only preleukemic CMML, JMML, and other MPN, but also progression to AML, suggesting that impairment of degradation of activated tyrosine kinases constitutes an important cancer mechanism.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makishima, Cazzolli, Szpurka, Dunbar, Tiu, Huh, Muramatsu, O'Keefe, Hsi, Paquette, Kojima, List, Sekeres, McDevitt, Maciejewski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7503</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mutations of E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl Family Members Constitute a Novel Common Pathogenic Lesion in Myeloid Malignancies [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6976v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myeloid Sarcoma and Eosinophilia: Prolonged Remission and Molecular Response to Imatinib [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6976v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vedy, Muehlematter, Rausch, Stalder, Jotterand, Spertini]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6976</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myeloid Sarcoma and Eosinophilia: Prolonged Remission and Molecular Response to Imatinib [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6497v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NOA-04 Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Radiochemotherapy of Anaplastic Glioma With Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine or Temozolomide [Neurooncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6497v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The standard of care for anaplastic gliomas is surgery followed by radiotherapy. The NOA-04 phase III trial compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy at progression with the reverse sequence in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (N = 318) were randomly assigned 2:1:1 (A:B1:B2) to receive conventional radiotherapy (arm A); procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV; arm B1); or temozolomide (arm B2) at diagnosis. At occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression, patients in arm A were treated with PCV or temozolomide (1:1 random assignment), whereas patients in arms B1 or B2 received radiotherapy. The primary end point was time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as progression after radiotherapy and one chemotherapy in either sequence.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patient characteristics in the intention-to-treat population (n = 274) were balanced between arms. All histologic diagnoses were centrally confirmed. Median TTF (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.8), progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.3, and overall survival (HR = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.9) were similar for arms A and B1/B2. Extent of resection was an important prognosticator. Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas share the same, better prognosis than anaplastic astrocytomas. Hypermethylation of the O<SUP>6</SUP>-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I>) promoter (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.0), mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (<I>IDH1</I>) gene (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.77), and oligodendroglial histology (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.55) reduced the risk of progression. Hypermethylation of the <I>MGMT</I> promoter was associated with prolonged PFS in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Initial radiotherapy or chemotherapy achieved comparable results in patients with anaplastic gliomas. <I>IDH1</I> mutations are a novel positive prognostic factor in anaplastic gliomas, with a favorable impact stronger than that of 1p/19q codeletion or <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wick, Hartmann, Engel, Stoffels, Felsberg, Stockhammer, Sabel, Koeppen, Ketter, Meyermann, Rapp, Meisner, Kortmann, Pietsch, Wiestler, Ernemann, Bamberg, Reifenberger, von Deimling, Weller]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6497</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NOA-04 Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Radiochemotherapy of Anaplastic Glioma With Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine or Temozolomide [Neurooncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5101v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Shows Similar Response in Patients With Inflammatory or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer When Compared With Operable Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the GeparTrio Trial Data [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5101v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by mastectomy is the treatment of choice in patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), but it is considered less effective in these diseases than in operable breast cancer (OBC). We report a prospective comparison of the GeparTrio trial of patients with IBC (cT4 days) or LABC (cT4a-c or cN3; stage IIIB or IIIC) and patients with OBC (cT2-3).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Participants were stratified by stage and were randomly assigned to six or eight cycles of docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) or to two cycles of TAC followed by four cycles of vinorelbine/capecitabine. We present results of a secondary aim of the study, which was to compare pathologic complete response (pCR; ie, no remaining invasive/noninvasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes) in different stage groups.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 287 patients with IBC (n = 93) or LABC (n = 194) and 1,777 patients with OBC were entered onto the trial. At baseline, parameters were as follows for the three types of cancer, respectively: median tumor sizes: 8.0 cm, 7.0 cm, and 4.0 cm (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); multiple lesions: 31.2%, 27.3%, and 19.6% (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); nodal involvement: 86.6%, 71.2%, and 51.6% (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); grade 3: 44.4%, 30.4%, and 39.9% (<I>P</I> = .178); lobular-invasive type: 7.5%, 17.5%, and 13.3% (<I>P</I> = .673); negative hormone receptor status: 38.0%, 20.0%, and 36.4% (<I>P</I> = .008); and positive human growth factor receptor 2 status: 45.1%, 38.9%, and 35.7% (<I>P</I> = .158). Response rates for IBC, LABC, and OBC, respectively, were 8.6%, 11.3%, and 17.7% for pCR (<I>P</I> = .002); 71.0%, 69.6%, and 83.4% for overall response by physical or sonographic examination (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); and 12.9%, 33.0%, and 69.9% for breast conservation (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). All <I>P</I> values were for IBC and LABC versus OBC. However, tumor stage itself was not an independent predictor for pCR in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.88 to 2.59; <I>P</I> = .13).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: No evidence of a difference in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was found by tumor stage when analysis was adjusted for baseline characteristics.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costa, Loibl, Kaufmann, Zahm, Hilfrich, Huober, Eidtmann, du Bois, Blohmer, Ataseven, Weiss, Tesch, Gerber, Baumann, Thomssen, Breitbach, Ibishi, Jackisch, Mehta, von Minckwitz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Shows Similar Response in Patients With Inflammatory or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer When Compared With Operable Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the GeparTrio Trial Data [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3890v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Cause of a Malignant Chylous Pleural Effusion [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3890v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malinowska-Kolodziej, Finlay, Campbell, Garcia-Moliner, Weinstein, Doughty, Qin, Butterfield, Short, Seyama, Kwiatkowski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3890</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Cause of a Malignant Chylous Pleural Effusion [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2793v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Care for Imminently Dying Cancer Patients: Family Members' Experiences and Recommendations [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2793v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The aim of this study was to clarify the level of emotional distress experienced by bereaved family members and the perceived necessity for improvement in the care for imminently dying patients and to explore possible causes of distress and alleviating measures.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: A cross-sectional nationwide survey was performed in 2007 of bereaved families of cancer patients at 95 palliative care units across Japan.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Questionnaires were sent to 670 families, and 76% responded. Families reported their experiences as very distressing in 45% of cases. Regarding care, 1.2% of respondents believed that a lot of improvement was needed, compared with 58% who believed no improvement was needed. Determinants of high-level distress were a younger patient age, being a spouse, and overhearing conversations between the medical staff outside the room at the time of the patient's death; those reporting high-level necessity of improvement were less likely to have encountered attempts to ensure the patient's comfort, received less family coaching on how to care for the patient, and felt that insufficient time was allowed for the family to grieve after the patient's death.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A considerable number of families experienced severe emotional distress when their family member died. Thus, we propose that a desirable care concept for imminently dying cancer patients should include relief of patient suffering, family advisement on how to care for the patient, allowance of enough time for the family to grieve, and ensuring that family members cannot overhear medical staff conversations at the time of the patient's death.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinjo, Morita, Hirai, Miyashita, Sato, Tsuneto, Shima]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Care for Imminently Dying Cancer Patients: Family Members' Experiences and Recommendations [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0169v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival Effect of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide and High-Dose Dexamethasone [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0169v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the survival effect of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Two identically designed, multicenter, double-blind, phase III clinical trials (MM-009 and MM-010) were conducted in Europe and the United States to assess the effect of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone versus dexamethasone plus placebo in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, after failing at least one prior line of treatment. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated incidence and survival effect of thromboembolism in 353 patients randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle, plus 40 mg of oral dexamethasone on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 for the first four cycles; after the fourth cycle, 40 mg of dexamethasone was administered on days 1 through 4 only.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Seventeen percent of patients experienced a thromboembolic episode. The development of VTE did not significantly affect overall survival (<I>P</I> = .90) or time to progression (<I>P</I> = .34). No significant survival impact was observed in a subgroup of patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation (overall survival <I>P</I> = .7, time to progression <I>P</I> = .1).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with MM treated with lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone who developed a VTE did not experience shorter overall survival or time to progression.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zangari, Tricot, Polavaram, Zhan, Finlayson, Knight, Fu, Weber, Dimopoulos, Niesvizky, Fink]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival Effect of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide and High-Dose Dexamethasone [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3354v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Activity of Gemcitabine Plus Pertuzumab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3354v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Pertuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) heterodimerization and has single-agent activity in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. The primary objective of this phase II study was to characterize the safety and estimate progression-free survival (PFS) of pertuzumab with gemcitabine in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with advanced, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had received a maximum of one prior treatment for recurrent cancer were randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus either pertuzumab or placebo. Collection of archival tissue was mandatory to permit exploration of biomarkers that would predict benefit from pertuzumab in this setting.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: One hundred thirty patients (65 per arm) were treated. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03; <I>P</I> = .07) in favor of gemcitabine + pertuzumab. The objective response rate was 13.8% in patients who received gemcitabine + pertuzumab compared with 4.6% in patients who received gemcitabine + placebo. In patients whose tumors had low HER3 mRNA expression (&lt; median, n = 61), an increased treatment benefit was observed in the gemcitabine + pertuzumab arm compared with the gemcitabine alone arm (PFS HR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.59; <I>P</I> = .0002). Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, diarrhea, and back pain were increased in patients treated with gemcitabine + pertuzumab. Symptomatic congestive heart failure was reported in one patient in the gemcitabine + pertuzumab arm.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Pertuzumab may add activity to gemcitabine for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Low HER3 mRNA expression may predict pertuzumab clinical benefit and be a valuable prognostic marker.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makhija, Amler, Glenn, Ueland, Gold, Dizon, Paton, Lin, Januario, Ng, Strauss, Kelsey, Sliwkowski, Matulonis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:03 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Activity of Gemcitabine Plus Pertuzumab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2273v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effective Strategies for Management of Hypertension After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Inhibition Therapy: Results From a Phase II Randomized, Factorial, Double-Blind Study of Cediranib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2273v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Hypertension is a commonly reported adverse effect after administration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Cediranib is a highly potent and selective VEGF signaling inhibitor of all three VEGFRs. This study prospectively investigated hypertension management to help minimize dose interruptions/reductions to maximize cediranib dose intensity.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (n = 126) with advanced solid tumors were randomly assigned to one of four groups: cediranib 30 or 45 mg/d with or without antihypertensive prophylaxis. All patients developing hypertension on cediranib treatment were treated with a standardized, predefined hypertension management protocol.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Cediranib was generally well tolerated, and all groups achieved high-dose intensities in the first 12 weeks (&gt; 74% in all groups). Antihypertensive prophylaxis did not result in fewer dose reductions or interruptions. Increases in blood pressure, including moderate and severe readings of hypertension, were seen early in treatment in all groups and successfully managed. Severe hypertension occurred in one patient receiving prophylaxis versus 18 in the nonprophylaxis groups. Overall, there were nine partial responses, and 38 patients experienced stable disease &ge; 8 weeks.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective investigation of hypertension management during administration of a VEGF signaling inhibitor. All four regimens were well tolerated with high-dose intensities and no strategy was clearly superior. The current cediranib hypertension management protocol appears to be effective in managing hypertension compared with previous cediranib studies where no plan was in place, and early recognition and treatment of hypertension is likely to reduce the number of severe hypertension events. This protocol is included in all ongoing cediranib clinical studies.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Langenberg, van Herpen, De Bono, Schellens, Unger, Hoekman, Blum, Fiedler, Drevs, Le Maulf, Fielding, Robertson, Voest]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2273</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effective Strategies for Management of Hypertension After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Inhibition Therapy: Results From a Phase II Randomized, Factorial, Double-Blind Study of Cediranib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1077v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Node-Positive or High-Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1077v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) are commonly used adjuvant regimens in women with early breast cancer. In a previous trial in women with locally advanced breast cancer, 3 months of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) administered every 2 weeks (dose-dense) was equivalent to 6 months of CEF. We hypothesized that 3 months of paclitaxel after dose-dense EC (EC/T) would be superior to CEF or AC/T.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: After lumpectomy or mastectomy, women 60 years of age or younger with axillary node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive CEF, EC/T, or AC/T for 6 months. This article reports the interim analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS), which was planned after 227 recurrences.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 30.4 months. Hazard ratios for recurrence are as follows: AC/T versus CEF, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.99), <I>P</I> = .005; AC/T versus EC/T, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.25 to 2.27), <I>P</I> = .0006; and EC/T versus CEF, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.22), <I>P</I> = .46. Three-year RFS rates for CEF, EC/T, and AC/T are 90.1%, 89.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. There was more febrile neutropenia with CEF (22.3%) and EC/T (16.4%) compared with AC/T (4.8%), but more neuropathy with the last two regimens.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Three-weekly AC/T is significantly inferior to CEF or EC/T in terms of RFS. It is too early to detect any difference between CEF and dose-dense EC/T.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burnell, Levine, Chapman, Bramwell, Gelmon, Walley, Vandenberg, Chalchal, Albain, Perez, Rugo, Pritchard, O'Brien, Shepherd]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Node-Positive or High-Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2679v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicenter, Phase I, Dose-Escalation Trial of Lenalidomide Plus Bortezomib for Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2679v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Lenalidomide and bortezomib are active in relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). In preclinical studies, lenalidomide sensitized MM cells to bortezomib and dexamethasone. This phase I, dose-escalation study (ie, NCT00153933) evaluated safety and determined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide plus bortezomib in patients with relapsed or with relapsed and refractory MM.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients received lenalidomide 5, 10, or 15 mg/d on days 1 through 14 and received bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles. Dexamethasone (20mg or 40 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12) was added for progressive disease after two cycles. Primary end points were safety and MTD determination.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled across six dose cohorts. The MTD was lenalidomide 15 mg/d plus bortezomib 1.0 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. Dose-limiting toxicities (n = 1 for each) were grade 3 hyponatremia and herpes zoster reactivation and grade 4 neutropenia. The most common treatment-related, grades 3 to 4 toxicities included reversible neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and leukopenia. Among 36 response-evaluable patients, 61% (90% CI, 46% to 75%) achieved minimal response or better. Among 18 patients who had dexamethasone added, 83% (90% CI, 62% to 95%) achieved stable disease or better. Median overall survival was 37 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Lenalidomide plus bortezomib was well tolerated and showed promising activity with durable responses in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory MM, including patients previously treated with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or thalidomide. The combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is being investigated in a phase II study in this setting and in newly diagnosed MM.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richardson, Weller, Jagannath, Avigan, Alsina, Schlossman, Mazumder, Munshi, Ghobrial, Doss, Warren, Lunde, McKenney, Delaney, Mitsiades, Hideshima, Dalton, Knight, Esseltine, Anderson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicenter, Phase I, Dose-Escalation Trial of Lenalidomide Plus Bortezomib for Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7166v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conjugated Equine Estrogen Influence on Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women in a Substudy of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7166v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Increased mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk and reduced sensitivity of screening mammography and is related to hormone exposure. However, the effects of conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs) alone on mammographic density in diverse racial/ethnic populations are not established. We examined the effect of CEE alone on mammographic density in a subsample of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial participants.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In the WHI trial, women were randomly assigned to daily CEE 0.625 mg or placebo. The effect of CEE on mammographic percent density was determined over 1 and 2 years in a stratified random sample of 435 racially and ethnically diverse participants from 15 of 40 WHI clinics.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Use of CEE resulted in mean increase in mammographic percent density of 1.6 percentage points (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.4) at year 1 compared with a mean decrease of 1.0 percentage point (95% CI, -1.7 to -0.4) in the placebo group (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). The effect persisted for 2 years, with a mean increase of 1.7 percentage points (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.7) versus a mean decrease of 1.2 percentage points (95% CI, -1.8 to -0.5; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) in the hormone and placebo groups, respectively. These effects were greater in women age 60 to 79 years (<I>P</I> = .03 for interaction across age).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Use of CEE results in a modest but statistically significant increase in mammographic density that is sustained over at least a 2-year period. The clinical significance of the CEE effect on mammographic density remains to be determined.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McTiernan, Chlebowski, Martin, Peck, Aragaki, Pisano, Wang, Johnson, Manson, Wallace, Vitolins, Heiss]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conjugated Equine Estrogen Influence on Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women in a Substudy of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.4156v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Germline Genetic Variation in an Organic Anion Transporter Polypeptide Associated With Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.4156v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Methotrexate plasma concentration is related to its clinical effects. Our aim was to identify the genetic basis of interindividual variability in methotrexate pharmacokinetics in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a genome-wide analysis of 500,568 germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify how inheritance affects methotrexate plasma disposition among 434 children with ALL who received 3,014 courses of methotrexate at 2 to 5 g/m<SUP>2</SUP>. SNPs were validated in an independent cohort of 206 patients.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Adjusting for age, race, sex, and methotrexate regimen, the most significant associations were with SNPs in the organic anion transporter polypeptide, <I>SLCO1B1</I>. Two SNPs in <I>SLCO1B1</I>, rs11045879 (<I>P</I> = 1.7 x 10<SUP>-10</SUP>) and rs4149081 (<I>P</I> = 1.7 x 10<SUP>-9</SUP>), were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with each other (<I>r</I><SUP>2</SUP> = 1) and with a functional polymorphism in <I>SLCO1B1</I>, T521C (rs4149056; <I>r</I><SUP>2</SUP> &gt; 0.84). rs11045879 and rs4149081 were validated in an independent cohort of 206 patients (<I>P</I> = .018 and <I>P</I> = .017), as were other <I>SLCO1B1</I> SNPs residing in different LD blocks. SNPs in <I>SLCO1B1</I> were also associated with GI toxicity (odds ratio, 15.3 to 16.4; <I>P</I> = .03 to .004).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A genome-wide interrogation identified inherited variations in a plausible, yet heretofore low-priority candidate gene, <I>SLCO1B1</I>, as important determinants of methotrexate's pharmacokinetics and clinical effects.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevino, Shimasaki, Yang, Panetta, Cheng, Pei, Chan, Sparreboom, Giacomini, Pui, Evans, Relling]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Germline Genetic Variation in an Organic Anion Transporter Polypeptide Associated With Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2952v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dose-Dense Adjuvant Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Is Not Associated With Frequent Short-Term Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2952v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) every 3 weeks has been associated with frequent asymptomatic declines in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Dose-dense (dd) AC followed by paclitaxel (P) is superior to the same regimen given every third week. Herein, we report the early cardiac safety of three sequential studies of ddAC alone or with bevacizumab (B).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with <I>HER2</I>-positive breast cancer were treated on two trials: ddAC followed by P and trastuzumab (T) and ddAC followed by PT and lapatinib. Patients with <I>HER2</I>-normal breast cancer were treated with B and ddAC followed by B and nanoparticle albumin&ndash;bound P. Prospective LVEF measurement by multigated radionuclide angiography scan before and after every 2 week AC for 4 cycles and at month 6 from all three trials were aggregated to determine the early risks of cardiac dysfunction.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: From January 2005 to May 2008, 245 patients were enrolled. The median age was 47 years (range, 27 to 75 years). Median LVEF pre-ddAC was 68% (range, 52% to 82%). LVEF post-ddAC was available in 241 patients (98%) and the median was unchanged at 68% (range, 47% to 81%). Per protocol no patients were ineligible for subsequent targeted biologic therapy based on LVEF decline post-ddAC. In addition, LVEF was available in 222 patients (92%) at 6 months, at which time the median LVEF was similar at 65% (range, 24% to 80%). Within 6 months of initiating chemotherapy, three patients (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.25% to 3.54%) developed CHF, all of whom received T.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Dose-dense AC with or without concurrent bevacizumab is not associated with frequent acute or short-term declines in LVEF.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morris, Dickler, McArthur, Traina, Sugarman, Lin, Moy, Come, Godfrey, Nulsen, Chen, Steingart, Rugo, Norton, Winer, Hudis, Dang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2952</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dose-Dense Adjuvant Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Is Not Associated With Frequent Short-Term Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2655v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Adolescents Treated With Adult Protocols: A Report From the German Hodgkin Study Group [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2655v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The standard of care for adolescent patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is undefined, particularly the choice between pediatric and adult protocols. Thus, we compared risk factors and outcome of adolescents and young adults treated within study protocols of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Three thousand seven hundred eighty-five patients treated within the GHSG studies HD4 to HD9 were analyzed; 557 patients were adolescents age 15 to 20 years, and 3,228 patients were young adults age 21 to 45 years.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Large mediastinal mass and involvement of three or more lymph node areas were more frequent in adolescents (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). The incidence of other risk factors did not differ significantly between age groups. With a median observation time of 81 months for freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and 85 months for overall survival (OS), log-rank test showed no significant differences between age groups regarding FFTF (<I>P</I> = .305) and a superior OS (<I>P</I> = .008) for adolescents. Six-year estimates for FFTF and OS were 80% and 94%, respectively, for adolescents and 80% and 91%, respectively, for young adults. After adjustment for other predictive factors, Cox regression analysis revealed age as a significant predictor for OS (<I>P</I> = .004), with a higher mortality risk for young adults. Secondary malignancies were more common in young adults (<I>P</I> = .037).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Outcome of adolescent and young adult patients treated within GHSG study protocols is comparable. These data suggest that adult treatment protocols exhibit a safe and effective treatment option for adolescent patients with HL. However, longer follow-up, including assessment of late toxicity, is necessary for final conclusions.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eichenauer, Bredenfeld, Haverkamp, Muller, Franklin, Fuchs, Borchmann, Muller-Hermelink, Eich, Muller, Diehl, Engert]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:44 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Adolescents Treated With Adult Protocols: A Report From the German Hodgkin Study Group [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6261v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Y-Box-Binding Protein YB-1 Identifies High-Risk Patients With Primary Breast Cancer Benefiting From Rapidly Cycled Tandem High-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6261v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To investigate the potential of Y-box&ndash;binding protein YB-1, a multifunctional protein linked to tumor aggressiveness and multidrug resistance, to identify patients with breast cancer likely to benefit from dose-intensified chemotherapy regimens.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: YB-1 was immunohistochemically determined in 211 primary tumors from the prospective, randomized West German Study Group WSG-AM-01 trial in high-risk (&ge; 10 involved lymph-nodes) breast cancer (HRBC). Predictive impact of YB-1 was assessed by multivariate survival analysis, including time-varying factor-therapy interactions.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At median follow-up of 61.7 months, patients receiving rapidly cycled tandem high-dose therapy (HD; two cycles [2x] epirubicin 90 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 14 days, followed by 2x epirubicin 90 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, and thiotepa 400 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 21 days) had better disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.89) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.89) than those receiving conventional dose-dense chemotherapy (DD; 4x epirubicin 90 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, followed by 3x cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, methotrexate 40 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 14 days). High YB-1 was associated with aggressive tumor phenotype (negative steroid hormone receptor status, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and <I>p53</I> status, high MIB-1, unfavorable tumor grade) and poor OS (median 78 <I>v</I> 97 months; <I>P</I> = .01). In patients with high YB-1, HD yielded a 63-month median DFS (<I>P</I> = .001) and a 46-month median OS advantage (<I>P</I> = .002) versus DD. In multivariate models, patients with high B-1 receiving HD (<I>v</I> DD) had one third the hazard rate after 20 months for DFS and one sixth after 40 months for OS.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In a randomized prospective cancer therapy trial, for the first time, a strong predictive impact of YB-1 on survival has been demonstrated: enhanced benefit from HD (<I>v</I> DD) therapy occurs in HRBC with high YB-1. Future trials could therefore address optimal chemotherapeutic strategies,taking YB-1 into account.