<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology Early Release</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed - Early Release</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1223v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0548v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9292v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9045v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8500v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8161v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5100v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4194v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2180v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1455v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9640v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9285v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8667v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8584v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8311v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7560v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7487v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7370v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5903v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5622v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5051v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4898v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4799v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4674v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1423v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0953v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0946v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0425v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9427v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8718v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7900v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5060v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2554v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0400v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9972v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5988v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.6755v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.3075v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.26.6171v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8632v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8319v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6669v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6156v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.5091v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4342v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3765v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3716v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1173v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0670v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7353v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5985v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5647v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3238v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1034v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8527v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7958v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7511v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7503v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6976v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6497v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5101v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3890v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2793v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0169v