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gluz, Mengele, Schmitt, Kates, Diallo-Danebrock, Neff, Royer, Eckstein, Mohrmann, Ting, Kiechle, Poremba, Nitz, Harbeck]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6261</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Y-Box-Binding Protein YB-1 Identifies High-Risk Patients With Primary Breast Cancer Benefiting From Rapidly Cycled Tandem High-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4326v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sanchez-Munoz et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4326v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montemurro, Del Mastro, Aglietta]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:53:15 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4326</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sanchez-Munoz et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4300v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to Aragon-Ching [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4300v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alibhai]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:53:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to Aragon-Ching [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4292v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to T. Grenader et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4292v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiralerspong, Gonzalez-Angulo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:56 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4292</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to T. Grenader et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4144v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to K. Satharasinghe et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4144v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kushner, Kramer, Modak, Cheung]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:47 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to K. Satharasinghe et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4110v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metformin As an Addition to Conventional Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4110v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grenader, Goldberg, Shavit]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:33 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metformin As an Addition to Conventional Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4078v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Disease With Androgen Deprivation: The (forgotten) Role of Testosterone [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4078v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aragon-Ching]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Disease With Androgen Deprivation: The (forgotten) Role of Testosterone [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3914v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Versus Disease-Free Survival As a Primary End Point in Clinical Practice [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3914v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez-Munoz, Ribelles, Marquez, Perez-Ruiz, Alba]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:14 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3914</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Versus Disease-Free Survival As a Primary End Point in Clinical Practice [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3757v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sasse et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3757v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soon, Stockler, Askie, Boyer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3757</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sasse et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1918v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Duration of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: More May Be Not Better [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1918v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sasse, Lima, Sasse, Santos]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1918</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Duration of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: More May Be Not Better [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0779v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0779v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To review and update the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including monitoring, response definition, and first- and second-line therapy.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: These recommendations are based on a critical and comprehensive review of the relevant papers up to February 2009 and the results of four consensus conferences held by the panel of experts appointed by ELN in 2008.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Cytogenetic monitoring was required at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Molecular monitoring was required every 3 months. On the basis of the degree and the timing of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular results, the response to first-line imatinib was defined as optimal, suboptimal, or failure, and the response to second-generation TKIs was defined as suboptimal or failure.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Initial treatment was confirmed as imatinib 400 mg daily. Imatinib should be continued indefinitely in optimal responders. Suboptimal responders may continue on imatinb, at the same or higher dose, or may be eligible for investigational therapy with second-generation TKIs. In instances of imatinib failure, second-generation TKIs are recommended, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation only in instances of failure and, sometimes, suboptimal response, depending on transplantation risk.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baccarani, Cortes, Pane, Niederwieser, Saglio, Apperley, Cervantes, Deininger, Gratwohl, Guilhot, Hochhaus, Horowitz, Hughes, Kantarjian, Larson, Radich, Simonsson, Silver, Goldman, Hehlmann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:50 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0779</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8013v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Forest and the Trees: Pathways and Proteins As Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8013v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bertagnolli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:42 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Forest and the Trees: Pathways and Proteins As Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7767v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to N. Magne et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7767v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halyard, Pisansky, Dueck, Suman, Pierce, Solin, Marks, Davidson, Martino, Kaufman, Kutteh, Dakhil, Perez]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7767</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to N. Magne et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6918v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact on Cardiac Toxicity With Trastuzumab and Radiotherapy: The Question Is Still Ongoing [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6918v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magne, Vedrine, Chargari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6918</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact on Cardiac Toxicity With Trastuzumab and Radiotherapy: The Question Is Still Ongoing [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6009v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Dalmau [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6009v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rauer, Veelken]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Dalmau [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5993v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognition and Treatment of Sleep Disturbances in Cancer [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5993v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ancoli-Israel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:03 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5993</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognition and Treatment of Sleep Disturbances in Cancer [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5837v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unique Localization of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Hepatic Metastases [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5837v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: There are few data on the impact of immediate and differing surgical interventions on circulating tumor cells (CTCs), nor their compartmentalization or localization in different anatomic vascular sites.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: CTCs from consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases were quantified before and immediately after open surgery, laparoscopic resection, open radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or percutaneous RFA. For individuals undergoing open surgery, either hepatic resections or open RFA, CTCs were examined in both systemic and portal circulation by measuring CTCs in samples derived from the peripheral vein, an artery, the hepatic portal vein, and the hepatic vein.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 29 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases with a median age of 55 years (range, 30 to 88 years) were included. CTCs were localized to the hepatic portosystemic macrocirculation with significantly greater numbers than in the systemic vasculature. Surgical procedures led to a statistically significant fall in CTCs at multiple sites measured. Conversely, RFA, either open or percutaneous, was associated with a significant increase in CTCs.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Surgical resection of metastases, but not RFA, immediately decreases CTC levels. In patients with colorectal liver metastases, CTCs appear localized to the hepatic (and pulmonary) macrocirculations. This may explain why metastases in sites other than the liver and lungs are infrequently observed in cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiao, Apostolopoulos, Jacob, Szydlo, Johnson, Tsim, Habib, Coombes, Stebbing]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:51 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5837</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unique Localization of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Hepatic Metastases [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5217v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Williams et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5217v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souhami, Bae, Sandler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5217</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Williams et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4822v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognizing Paraneoplastic Limbic Encephalitis [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4822v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dalmau]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4822</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognizing Paraneoplastic Limbic Encephalitis [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4277v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multimodality Screening of High-Risk Women: A Prospective Cohort Study [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4277v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Mammography has been established as the primary imaging screening method for breast cancer; however, the sensitivity of mammography is limited, especially in women with dense breast tissue. Given the limitations of mammography, interest has developed in alternative screening techniques. This interest has led to numerous studies reporting mammographically occult breast cancers detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. In addition, digital mammography was shown to be more sensitive than film mammography in selected populations. Our goal was to prospectively compare cancer detection of digital mammography (DM), whole-breast ultrasound (WBUS), and contrast-enhanced MRI in a high-risk screening population previously screened negative by film screen mammogram (FSM).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: During a 2-year period, 609 asymptomatic high-risk women with nonactionable FSM examinations presented for a prospective multimodality screening consisting of DM, WBUS, and MRI. The FSM examinations were reinterpreted by study radiologists. Patients had benign or no suspicious findings on clinical examination. The cancer yield by modality was evaluated.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Twenty cancers were diagnosed in 18 patients (nine ductal carcinomas in situ and 11 invasive breast cancers). The overall cancer yield on a per-patient basis was 3.0% (18 of 609 patients). The cancer yield by modality was 1.0% for FSM (six of 597 women), 1.2% for DM (seven of 569 women), 0.53% for WBUS (three of 567 women), and 2.1% for MRI (12 of 571 women). Of the 20 cancers detected, some were only detected on one imaging modality (FSM, n = 1; DM, n = 3; WBUS, n = 1; and MRI, n = 8).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The addition of MRI to mammography in the high-risk group has the greatest potential to detect additional mammographically occult cancers. The incremental cancer yield of WBUS and DM is much less.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weinstein, Localio, Conant, Rosen, Thomas, Schnall]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4277</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multimodality Screening of High-Risk Women: A Prospective Cohort Study [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4137v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Prostate Cancer Duration [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4137v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, Pickles, Buyyounouski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:14 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Prostate Cancer Duration [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3675v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Clinical Trial of a Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Encoding, Second-Generation Oncolytic Herpesvirus in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3675v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Treatment options for metastatic melanoma are limited. We conducted this phase II trial to assess the efficacy of JS1/34.5-/47-/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in stages IIIc and IV disease.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Treatment involved intratumoral injection of up to 4 mL of 10<SUP>6</SUP> pfu/mL of JS1/34.5-/47-/GM-CSF followed 3 weeks later by up to 4 mL of 10<SUP>8</SUP> pfu/mL every 2 weeks for up to 24 treatments. Clinical activity (by RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors]), survival, and safety parameters were monitored.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Fifty patients (stages IIIc, n = 10; IVM1a, n = 16; IVM1b, n = 4; IVM1c, n = 20) received a median of six injection sets; 74% of patients had received one or more nonsurgical prior therapies for active disease, including dacarbazine/temozolomide or interleukin-2 (IL-2). Adverse effects were limited primarily to transient flu-like symptoms. The overall response rate by RECIST was 26% (complete response [CR], n = 8; partial response [PR], n = 5), and regression of both injected and distant (including visceral) lesions occurred. Ninety-two percent of the responses had been maintained for 7 to 31 months. Ten additional patients had stable disease (SD) for greater than 3 months, and two additional patients had surgical CR. On an extension protocol, two patients subsequently achieved CR by 24 months (one previously PR, one previously SD), and one achieved surgical CR (previously PR). Overall survival was 58% at 1 year and 52% at 24 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The 26% response rate, with durability in both injected and uninjected lesions including visceral sites, together with the survival rates, are evidence of systemic effectiveness. This effectiveness, combined with a limited toxicity profile, warrants additional evaluation of JS1/34.5-/47-/GM-CSF in metastatic melanoma. A US Food and Drug Administration&ndash;approved phase III investigation is underway.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senzer, Kaufman, Amatruda, Nemunaitis, Reid, Daniels, Gonzalez, Glaspy, Whitman, Harrington, Goldsweig, Marshall, Love, Coffin, Nemunaitis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Clinical Trial of a Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Encoding, Second-Generation Oncolytic Herpesvirus in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2222v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Refining Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: T Stands for Trastuzumab, Tumor Size, and Treatment Strategy [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2222v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burstein, Winer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Refining Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: T Stands for Trastuzumab, Tumor Size, and Treatment Strategy [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0317v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MicroRNAs in Cancer: Small Molecules With a Huge Impact [Biology of Neoplasia]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0317v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P>Every cellular process is likely to be regulated by microRNAs, and an aberrant microRNA expression signature is a hallmark of several diseases, including cancer. MicroRNA expression profiling has indeed provided evidence of the association of these tiny molecules with tumor development and progression. An increasing number of studies have then demonstrated that microRNAs can function as potential oncogenes or oncosuppressor genes, depending on the cellular context and on the target genes they regulate. Here we review our current knowledge about the involvement of microRNAs in cancer and their potential as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iorio, Croce]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0317</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MicroRNAs in Cancer: Small Molecules With a Huge Impact [Biology of Neoplasia]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Biology of Neoplasia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0036v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[False-Positive MIBG Scans With Normal Computed Tomography Imaging In Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0036v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satharasinghe, Trahair, Barbaric, O'Brien, Russell, Cohn, Marshall, Ziegler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[False-Positive MIBG Scans With Normal Computed Tomography Imaging In Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9020v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical Review of the Determination Process by the Japanese Reviewing Authority in Approving the Additional Efficacy of Fludarabine Phosphate [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9020v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narimatsu, Oiso, Ono, Kami]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical Review of the Determination Process by the Japanese Reviewing Authority in Approving the Additional Efficacy of Fludarabine Phosphate [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8592v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8592v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: On the basis of the benefits of frontline radiation in early-stage, extranodal, natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), we conducted a phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by three cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (VIPD).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Thirty patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL received CCRT (ie radiation 40 to 52.8 Gy and cisplatin 30 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> weekly). Three cycles of VIPD (etoposide 100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> days 1 through 3, ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> days 1 through 3, cisplatin 33 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> days 1 through 3, and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1 through 4) were scheduled after CCRT.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: All patients completed CCRT, which resulted in 100% response that included 22 complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs). The CR rate after CCRT was 73.3% (ie, 22 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 57.46 to 89.13). Twenty-six of 30 patients completed the planned three cycles of VIPD, whereas four patients did not because they withdrew (n = 2) or because they had an infection (n = 2). The overall response rate and the CR rate were 83.3% (ie; 25 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 65.28 to 94.36) and 80.0% (ie, 24 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 65.69 to 94.31), respectively. Only one patient experienced grade 3 toxicity during CCRT (nausea), whereas 12 of 29 patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The estimated 3-year, progression-free and overall survival rates were 85.19% (95% CI, 72.48 to 97.90) and 86.28% (95% CI, 73.97 to 98.59), respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL are best treated with frontline CCRT.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Suh, Huh, Lee, Kim, Cho, Lee, Kang, Eom, Pyo, Ahn, Ko, Kim]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:55 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8436v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bilateral Occipital Lobe Invasion in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8436v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kakimoto, Nakazato, Hayashi, Hayashi, Hayashi, Ishiyama, Asada, Ishida]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:44 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bilateral Occipital Lobe Invasion in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5408v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Neurocognitive Functioning in Children Previously Randomly Assigned to Intrathecal Methotrexate Compared With Triple Intrathecal Therapy for the Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5408v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: For the majority of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CNS prophylaxis consists of either intrathecal (IT) methotrexate or triple IT therapy (ie, methotrexate with both cytarabine and hydrocortisone). The long-term neurotoxicities of these two IT strategies have not yet been directly compared.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In this multisite study, 171 children with standard-risk ALL, age 1 to 9.99 years at diagnosis, previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate (n = 82) or to triple IT therapy (n = 89) on CCG 1952, underwent neurocognitive evaluation by a licensed psychologist at a mean of 5.9 years after random assignment.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patients who received IT methotrexate had a mean Processing Speed Index that was 3.6 points lower, about one fourth of a standard deviation, than those who received triple IT therapy (<I>P</I> = .04) after analysis was adjusted for age, sex, and time since diagnosis. Likewise, 19.5% of children in the IT methotrexate group had a Processing Speed Index score in the below-average range compared with 6.9% in the triple IT therapy group (<I>P</I> = .02). Otherwise, the groups performed similarly on tests of full-scale intelligence quotient, academic achievement, attention/concentration, memory, and visual motor integration. The association of treatment with measures of cognitive functioning was not modified by sex or age at diagnosis. In the post-therapy period, there were no group differences in special education services, neurologic events, or use of psychotropic medications.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This study did not show any clinically meaningful differences in neurocognitive functioning between patients previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate or triple IT therapy except for a small difference in processing speed in the IT methotrexate group.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kadan-Lottick, Brouwers, Breiger, Kaleita, Dziura, Northrup, Chen, Nicoletti, Bostrom, Stork, Neglia]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5408</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Neurocognitive Functioning in Children Previously Randomly Assigned to Intrathecal Methotrexate Compared With Triple Intrathecal Therapy for the Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4252v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sorafenib-Induced Bilateral Osteonecrosis of Femoral Heads [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4252v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillet, Walter, Scoazec, Vial, Lombard-Bohas, Dumortier]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4252</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sorafenib-Induced Bilateral Osteonecrosis of Femoral Heads [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2025v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High Risk of Recurrence for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Node-Negative Tumors 1 cm or Smaller [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2025v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the risk of recurrence in women diagnosed with T1a and T1b, node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) &ndash;positive breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We reviewed 965 T1a,bN0M0 breast cancers diagnosed at our institution between 1990 and 2002. Dedicated breast pathologists confirmed HER2 positivity if 3+ by immunohistochemistry or if it had a ratio of 2.0 or greater by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or trastuzumab were excluded. Kaplan-Meier product was used to calculate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant recurrence&ndash;free survival (DRFS). Cox proportional hazard models were fit to determine associations between HER2 status and survival after adjustment for patient and disease characteristics. Additionally, 350 breast cancers from two other institutions were used for validation.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Ten percent of patients had HER2-positive tumors. At a median follow-up of 74 months, there were 72 recurrences. The 5-year RFS rates were 77.1% and 93.7% in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumors, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). The 5-year DRFS rates were 86.4% and 97.2% in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumors, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). In multivariate analysis, patients with HER2-positive tumors had higher risks of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.68; 95% CI, 1.44 to 5.0; <I>P</I> = .002) and distant recurrence (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.23 to 12.62; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) than those with HER2-negative tumors. Patients with HER2-positive tumors had 5.09 times (95% CI, 2.56 to 10.14; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) the rate of recurrences and 7.81 times (95% CI, 3.17 to 19.22; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) the rate of distant recurrences at 5 years compared with patients who had hormone receptor&ndash;positive tumors.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with HER2-positive T1abN0M0 tumors have a significant risk of relapse and should be considered for systemic, anti-HER2, adjuvant therapy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez-Angulo, Litton, Broglio, Meric-Bernstam, Rakkhit, Cardoso, Peintinger, Hanrahan, Sahin, Guray, Larsimont, Feoli, Stranzl, Buchholz, Valero, Theriault, Piccart-Gebhart, Ravdin, Berry, Hortobagyi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High Risk of Recurrence for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Node-Negative Tumors 1 cm or Smaller [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1670v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative Prognostic Value of HPV16 E6 mRNA Compared With In Situ Hybridization for Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1670v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: A significant proportion of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) are associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV), particularly HPV16. The optimal method for HPV determination on archival materials however, remains unclear. We compared a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay for HPV16 mRNA to a DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) method, and evaluated their significance for overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Matched, archival biopsies from 111 patients with OSCC were evaluated for HPV16 using a qRT-PCR for E6 mRNA and ISH for DNA. Immunohistochemistry for p16, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor were also performed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: HPV16 E6 mRNA was positive in 73 (66%) of 111 samples; ISH was positive in 62 of 106 samples (58%), with 86% concordance. P16 was overexpressed in 72 samples (65%), which was strongly associated with HPV16 status by either method. E6 mRNA presence or p16 overexpression were significantly associated with superior OS; E6 mRNA, HPV16 ISH, or p16 were all significantly associated with DFS. On multivariate analysis adjusted for age, stage, and treatment, positive E6 mRNA was the only independent predictor for superior OS; for DFS, p16 expression or HPV16 status determined by either method was significant.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The prevalence of HPV16 in OSCC ranges from 58% to 66%, in a recently treated Canadian cohort. Classification of HPV-positivity by HPV16 E6 mRNA, HPV16 ISH or p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is associated with improved DFS. However, the latter two assays are technically easier to perform; hence, HPV16 ISH or p16 IHC should become standard evaluations for all patients with OSCC.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, Kato, Perez-Ordonez, Pintilie, Huang, Hui, O'Sullivan, Waldron, Cummings, Kim, Ringash, Dawson, Gullane, Siu, Gillison, Liu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative Prognostic Value of HPV16 E6 mRNA Compared With In Situ Hybridization for Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1613v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Breast [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1613v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoimes, Selbst, Shafi, Rose, Rosado]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1613</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Breast [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8239v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Melanoma Prognostic Model Using Tissue Microarrays and Genetic Algorithms [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8239v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: As a result of the questionable risk-to-benefit ratio of adjuvant therapies, stage II melanoma is currently managed by observation because available clinicopathologic parameters cannot identify the 20% to 60% of such patients likely to develop metastatic disease. Here, we propose a multimarker molecular prognostic assay that can help triage patients at increased risk of recurrence.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Protein expression for 38 candidates relevant to melanoma oncogenesis was evaluated using the automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method for immunofluorescence-based immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from a cohort of 192 primary melanomas collected during 1959 to 1994. The prognostic assay was built using a genetic algorithm and validated on an independent cohort of 246 serial primary melanomas collected from 1997 to 2004.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Multiple iterations of the genetic algorithm yielded a consistent five-marker solution. A favorable prognosis was predicted by ATF2 ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of more than &ndash;0.052, p21<SUP>WAF1</SUP> nuclear compartment AQUA score of more than 12.98, p16<SUP>INK4A</SUP> ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of &le; -0.083, &beta;-catenin total AQUA score of more than 38.68, and fibronectin total AQUA score of &le; 57.93. Primary tumors that met at least four of these five conditions were considered a low-risk group, and those that met three or fewer conditions formed a high-risk group (log-rank <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Multivariable proportional hazards analysis adjusting for clinicopathologic parameters shows that the high-risk group has significantly reduced survival on both the discovery (hazard ratio = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.49; <I>P</I> = .002) and validation (hazard ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.58; <I>P</I> = .027) cohorts.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This multimarker prognostic assay, an independent determinant of melanoma survival, might be beneficial in improving the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant therapy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gould Rothberg, Berger, Molinaro, Subtil, Krauthammer, Camp, Bradley, Ariyan, Kluger, Rimm]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8239</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Melanoma Prognostic Model Using Tissue Microarrays and Genetic Algorithms [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7041v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Mortality in Randomized Controlled Trials on Mammography Screening [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7041v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: We assessed changes in advanced cancer incidence and cancer mortality in eight randomized trials of breast cancer screening.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Depending on published data, advanced cancer was defined as cancer &ge; 20 mm in size (four trials), stage II+ (four trials), and &ge; one positive lymph node (one trial). For each trial, we obtained the estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% CI between the intervention and control groups, for both breast cancer mortality and diagnosis of advanced breast cancer. Using a meta-regression approach, log(RR-mortality) was regressed on log(RR-advanced cancer), weighting each trial by the reciprocal of the square of the standard error of log(RR) for mortality.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: RR for advanced breast cancer ranged from 0.69 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.78) in the Swedish Two-County Trial to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.25) in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1 (NBSS-1) trial. Log(RR)s for advanced cancer were highly predictive of log(RR)s for mortality (<I>R</I><SUP>2</SUP> = 0.95; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001), and the linear regression curve had a slope of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.25) after fixing the intercept to zero. The slope changed only slightly after excluding the Two-County Trial and the Canadian NBSS-1 and NBSS-2 trials.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In trials on breast cancer screening, for each unit decrease in incidence of advanced breast cancer, there was an equal decrease in breast cancer mortality. Monitoring of incidence of advanced breast cancer may provide information on the current impact of screening on breast cancer mortality in the general population.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Autier, Hery, Haukka, Boniol, Byrnes]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:16 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Mortality in Randomized Controlled Trials on Mammography Screening [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5151v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients' Supportive Care Needs Beyond the End of Cancer Treatment: A Prospective, Longitudinal Survey [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5151v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To estimate prevalence and severity of patients' self-perceived supportive care needs in the immediate post-treatment phase and identify predictors of unmet need.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal survey was conducted. Sixty-six centers recruited patients for 12 weeks. Patients receiving treatment for the following cancers were recruited: breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Measures of supportive care needs, anxiety and depression, fear of recurrence, and positive and negative affect were completed at the end of treatment (T0) and 6 months later (T1).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 1,850 patients given questionnaire packs, 1,425 (79%) returned questionnaires at T0, and 1,152 (62%) returned questionnaires at T1. Mean age was 61 years; and most respondents were female (69%) and had breast cancer (57%). Most patients had no or few moderate or severe unmet supportive care needs. However, 30% reported more than five unmet needs at baseline, and for 60% of these patients, the situation did not improve. At both assessments, the most frequently endorsed unmet needs were psychological needs and fear of recurrence. Logistic regression revealed several statistically significant predictors of unmet need, including receipt of hormone treatment, negative affect, and experiencing an unrelated significant event between assessments.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Most patients do not express unmet needs for supportive care after treatment. Thirty percent reported more than five moderate or severe unmet needs at both assessments. Unmet needs were predicted by hormone treatment, negative mood, and experiencing a significant event. Our results suggest that there is a proportion of survivors with unmet needs who might benefit from the targeted application of psychosocial resources.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armes, Crowe, Colbourne, Morgan, Murrells, Oakley, Palmer, Ream, Young, Richardson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients' Supportive Care Needs Beyond the End of Cancer Treatment: A Prospective, Longitudinal Survey [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4295v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4295v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Activating mutation of the <I>KRAS</I> oncogene is an established predictive biomarker for resistance to anti&ndash;epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We wanted to determine whether <I>KRAS</I> and/or <I>BRAF</I> mutation is also a predictive biomarker for other aCRC therapies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The Medical Research Council Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS) trial compared treatment sequences including first-line fluorouracil (FU), FU/irinotecan or FU/oxaliplatin in aCRC. Tumor blocks were obtained from 711 consenting patients. DNA was extracted and <I>KRAS</I> codons 12, 13, and 61 and <I>BRAF</I> codon 600 were assessed by pyrosequencing. Mutation (mut) status was assessed first as a prognostic factor and then as a predictive biomarker for the benefit of adding irinotecan or oxaliplatin to FU. The association of <I>BRAF</I>-mut with loss of MLH1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Three hundred eight (43.3%) of 711 patients had <I>KRAS</I>-mut and 56 (7.9%) of 711 had <I>BRAF</I>-mut. Mutation of <I>KRAS</I>, <I>BRAF</I>, or both was present in 360 (50.6%) of 711 patients. Mutation in either <I>KRAS</I> or <I>BRAF</I> was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) but had minimal impact on progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.36; <I>P</I> = .05). Mutation status did not affect the impact of irinotecan or oxaliplatin on PFS or OS. <I>BRAF</I>-mut was weakly associated with loss of MLH1 staining (<I>P</I> = .012).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: <I>KRAS/BRAF</I> mutation is associated with poor prognosis but is not a predictive biomarker for irinotecan or oxaliplatin. There is no evidence that patients with <I>KRAS/BRAF</I> mutated tumors are less likely to benefit from these standard chemotherapy agents.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richman, Seymour, Chambers, Elliott, Daly, Meade, Taylor, Barrett, Quirke]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4295</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3693v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Epoetin Alfa on Survival and Cancer Treatment-Related Anemia and Fatigue in Patients Receiving Radical Radiotherapy With Curative Intent for Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3693v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa on local disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer treatment&ndash;related anemia and fatigue in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radical radiotherapy with curative intent.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (N = 301) with hemoglobin (Hb) less than 15 g/dL were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive radiotherapy plus epoetin alfa (10,000 U subcutaneously [SC] three times weekly if baseline Hb was &lt; 12.5 g/dL; 4,000 U SC three times weekly if baseline Hb &ge; 12.5 g/dL) or radiotherapy alone. Hb levels were monitored weekly. The primary end point was local DFS, defined as the time from random assignment to local disease recurrence or death. Secondary efficacy end points included OS, local tumor response, and local tumor control. Patients were followed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postradiotherapy and annually for 5 years. Cancer treatment&ndash;related anemia and fatigue were evaluated with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck. Adverse events were recorded up to 12 weeks postradiotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Hb levels increased from baseline with epoetin alfa. The median duration of local DFS was not statistically different between groups (observation, 35.42 months; epoetin alfa, 31.47 months; hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.41). Groups did not significantly differ in DFS, OS, tumor outcomes, or cancer treatment&ndash;related anemia or fatigue. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Addition of epoetin alfa to radical radiotherapy did not affect survival, tumor outcomes, anemia, or fatigue positively or negatively in patients with head and neck cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoskin, Robinson, Slevin, Morgan, Harrington, Gaffney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3693</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Epoetin Alfa on Survival and Cancer Treatment-Related Anemia and Fatigue in Patients Receiving Radical Radiotherapy With Curative Intent for Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3370v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Preoperative Gefitinib in Clinical Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3370v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have proven efficacy in advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their role in early-stage NSCLC has not been established. Our purpose was to explore the use of preoperative gefitinib in clinical stage I NSCLC to assess tumor response, toxicity, and clinical and molecular predictors of response.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients received gefitinib 250 mg/d for up to 28 days, followed by mediastinoscopy and surgical resection in an open-label, single-arm study. Tumor response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Blood samples and tumor biopsies were collected and analyzed for transforming growth factor  level, EGFR protein expression, <I>EGFR</I> gene copy number, and <I>EGFR</I> (exon 19 to 21) and <I>KRAS</I> mutations.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Thirty-six patients completed preoperative treatment (median duration, 28 days; range, 27 to 30 days). Median follow-up time is 2.1 years (range, 0.86 to 3.46 years). Three patients experienced grade 3 toxicities (rash, diarrhea, and elevated ALT). Tumors demonstrated EGFR-positive protein expression in 83%, high gene copy number in 59%, <I>EGFR</I> mutations in 17%, and <I>KRAS</I> mutations in 17%. Tumor shrinkage was more frequent among women and nonsmokers. Partial response was seen in four patients (11%), and disease progression was seen in three patients (9%). The strongest predictor of response was <I>EGFR</I> mutation.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Preoperative window therapy with gefitinib is a safe and feasible regimen in early NSCLC and provides a trial design that may better inform predictors of treatment response or sensitivity.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lara-Guerra, Waddell, Salvarrey, Joshua, Chung, Paul, Boerner, Sakurada, Ludkovski, Ma, Squire, Liu, Shepherd, Tsao, Leighl]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3370</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Preoperative Gefitinib in Clinical Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1507v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the Mechanisms Behind Trastuzumab Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1507v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Targeted therapy with the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has become a mainstay for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) &ndash;positive breast cancer (BC). The mechanisms of action of trastuzumab have not been fully elucidated, and data available to date are reviewed here. The impact of the mechanisms of action on clinical benefit also is discussed.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: An extensive literature review of trastuzumab and proposed mechanisms of action was performed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At least five potential extracellular and intracellular antitumor mechanisms of trastuzumab have been identified in the preclinical setting. These include activation of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, inhibition of extracellular domain cleavage, abrogation of intracellular signaling, reduction of angiogenesis, and decreased DNA repair. These effects lead to tumor cell stasis and/or death. Clinical benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy in both early and advanced BC has been demonstrated. The benefit of trastuzumab use beyond progression has also been shown, which indicates the need for continuous suppression of the HER2 pathway. Targeting both HER2, with various approaches, and other pathways may enhance the clinical benefit observed with trastuzumab and overcome potential resistance. Novel combinations include pertuzumab (a HER2 dimerization inhibitor), lapatinib (a HER1/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor), bevacizumab (an antiangiogenic agent), tanespimycin (a heat shock protein inhibitor), antiestrogen therapies, and an antibody-drug conjugate (trastuzumab-DM1).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Trastuzumab is the foundation of care for patients with HER2-positive BC. Emerging data from studies of other targeted agents may provide alternative treatment combinations to maximize the clinical benefit from trastuzumab and prevent or delay resistance. The continued development of trastuzumab highlights promising treatment approaches for the future.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spector, Blackwell]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1507</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the Mechanisms Behind Trastuzumab Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0962v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients With Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0962v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To assess the prognostic role of <I>HER2</I> overexpression/amplification in patients with node-negative, pT1a-b breast cancers.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: All patients with <I>HER2</I>-positive breast cancer were identified among a population of 2,130 patients whose diseases were staged as pT1a-b, pN0 and who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology from 1999 to 2006. A matched cohort was selected by using variables of hormone receptor status, age, and year of surgery. We estimated rates of local and distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two groups.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: We identified 150 consecutive patients with pT1a-b, pN0, <I>HER2</I>-positive tumors. No patient received adjuvant trastuzumab. The median follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 1.0 to 9.0 years). In the hormone receptor&ndash;positive group, 5-year DFS rates were 99% (95% CI, 96% to 100%) for <I>HER2</I>-negative disease and 92% (95% CI, 86% to 99%) for <I>HER2</I>-positive disease. In the hormone receptor&ndash;negative group, 5-year DFS rates were 92% (95% CI, 84% to 100%) for <I>HER2</I>-negative disease and 91% (95% CI, 84% to 99%) for <I>HER2</I>-positive disease. Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) associated with <I>HER2</I> overexpression was 2.4 (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.5; <I>P</I> = .09). After analysis was adjusted for pT1 stage, hormone receptor&ndash;positive disease with <I>HER2</I>-positive status was associated with a worse prognosis (HR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 25.7). OS in <I>HER2</I>-positive, pT1a-b, pN0 breast cancer was similar irrespective of the hormone receptor status (<I>P</I> = .93).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with node-negative, <I>HER2</I> positive, pT1a-b breast cancer have a low risk of recurrence at 5 years of follow-up. In patients with hormone receptor&ndash;positive disease and pT1a-b, N0 tumors, <I>HER2</I> overexpression was associated with a worse DFS.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curigliano, Viale, Bagnardi, Fumagalli, Locatelli, Rotmensz, Ghisini, Colleoni, Munzone, Veronesi, Zurrida, Nole, Goldhirsch]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0962</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients With Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9766v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy With In Situ RRM1 and ERCC1 Protein Levels for Response Prediction in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9766v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: We evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) of 2 and assessed if tumoral RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels are predictive of response to therapy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A randomized phase III trial was conducted in community-based oncology practices. Tumor specimens were collected a priori and shipped to a single laboratory for blinded determination of in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein expression levels by an automated quantitative immunofluorescent-based technology.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: One hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned. Overall median survival was 5.1 months for gemcitabine and 6.7 months for gemcitabine and carboplatin (<I>P</I> = .24). RRM1 (range, 5.3 to 105.6; median, 34.1) and ERCC1 (range, 5.2 to 131.3; median, 34.7) values were significantly and inversely correlated with disease response (<I>r</I> = -0.41; <I>P</I> = .001 for RRM1; <I>r</I> = -0.39; <I>P</I> = .003 for ERCC1; ie, response was better for patients with low levels of expression). A model for response prediction that included RRM1, ERCC1, and treatment arm, was highly predictive of the treatment response observed (<I>P</I> = .0005). We did not find statistically significant associations between survival and RRM1 or ERCC1 levels.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC and poor PS. Quantitative analysis of RRM1 and ERCC1 protein expression in routinely collected tumor specimens in community oncology practices is predictive of response to gemcitabine and gemcitabine and carboplatin therapy. Oncologists should consider including in situ expression analysis for these proteins into their therapeutic decisions.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reynolds, Obasaju, Schell, Li, Zheng, Boulware, Caton, DeMarco, O'Rourke, Shaw Wright, Boehm, Asmar, Bromund, Peng, Monberg, Bepler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:02 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9766</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy With In Situ RRM1 and ERCC1 Protein Levels for Response Prediction in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1763v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Extracellular Domain in Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in a Randomized Phase III Study [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1763v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) is enzymatically cleaved from the cell membrane. Shed ECD in serum has been studied as both prognostic and predictive markers. Lapatinib is a dual inhibitor of HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. We examined the prognostic and predictive role of HER2 ECD in a randomized trial of paclitaxel with placebo or lapatinib in women with HER2-negative or -unknown breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (n = 579) with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were randomly assigned to paclitaxel with placebo or lapatinib. HER2 status was determined centrally. ECD was centrally measured by enzyme linked immunoassay in available samples at baseline (b; n = 472), week 9, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Results were correlated to overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Elevated baseline ECD (bECD) levels (&ge; 16 ng/mL) did not predict HER2 tumor status (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 75%). In HER2-negative tumors, elevated bECD was not correlated with improved efficacy for lapatinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel (ORR: odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.1 to 3.8; <I>P</I> = .365; PFS: hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.47; <I>P</I> = .797). ECD levels tended to decrease over time when bECD was elevated. ECD conversion from low to high was associated with worse PFS. Converting from high to low was associated with a better PFS. A consistently low ECD level had better PFS than a consistently elevated ECD. All associations were found to be independent of lapatinib.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: HER2 bECD does not predict lapatinib benefit in patients with HER2-negative MBC. Changes in ECD status correlates with patient outcome regardless of treatment given. Measuring HER2 ECD is not currently recommended for predicting benefit to lapatinib.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finn, Gagnon, Di Leo, Press, Arbushites, Koehler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:44:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1763</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Extracellular Domain in Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in a Randomized Phase III Study [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7588v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of Screening Principles to the Reconstructed Breast [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7588v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P>A significant number of women choose mastectomy for the treatment of early and locally advanced breast cancer. Advances in reconstruction techniques and greater awareness of options have led to an increased use of immediate breast reconstruction, which has resulted in uncertainty for the management of surveillance for local recurrence. In this article, we review mastectomy and reconstruction trends and how these techniques affect the frequency and location of local recurrence. The data on surveillance imaging of the reconstructed breast are extremely limited. However, by assessing the potential role for imaging in this setting and applying the principles of screening, we have identified that there is a potential theoretic advantage of surveillance imaging in a very small subset of women: those with autologous tissue reconstructions and moderate to high risk of recurrence. A prospective registry study of surveillance imaging in this target population would be the appropriate way to determine its benefit and its impact on survival outcomes. In this review article, we will detail the reasons that should allow clinicians to forego routine surveillance imaging in the majority of women who undergo mastectomy and reconstruction.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakhireh, Fowble, Esserman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7588</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of Screening Principles to the Reconstructed Breast [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6796v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR Status in Determining Benefit From Cetuximab Therapy in Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6796v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: The occurrence of <I>KRAS</I> mutation is predictive of nonresponse and shorter survival in patients treated by anti&ndash;epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), leading the European Medicine Agency to limit its use to patients with wild-type <I>KRAS</I> tumors. However, only half of these patients will benefit from treatment, suggesting the need to identify additional biomarkers for cetuximab-based treatment efficacy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We retrospectively collected tumors from 173 patients with mCRC. All but one patient received a cetuximab-based regimen as second-line or greater therapy. <I>KRAS</I> and <I>BRAF</I> status were assessed by allelic discrimination. EGFR amplification was assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescent in situ hybridization, and the expression of PTEN was assessed by immunochemistry.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In patients with <I>KRAS</I> wild-type tumors (n = 116), <I>BRAF</I> mutations (n = 5) were weakly associated with lack of response (<I>P</I> = .063) but were strongly associated with shorter progression-free survival (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) and shorter overall survival (OS; <I>P</I> &lt; .001). A high EGFR polysomy or an EGFR amplification was found in 17.7% of the patients and was associated with response (<I>P</I> = .015). PTEN null expression was found in 19.9% of the patients and was associated with shorter OS (<I>P</I> = .013). In multivariate analysis, <I>BRAF</I> mutation and PTEN expression status were associated with OS.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: <I>BRAF</I> status, <I>EGFR</I> amplification, and cytoplasmic expression of PTEN were associated with outcome measures in <I>KRAS</I> wild-type patients treated with a cetuximab-based regimen. Subsequent studies in clinical trial cohorts will be required to confirm the clinical utility of these markers.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurent-Puig, Cayre, Manceau, Buc, Bachet, Lecomte, Rougier, Lievre, Landi, Boige, Ducreux, Ychou, Bibeau, Bouche, Reid, Stone, Penault-Llorca]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:43 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6796</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR Status in Determining Benefit From Cetuximab Therapy in Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4577v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide With Either Docetaxel or Vinorelbine, With or Without Trastuzumab, As Adjuvant Treatments of Breast Cancer: Final Results of the FinHer Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4577v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Docetaxel has not been compared with vinorelbine as adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Efficacy and long-term safety of a short course of adjuvant trastuzumab administered concomitantly with chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (<I>HER2</I>) &ndash;positive cancer are unknown.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: One thousand ten women with axillary node&ndash;positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of docetaxel or vinorelbine, followed in both groups by three cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC). Women with <I>HER2</I>-positive cancer (n = 232) were further assigned to either receive or not receive trastuzumab for 9 weeks with docetaxel or vinorelbine. The median follow-up time was 62 months after random assignment.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Women assigned to docetaxel had better distant disease&ndash;free survival (DDFS) than those assigned to vinorelbine (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.91; <I>P</I> = .010). In the subgroup of <I>HER2</I>-positive disease, patients treated with trastuzumab tended to have better DDFS than those treated with chemotherapy only (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.12; <I>P</I> = .12; with adjustment for presence of axillary nodal metastases, HR = 0.57; <I>P</I> = .047). In exploratory analyses, docetaxel, trastuzumab, and FEC improved DDFS compared with docetaxel plus FEC (HR = 0.32; <I>P</I> = .029) and vinorelbine, trastuzumab, and FEC (HR = 0.31; <I>P</I> = .020). The median left ventricular ejection fraction of trastuzumab-treated patients remained unaltered during the 5-year follow-up; only one woman treated with trastuzumab was diagnosed with a heart failure.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Adjuvant treatment with docetaxel improves DDFS compared with vinorelbine. A brief course of trastuzumab administered concomitantly with docetaxel is safe and effective and warrants further evaluation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joensuu, Bono, Kataja, Alanko, Kokko, Asola, Utriainen, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Jyrkkio, Moykkynen, Helle, Ingalsuo, Pajunen, Huusko, Salminen, Auvinen, Leinonen, Leinonen, Isola, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:29 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide With Either Docetaxel or Vinorelbine, With or Without Trastuzumab, As Adjuvant Treatments of Breast Cancer: Final Results of the FinHer Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8306v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[One-Year Outcomes of a Behavioral Therapy Intervention Trial on Sleep Quality and Cancer-Related Fatigue [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8306v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine 1-year outcomes of a four-component behavioral therapy (BT) sleep intervention (Individualized Sleep Promotion Plan [ISPP]) versus a healthy eating control (HEC) on cancer-related fatigue in women receiving breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (CTX).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A total of 219 participants from 12 oncology clinics were randomly assigned in a clinical trial. Before CTX, research nurses coached intervention participants to develop a BT plan including stimulus control, modified sleep restriction, relaxation therapy, and sleep hygiene. BT plans were revised before each CTX and 30, 60, and 90 days after the last CTX and reinforced 7 to 9 days later. HEC participants received nutritional information and equal attention. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Daily Diary, Wrist Actigraph, and Piper Fatigue Scale measures and Repeated Linear Mixed Model analysis following the Intent to Treat paradigm were used.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Sleep quality differed over 1 years time (F [4,162] = 7.7, <I>P</I> &lt; .001; by group, F [1,173] = 4.8, <I>P</I> = .029; and over time by group, F [4,162] = 3.3, <I>P</I> = .013). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between groups at 90 days (<I>P</I> = .002) but not at 1 year (<I>P</I> = .052). Seven days of diary and actigraphy data did not corroborate with monthly reflections (PSQI). The night awakenings (Actigraph) pattern was significantly different by group over time (<I>P</I> = .046), with no differences between groups at 90 days or at 1 year. Fatigue was lower at 1 year than before CTX; no group effects were found.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The BT group, on average, experienced significant improvement on global sleep quality compared with the HEC group, but not on objective sleep or fatigue outcomes.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berger, Kuhn, Farr, Von Essen, Chamberlain, Lynch, Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[One-Year Outcomes of a Behavioral Therapy Intervention Trial on Sleep Quality and Cancer-Related Fatigue [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.18.8821v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Papillary Histology Renal Cell Cancer: SWOG S0317 [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.18.8821v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Patients with advanced papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC) have poor survival after systemic therapy; the reported median survival time is 7 to 17 months. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced pRCC, a tumor type associated with wild-type von Hippel Lindau gene.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with histologically confirmed, advanced, or metastatic pRCC were treated with erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily. A RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) response rate (RR) of &ge; 20% was considered a promising outcome. Secondary end points included overall survival and 6-month probability of treatment failure.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 52 patients registered, 45 were evaluable. The overall RR was 11% (five of 45 patients; 95% CI, 3% to 24%), and the disease control rate was 64% (ie five partial response and 24 stable disease). The median overall survival time was 27 months (95% CI, 13 to 36 months). Probability of freedom from treatment failure at 6 months was 29% (95% CI, 17% to 42%). There was one grade 5 adverse event (AE) of pneumonitis, one grade 4 thrombosis, and nine other grade 3 AEs.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Although the RECIST RR of 11% did not exceed prespecified estimates for additional study, single-agent erlotinib yielded disease control and survival outcomes of interest with an expected toxicity profile. The design of future trials of the EGFR axis in pRCC should be based on preclinical or molecular data that define appropriate patient subgroups, new drug combinations, or potentially more active alternative schedules.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon, Hussey, Nagle, Lara, Mack, Dutcher, Samlowski, Clark, Quinn, Pan, Crawford]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:07 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8821</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Papillary Histology Renal Cell Cancer: SWOG S0317 [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4284v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to R. Memmott et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4284v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodwin, Ligibel, Stambolic]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:51:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4284</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to R. Memmott et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3963v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LKB1 and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin As Predictive Factors for the Anticancer Efficacy of Metformin [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3963v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memmott, Dennis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:51:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3963</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LKB1 and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin As Predictive Factors for the Anticancer Efficacy of Metformin [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1652v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The Story of the Other Side [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1652v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garber, Golshan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:51:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1652</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The Story of the Other Side [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1371v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Hardest Job in Medicine [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1371v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Hardest Job in Medicine [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0860v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to G. Ferretti et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0860v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludwig, Fleishman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0860</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to G. Ferretti et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8542v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Call for Clarity in the Reporting of Benefit Associated With Anticancer Therapies [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8542v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Booth, Ohorodnyk, Eisenhauer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8542</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Call for Clarity in the Reporting of Benefit Associated With Anticancer Therapies [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to L.H. Jensen et al and S. Jahn et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hampel, Frankel, de la Chapelle]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:19 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to L.H. Jensen et al and S. Jahn et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6744v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular Screening for Lynch Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6744v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jensen, Lindebjerg, Kolvraa, Cruger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6744</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular Screening for Lynch Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6454v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Darbepoetin Alfa and History of Thromboembolic Events [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6454v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferretti, Felici, Cognetti]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:59 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6454</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Darbepoetin Alfa and History of Thromboembolic Events [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6033v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Vazquez-Martin et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6033v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodwin, Ligibel, Stambolic]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Vazquez-Martin et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5456v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[If Mammalian Target of Metformin Indirectly Is Mammalian Target of Rapamycin, Then the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Axis Will Audit the Efficacy of Metformin in Cancer Clinical Trials [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5456v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vazquez-Martin, Oliveras-Ferraros, Del Barco, Martin-Castillo, Menendez]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5456</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[If Mammalian Target of Metformin Indirectly Is Mammalian Target of Rapamycin, Then the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Axis Will Audit the Efficacy of Metformin in Cancer Clinical Trials [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5233v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Thiele et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5233v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, Bareford, Erber, Wilkins, Wright, Buck, Wheatley, Harrison, Green]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Thiele et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3808v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Treat Pelvic Nodes or Not: Could the Greater Testicular Scatter Dose From Whole Pelvic Fields Confound Results of Prostate Cancer Trials? [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3808v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[King, Kapp]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3808</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Treat Pelvic Nodes or Not: Could the Greater Testicular Scatter Dose From Whole Pelvic Fields Confound Results of Prostate Cancer Trials? [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3485v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bone Marrow Fibrosis and Diagnosis of Essential Thrombocythemia [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3485v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thiele, Kvasnicka, Vardiman, Orazi, Franco, Gisslinger, Birgegard, Griesshammer, Tefferi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3485</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bone Marrow Fibrosis and Diagnosis of Essential Thrombocythemia [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2446v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2446v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Both gemcitabine (GEM) and fluoropyrimidines are valuable treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. This open-label study was designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients randomly assigned to GEM alone or GEM plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with previously untreated histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas with a performance status &le; 2 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to GEM or GEM-CAP. The primary outcome measure was survival. Meta-analysis of published studies was also conducted.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Between May 2002 and January 2005, 533 patients were randomly assigned to GEM (n = 266) and GEM-CAP (n = 267) arms. GEM-CAP significantly improved objective response rate (19.1% <I>v</I> 12.4%; <I>P</I> = .034) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; <I>P</I> = .004) and was associated with a trend toward improved OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; <I>P</I> = .08) compared with GEM alone. This trend for OS benefit for GEM-CAP was consistent across different prognostic subgroups according to baseline stratification factors (stage and performance status) and remained after adjusting for these stratification factors (<I>P</I> = .077). Moreover, the meta-analysis of two additional studies involving 935 patients showed a significant survival benefit in favor of GEM-CAP (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.98; <I>P</I> = .02) with no intertrial heterogeneity.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: On the basis of our trial and the meta-analysis, GEM-CAP should be considered as one of the standard first-line options in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunningham, Chau, Stocken, Valle, Smith, Steward, Harper, Dunn, Tudur-Smith, West, Falk, Crellin, Adab, Thompson, Leonard, Ostrowski, Eatock, Scheithauer, Herrmann, Neoptolemos]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:47 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9798v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to F. Puglisi [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9798v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9798</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to F. Puglisi [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9467v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Does Similarity Mean in Clinical Trials? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9467v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Puglisi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9467</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Does Similarity Mean in Clinical Trials? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7545v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Cisplatin Plus Etoposide and Bevacizumab for Previously Untreated, Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3501 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7545v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus cisplatin and etoposide in patients with extensive-stage disease, small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In this phase II trial, 63 patients were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg plus cisplatin 60 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and etoposide 120 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, which was followed by bevacizumab alone until death or disease progression occurred. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive at 6 months without disease progression (ie, progression-free survival [PFS]). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and toxicity. Correlative studies were performed to explore the relationship between baseline and changes in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble cell adhesion molecules (ie, vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM], intercellular cell adhesion molecule [ICAM], and E-selectin) and basic fibroblast growth factor and outcome.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The 6-month PFS was 30.2%, the median PFS was 4.7 months, and OS was 10.9 months. The response rate was 63.5%. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (57.8%). Only one patient had grade 3 pulmonary hemorrhage. Patients who had high baseline VCAM had a higher risk of progression or death compared with those who had low baseline VCAM levels. No relationships between outcome and any other biomarkers were seen.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin and etoposide in patients with ED-SCLC results in improved PFS and OS relative to historical controls who received this chemotherapy regimen without bevacizumab. This regimen appears to be well tolerated and has minimal increase in toxicities compared with chemotherapy alone. Baseline VCAM levels predicted survival, but no other relationships among treatment, biomarkers, and outcome were identified.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horn, Dahlberg, Sandler, Dowlati, Moore, Murren, Schiller]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Cisplatin Plus Etoposide and Bevacizumab for Previously Untreated, Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3501 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7461v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Solitary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the Vocal Cord in an Adolescent [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7461v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanan, Redner, Atlas, Marin, Kadkade, Bandovic, Jaffe]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Solitary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the Vocal Cord in an Adolescent [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7420v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of Life Supersedes the Classic Prognosticators for Long-Term Survival in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of RTOG 9801 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7420v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine the added value of quality of life (QOL) as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG-9801.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Two hundred forty-three patients with stage II/IIIAB NSCLC received induction paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) and then concurrent weekly PC and hyperfractionated radiation (to 69.6 Gy). Patients were randomly assigned to amifostine (AM) or no AM during chemoradiotherapy. The following pretreatment factors were analyzed as prognostic factors for OS: Karnofsky performance status, stage, sex, age, race, marital status, histology, tumor location, hemoglobin, tobacco use, treatment arm (AM <I>v</I> no AM) and QOL scores (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 [QLQ-C30] and Lung Cancer 13 [LC-13]). A multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards model was performed using a backwards selection process.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of the 239 analyzable patients, 91% had a baseline global QOL score. Median follow-up time was 59 months for patients still alive and 17 months for all patients. Median baseline QLQ-C30 global QOL score was 66.7 on both treatment arms. Whether the global QOL score was treated as a dichotomized variable (based on the median score) or a continuous variable, all other variables fell out of the MVA for OS. Patients with a global QOL score less than 66.7 had an approximately 70% higher rate of death than patients with scores &ge; 66.7 (<I>P</I> = .004). A 10-point higher baseline global QOL score corresponded to a decrease in the hazard of death by approximately 10% (<I>P</I> = .004). The other independent QOL predictors for OS were the QLQ-C30 physical functioning (<I>P</I> = .011) and LC-13 dyspnea scores (<I>P</I> = .012).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In this analysis, baseline global QOL score replaced known prognostic factors as the sole predictor of long-term OS for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Movsas, Moughan, Sarna, Langer, Werner-Wasik, Nicolaou, Komaki, Machtay, Wasserman, Bruner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7420</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of Life Supersedes the Classic Prognosticators for Long-Term Survival in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of RTOG 9801 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6901v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bladder Cancer: Narrowing the Gap Between Evidence and Practice [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6901v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hussain, Wood, Bajorin, Bochner, Dreicer, Lamm, O'Donnell, Siefker-Radtke, Theodorescu, Dinney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6901</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bladder Cancer: Narrowing the Gap Between Evidence and Practice [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6067v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the Combined Effect of Comorbidity and Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics on the Risk of Death in Men After Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6067v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: We examined whether time-dependent continuous prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity at recurrence was associated with all cause mortality (ACM) adjusting for comorbidity levels among men treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone with or without androgen suppression therapy (AST) in the setting of a randomized controlled trial.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: From 1995 to 2001, 206 men with localized, unfavorable prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive RT alone or RT and AST combined. Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between PSA velocity at recurrence and ACM, adjusting for known prostate cancer prognostic factors, including Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 comorbidity level.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: With a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 89 biochemical recurrences and 74 ACM deaths occurred. Among all patients, higher PSA velocity was associated with increased ACM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.44; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) after adjusting for age, treatment arm, comorbidity score, and salvage AST. For 89 patients with biochemical recurrence, increasing PSA velocity at recurrence (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.09; <I>P</I> &le; .001) and moderate to severe comorbidity score (HR, 7.94; 95% CI, 1.55 to 40.52; <I>P</I> = .01) were associated with increased ACM. PSA velocity at recurrence was associated with significantly higher risk of ACM among patients with no or minimal comorbidity (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), but not moderate to severe comorbidity (<I>P</I> = .12).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Rapid PSA velocity at recurrence is significantly associated with an increased risk of ACM among patients with no or minimal comorbidity but not moderate to severe comorbidity. These findings support judicious use of salvage AST, particularly in men with moderate to severe comorbidities, where prospective surveillance protocols are needed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wo, Chen, Nguyen, Renshaw, Loffredo, Kantoff, D'Amico]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:33 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the Combined Effect of Comorbidity and Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics on the Risk of Death in Men After Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4468v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Left Thumb [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4468v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Longo, Castellana, Gasparini]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4468</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Left Thumb [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3098v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changing the Paradigm in Conducting Randomized Clinical Studies in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An Opportunity for Better Clinical Development [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3098v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabernero, Macarulla]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:18 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changing the Paradigm in Conducting Randomized Clinical Studies in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An Opportunity for Better Clinical Development [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2280v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do Male Lymphoma Survivors Have Impaired Sexual Function? [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2280v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Sexual function in male lymphoma survivors was examined and compared with that of age-matched controls.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: This cross-sectional study included serum gonadal hormone levels (testosterone, sex hormone&ndash;binding globulin, luteinizing hormone [LH], and follicle-stimulating hormone) and responses to questionnaires assessing sexual function (Brief Sexual Function Inventory [BSFI]), socioeconomic factors, quality of life, emotional distress, and fatigue. The lymphoma group included 246 men &le; 50 years old at diagnosis who were diagnosed from 1980 to 2002 and treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. For each lymphoma survivor, two age-matched controls (n = 492) were drawn from a normative sample with BSFI scores.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The lymphoma survivors had a mean age at survey of 47.4 years, the mean duration of follow-up was 14.8 years, and 79% lived in committed relationships. All BSFI domain scores decreased significantly with age. Lymphoma survivors having low testosterone and/or elevated LH had lower BSFI scores than survivors with normal gonadal hormones. Multivariate analyses showed that increasing age, more emotional distress, poor physical health, and low testosterone and/or elevated LH were significantly associated with reduced sexual function within the lymphoma group. Lymphoma survivors had significantly lower BSFI domain scores than did controls on erection, ejaculation, and sexual satisfaction.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Lymphoma survivors had significantly poorer sexual function than normative controls. It is unclear whether the abnormal hormone levels directly cause the reduced sexual function within the lymphoma group or if a mediating factor is involved, such as aging, emotional distress, or perceived health status.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiserud, Schover, Dahl, Fossa, Bjoro, Loge, Holte, Yuan, Fossa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:09 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2280</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do Male Lymphoma Survivors Have Impaired Sexual Function? [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9054v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Personalized Cancer Therapy With Selective Kinase Inhibitors: An Emerging Paradigm in Medical Oncology [Biology of Neoplasia]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9054v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P>Selective kinase inhibitors have emerged as an important class of anticancer agents, with demonstrated clinical efficacy and generally favorable toxicity profiles in several common disease settings where conventional treatments have previously provided only modest benefit. Consequently, a substantial effort is now underway to identify additional therapeutically relevant kinase targets and to develop and test inhibitors of those proteins in a variety of human malignancies. However, it has also become clear that the clinical benefit associated with these agents is typically limited to a subset of treated patients, who in many cases are defined by a specific genomic lesion within their tumor cells&mdash;frequently, an activating mutation within the gene encoding the target kinase. This discovery has prompted efforts to stratify patients before treatment with kinase inhibitors based on specific genomic biomarkers, with the goal of optimizing clinical outcomes through the effective personalization of treatment (ie, matching the right patients with the right therapies). With recent advances in our understanding of the relationship between tumor genotypes and cancer cell sensitivity to kinase inhibition, together with improved technologies for rapidly genotyping tumor biopsies for relevant lesions, the implementation of personalized cancer care with this exciting new class of inhibitors is now becoming a reality. In this review, we summarize recent developments in this area, and we highlight some of the logistical challenges posed by this emerging paradigm in medical oncology.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McDermott, Settleman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Personalized Cancer Therapy With Selective Kinase Inhibitors: An Emerging Paradigm in Medical Oncology [Biology of Neoplasia]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Biology of Neoplasia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7942v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tracheal Glomangioma in a Patient With Asthma and Chest Pain [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7942v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker, Zervos, Donington, Shukla, Bizekis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7942</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tracheal Glomangioma in a Patient With Asthma and Chest Pain [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7504v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Multicenter Trial of Anthracycline Rechallenge With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide for First-Line Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Adjuvant Anthracyclines [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7504v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Anthracyclines are a component of breast cancer chemotherapy regimens in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Anthracycline rechallenge for metastatic disease, for those previously exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines, may not be considered because of concerns about efficacy, tolerability, and cumulative cardiotoxicity.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial examined the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) 35 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> as first-line therapy, delivered every 3 weeks, in 70 patients who developed metastatic disease more than 12 months after completion of an adjuvant anthracycline-containing regimen. Seven patients discontinued treatment early and were excluded from the efficacy analysis.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: After a median of six cycles, the objective response rate was 38%. An additional 33% of patients achieved stable disease lasting more than 6 months, for an overall clinical benefit rate of 71%. The estimated median time to progression was 12.2 months. Median overall survival time was 16.5 months. Clinical response was equally robust in patients with and without prior taxane exposure. Treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 10%), dyspnea (9%), and neutropenia (9%). One (1.4%) of 70 patients discontinued treatment as a result of PPE. One patient (1.4%) experienced an infusion reaction requiring discontinuation. No symptomatic cardiac events were observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: PLD plus cyclophosphamide is effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received prior adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The majority of patients experienced a clinical benefit without any significant impact on cardiac function.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trudeau, Clemons, Provencher, Panasci, Yelle, Rayson, Latreille, Vandenberg, Goel, Zibdawi, Rahim, Pouliot]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7504</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Multicenter Trial of Anthracycline Rechallenge With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide for First-Line Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Adjuvant Anthracyclines [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6258v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative PCR Analysis for Bcl-2/IgH in a Phase III Study of Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan As Consolidation of First Remission in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6258v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The randomized First-Line Indolent Trial (FIT) was conducted in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL), to evaluate the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 (<SUP>90</SUP>Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan given as consolidation of complete or partial remission. This study of minimal residual disease was undertaken in parallel, to determine the rate of conversion from <I>bcl-2</I> polymerase chain reaction (PCR) &ndash;detectable to &ndash;undetectable status and the corresponding effect on progression-free survival (PFS).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Blood samples from 414 patients (<SUP>90</SUP>Y-ibritumomab, n = 208; control, n = 206) were evaluated using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR); 186 were found to have the <I>bcl-2</I> rearrangement and were thus eligible for inclusion in the RQ-PCR analysis.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall, 90% of treated patients converted from <I>bcl-2</I> PCR&ndash;detectable to &ndash;undetectable disease status, compared with 36% in the control group. Treatment significantly prolonged median PFS in patients converting to <I>bcl-2</I> PCR-undetectable status (40.8 <I>v</I> 24.0 months in the control group; <I>P</I> &lt; .01, hazard ratio [HR], 0.399). In patients who had <I>bcl-2</I> PCR-detectable disease at random assignment, treatment significantly prolonged median PFS (38.4 <I>v</I> 8.2 months in the control group; <I>P</I> &lt; .01, HR, 0.293).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Eradication of PCR-detectable disease occurred more frequently after treatment with <SUP>90</SUP>Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and was associated with prolongation of PFS.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goff, Summers, Iqbal, Kuhlmann, Kunz, Louton, Hagenbeek, Morschhauser, Putz, Lister, Rohatiner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:18 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative PCR Analysis for Bcl-2/IgH in a Phase III Study of Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan As Consolidation of First Remission in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2547v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age-Specific Differences in Oncogenic Pathway Dysregulation and Anthracycline Sensitivity in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2547v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To define the biology driving the aggressive nature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Clinically annotated microarray data from 425 patients with newly diagnosed de novo AML from two publicly available data sets were analyzed after age-specific cohorts (young &le; 45 years, n = 175; elderly &ge; 55 years; n = 144) were prospectively identified. Gene expression analysis was conducted utilizing gene set enrichment analysis, and by applying previously defined and tested signature profiles reflecting dysregulation of oncogenic signaling pathways, altered tumor environment, and signatures of chemotherapy sensitivity.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Elderly AML patients as expected had worse overall survival and event-free survival compared with younger patients. Analysis of oncogenic pathways revealed that older patients had higher probability of RAS, Src, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway activation (all <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Older patients were also less sensitive to anthracycline compared with younger patients with AML (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Hierarchical clustering revealed that younger AML patients in cluster 2 had clinically worse survival, with high RAS, Src, and TNF pathway activation and in turn were less sensitive to anthracycline compared with patients in cluster 1. However, among elderly patients with AML, those in cluster 1 also demonstrated high RAS, Src, and TNF pathway activation but this did not translate into differences in survival or anthracycline sensitivity.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: AML in the elderly represents a distinct biologic entity characterized by unique patterns of deregulated signaling pathway variations that contributes to poor survival and anthracycline resistance. These insights should enable development and adjustments of clinically meaningful treatment strategies in the older patient population.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rao, Valk, Metzeler, R. Acharya, Tuchman, Stevenson, Rizzieri, Delwel, Buske, Bohlander, Potti, Lowenberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2547</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age-Specific Differences in Oncogenic Pathway Dysregulation and Anthracycline Sensitivity in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2232v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[VMP (Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone) Is Active and Well Tolerated in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Moderately Impaired Renal Function, and Results in Reversal of Renal Impairment: Cohort Analysis of the Phase III VISTA Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2232v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To assess bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) and melphalan and prednisone (MP) in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with renal impairment enrolled on the phase III VISTA study, and to evaluate renal impairment reversibility.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients received nine 6-week cycles of VMP (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, melphalan 9 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, prednisone 60 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>) or MP. Patients with serum creatinine higher than 2 mg/dL were excluded.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In the VMP/MP arms, 6%/4%, 27%/30%, and 67%/66% of patients had baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of &le; 30, 31 to 50, and higher than 50 mL/min, respectively. Response rates were higher and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) longer with VMP versus MP across renal cohorts. Response rates with VMP and TTP in both arms did not appear significantly different between patients with GFR &le; 50 or higher than 50 mL/min; OS appeared somewhat longer in patients with normal renal function in both arms. Renal impairment reversal (baseline GFR &lt; 50 improving to &gt; 60 mL/min) was seen in 49 (44%) of 111 patients receiving VMP versus 40 (34%) of 116 patients receiving MP. By multivariate analysis, younger age (&lt; 75 years; <I>P</I> = .006) and less severe impairment (GFR &ge; 30 mL/min; <I>P</I> = .027) were associated with higher reversal rates. In addition, treatment with VMP approached significance (<I>P</I> = .07). In both arms, rates of grade 4 and 5 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs appeared higher in patients with renal impairment; with VMP, rates of discontinuations/bortezomib dose reductions due to AEs did not appear affected.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: VMP is a feasible, active, and well-tolerated treatment option for previously untreated patients with MM with moderate renal impairment, resulting in 44% renal impairment reversal.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimopoulos, Richardson, Schlag, Khuageva, Shpilberg, Kastritis, Kropff, Petrucci, Delforge, Alexeeva, Schots, Masszi, Mateos, Deraedt, Liu, Cakana, van de Velde, San Miguel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:45:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2232</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[VMP (Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone) Is Active and Well Tolerated in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Moderately Impaired Renal Function, and Results in Reversal of Renal Impairment: Cohort Analysis of the Phase III VISTA Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1614v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence-Based Approach to the Introduction of Positron Emission Tomography in Ontario, Canada [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1614v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The uptake of new health care technologies is usually driven by industry promotion, physician interest, patient demand, and institutional ability to acquire the technology. The introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in the province of Ontario, Canada, followed a different path.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: The Ontario provincial government, through its Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, commissioned a systematic review of the literature. When this found only weak evidence that PET has a positive impact on clinical outcomes, the Ministry introduced a provincial PET evaluation program to close the evidence gap.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: This article describes the challenges encountered establishing the PET evaluation program. These included the design and conduct of the initial clinical trials, the establishment of a PET cancer registry, standardizing how PET scans were performed and reported, and gaining acceptance by health professionals for the evaluative program.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The proliferation of health technologies is a key driver of increasing health care costs. The Ontario approach to the introduction of PET is a model worth consideration by health systems seeking to ensure that they receive value for money based on a strong evidentiary base when introducing new health technologies.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evans, Laupacis, Gulenchyn, Levin, Levine]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:45:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1614</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence-Based Approach to the Introduction of Positron Emission Tomography in Ontario, Canada [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health Services and Outcomes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1309v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Administered at a Fixed Dose Rate or in Combination With Cisplatin, Docetaxel, or Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: CALGB 89904 [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1309v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The relative value of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy therapy and prolonged infusions of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer remains controversial. We explored the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in a multi-institutional, randomized, phase II study.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following four regimens: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1, 8, and 15 with cisplatin 50 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1 and 15 (arm A); gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> at a rate of 10 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/min on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm B); gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> with docetaxel 40 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1 and 8 (arm C); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> with irinotecan 100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1 and 8 (arm D). Patients were observed for response, toxicity, and survival.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study, of whom 245 were eligible and received treatment. Anticipated rates of myelosuppression, fatigue, and expected regimen-specific toxicities were observed. The overall tumor response rates were 12% to 14%, and the median overall survival times were 6.4 to 7.1 months among the four regimens.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Gemcitabine/cisplatin, fixed dose rate gemcitabine, gemcitabine/docetaxel, and gemcitabine/irinotecan have similar antitumor activity in metastatic pancreatic cancer. In light of recent negative randomized studies directly comparing several of these regimens with standard gemcitabine, none of these approaches can be recommended for routine use in patients with this disease.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kulke, Tempero, Niedzwiecki, Hollis, Kindler, Cusnir, Enzinger, Gorsch, Goldberg, Mayer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:45:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1309</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Administered at a Fixed Dose Rate or in Combination With Cisplatin, Docetaxel, or Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: CALGB 89904 [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9022v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consensus Report of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting on Pancreas Cancer Treatment [Special Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9022v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality, despite significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and operative mortality rates. The 5-year survival rate remains less than 5% because of microscopic or gross metastatic disease at time of diagnosis. The Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in pancreatic cancer was convened by the National Cancer Institute's Gastrointestinal Cancer Steering Committee to discuss the integration of basic and clinical knowledge in the design of clinical trials in PDAC. Major emphasis was placed on the enhancement of research to identify and validate the relevant targets and molecular pathways in PDAC, cancer stem cells, and the microenvironment. Emphasis was also placed on developing rational combinations of targeted agents and the development of predictive biomarkers to assist selection of patient subsets. The development of preclinical tumor models that are better predictive of human PDAC must be supported with wider availability to the research community. Phase III clinical trials should be implemented only if there is a meaningful clinical signal of efficacy and safety in the phase II setting. The emphasis must therefore be on performing well-designed phase II studies with uniform sets of basic entry and evaluation criteria with survival as a primary endpoint. Patients with either metastatic or locally advanced PDAC must be studied separately.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip, Mooney, Jaffe, Eckhardt, Moore, Meropol, Emens, O'Reilly, Korc, Ellis, Benedetti, Rothenberg, Willett, Tempero, Lowy, Abbruzzese, Simeone, Hingorani, Berlin, Tepper]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:45:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consensus Report of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting on Pancreas Cancer Treatment [Special Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6283v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of Molecular Markers With Toxicity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Chemotherapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The FOCUS Trial [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6283v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Predicting efficacy and toxicity could potentially allow individualization of cancer therapy. We investigated putative pharmacogenetic markers of chemotherapy toxicity in a large randomized trial.</P>
<P><B>Patients, Materials, and Methods</B>: Patients were randomly assigned to different sequences of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. First-line therapy was fluorouracil (FU), irinotecan/FU (IrFU) or oxaliplatin/FU (OxFU). Patients allocated first-line FU had planned second-line irinotecan alone, IrFU, or OxFU. The primary toxicity outcome measure was toxicity-induced delay or dose reduction; the secondary outcome was Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grade &ge; 3 toxicity. DNA was analyzed in 1,188 patients; 1,036 were assessable for the primary outcome, including 688 treated with FU, 270 with IrFU (first or second line), 280 with OxFU (first or second line), 184 with irinotecan alone, and 454 with any irinotecan-containing regimen. Ten polymorphisms were assessed: thymidylate synthase&ndash;enhancer region (<I>TYMS</I>-ER), thymidylate synthase 1494 (<I>TYMS</I>-1494), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (<I>DPYD</I>), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (<I>MTHFR</I>), mutL homolog 1 (<I>MLH1</I>), UDP glucuronyltransferase (<I>UGT1A1</I>), ATP-binding cassette group B gene 1 (<I>ABCB1</I>), x-ray cross-complementing group 1 (<I>XRCC1</I>), glutathione-<I>S</I>-transferase P1 (<I>GSTP1</I>), and excision repair cross-complementing gene 2 (<I>ERCC2</I>).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Using the primary outcome measure, no polymorphism was significantly associated (<I>P</I> &lt; .01) with the toxicity of any regimen or with the difference in toxicity of IrFU or OxFU versus FU alone. Trends (of doubtful significance) were seen for associations of <I>XRCC1</I>, <I>ERCC2</I>, and <I>GSTP1</I> with toxicity during irinotecan regimens: <I>XRCC1</I>, primary end point, any irinotecan-containing regimen (<I>P</I> = .045); <I>ERCC2</I>, secondary end point, irinotecan alone (<I>P</I> = .003); <I>GSTP1</I>, secondary end point; IrFU (<I>P</I> = .039); and irinotecan alone (<I>P</I> = .05). There was no evidence of association of <I>UGT1A1*28</I> with irinotecan toxicity.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: These results do not support the routine clinical use of the evaluated polymorphisms, including <I>UGT1A1*28</I>. Further investigation of <I>XRCC1</I>, <I>ERCC2</I>, and <I>GSTP1</I> as potential predictors of irinotecan toxicity is warranted.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braun, Richman, Thompson, Daly, Meade, Adlard, Allan, Parmar, Quirke, Seymour]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:45:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6283</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of Molecular Markers With Toxicity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Chemotherapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The FOCUS Trial [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5384v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dose Finding and Early Efficacy Study of Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Combination With Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5384v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This study evaluated safety and efficacy of chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus capecitabine) plus bevacizumab/erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer because dual epidermal growth factor receptor/vascular endothelial growth factor blockade has a rational biologic basis in this malignancy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled onto one of the following four sequential dose levels (DLs) of escalating capecitabine doses (days 1 to 21): DL1, 910 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>; DL2, 1,160 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>; DL3, 1,400 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>; or DL4, 1,660 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. Doses of coadministered gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1, 8, and 15), bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15), and erlotinib (100 mg/d) every 28 days (up to six cycles) were fixed. Using a 3+3 study design, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed in cycle 1.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Twenty assessable patients were enrolled (DL1, n = 8; DL2, n = 3; DL3, n = 6; and DL4, n = 3); 97 cycles were administered. Median age was 63 years (range, 33 to 77 years), and male-to-female ratio was 10:10. Performance status was 0 and 1 in two and 17 patients, respectively; and nine and 11 patients had locally advanced and metastatic disease, respectively. DLT occurred in one patient at DL1 (grade 3 epistaxis) and two patients at DL4 (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 skin rash &gt; 7 days). Common grade 3 and 4 toxicities (10% to 20%) were diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, stomatitis, and skin rash. Grade 3 lethargy and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 40% and 45% of patients, respectively. No GI perforation, grade 3 GI hemorrhage/hypertension, or pneumonitis occurred. Ten partial responses were observed. Median overall and progression-survival times (all patients) were 12.5 and 9.0 months, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The maximum-tolerated dose of capecitabine was 1,660 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. The recommended capecitabine dose in this cytotoxic doublet/biologic doublet regimen is 1,440 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>; this regimen is under evaluation in an ongoing phase II study.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starling, Watkins, Cunningham, Thomas, Webb, Brown, Thomas, Oates, Chau]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:44:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5384</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dose Finding and Early Efficacy Study of Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Combination With Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8876v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Prostate Tumor Angiogenesis and Cancer-Specific Mortality in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8876v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Tumor growth requires the development of independent vascular networks that are often primitive in morphology and function. We examined whether microvessel morphology contributes to the considerable biologic heterogeneity of prostate cancer.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We evaluated microvessel morphology as a predictor of prostate cancer mortality among 572 men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study diagnosed with cancer during 1986 to 2000. We immunostained prostatectomy tumor block sections for endothelial marker CD34 and assessed microvessel density, vessel size (area and diameter), and irregularity of vessel lumen using image analysis. Proportional hazards models were used to assess microvessel density and morphology in relation to lethal prostate cancer.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Poorly differentiated tumors exhibited greater microvessel density, greater irregularity of the vessel lumen, and smaller vessels. During 20 years of follow-up, 44 men developed bone metastases or died of cancer. Men with tumors exhibiting the smallest vessel diameter, based on quartiles, were 6.0 times more likely (95% CI, 1.8 to 20.0) to develop lethal prostate cancer. Men with the most irregularly shaped vessels were 17.1 times more likely (95% CI, 2.3 to 128) to develop lethal disease. Adjusting for Gleason grade and prostate-specific antigen levels did not qualitatively change the results. Microvessel density was not linked to cancer-specific mortality after adjusting for clinical factors.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Aggressive tumors form vessels that are primitive in morphology and function, with consequences for metastases. Vascular size and irregularity reflect the angiogenic potential of prostate cancer and may serve as biomarkers to predict prostate cancer mortality several years after diagnosis.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mucci, Powolny, Giovannucci, Liao, Kenfield, Shen, Stampfer, Clinton]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:44:24 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8876</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Prostate Tumor Angiogenesis and Cancer-Specific Mortality in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.9430v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.9430v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To estimate the risk for contralateral breast cancer in members of <I>BRCA1</I>- and <I>BRCA2</I>-positive families and to determine predictive risk factors.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed from 1996 until 2008 and comprised 2,020 women with unilateral breast cancer (index patients, n = 978; relatives, n = 1,42) from 978 families who had a <I>BRCA1</I> or <I>BRCA2</I> mutation. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the association of age at first breast cancer with time from first to contralateral breast cancer, stratified by the affected <I>BRCA</I> gene.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The cumulative risk for contralateral breast cancer 25 years after first breast cancer was 47.4% (95% CI, 38.8% to 56.0%) for patients from families with <I>BRCA1</I> or <I>BRCA2</I> mutations. Members of families with <I>BRCA1</I> mutations had a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.2-fold to 2.3-fold) higher risk of contralateral breast cancer than members of families with <I>BRCA2</I> mutations. Younger age at first breast cancer was associated with a significantly higher risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients with <I>BRCA1</I> mutation, and a trend was observed in patients with <I>BRCA2</I> mutation. After 25 years, 62.9% (95% CI, 50.4% to 75.4%) of patients with <I>BRCA1</I> mutation who were younger than 40 years of age at first breast cancer developed contralateral breast cancer, compared with only 19.6% (95% CI, 5.3% to 33.9%) of those who were older than 50 years of age at first breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Contralateral breast cancer risk depends on age at first breast cancer and on the affected <I>BRCA</I> gene, and this risk should be considered in treatment planning.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeser, Engel, Rhiem, Gadzicki, Bick, Kast, Froster, Schlehe, Bechthold, Arnold, Preisler-Adams, Nestle-Kraemling, Zaino, Loeffler, Kiechle, Meindl, Varga, Schmutzler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:44:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9430</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6931v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6931v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: A growing number of patients with testicular cancer (TC) become long-term survivors. As a consequence, quality-of-life (QOL) issues become increasingly important. The objective of this study was to investigate QOL among Danish TC survivors.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: A long-term follow-up assessment of all patients with TC treated at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark between 1990 and 2000 was conducted. A total of 401 survivors (response rate, 66%) completed questionnaires concerning QOL (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30), depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20), and health-related issues such as neurotoxic symptoms and Raynaud-like phenomena. On the basis of their treatment, participants were categorized as having received surveillance, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: QOL among patients with TC was equal to that of men from the general population. Although patients who received chemotherapy reported higher levels of peripheral sensory neuropathy, ototoxicity, and Raynaud-like phenomena, treatment strategies were generally unrelated to QOL and depressive symptoms.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Overall, the patients in this study reported high levels of QOL. The results suggest that patients treated for TC should be informed about the anticipated good post-therapeutic QOL and the low risk of psychosocial and physical long-term effects.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossen, Pedersen, Zachariae, von der Maase]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:43:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6147v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In Situ Cytotoxic and Memory T Cells Predict Outcome in Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6147v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Many patients who present with early-stage colorectal cancer (International Union Against Cancer TNM stages I and II) are nevertheless at high risk of relapse. We hypothesized that intratumoral immune reaction could influence their prognosis.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The intratumoral immune reaction was investigated in 29 tumors by large-scale real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cytotoxic (CD8) and memory (CD45RO) T cells were quantified by immunohistochemical analyses of tissue microarrays from the center (CT) and the invasive margin (IM) of the 602 tumors from two independent cohorts. The results were correlated with tumor recurrence and patient survival.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patients with a strong infiltration of CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cells in the tumor exhibited an increased expression of T-helper 1 and cytotoxicity-related genes. Densities of CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> and CD8<SUP>+</SUP> cells in tumor regions (CT/IM) classified the patients into four distinct prognostic groups based on the presence of high density of each marker in each tumor region. The four groups were associated with dramatic differences in disease-free, disease-specific, and overall survival (all <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Five years after diagnosis, only 4.8% (95% CI, 0.6% to 8.8%) of patients with high densities of CD8<SUP>+</SUP> plus CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cells had tumor recurrence, and 86.2% (CI, 79.4% to 93.6%) survived. In contrast, the tumor recurred in 75% (95% CI, 17% to 92.5%) of patients with low densities of these cells, and only 27.5% (95% CI, 10.5% to 72%) survived (all <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Multivariate analyses showed that the immune criteria had independent effects on the rates of complete remission and survival.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The combined analysis of CD8<SUP>+</SUP> plus CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cells in specific tumor regions could provide a useful criterion for the prediction of tumor recurrence and survival in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pages, Kirilovsky, Mlecnik, Asslaber, Tosolini, Bindea, Lagorce, Wind, Marliot, Bruneval, Zatloukal, Trajanoski, Berger, Fridman, Galon]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:43:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In Situ Cytotoxic and Memory T Cells Predict Outcome in Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2544v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward Efficient Trials in Colorectal Cancer: The ARCAD Clinical Trials Program [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2544v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Gramont, Haller, Sargent, Tabernero, Matheson, Schilsky]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:55:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2544</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward Efficient Trials in Colorectal Cancer: The ARCAD Clinical Trials Program [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2221v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to Lin et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2221v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souhami, Bae, Sandler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to Lin et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0969v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Clouds Apparent Benefit of Longer Hormone Duration [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0969v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Lee, Steinberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Clouds Apparent Benefit of Longer Hormone Duration [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0522v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Nagai et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0522v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grimwade, Jovanovic, Hills, Solomon, Lo-Coco, Wheatley, Burnett]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Nagai et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0282v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Concept of Phenotypically Distinct Malignant Pancreatic Stem-Cell Subsets Based on Limiting Dilution Transplantation Assays [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0282v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonnefoix, Callanan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:29 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Concept of Phenotypically Distinct Malignant Pancreatic Stem-Cell Subsets Based on Limiting Dilution Transplantation Assays [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9995v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How Should We Prevent Hematologic Relapse of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9995v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagai, Takahashi, Kurokawa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9995</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How Should We Prevent Hematologic Relapse of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6736v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to P. Prassopoulos et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6736v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillman, Sargent]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6736</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to P. Prassopoulos et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4004v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metastatic Disease Response to Treatment: How Many Lesions to Measure? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4004v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prassopoulos, Mantatzis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metastatic Disease Response to Treatment: How Many Lesions to Measure? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3253v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Arena et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3253v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zurrida, Viale, Veronesi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3253</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Arena et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2461v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast Cancer Classification: The Dialogue Is Open [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2461v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arena, Pennacchia, Monego, Carbone, Capelli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast Cancer Classification: The Dialogue Is Open [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6406v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Bevacizumab for Second-Line Therapy of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NCCTG and SWOG Study N0426 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6406v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed combined with bevacizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to correlate allelic variants in pemetrexed-metabolizing genes with clinical outcome.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with previously treated NSCLC received pemetrexed (500 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> intravenous) combined with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenous) every 3 weeks. The primary end point, evaluated using a one-stage Fleming design for detecting a true success rate of at least 70%, was the proportion of patients who were progression free and on treatment at 3 months. Polymorphisms in genes responsible for pemetrexed transport (reduced folate carrier [<I>SLC19A1</I>]) and metabolism (folylpolyglutamate synthase [<I>FPGS</I>] and gamma-glutamyl hydrolase [<I>GGH</I>]) evaluated in germline DNA (blood) were correlated with treatment outcome.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-eight evaluable patients (14 females and 34 males) received a median of four cycles (range, one to 20 cycles). The most common grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (13%), dyspnea (10%), and thrombosis (10%). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs were neutropenia (19%) and lymphopenia (13%). Twenty-four (57%; 95% CI, 41% to 72%) of the first 42 patients met the success criteria. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 8.6 and 4.0 months, respectively. The exon 6 (2522)C-&gt;T polymorphism in <I>SLC19A1</I> correlated with 3-month progression-free status (<I>P</I> = .01) and with PFS (<I>P</I> = .05). The IVS1(1307)C-&gt;T polymorphism in <I>GGH</I> correlated with OS (<I>P</I> = .04).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The study did not meet it's primary end point. However, the median PFS time of 4 months is promising. Pharmacogenetic studies in larger cohorts are needed to definitively identify polymorphisms that predict for survival and toxicity of pemetrexed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adjei, Mandrekar, Dy, Molina, Adjei, Gandara, Allen Ziegler, Stella, Rowland, Schild, Zinner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6406</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Bevacizumab for Second-Line Therapy of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NCCTG and SWOG Study N0426 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4450v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Clinical Evidence Review on Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [ASCO Special Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4450v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To review the evidence about the efficacy and utility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRHM).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and analyze a comprehensive systematic review of the RFA literature from Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Because data were considered insufficient to form the basis of a practice guideline, ASCO has instead published a clinical evidence review. The evidence is from single-arm, retrospective, and prospective trials. No randomized controlled trials have been included. The following three clinical issues were considered by the panel: the efficacy of surgical hepatic resection versus RFA for resectable tumors; the utility of RFA for unresectable tumors; and RFA approaches (open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous). Evidence suggests that hepatic resection improves overall survival (OS), particularly for patients with resectable tumors without extrahepatic disease. Careful patient and tumor selection is discussed at length in the literature. RFA investigators report a wide variability in the 5-year survival rate (14% to 55%) and local tumor recurrence rate (3.6% to 60%). The reported mortality rate was low (0% to 2%), and the major complications rate was commonly reported to be between 6% and 9%. RFA is currently performed with all three approaches.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: There is a compelling need for more research to determine the efficacy and utility of RFA to increase local recurrence-free, progression-free, and disease-free survival as well as OS for patients with CRHM. Clinical trials have established that hepatic resection can improve OS for patients with resectable CRHM.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, Mangu, Choti, Crocenzi, Dodd, Dorfman, Eng, Fong, Giusti, Lu, Marsland, Michelson, Poston, Schrag, Seidenfeld, Benson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4450</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Clinical Evidence Review on Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [ASCO Special Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>ASCO Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2801v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer During Pregnancy: An Analysis of 215 Patients Emphasizing the Obstetrical and the Neonatal Outcomes [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2801v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The aim of this study was to assess the management and the obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In an international collaborative setting, patients with invasive cancer diagnosed during pregnancy between 1998 and 2008 were identified. Clinical data regarding the cancer diagnosis and treatment and the obstetric and neonatal outcomes were collected and analyzed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 215 patients, five (2.3%) had a pregnancy that ended in a spontaneous miscarriage and 30 (14.0%) pregnancies were interrupted. Treatment was initiated during pregnancy in 122 (56.7%) patients and postpartum in 58 (27.0%) patients. The most frequently encountered cancer types were breast cancer (46%), hematologic malignancies (18%), and dermatologic malignancies (10%). The mean gestational age at delivery was 36.3 &plusmn; 2.9 weeks. Delivery was induced in 71.7% of pregnancies, and 54.2% of children were born preterm. In the group of patients prenatally exposed to cytotoxic treatment, the prevalence of preterm labor was increased (11.8%; <I>P</I> = .012). Furthermore, in this group a higher proportion of small-for-gestational-age children (birth weight below 10th percentile) was observed (24.2%; <I>P</I> = .001). Of all neonates, 51.2% were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit, mainly (85.2%) because of prematurity. There was no increased incidence of congenital malformations.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Pregnant cancer patients should be treated in a multidisciplinary setting with access to maternal and neonatal intensive care units. Prevention of iatrogenic prematurity appears to be an important part of the treatment strategy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Calsteren, Heyns, De Smet, Van Eycken, Gziri, Van Gemert, Halaska, Vergote, Ottevanger, Amant]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer During Pregnancy: An Analysis of 215 Patients Emphasizing the Obstetrical and the Neonatal Outcomes [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2470v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Costs and Benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board [Economic Analysis]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2470v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: In 2001, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) formed the Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) to conduct a single human subjects review for its multisite phase III oncology trials. The goal of this study was to assess whether NCI's CIRB was associated with lower effort, time, and cost in processing adult phase III oncology trials.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We conducted an observational study and compared sites affiliated with the NCI CIRB to unaffiliated sites that used their local IRB for review. Oncology research staff and IRB staff were surveyed to understand effort and timing. Response rates were 60% and 42%, respectively. Analysis of these survey data yielded information on effort, timing, and costs. We combined these data with CIRB operational data to determine the net savings of the CIRB using a societal perspective.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: CIRB affiliation was associated with faster reviews (33.9 calendar days faster on average), and 6.1 fewer hours of research staff effort. CIRB affiliation was associated with a savings of $717 per initial review. The estimated cost of running the CIRB was $161,000 per month. The CIRB yielded a net cost of approximately $55,000 per month from a societal perspective. Whether the CIRB results in higher or lower quality reviews was not assessed because there is no standard definition of review quality.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The CIRB was associated with decreases in investigator and IRB staff effort and faster protocol reviews, although savings would be higher if institutions used the CIRB as intended.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wagner, Murray, Goldberg, Adler, Abrams]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2470</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Costs and Benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board [Economic Analysis]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Economic Analysis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8635v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suicide Ideation in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8635v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate risk of suicide ideation (SI) after childhood cancer, prevalence of SI in a cohort of adult survivors of pediatric cancers was compared with prevalence in a sibling comparison group. The relationship of SI to cancer treatment and current health was examined, and the hypothesis that poor physical health is significantly associated with suicidality, after adjusting for depression, was specifically tested.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Nine thousand one hundred twenty-six adult survivors of childhood cancer and 2,968 siblings enrolled onto the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study completed a survey describing their demographics and medical and psychological functioning, including SI in the prior week.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of survivors, 7.8% reported SI compared with 4.6% of controls (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4). Suicidality was unrelated to age, age at diagnosis, sex, cancer therapy, recurrence, time since diagnosis, or second malignancy. SI was associated with primary CNS cancer diagnosis, depression, and poor health outcomes including chronic conditions, pain, and poor global health rating. A logistic regression analysis showed that poor current physical health was significantly associated with SI even after adjusting for cancer diagnosis and depression.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Adult survivors of childhood cancers are at increased risk for SI. Risk of SI is related to cancer diagnosis and post-treatment mental and physical health, even many years after completion of therapy. The association of suicidal symptoms with physical health problems is important because these may be treatable conditions for which survivors seek follow-up care and underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to survivor care.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recklitis, Diller, Li, Najita, Robison, Zeltzer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:29 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suicide Ideation in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2950v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome of Patients Treated for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2950v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Despite improvements in treatment, approximately 20% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) experience relapse and do poorly. The Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia (TACL) Consortium was assembled to assess novel drugs for children with resistant leukemia. We hypothesize that novel agents and combinations that fail to improve baseline complete remission rates in comparable populations are unlikely to contribute to better outcomes and should be abandoned. We sought to define response rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates in patients treated at TACL institutions, which could serve as a comparator for future studies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed and refractory ALL previously treated at TACL institutions between the years of 1995 and 2004. Data regarding initial and relapsed disease characteristics, disease response, and survival were collected and compared with those of published reports.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Complete remission (CR) rates (mean &plusmn; SE) were 83% &plusmn; 4% for early first marrow relapse, 93% &plusmn; 3% for late first marrow relapse, 44% &plusmn; 5% for second marrow relapse, and 27% &plusmn; 6% for third marrow relapse. Five-year DFS rates in CR2 and CR3 were 27% &plusmn; 4% and 15% &plusmn; 7% respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: We generally confirm a 40% CR rate for second and subsequent relapse, but our remission rate for early first relapse seems better than that reported in the literature (83% <I>v</I> approximately 70%). Our data may allow useful modeling of an expected remission rate for any population of patients who experience relapse.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ko, Ji, Barnette, Bostrom, Hutchinson, Raetz, Seibel, Twist, Eckroth, Sposto, Gaynon, Loh]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:19 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2950</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome of Patients Treated for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8784v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility Trial of Letrozole in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8784v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Preclinical models suggest that the use of anti&ndash;vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with antiestrogens may prevent or delay the development of endocrine therapy resistance. We therefore performed a feasibility study to evaluate the safety of letrozole plus bevacizumab in patients with hormone receptor&ndash;positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC were treated with the aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole (2.5 mg orally daily) and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks). The primary end point was safety, defined by grade 4 toxicity using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0. Secondary end points included response rate, clinical benefit rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). Prior nonsteroidal AIs (NSAIs) were permitted in the absence of progressive disease.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-three patients were treated. After a median of 13 cycles (range, 1 to 71 cycles), select treatment-related toxicities included hypertension (58%; grades 2 and 3 in 19% and 26%), proteinuria (67%; grades 2 and 3 in 14% and 19%), headache (51%; grades 2 and 3 in 16% and 7%), fatigue (74%; grades 2 and 3 in 19% and 2%), and joint pain (63%; grades 2 and 3 in 19% and 0%). Eighty-four percent of patients had at least stable disease on an NSAI, confounding efficacy results. Partial responses were seen in 9% of patients and stable disease &ge; 24 weeks was noted in 67%. Median PFS was 17.1 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Combination letrozole and bevacizumab was feasible with expected bevacizumab-related events of hypertension, headache, and proteinuria. Phase III proof-of-efficacy trials of endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab are in progress (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503).</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traina, Rugo, Caravelli, Patil, Yeh, Melisko, Park, Geneus, Paulson, Grothusen, Seidman, Fornier, Lake, Dang, Robson, Theodoulou, Flombaum, Norton, Hudis, Dickler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:09 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8784</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility Trial of Letrozole in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8032v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinically Driven Diagnostic Antifungal Approach in Neutropenic Patients: A Prospective Feasibility Study [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8032v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Preemptive strategies in neutropenic patients based on serum galactomannan (GM) &ndash;guided triggering of diagnostic work-up may be time-consuming and expensive when applied to the entire population. We have assessed the feasibility of a clinically driven diagnostic strategy without GM screening.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with neutropenic fever underwent a baseline diagnostic work-up (BDWU; three blood cultures and other examinations as indicated). An intensive diagnostic work-up (IDWU; GM for 3 days, chest computed tomography and other examinations as indicated) was reserved for patients with 4 days of persisting or relapsing fever or with other clinical findings possibly related to an invasive fungal diseaser (IFD). Antifungal therapy was administered to patients diagnosed with IFD and empirically (negative IDWU) only to those with persisting neutropenic fever and worsening clinical conditions.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 220 neutropenia episodes, fever occurred in 159 cases and recurred in 28 cases. Overall, 49 IFDs were diagnosed (two by BDWU and 47 by IDWU) during 48 episodes (21.8%). Diagnostic-driven therapy was administered to 48 patients with IFDs; one patient with zygomycosis died without treatment. Only one patient received empirical therapy. IDWU was required in 40% of neutropenia episodes, and only 1.4 mean blood samples per neutropenia episode were tested for GM. Our strategy allowed a 43% reduction in antifungal treatments compared with a standard empirical approach. At 3-month follow-up, 63% of patients with IFD survived, and no undetected IFDs were found.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A clinically driven diagnostic approach in selected neutropenia episodes offered effective antifungal control and reduced the exposure to unnecessary antifungal treatment.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girmenia, Micozzi, Gentile, Santilli, Arleo, Cardarelli, Capria, Minotti, Cartoni, Brocchieri, Guerrisi, Meloni, Foa, Martino]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinically Driven Diagnostic Antifungal Approach in Neutropenic Patients: A Prospective Feasibility Study [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4684v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventing Future Cancers by Testing Women With Ovarian Cancer for BRCA Mutations [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4684v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Women with ovarian cancer have a 10% probability of carrying a <I>BRCA</I> mutation. If a mutation is identified, unaffected family members can undergo genetic testing and cancer risk-reducing strategies. We estimated the net health benefits and cost-effectiveness of different criteria for <I>BRCA</I> mutation testing in women with ovarian cancer, and the downstream benefits for their first-degree relatives (FDRs).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We developed a Markov Monte Carlo simulation model to compare four criteria for <I>BRCA</I> testing in women with ovarian cancer: no testing (reference); only if personal history of breast cancer, family history of breast/ovarian cancer, or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry; only if invasive serous cancer; any invasive nonmucinous epithelial cancer. Net health benefit was life expectancy for FDRs and primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The model estimated the number of future breast and ovarian cancer cases in FDRs.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: <I>BRCA</I> testing based on personal/family history and ancestry could prevent future cases in FDRs with an ICER of $32,018 per year of life (LY) gained compared with the reference strategy. <I>BRCA</I> testing based on serous or any nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer could prevent more cancer cases, but at ICERs of $128,465 and $148,363 per LY gained, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: <I>BRCA</I> testing of women with ovarian cancer based on personal/family history of cancer or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry is a cost-effective strategy to prevent future breast and ovarian cancers among FDRs. More inclusive testing strategies prevent additional cancer cases but at significant cost.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwon, Daniels, Sun, Lu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventing Future Cancers by Testing Women With Ovarian Cancer for BRCA Mutations [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8199v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial on Gemcitabine Versus Mytomicin in Recurrent Superficial Bladder Cancer: Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8199v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Approximately 30% to 40% patients with a superficial bladder cancer treated with Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or epirubicin do not respond; of the initial responders, 35% have a relapse within 5 years. We compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of intravescical infusions of gemcitabine (GEM) with mitomycin (MMC) in patients with a recurrent superficial bladder cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with a history of a previously treated, recurrent Ta-T1, G1-G3 bladder transitional cell carcinoma were enrolled in the study. The patients received a 6-week course of GEM infusions or 4-week course of MMC. In both arms, for the initial responders who remained free of recurrences, maintenance therapy consisted of 10 monthly treatments during the first year.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 120 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the MMC or GEM treatment arm. At the end of the study, 109 patients (55 in MMC and 54 in GEM) were assessable. The median duration of follow-up was 36 months for either arm. In the GEM arm, 39 (72%) of 54 patients remained free of recurrence versus 33 (61%) of 55 in MMC arm. Among patients with recurrences, 10 in the MMC arm and six in the GEM arm also had a progressive disease by stage. The incidence of chemical cystitis in the MMC arm was statistically higher than in the GEM arm (<I>P</I> = .012).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This study demonstrates that GEM has better efficacy and lower toxicity than MMC; therefore, GEM appears as a logical candidate for intrabladder therapy in patients with refractory transitional cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addeo, Caraglia, Bellini, Abbruzzese, Vincenzi, Montella, Miragliuolo, Guarrasi, Lanna, Cennamo, Faiola, Del Prete]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8199</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial on Gemcitabine Versus Mytomicin in Recurrent Superficial Bladder Cancer: Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4525v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting the Risk of Axillary Nodal Metastases and Their Use in Selecting Breast Surgery Options [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4525v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobs, Balch, Soong]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4525</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting the Risk of Axillary Nodal Metastases and Their Use in Selecting Breast Surgery Options [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3311v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Axillary Reverse Mapping to Prevent Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Surgery: Defining the Limits of the Concept [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3311v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3311</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Axillary Reverse Mapping to Prevent Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Surgery: Defining the Limits of the Concept [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6018v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultimate Fate of Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without a Randomized Trial [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6018v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To approve a new anticancer drug, the US Food and Drug Administration often requires randomized trials. However, several oncology drugs have been approved on the basis of objective end points without a randomized trial. We reviewed the long-term safety and efficacy of such agents.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We searched the Web site of the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and MEDLINE for initial applications of investigational anticancer drugs from 1973 through 2006.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall, 68 oncology drugs, excluding hormone therapy and supportive care, were approved, including 31 without a randomized trial. For these 31 drugs, a median of two clinical trials (range, one to seven) and 79 patients (range, 40 to 413) were used per approval. Objective response was the most common end point used for approval; median response rate was 33% (range, 11% to 90%). Thirty drugs are still fully approved. United States marketing authorization for one drug, gefitinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] inhibitor), was rescinded after a randomized trial showed no survival improvement; however, this trial was performed in unselected patients, and it was subsequently demonstrated that patients with EGFR mutation are more likely to respond. Nineteen of the 31 drugs have additional uses (per National Comprehensive Cancer Network or National Cancer Institute Physician Data Query guidelines), and subsequent formal US Food and Drug Administration approvals were obtained for 11 of these (range, one to 18 new indications). No drug has demonstrated safety concerns.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Nonrandomized clinical trials with definitive end points can yield US Food and Drug Administration approvals, and these drugs have a reassuring record of long-term safety and efficacy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsimberidou, Braiteh, Stewart, Kurzrock]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:59 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultimate Fate of Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without a Randomized Trial [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2777v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cediranib, an Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Kinases, Is an Active Drug in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2777v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Angiogenesis is important for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) growth, and blocking angiogenesis can lead to EOC regression. Cediranib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, and c-kit.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We conducted a phase II study of cediranib for recurrent EOC or peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer; cediranib was administered as a daily oral dose, and the original dose was 45 mg daily. Because of toxicities observed in the first 11 patients, the dose was lowered to 30 mg. Eligibility included &le; two lines of chemotherapy for recurrence. End points included response rate (via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] or modified Gynecological Cancer Intergroup CA-125), toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-seven patients were enrolled; 46 were treated. Clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response [CR] or partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] &gt; 16 weeks, or CA-125 nonprogression &gt; 16 weeks), which was the primary end point, was 30%; eight patients (17%; 95% CI, 7.6% to 30.8%) had a PR, six patients (13%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 25.7%) had SD, and there were no CRs. Eleven patients (23%) were removed from study because of toxicities before two cycles. Grade 3 toxicities (&gt; 20% of patients) included hypertension (46%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (13%). Grade 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 43% of patients. Grade 4 toxicities included CNS hemorrhage (n = 1), hypertriglyceridemia/hypercholesterolemia/elevated lipase (n = 1), and dehydration/elevated creatinine (n = 1). No bowel perforations or fistulas occurred. Median PFS was 5.2 months, and median OS has not been reached; median follow-up time is 10.7 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Cediranib has activity in recurrent EOC, tubal cancer, and peritoneal cancer with predictable toxicities observed with other TKIs.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matulonis, Berlin, Ivy, Tyburski, Krasner, Zarwan, Berkenblit, Campos, Horowitz, Cannistra, Lee, Lee, Roche, Hill, Whalen, Sullivan, Tran, Humphreys, Penson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2777</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cediranib, an Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Kinases, Is an Active Drug in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1738v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Polymorphisms in the CASPASE Genes and Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1738v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This study was conducted to determine the impact of potentially functional polymorphisms in the <I>CASPASE</I> (<I>CASP</I>) genes on the survival of early-stage non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Four hundred eleven consecutive patients with surgically resected NSCLC were enrolled. Nine potentially functional polymorphisms in the <I>CASP3, CASP7, CASP8, CASP9</I>, and <I>CASP10</I> genes were investigated. The genotype and haplotype associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patients with the rs2227310 GG genotype had a significantly decreased OS and DFS compared with patients with the CC + CG genotype (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] for OS, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.35; <I>P</I> = .003; aHR for DFS, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.22; <I>P</I> = .002). The rs4645981C&gt;T genotype also had a significant effect on OS and DFS (under a recessive model; aHR for OS, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.85; <I>P</I> = .04; aHR for DFS, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.58 to 4.80; <I>P</I> = .0003). When the rs2227310 and rs4645981 genotypes were combined, patients with one or two bad genotypes had worse OS and DFS compared with those who had zero bad genotypes (aHR for OS, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.45; <I>P</I> = .001; aHR for DFS, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.26; <I>P</I> = .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The <I>CASP7</I> rs2227310 and <I>CASP9</I> rs4645981 polymorphisms may affect survival in early-stage NSCLC. The analysis of these polymorphisms can help identify patients at high risk for a poor disease outcome.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoo, Choi, Lee, Choi, Kam, Kim, Jeon, Lee, Kim, Lee, Kim, Jheon, Park]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1738</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Polymorphisms in the CASPASE Genes and Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0250v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physician Referral for Fertility Preservation in Oncology Patients: A National Study of Practice Behaviors [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0250v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cancer survival rates are improving, and the focus is moving toward quality survival. Fertility is a key aspect of quality of life for cancer patients of childbearing age. Although cancer treatment may impair fertility, some patients may benefit from referral to a specialist before treatment. However, the majority of studies examining patient recall of discussion and referral for fertility preservation (FP) show that less than half receive this information. This study examined the referral practices of oncologists in the United States.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: This study examined oncologists' referral practice patterns for FP among US physicians using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database. A 53-item survey was administered via mail and Internet to a stratified random sample of US physicians.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-seven percent of respondents routinely refer cancer patients of childbearing age to a reproductive endocrinologist. Referrals were more likely among female physicians (<I>P</I> = .004), those with favorable attitudes (<I>P</I> = .043), and those whose patients routinely ask about FP (odds ratio = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.33).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Less than half of US physicians are following the guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which suggest that all patients of childbearing age should be informed about FP.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quinn, Vadaparampil, Lee, Jacobsen, Bepler, Lancaster, Keefe, Albrecht]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physician Referral for Fertility Preservation in Oncology Patients: A National Study of Practice Behaviors [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health Services and Outcomes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9799v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Acceptance and the Well-Being of Patients Receiving Palliative Care for Cancer [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9799v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To identify the impact of prognostic acceptance/nonacceptance on the physical, psychological, and existential well-being of patients with advanced cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A Canadian multicenter prospective national survey was conducted of patients diagnosed with advanced cancer with an estimated survival duration of 6 months or less (n = 381) receiving palliative care services.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of the total number of participants, 74% reported accepting their situation and 8.6% reported accepting with "moderate" to "extreme" difficulty. More participants with acceptance difficulties than without acceptance difficulties met diagnostic criteria for a depressive or anxiety disorder (<SUP>2</SUP> = 8.67; <I>P</I> &lt; .01). Nonacceptors were younger (<I>t</I> = 4.13; <I>P</I> &lt; .000), had more than high school education (<SUP>2</SUP> = 4.69; <I>P</I> &lt; .05), and had smaller social networks (<I>t</I> = 2.53; <I>P</I> &lt; .05) than Acceptors. Of the Nonacceptors, 42% described their experience as one of "moderate" to "extreme" suffering compared with 24.1% of Acceptors (<SUP>2</SUP> = 5.28; <I>P</I> &lt; .05). More than one third (37.5%) of Nonacceptors reported feeling hopeless compared with 8.6% who had no difficulty accepting (<SUP>2</SUP> = 24.76; <I>P</I> &lt; .000). Qualitatively, participants described active and passive coping strategies that helped them accept what was happening to them, as well as barriers that made it difficult to come to terms with their current situation.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The challenge of coming to terms with a terminal prognosis is a complex interplay between one's basic personality, the availability of social support, and one's spiritual and existential views on life. Nonacceptance appears to be highly associated with feelings of hopelessness, a sense of suffering, depression, and anxiety, along with difficulties in terms of social&ndash;relational concerns.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thompson, Chochinov, Wilson, McPherson, Chary, O'Shea, Kuhl, Fainsinger, Gagnon, Macmillan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9799</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Acceptance and the Well-Being of Patients Receiving Palliative Care for Cancer [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7769v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidental Detection of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia on [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7769v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ennishi, Maeda, Niiya, Shinagawa, Tanimoto]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7769</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidental Detection of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia on [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6944v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Flavopiridol in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Demonstrating High Response Rates in Genetically High-Risk Disease [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6944v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with high-risk genomic features achieve poor outcomes with traditional therapies. A phase I study of a pharmacokinetically derived schedule of flavopiridol suggested promising activity in CLL, irrespective of high-risk features. Given the relevance of these findings to treating genetically high-risk CLL, a prospective confirmatory study was initiated.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with relapsed CLL were treated with single-agent flavopiridol, with subsequent addition of dexamethasone to suppress cytokine release syndrome (CRS). High-risk genomic features were prospectively assessed for response to therapy.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Sixty-four patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years, median number of prior therapies was four, and all patients had received prior purine analog therapy. If patients tolerated treatment during week 1, dose escalation occurred during week 2. Dose escalation did not occur in four patients, as a result of severe tumor lysis syndrome; three of these patients required hemodialysis. Thirty-four patients (53%) achieved response, including 30 partial responses (PRs; 47%), three nodular PRs (5%), and one complete response (1.6%). A majority of high-risk patients responded; 12 (57%) of 21 patients with del(17p13.1) and 14 (50%) of 28 patients with del(11q22.3) responded irrespective of lymph node size. Median progression-free survival among responders was 10 to 12 months across all cytogenetic risk groups. Reducing the number of weekly treatments per cycle from four to three and adding prophylactic dexamethasone, which abrogated interleukin-6 release and CRS (<I>P</I> &le; .01), resulted in improved tolerability and treatment delivery.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Flavopiridol achieves significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed CLL, including those with high-risk genomic features and bulky lymphadenopathy. Subsequent clinical trials should use the amended treatment schedule developed herein and prophylactic corticosteroids.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Ruppert, Johnson, Fischer, Heerema, Andritsos, Blum, Flynn, Jones, Hu, Moran, Mitchell, Smith, Wagner, Raymond, Schaaf, Phelps, Villalona-Calero, Grever, Byrd]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6944</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Flavopiridol in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Demonstrating High Response Rates in Genetically High-Risk Disease [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6852v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paraneoplastic Acrokeratosis (Bazex Syndrome) in Lung Cancer [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6852v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crucitti, Feliciani, Grossi, La Greca, Porziella, Giustacchini, Congedo, Fronterre, Granone]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6852</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paraneoplastic Acrokeratosis (Bazex Syndrome) in Lung Cancer [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4329v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of Sensitivity Analyses in Assessing Progression-Free Survival in Late-Stage Oncology Trials [Clinical Trials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4329v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P>Sensitivity analysis is an important statistical technique that assesses whether the results of phase III trials are robust and likely to be generalizable. Until recently, sensitivity analyses were rarely included in phase III trials, and they remain poorly understood by many oncologists. Sensitivity analyses are critical to understanding the strength of conclusions made in the primary analysis of a late-stage clinical trial. They examine the influence of protocol design errors, unintended biases, deviations from assumptions underlying statistical models, and any unanticipated treatment delivery or practice patterns on trial results. In trials with complex or subjective end points, they also allow an understanding of the extent to which a positive outcome is driven by a single, possibly subjective, and therefore biased, element of an end point. The purposes of this article are to explain how sensitivity analyses are performed, to discuss areas of a clinical trial where sensitivity analyses should focus, and to illuminate the importance of this technique in the rigorous evaluation of late-stage clinical trial data, using specific examples. This article focuses on late-stage trials that use progression-free survival or time to progression as their primary end point, because sensitivity analyses are particularly important in these cases for which the end point is potentially subject to bias. Three sources of potential bias are explored: assessment time, symptomatic (ie, nonradiologic) disease progression, and missing data. For each source of potential bias, case studies are presented to highlight the role that sensitivity analyses play in determining whether the trial's conclusions are robust.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhattacharya, Fyfe, Gray, Sargent]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4329</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of Sensitivity Analyses in Assessing Progression-Free Survival in Late-Stage Oncology Trials [Clinical Trials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Trials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4162v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incremental Advance or Seismic Shift? The Need to Raise the Bar of Efficacy for Drug Approval [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4162v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sobrero, Bruzzi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:33 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incremental Advance or Seismic Shift? The Need to Raise the Bar of Efficacy for Drug Approval [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1846v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extensive Nodal Disease May Impair Axillary Reverse Mapping in Patients With Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1846v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The aim of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is to preserve arm lymphatics in patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical axillary staging.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: From June 2007 to December 2008, 49 patients who required axillary dissection (AD) underwent ARM. One milliliter of patent blue dye was injected in the ipsilateral arm, and all blue nodes identified during AD were sent separately for pathologic examination. Main variables associated with the detection rates of blue lymphatics, the pathologic status of blue and nonblue nodes, and the complications of the procedure were analyzed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Identification rates of blue lymphatics and blue nodes were 73.5% and 55.1%, respectively. Blue node identification was influenced by the time elapsed between injection of blue dye and surgery (<I>P</I> = .002) but not by the learning curve of the procedure. Although the blue node was clear of metastases in 24 of 27 patients, three patients with extensive nodal metastatic involvement (ie, pN2a and pN3a) showed breast cancer metastatic cells in the blue nodes as well. The only adverse effect of the procedure was skin tattooing at the injection site, which disappeared within 4 months in almost 80% of the procedures.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In patients with clinically negative axillary nodes, additional study is warranted to assess whether ARM may be used to spare the lymphatics from the arm. In the presence of extensive nodal disease, this technique may identify metastatic blue nodes, which demonstrates that there is not reliable separation of arm and breast lymphatic pathways.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ponzone, Tomasi Cont, Maggiorotto, Cassina, Mininanni, Biglia, Sismondi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:25 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1846</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extensive Nodal Disease May Impair Axillary Reverse Mapping in Patients With Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9139v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Models to Predict Four or More Involved Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer With One to Three Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9139v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Three models have been developed to predict four or more involved axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in patients with breast cancer with one to three involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Two scores were developed by Chagpar et al (Louisville scores excluding or including method of detection), and a nomogram was developed by Katz et al. The purpose of our investigation was to compare these models in a prospective, multicenter study.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Our study involved a cohort of 536 patients having one to three involved SLNs who underwent ALN dissection. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration (for the Katz nomogram only), false-negative (FN) rate, and clinical utility of the three models. Results were compared with the optimal logistic regression (OLR) model that was developed from the validation cohort.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Among the 536 patients, 57 patients (10.6%) had &ge; four involved ALNs. The AUC for the Katz nomogram was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.86). The Louisville score excluding method of detection was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.78). The Louisville score including method of detection was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.79). The FN rates were 2.5% (eight of 321 patients), 1.8% (two of 109 patients), and 0% (zero of 27 patients) for the Katz nomogram and the Louisville scores excluding and including method of detection, respectively. The Katz nomogram was well calibrated. Optimism-corrected bootstrap estimate AUC of the OLR model was 0.86. Using this result as a reasonable target for an external model, the performance of the Katz nomogram was remarkable.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: We validated the three models for their use in clinical practice. The Katz nomogram outperformed the two other models.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Werkoff, Lambaudie, Fondrinier, Leveque, Marchal, Uzan, Barranger, Guillemin, Darai, Uzan, Houvenaeghel, Rouzier, Coutant]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Models to Predict Four or More Involved Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer With One to Three Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6366v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis [Epidemiology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6366v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Case-control studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between mobile phone use and tumor risk. We investigated these associations using a meta-analysis.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library in August 2008. Two evaluators independently reviewed and selected articles based on predetermined selection criteria.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 465 articles meeting our initial criteria, 23 case-control studies, which involved 37,916 participants (12,344 patient cases and 25,572 controls), were included in the final analyses. Compared with never or rarely having used a mobile phone, the odds ratio for overall use was 0.98 for malignant and benign tumors (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.07) in a random-effects meta-analysis of all 23 studies. However, a significant positive association (harmful effect) was observed in a random-effects meta-analysis of eight studies using blinding, whereas a significant negative association (protective effect) was observed in a fixed-effects meta-analysis of 15 studies not using blinding. Mobile phone use of 10 years or longer was associated with a risk of tumors in 13 studies reporting this association (odds ratio = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.34). Further, these findings were also observed in the subgroup analyses by methodologic quality of study. Blinding and methodologic quality of study were strongly associated with the research group.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The current study found that there is possible evidence linking mobile phone use to an increased risk of tumors from a meta-analysis of low-biased case-control studies. Prospective cohort studies providing a higher level of evidence are needed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myung, Ju, McDonnell, Lee, Kazinets, Cheng, Moskowitz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:58:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6366</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis [Epidemiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4809v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents: Results From a Large, Multicenter Study [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4809v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: There are no robust data on prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) &ndash;targeted therapy.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Baseline characteristics and outcomes on 645 patients with anti-VEGF therapy&ndash;na&iuml;ve metastatic RCC were collected from three US and four Canadian cancer centers. Cox proportional hazards regression, followed by bootstrap validation, was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The median OS for the whole cohort was 22 months (95% CI, 20.2 to 26.5 months), and the median follow-up was 24.5 months. Overall, 396, 200, and 49 patients were treated with sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab, respectively. Four of the five adverse prognostic factors according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were independent predictors of short survival: hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), corrected calcium greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN; <I>P</I> = .0006), Karnofsky performance status less than 80% (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), and time from diagnosis to treatment of less than 1 year (<I>P</I> = .01). In addition, neutrophils greater than the ULN (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) and platelets greater than the ULN (<I>P</I> = .01) were independent adverse prognostic factors. Patients were segregated into three risk categories: the favorable-risk group (no prognostic factors; n = 133), in which median OS (mOS) was not reached and 2-year OS (2y OS) was 75%; the intermediate-risk group (one or two prognostic factors; n = 301), in which mOS was 27 months and 2y OS was 53%; and the poor-risk group (three to six prognostic factors; n = 152), in which mOS was 8.8 months and 2y OS was 7% (log-rank <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The C-index was 0.73.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This model validates components of the MSKCC model with the addition of platelet and neutrophil counts and can be incorporated into patient care and into clinical trials that use VEGF-targeted agents.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heng, Xie, Regan, Warren, Golshayan, Sahi, Eigl, Ruether, Cheng, North, Venner, Knox, Chi, Kollmannsberger, McDermott, Oh, Atkins, Bukowski, Rini, Choueiri]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:58:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents: Results From a Large, Multicenter Study [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1060v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Achievement of at Least Very Good Partial Response Is a Simple and Robust Prognostic Factor in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With High-Dose Therapy: Long-Term Analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1060v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The prognostic impact of complete response (CR) achievement in multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown mostly in the context of autologous stem-cell transplantation. Other levels of response have been defined because, even with high-dose therapy, CR is a relatively rare event. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic impact of very good partial response (VGPR) in patients treated with high-dose therapy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: All patients were included in the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 99-02 and 99-04 trials and treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) induction therapy followed by double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Best post-ASCT response assessment was available for 802 patients.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: With a median follow-up of 67 months, median event-free survival (EFS) and 5-year EFS were 42 months and 34%, respectively, for 405 patients who achieved at least VGPR after ASCT versus 32 months and 26% in 288 patients who achieved only partial remission (<I>P</I> = .005). Five-year overall survival (OS) was significantly superior in patients achieving at least VGPR (74% <I>v</I> 61% <I>P</I> = .0017). In multivariate analysis, achievement of less than VGPR was an independent factor predicting shorter EFS and OS. Response to VAD had no impact on EFS and OS. The impact of VGPR achievement on EFS and OS was significant in patients with International Staging System stages 2 to 3 and for patients with poor-risk cytogenetics t(4;14) or del(17p).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In the context of ASCT, achievement of at least VGPR is a simple prognostic factor that has importance in intermediate and high-risk MM and can be informative in more patients than CR.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harousseau, Avet-Loiseau, Attal, Charbonnel, Garban, Hulin, Michallet, Facon, Garderet, Marit, Ketterer, Lamy, Voillat, Guilhot, Doyen, Mathiot, Moreau]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:58:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Achievement of at Least Very Good Partial Response Is a Simple and Robust Prognostic Factor in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With High-Dose Therapy: Long-Term Analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2206v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What's Race Got to Do With It? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2206v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhodes, Teno]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:50:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What's Race Got to Do With It? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8295v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I/II Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Localized Nasal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0211 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8295v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To explore a more effective treatment for localized nasal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, we conducted a phase I/II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Treatments comprised concurrent radiotherapy (50 Gy) and 3 courses of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin (DeVIC). Patients with a newly diagnosed stage IE or contiguous IIE disease with cervical node involvement and a performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 were eligible for enrollment. The primary end point of the phase II portion was a 2-year overall survival in patients treated with the recommended dose.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of the 33 patients enrolled, 10 patients were enrolled in the phase I portion and a two thirds dose of DeVIC was established as the recommended dose. Twenty-seven patients (range, 21 to 68; median, 56 years) treated with the recommended dose showed the following clinical features: male:female, 17:10; stage IE, 18; stage IIE, 9; B symptoms present, 10; elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, 5; and PS 2, 2. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 2-year overall survival was 78% (95% CI, 57% to 89%). This compared favorably with the historical control of radiotherapy alone (45%). Of the 26 patients assessable for a response, 20 (77%) achieved a complete response, with one partial response. The overall response rate was 81%. The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity was mucositis related to radiation (30%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using multidrug resistance-nonrelated agents and etoposide is a safe and effective treatment for localized nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma and warrants further investigation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yamaguchi, Tobinai, Oguchi, Ishizuka, Kobayashi, Isobe, Ishizawa, Maseki, Itoh, Usui, Wasada, Kinoshita, Ohshima, Matsuno, Terauchi, Nawano, Ishikura, Kagami, Hotta, Oshimi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8295</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I/II Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Localized Nasal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0211 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3494v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Timed Sequential Treatment With Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and an Allogeneic Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Secreting Breast Tumor Vaccine: A Chemotherapy Dose-Ranging Factorial Study of Safety and Immune Activation [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3494v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) &ndash;secreting tumor vaccines have demonstrated bioactivity but may be limited by disease burdens and immune tolerance. We tested the hypothesis that cyclophosphamide (CY) and doxorubicin (DOX) can enhance vaccine-induced immunity in patients with breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We conducted a 3 x 3 factorial (response surface) dose-ranging study of CY, DOX, and an HER2-positive, allogeneic, GM-CSF&ndash;secreting tumor vaccine in 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients received three monthly immunizations, with a boost 6 to 8 months from study entry. Primary objectives included safety and determination of the chemotherapy doses that maximize HER2-specific immunity.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Twenty-eight patients received at least one immunization, and 16 patients received four immunizations. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. HER2-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity developed in most patients who received vaccine alone or with 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> CY. HER2-specific antibody responses were enhanced by 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> CY and 35 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> DOX, but higher CY doses suppressed immunity. Analyses revealed that CY at 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and DOX at 35 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> is the combination that produced the highest antibody responses.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: First, immunotherapy with an allogeneic, HER2-positive, GM-CSF&ndash;secreting breast tumor vaccine alone or with CY and DOX is safe and induces HER2-specific immunity in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Second, the immunomodulatory activity of low-dose CY has a narrow therapeutic window, with an optimal dose not exceeding 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. Third, factorial designs provide an opportunity to identify the most active combination of interacting drugs in patients. Further investigation of the impact of chemotherapy on vaccine-induced immunity is warranted.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emens, Asquith, Leatherman, Kobrin, Petrik, Laiko, Levi, Daphtary, Biedrzycki, Wolff, Stearns, Disis, Ye, Piantadosi, Fetting, Davidson, Jaffee]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:31 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Timed Sequential Treatment With Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and an Allogeneic Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Secreting Breast Tumor Vaccine: A Chemotherapy Dose-Ranging Factorial Study of Safety and Immune Activation [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1860v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practical Application of a Calculator for Conditional Survival in Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1860v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Conditional survival (CS) estimates provide important prognostic information for clinicians and patients who have survived a period after diagnosis. In this study we performed a contemporary evaluation of conditional survival among colon cancer patients and created a browser-based tool for real-time determination of conditional survival expectancies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1988 and 2000 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) registry. Conditional survival estimates were calculated by using the multiplicative law of probability after adjustment for age; sex; ethnicity; grade; and American Joint Commission on Cancer, sixth edition stage. A browser-based calculator was constructed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 83,419 patients were analyzed. As the time alive after initial treatment increased from 0 to 5 years, significant improvements in CS were observed for patients in all stages except stage I, which was associated with good CS even at diagnosis and which reflected the high likelihood of cure. Notably, adjusted 5-year CS rates improved from 42% to 80% for stage IIIC cancers and from 5% to 48% for stage IV cancers during the first 5 years. Differences in cancer-related CS at diagnosis were identified on the basis of age, ethnicity, and grade, but these differences decreased over time. A browser-based CS calculator was implemented by using the multivariate survival model (concordance index, 0.81).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: For patients with colon cancer who survive over time, 5-year, cancer-specific CS improved dramatically, and the greatest improvements were among patients with poorer initial prognoses. These prognostic data are critical to inform patients for non&ndash;treatment-related life decisions and to inform treating physicians for planning of follow-up and surveillance strategies.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, Hu, Eng, Skibber, Rodriguez-Bigas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1860</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practical Application of a Calculator for Conditional Survival in Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1282v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alpha-Fetoprotein Response After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Oncologic Marker of Radiologic Response, Progression, and Survival [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1282v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is considered to be an indicator of tumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We present a novel correlation of AFP response to radiologic response, time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with locoregional therapies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Four hundred sixty-three patients with HCC were treated with chemoembolization or radioembolization at our institution. One hundred twenty-five patients with baseline AFP higher than 200 ng/mL were studied for this analysis. AFP response was defined as more than 50% decrease from baseline. One hundred nineteen patients with follow-up imaging were studied for the AFP imaging correlation analysis. AFP response was correlated to radiologic response, TTP, PFS, and OS. Multivariate analyses were performed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Eighty-one patients (65%) showed AFP response. AFP response was seen in 26 (55%) of 47 and 55 (70%) of 78 of patients treated with chemoembolization and radioembolization, respectively (<I>P</I> = .12). WHO response was seen in 41 (53%) of 77 and 10 (24%) of 42 of AFP responders and nonresponders, respectively (<I>P</I> = .002). The hazard ratio (HR) for TTP in AFP nonresponders compared with responders was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5 to 5.1). The HR for PFS was 4.2 (95% CI, 2.4 to 7.2) in AFP nonresponders compared with responders. The HR for OS in AFP nonresponders compared with responders was 5.5 (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.9) and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 4.6) on univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The data presented support the use of AFP response seen after locoregional therapy as an ancillary method of assessing tumor response and survival, as well as an early objective screening tool for progression by imaging.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riaz, Ryu, Kulik, Mulcahy, Lewandowski, Minocha, Ibrahim, Sato, Baker, Miller, Newman, Omary, Abecassis, Benson, Salem]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alpha-Fetoprotein Response After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Oncologic Marker of Radiologic Response, Progression, and Survival [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0805v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular Predictors of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Translational Study of the German Glioma Network [Neurooncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0805v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The prognostic value of genetic alterations characteristic of glioblastoma in patients treated according to present standards of care is unclear.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Three hundred one patients with glioblastoma were prospectively recruited between October 2004 and December 2006 at the clinical centers of the German Glioma Network. Two hundred fifty-eight patients had radiotherapy, 199 patients had temozolomide, 189 had both, and seven had another chemotherapy as the initial treatment. The tumors were investigated for <I>TP53</I> mutation, p53 immunoreactivity, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinase <I>CDK</I> <I>4</I> or murine double minute <I>2</I> amplification, <I>CDKN2A</I> homozygous deletion, allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 9p, 10q, and 19q, O<SUP>6</SUP>-methylguanine methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I>) promoter methylation, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (<I>IDH1</I>) mutations.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 12.5 months. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, higher performance score, <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation, and temozolomide radiochemotherapy as independent factors associated with longer OS. <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was associated with longer PFS (relative risk [RR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and OS (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) in patients receiving temozolomide. <I>IDH1</I> mutations were associated with prolonged PFS (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.91; <I>P</I> = .028) and a trend for prolonged OS (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.19; <I>P</I> = .10). No other molecular factor was associated with outcome.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Molecular changes associated with gliomagenesis do not predict response to therapy in glioblastoma patients managed according to current standards of care. <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation and <I>IDH</I><I>1</I> mutational status allow for stratification into prognostically distinct subgroups.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weller, Felsberg, Hartmann, Berger, Steinbach, Schramm, Westphal, Schackert, Simon, Tonn, Heese, Krex, Nikkhah, Pietsch, Wiestler, Reifenberger, von Deimling, Loeffler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0805</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular Predictors of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Translational Study of the German Glioma Network [Neurooncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4733v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Racial Differences in Predictors of Intensive End-of-Life Care in Advanced Cancer Patients [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4733v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Black patients are more likely than white patients to receive life-prolonging care near death. This study examined predictors of intensive end-of-life (EOL) care for black and white advanced cancer patients.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Three hundred two self-reported black (n = 68) and white (n = 234) patients with stage IV cancer and caregivers participated in a US multisite, prospective, interview-based cohort study from September 2002 to August 2008. Participants were observed until death, a median of 116 days from baseline. Patient-reported baseline predictors included EOL care preference, physician trust, EOL discussion, completion of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, and religious coping. Caregiver postmortem interviews provided information regarding EOL care received. Intensive EOL care was defined as resuscitation and/or ventilation followed by death in an intensive care unit.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Although black patients were three times more likely than white patients to receive intensive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.04, <I>P</I> = .037), white patients with a preference for this care were approximately three times more likely to receive it (aOR = 13.20, <I>P</I> = .008) than black patients with the same preference (aOR = 4.46, <I>P</I> = .058). White patients who reported an EOL discussion or DNR order did not receive intensive EOL care; similar reports were not protective for black patients (aOR = 0.53, <I>P</I> = .460; and aOR = 0.65, <I>P</I> = .618, respectively).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: White patients with advanced cancer are more likely than black patients with advanced cancer to receive the EOL care they initially prefer. EOL discussions and DNR orders are not associated with care for black patients, highlighting a need to improve communication between black patients and their clinicians.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loggers, Maciejewski, Paulk, DeSanto-Madeya, Nilsson, Viswanath, Wright, Balboni, Temel, Stieglitz, Block, Prigerson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4733</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Racial Differences in Predictors of Intensive End-of-Life Care in Advanced Cancer Patients [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4436v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Underweight and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Death: A Report From the Korean Breast Cancer Society [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4436v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The association between body mass index and breast cancer outcome is controversial. Furthermore, the impact of underweight on breast cancer recurrence and death has not been adequately addressed.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We investigated this issue using a large nationwide database of 24,698 Korean breast cancer patients. The association between body weight status and breast cancer recurrence was further explored using a single-institution database containing information on 4,345 patients.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The results from the nationwide database showed significantly lower overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in underweight patients compared with survival in patients of normal weight after adjusting for known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, hormone receptor status, histologic grade, and lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.90 for OS; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.93 for BCSS), which were not observed in obese patients. In an analysis of recurrence data from the single institution, underweight women had a significantly higher risk of both distant metastasis and local recurrence of breast cancer (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.58 and HR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.66 to 9.90, respectively).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Our study suggests that underweight should be considered to be a high risk factor for death and recurrence after breast cancer surgery, especially in Asian breast cancer patients.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moon, Han, Noh]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Underweight and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Death: A Report From the Korean Breast Cancer Society [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3685v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reporting of Time-to-Event End Points and Tracking of Failures in Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy With or Without Any Concomitant Anticancer Agent for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3685v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: For multiple reasons, including complexities in anatomy and management, locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHNs) represent a challenging disease for the reporting of end points and the tracking of failures.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We retrieved all randomized trials published in English that began accrual on or after 1978 and enrolled previously untreated patients with nonmetastatic SCCHN receiving primary radiotherapy with or without any concomitant anticancer agent. The reporting of time-to-event end points and the tracking of failures in these trials were analyzed. Failures were defined as events meeting a prespecified end point definition.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty trials involving a total of 125 time-to-event end points were identified. A total of 17 different types of end points were reported. Locoregional control and overall survival accounted for 70% of primary end points. Except for survival, the definitions used for all other end points were heterogeneous. Among 72 end points tracking locoregional failures, 29% did not define the term, whereas 64% specified the absence of complete response as a failure. Overall, the specification of details related to elective neck dissection or salvage surgery to define locoregional failures was deficient. Furthermore, it was rarely stated whether residual disease found during these procedures represents a failure. The methods and timing specifications to assess failures were frequently missing in published reports. The tracking of other types of failure beyond the first failure was reported in only one trial.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: These results support the need to standardize the selection, definition, and reporting of time-to-event end points in clinical trials of locally advanced SCCHN.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Tourneau, Michiels, Gan, Siu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3685</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reporting of Time-to-Event End Points and Tracking of Failures in Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy With or Without Any Concomitant Anticancer Agent for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0392v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spontaneous Remission in a Patient With t(4;14) Translocation Multiple Myeloma [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0392v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Puig, Trudel, Keats, Li, Braggio, Ahmann, Zeng, Fonseca, Kukreti]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:47:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0392</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spontaneous Remission in a Patient With t(4;14) Translocation Multiple Myeloma [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6473v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognition of a New Chemotherapeutic Vesicant: Trabectedin (Ecteinascidin-743) Extravasation With Skin and Soft Tissue Damage [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6473v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theman, Hartzell, Sinha, Polson, Morgan, Demetri, Orgill, George]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:47:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6473</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognition of a New Chemotherapeutic Vesicant: Trabectedin (Ecteinascidin-743) Extravasation With Skin and Soft Tissue Damage [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5756v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incremental Cancer Detection and Impact on Surgical Management [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5756v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for staging women with breast cancer, including screening for occult contralateral cancer. This article is a review and meta-analysis of studies reporting contralateral MRI in women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We systematically reviewed the evidence on contralateral MRI, calculating pooled estimates for positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive:false-positive ratio (TP:FP), and incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) over conventional imaging. Random effects logistic regression examined whether estimates were associated with study quality or clinical variables.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Twenty-two studies reported contralateral malignancies detected only by MRI in 131 of 3,253 women. Summary estimates were as follows: MRI-detected suspicious findings (TP plus FP), 9.3% (95% CI, 5.8% to 14.7%); ICDR, 4.1% (95% CI, 2.7% to 6.0%), PPV, 47.9% (95% CI, 31.8% to 64.6%); TP:FP ratio, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.82). PPV was associated with the number of test positives and baseline imaging. Few studies included consecutive women, and few ascertained outcomes in all subjects. Where reported, 35.1% of MRI-detected cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ (mean size = 6.9 mm), 64.9% were invasive cancers (mean size = 9.3 mm), and the majority were stage pTis or pT1 and node negative. Effect on treatment was inconsistently reported, but many women underwent contralateral mastectomy.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: MRI detects contralateral lesions in a substantial proportion of women, but does not reliably distinguish benign from malignant findings. Relatively high ICDR may be due to selection bias and/or overdetection. Women must be informed of the uncertain benefit and potential harm, including additional investigations and surgery.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan, Houssami, Lord, Macaskill, Irwig, Dixon, Warren, Ciatto]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:46:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5756</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incremental Cancer Detection and Impact on Surgical Management [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5079v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Novel Breast Tissue Feature Strongly Associated With Risk of Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5079v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Accurate, individualized risk prediction for breast cancer is lacking. Tissue-based features may help to stratify women into different risk levels. Breast lobules are the anatomic sites of origin of breast cancer. As women age, these lobular structures should regress, which results in reduced breast cancer risk. However, this does not occur in all women.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We have quantified the extent of lobule regression on a benign breast biopsy in 85 patients who developed breast cancer and 142 age-matched controls from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort, by determining number of acini per lobule and lobular area. We also calculated Gail model 5-year predicted risks for these women.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There is a step-wise increase in breast cancer risk with increasing numbers of acini per lobule (<I>P</I> = .0004). Adjusting for Gail model score, parity, histology, and family history did not attenuate this association. Lobular area was similarly associated with risk. The Gail model estimates were associated with risk of breast cancer (<I>P</I> = .03). We examined the individual accuracy of these measures using the concordance (c) statistic. The Gail model c statistic was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.70); the acinar count c statistic was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.75). Combining acinar count and lobular area, the c statistic was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.78). Adding the Gail model to these measures did not improve the c statistic.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Novel, tissue-based features that reflect the status of a woman's normal breast lobules are associated with breast cancer risk. These features may offer a novel strategy for risk prediction.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKian, Reynolds, Visscher, Nassar, Radisky, Vierkant, Degnim, Boughey, Ghosh, Anderson, Minot, Caudill, Vachon, Frost, Pankratz, Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:46:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Novel Breast Tissue Feature Strongly Associated With Risk of Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.0204v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Trying to Be a Good Parent" As Defined By Interviews With Parents Who Made Phase I, Terminal Care, and Resuscitation Decisions for Their Children [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.0204v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: When a child's cancer progresses beyond current treatment capability, the parents are likely to participate in noncurative treatment decision making. One factor that helps parents to make these decisions and remain satisfied with them afterward is deciding as they believe a good parent would decide. Because being a good parent to a child with incurable cancer has not been formally defined, we conducted a descriptive study to develop such a definition.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: In face-to-face interviews, 62 parents who had made one of three decisions (enrollment on a phase I study, do not resuscitate status, or terminal care) for 58 patients responded to two open-ended questions about the definition of a good parent and about how clinicians could help them fulfill this role. For semantic content analysis of the interviews, a rater panel trained in this method independently coded all responses. Inter-rater reliability was excellent.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Among the aspects of the definition qualitatively identified were making informed, unselfish decisions in the child's best interest, remaining at the child's side, showing the child that he is cherished, teaching the child to make good decisions, advocating for the child with the staff, and promoting the child's health. We also identified 15 clinician strategies that help parents be a part of making these decisions on behalf of a child with advanced cancer.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The definition and the strategies may be used to guide clinicians in helping parents fulfill the good parent role and take comfort afterward in having acted as a good parent.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hinds, Oakes, Hicks, Powell, Srivastava, Spunt, Harper, Baker, West, Furman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:45:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Trying to Be a Good Parent" As Defined By Interviews With Parents Who Made Phase I, Terminal Care, and Resuscitation Decisions for Their Children [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5209v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stop and Go: Yes or No? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5209v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hochster]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5209</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stop and Go: Yes or No? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3683v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relapse/Refractory Myeloma Patient: Potential Treatment Guidelines [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3683v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Miguel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:37 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3683</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relapse/Refractory Myeloma Patient: Potential Treatment Guidelines [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8089v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to Treat Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Amplified Breast Cancer [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8089v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cortes, Baselga]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:31 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to Treat Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Amplified Breast Cancer [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6745v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of AMG 479, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor 1 [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6745v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and evidence of antitumor activity of AMG 479, a fully human monoclonal antibody to insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with advanced solid malignancies or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received escalating doses of AMG 479 intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (Q2W). Blood samples were assayed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters and IGF-1R occupancy on neutrophils; fluorodeoxyglucose&ndash;positron emission tomography scans were used to assess tumor metabolic effects.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Fifty-three patients received 312 infusions of AMG 479 Q2W. Overall, the most common grades 1 to 2 toxicities were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, fever, rash, chills, and anorexia. One dose-limiting toxicity (ie, grade 3 thrombocytopenia) occurred in a patient at 20 mg/kg during course 1; grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 8) and grade 3 transaminitis elevations (n = 1) also were reported but not in the escalation phase. The maximum-planned dose of 20 mg/kg was safely administered; thus, an MTD was not reached. High levels of neutrophil IGF-1R binding and increases from baseline in serum IGF-1 levels were observed in the 12- and 20-mg/kg cohorts. Tumor responses included one durable complete response (CR) and one unconfirmed partial response (PR) in two patients with Ewing/primitive neuroectodermal tumors and included one PR and one minor response in two patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The patients with Ewing/PNET who had a CR have remained disease free on therapy after 28 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: AMG 479 can be administered safely at 20 mg/kg IV Q2W. The absence of severe toxicities, attainment of serum concentrations associated with high levels of IGF-1R binding on neutrophils, and provocative antitumor activity warrant additional studies of this agent.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tolcher, Sarantopoulos, Patnaik, Papadopoulos, Lin, Rodon, Murphy, Roth, McCaffery, Gorski, Kaiser, Zhu, Deng, Friberg, Puzanov]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6745</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of AMG 479, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor 1 [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6000v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biased Hormonal Therapy Duration Analysis Makes Results Uninterpretable [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6000v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tangen, Goldman, Swanson, Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6000</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biased Hormonal Therapy Duration Analysis Makes Results Uninterpretable [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5341v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to L. Collette et al and C.M. Tangen et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5341v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souhami, Bae, Sandler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5341</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to L. Collette et al and C.M. Tangen et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4344v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can Chemotherapy Be Discontinued in Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4344v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This study compared chemotherapy discontinuation with maintenance therapy with leucovorin and fluorouracil after six cycles of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Two hundred two patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) followed by simplified leucovorin plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil until progression (arm 1 or maintenance arm, n = 98) or six cycles of mFOLFOX7 before a complete stop of chemotherapy (arm 2 or chemotherapy-free interval [CFI] arm, n = 104). Reintroduction of mFOLFOX7 was scheduled after tumor progression in both arms. The primary study end point was duration of disease control (DDC).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Median DDC was 13.1 months in patients assigned to the maintenance arm and 9.2 months in patients assigned to the CFI arm (<I>P</I> = .046). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 8.6 and 23.8 months, respectively, in the maintenance arm and 6.6 and 19.5 months, respectively, in the CFI arm. Median duration of maintenance therapy (arm 1) and CFIs (arm 2) were 4.8 months and 3.9 months, respectively. Overall response rates were 59.2% and 59.6% for the initial FOLFOX chemotherapy and 20.4% and 30.3% for FOLFOX reintroduction in arms 1 and 2, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The planned complete discontinuation of chemotherapy had a negative impact on DDC and PFS compared with the maintenance therapy strategy. These results suggest that chemotherapy discontinuation cannot be decided before therapy is initiated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chibaudel, Maindrault-Goebel, Lledo, Mineur, Andre, Bennamoun, Mabro, Artru, Carola, Flesch, Dupuis, Colin, Larsen, Afchain, Tournigand, Louvet, de Gramont]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4344</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can Chemotherapy Be Discontinued in Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3734v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lapatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Letrozole and Placebo As First-Line Therapy for Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3734v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) &ndash;positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; <I>P</I> = .019); median PFS was 8.2 <I>v</I> 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease &ge; 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% <I>v</I> 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; <I>P</I> = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; <I>P</I> = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% <I>v</I> 1%; rash, 1% <I>v</I> 0%, respectively), but they were manageable.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnston, Pippen, Pivot, Lichinitser, Sadeghi, Dieras, Gomez, Romieu, Manikhas, Kennedy, Press, Maltzman, Florance, O'Rourke, Oliva, Stein, Pegram]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3734</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lapatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Letrozole and Placebo As First-Line Therapy for Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3601v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Is Not a Good Reason for Advising More Than 5 Years of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy for All Patients With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3601v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collette, Studer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3601</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Is Not a Good Reason for Advising More Than 5 Years of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy for All Patients With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1431v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genetic Abnormalities of the EGFR Pathway in African American Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1431v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Previous studies in non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have demonstrated a wide variation in responsiveness to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) &ndash;targeting agents and in genetic aberrancies of the <I>EGFR</I> pathway according to ethnic background, most notably a higher frequency of activating <I>EGFR</I> mutations among East-Asian patients. We investigated the frequency of <I>EGFR</I> pathway aberrancies among African American patients with NSCLC, for whom limited information presently exists.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: <I>EGFR</I> fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on archived tissues from 53 African American patients. Extracted DNA was sequenced for mutational analysis of <I>EGFR</I> exons 18 to 21 and <I>KRAS</I> exon 2. Results were compared by multivariate analysis to an historical control cohort of 102 white patients with NSCLC.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: African Americans were significantly less likely to harbor activating mutations of <I>EGFR</I> than white patients (2% <I>v</I> 17%; <I>P</I> = .022). Only one <I>EGFR</I> mutation was identified, a novel S768N substitution. <I>EGFR</I> FISH assay was more frequently positive for African Americans than for white patients (51% <I>v</I> 32%; <I>P</I> = .018). <I>KRAS</I> mutational frequency did not differ between the groups (23% <I>v</I> 21%; <I>P</I> = .409).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: African American patients with NSCLC are significantly less likely than white counterparts to harbor activating mutations of <I>EGFR</I>, which suggests that EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are unlikely to yield major remissions in this population. Our findings add to a growing body of evidence that points to genetic heterogeneity of the <I>EGFR</I> pathway in NSCLC among different ethnic groups and that underscores the need for consideration of these differences in the design of future trials of agents that target the <I>EGFR</I> pathway.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leidner, Fu, Clifford, Hamdan, Jin, Eisenberg, Boggon, Skokan, Franklin, Cappuzzo, Hirsch, Varella-Garcia, Halmos]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1431</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genetic Abnormalities of the EGFR Pathway in African American Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8833v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic Model for Predicting Death Within 12 Months in Patients With Primary or Post-Polycythemia Vera/Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8833v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Current prognostic tools in myelofibrosis (MF) fail to identify patients at the highest risk of death and are limited by their applicability only to the time of diagnosis. We aimed to define an accelerated phase (AP) in MF by characterizing disease features that can identify patients with median overall survival of &le; 12 months at any time in the disease course.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Baseline characteristics of 370 consecutive patients with MF from a single center were analyzed to identify features associated with a median overall survival of &le; 12 months. These putative AP features were then validated by following the course of chronic-phase patients (no AP features at baseline) until the development of one or more AP features and determining their subsequent survival.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The following three characteristics were associated with poor survival at baseline and were selected as putative AP features: blasts in blood or bone marrow &ge; 10%, platelets less than 50 x 10<SUP>9</SUP>/L, and chromosome 17 aberrations (median overall survival, 10, 12, and 5 months, respectively). In the validation phase, chronic-phase patients who developed AP features during follow-up were found to have short subsequent survival times (median overall survival, 12, 15, and 6 months, respectively). AP was a necessary step in the progression to blast phase, with leukemic transformation being exceedingly rare (3% risk at 10 years) in patients who remained persistently in chronic phase.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Blood or bone marrow blasts &ge; 10%, platelets less than 50 x 10<SUP>9</SUP>/L, and chromosome 17 aberrations defined AP in patients with MF. Patients in AP should be candidates for intensive therapeutic interventions.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam, Kantarjian, Cortes, Lynn, Pierce, Zhou, Keating, Thomas, Verstovsek]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8833</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic Model for Predicting Death Within 12 Months in Patients With Primary or Post-Polycythemia Vera/Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7868v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geographic Distribution of Lapatinib-Induced Skin Rash: Sparing of Abdominal Skin Persists in the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7868v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Kasparian, Morganstern, Beard]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7868</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geographic Distribution of Lapatinib-Induced Skin Rash: Sparing of Abdominal Skin Persists in the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7793v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Tell or Not to Tell: The Community Wants to Know About Expensive Anticancer Drugs As a Potential Treatment Option [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7793v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Many new cancer treatments are available only at significant financial cost to the patient. We previously reported that Australian medical oncologists commonly do not discuss unsubsidized, expensive anticancer drugs (EACD) because of concern about causing distress. We argued that this position was not consistent with modern ethical principals but wanted to seek the community viewpoint.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: A cross-sectional telephone survey of the Australian general public was performed. Respondents' views were sought about three hypothetical scenarios in which they were diagnosed with incurable cancer and an EACD treatment (out-of-pocket cost US$25,000) was available.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Responses were obtained from 1,255 respondents (response rate, 43%). One hundred thirty-seven (11%) had a prior cancer diagnosis. Ninety-one percent of respondents wanted to be told by their doctor about an EACD that could improve survival by an additional 4 to 6 months, with 51% prepared to pay for it. People were more willing to pay if the drug could improve quality of life (71%) or if there was no effective standard treatment (76%). Sixty-eight percent believed the government should pay. Cost would be a significant financial burden for 31% of those willing to pay. Those more likely to want to be informed were younger, employed, better-educated, or had higher income levels (<I>P</I> &lt; .05). Responses did not vary with the person's personal experience of cancer. Of the 9% who did not wish to be informed, half of these were concerned about the information causing distress.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The Australian general public wants to be informed about EACD as potential treatment options, even if they are not willing or readily able to pay for them.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mileshkin, Schofield, Jefford, Agalianos, Levine, Herschtal, Savulescu, Thomson, Zalcberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:06 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Tell or Not to Tell: The Community Wants to Know About Expensive Anticancer Drugs As a Potential Treatment Option [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health Services and Outcomes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7058v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immuno-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Index Predicts Survival in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-CHOP: A GELA Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7058v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the prognostic value of cell of origin immunohistochemical markers and <I>BCL2</I>, <I>BCL6</I>, and c-<I>MYC</I> translocations in a homogeneous cohort of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with CD20+ DLBCL were enrolled in the randomized LNH98-5 and 01-5B Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte trials. Paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 119 patients treated with R-CHOP were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for CD10, BCL6, MUM1/IRF4, LMO2, and forkhead box protein P1 (FOXP1) expression and for <I>BCL2</I>, <I>BCL6</I>, and c-<I>MYC</I> breakpoints by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on tissue microarray.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: LMO2 expression and <I>BCL2</I> breakpoint were associated with the germinal center (GC) subtype defined by Hans' algorithm, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001; <I>P</I> = .0002) whereas FOXP1 expression and <I>BCL6</I> breakpoint were associated with the non-germinal center (non-GC) subtype (<I>P</I> = .008 and <I>P</I> = .0001, respectively). The immunohistochemical markers analyzed independently, GC/non-GC phenotype and <I>BCL2</I> breakpoint did not predict overall survival (OS). <I>BCL6</I> breakpoint was significantly associated with an unfavorable impact on OS (<I>P</I> = .04). Interestingly, an immunoFISH index, defined by positivity for at least two of three non-GC markers (FOXP1, MUM1/IRF4, <I>BCL6</I> breakpoint) was significantly associated with a shorter 5-year OS rate (44%; 95% CI, 28 to 60 <I>v</I> 78%; 95% CI, 59 to 89; <I>P</I> = .01) which was independent (<I>P</I> = .04) of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (<I>P</I> = .04) in multivariate analysis.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Our study demonstrates that combining immunohistochemistry with FISH allows construction of an immunoFISH index that significantly predicts survival in elderly DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Copie-Bergman, Gaulard, Leroy, Briere, Baia, Jais, Salles, Berger, Haioun, Tilly, Emile, Banham, Mounier, Gisselbrecht, Feugier, Coiffier, Molina]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immuno-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Index Predicts Survival in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-CHOP: A GELA Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4931v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid Clinical Deterioration and Leukemoid Reaction After Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Possible Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4931v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez, Fligner, Yu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:47 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid Clinical Deterioration and Leukemoid Reaction After Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Possible Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4386v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival After Second Primary Neoplasms of the Brain or Spinal Cord in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results From the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4386v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Survival after brain or spinal cord neoplasms is poor and varies by diagnostic group, age, grade, treatment and pretreatment factors, and location and size of tumor. We carried out a study to investigate survival and factors affecting survival of all diagnostic types of second primary brain or spinal cord neoplasms.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (BCCSS) is a long-term population-based follow-up study of 17,980 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. We used relative survival and multivariate Cox regression analysis to determine 5-year relative survival and factors affecting survival in second primary meningiomas and gliomas that developed in survivors included in the BCCSS.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There were 247 second primary brain or spinal cord neoplasms, including 137 meningiomas and 73 gliomas in a young adult population. Five-year relative survival after meningiomas was similar for males (84.0%; 95% CI, 72.6% to 91.1%) and females (81.7%; 95% CI, 69.9% to 89.3%). For gliomas, 5-year relative survival was 19.5% (95% CI, 8.6% to 33.7%) for males and females. Multivariate analysis showed significant heterogeneity by decade of treatment (<I>P</I> = .04), grade (<I>P</I> = .03), and genetic risk (<I>P</I> = .03) for rate of mortality after a meningioma. For gliomas, survival was significantly affected by grade (<I>P</I> &lt; .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Our results indicate survival is poor after second primary glioma in this young adult population, although survival after second primary meningioma is good. Our study has clinical implications for the surveillance of childhood cancer survivors at risk of developing second primary brain tumors, in particular survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia or childhood brain tumors.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, Frobisher, Ellison, Reulen, Winter, Taylor, Stiller, Lancashire, Tudor, Baggott, May, Hawkins]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4386</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival After Second Primary Neoplasms of the Brain or Spinal Cord in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results From the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4924v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase II/III Trial Assessing Gemcitabine/Carboplatin and Methotrexate/Carboplatin/Vinblastine in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer "Unfit" for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: Phase II--Results of EORTC Study 30986 [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4924v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: There is no standard treatment for patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are ineligible ("unfit") for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CHT). To compare the activity and safety of two CHT combinations in this patient group, a randomized phase II/III trial was conducted by the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). We report here the phase II results of the study.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: CHT-na&iuml;ve patients with measurable disease and impaired renal function (30 mL/min &lt; glomerular filtration rate [GFR] &lt; 60 mL/min) and/or performance status (PS) 2 were randomly assigned to receive either GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] 4.5) for 21 days or M-CAVI (methotrexate 30 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1, 15, and 22; carboplatin AUC 4.5 on day 1; and vinblastine 3 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1, 15, and 22) for 28 days. End points of response and severe acute toxicity (SAT) were evaluated with respect to treatment group, renal function, PS, and Bajorin risk groups.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Three of 178 patients who were ineligible or did not start treatment were excluded. SAT was reported in 13.6% of patients on GC and in 23% on M-CAVI. Overall response rates were 42% (37 of 88) for GC and 30% (26 of 87) for M-CAVI. Patients with PS 2 and GFR less than 60 mL/min and patients in Bajorin risk group 2 showed a response rate of only 26% and 20% and an SAT rate of 26% and 25%, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Both combinations are active in this group of unfit patients. However, patients with PS 2 and GFR less than 60 mL/min do not benefit from combination CHT. Alternative treatment modalities should be sought in this subgroup of poor-risk patients.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Santis, Bellmunt, Mead, Kerst, Leahy, Maroto, Skoneczna, Marreaud, de Wit, Sylvester]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4924</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase II/III Trial Assessing Gemcitabine/Carboplatin and Methotrexate/Carboplatin/Vinblastine in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer "Unfit" for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: Phase II--Results of EORTC Study 30986 [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4882v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeted High-Resolution Ultrasound Is Not an Effective Substitute for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4882v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To reassess traditional ultrasound descriptors of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases, to determine the minimum cross-sectional area (CSA) of an SLN metastasis detectable by ultrasound (US), and to establish whether targeted, high-resolution US of SLNs identified by lymphoscintigraphy before initial melanoma surgery can be used as a substitute for excisional SLN biopsy.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: US was performed on SLNs identified in 871 lymph node fields in 716 patients. SLN biopsy was performed within 24 hours of lymphoscintigraphy and US examination. The CSA of each SLN metastatic deposit was determined sonographically and histologically.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The sensitivity of targeted US in the detection of positive SLNs was 24.3% (95% CI, 19.5% to 28.7%), and the specificity was 96.8% (95% CI, 95.9% to 97.7%). The sensitivity was highest for neck SLNs (45.8%) and improved with greater Breslow thickness. The median histologic CSA of the SLN metastatic deposits was 0.39 mm<SUP>2</SUP> (12.75 mm<SUP>2</SUP> for US true-positive results and 0.22 mm<SUP>2</SUP> for US false-negative results). True-positive, US-detected SLNs had significantly greater CSAs (<I>t</I> test <I>P</I> &lt; .001) than undetected SLN metastases and were more likely to be spherical in cross-section. More than two sonographic descriptors of SLN metastases or rounding of the node alone were factors highly suggestive of a melanoma deposit.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: US is not an appropriate substitute for SLN biopsy, but it is of value in preoperative SLN assessment and postoperative monitoring.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanki, Uren, Moncrieff, Tran, Scolyer, Lin, Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4882</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeted High-Resolution Ultrasound Is Not an Effective Substitute for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.6847v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trastuzumab Plus Anastrozole Versus Anastrozole Alone for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III TAnDEM Study [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.6847v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: TAnDEM is the first randomized phase III study to combine a hormonal agent and trastuzumab without chemotherapy as treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/hormone receptor&ndash;copositive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Postmenopausal women with HER2/hormone receptor&ndash;copositive MBC were randomly assigned to anastrozole (1 mg/d orally) with or without trastuzumab (4 mg/kg intravenous infusion on day 1, then 2 mg/kg every week) until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat population.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall, 103 patients received trastuzumab plus anastrozole; 104 received anastrozole alone. Patients in the trastuzumab plus anastrozole arm experienced significant improvements in PFS compared with patients receiving anastrozole alone (hazard ratio = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.84; median PFS, 4.8 <I>v</I> 2.4 months; log-rank <I>P</I> = .0016). In patients with centrally confirmed hormone receptor positivity (n = 150), median PFS was 5.6 and 3.8 months in the trastuzumab plus anastrozole and anastrozole alone arms, respectively (log-rank <I>P</I> = .006). Overall survival in the overall and centrally confirmed hormone receptor&ndash;positive populations showed no statistically significant treatment difference; however, 70% of patients in the anastrozole alone arm crossed over to receive trastuzumab after progression on anastrozole alone. Incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was 23% and 5%, respectively, in the trastuzumab plus anastrozole arm, and 15% and 1%, respectively, in the anastrozole alone arm; one patient in the combination arm experienced New York Heart Association class II congestive heart failure.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Trastuzumab plus anastrozole improves outcomes for patients with HER2/hormone receptor&ndash;copositive MBC compared with anastrozole alone, although adverse events and serious adverse events were more frequent with the combination.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaufman, Mackey, Clemens, Bapsy, Vaid, Wardley, Tjulandin, Jahn, Lehle, Feyereislova, Revil, Jones]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:56:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trastuzumab Plus Anastrozole Versus Anastrozole Alone for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III TAnDEM Study [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4681v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Homecoming [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4681v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majhail]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:58:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Homecoming [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8429v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pancreatic Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8429v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Conventional medicine has had little to offer patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma; thus, many patients seek alternative treatments. The National Cancer Institute, in 1998, sponsored a randomized, phase III, controlled trial of proteolytic enzyme therapy versus chemotherapy. Because most eligible patients refused random assignment, the trial was changed in 2001 to a controlled, observational study.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: All patients were seen by one of the investigators at Columbia University, and patients who received enzyme therapy were seen by the participating alternative practitioner. All met strict clinical criteria for eligibility. Of 55 patients who had inoperable pancreatic cancer, 23 elected gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, and 32 elected enzyme treatment, which included pancreatic enzymes, nutritional supplements, detoxification, and an organic diet. Primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival and quality of life, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At enrollment, the treatment groups had no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, pathology, quality of life, or clinically meaningful laboratory values. Kaplan-Meier analysis found a 9.7-month difference in median survival between the chemotherapy group (median survival, 14 months) and enzyme treatment groups (median survival, 4.3 months) and found an adjusted-mortality hazard ratio of the enzyme group compared with the chemotherapy group of 6.96 (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). At 1 year, 56% of chemotherapy-group patients were alive, and 16% of enzyme-therapy patients were alive. The quality of life ratings were better in the chemotherapy group than in the enzyme-treated group (<I>P</I> &lt; .01).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Among patients who have pancreatic cancer, those who chose gemcitabine-based chemotherapy survived more than three times as long (14.0 <I>v</I> 4.3 months) and had better quality of life than those who chose proteolytic enzyme treatment.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chabot, Tsai, Fine, Chen, Kumah, Antman, Grann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:48:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8429</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pancreatic Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>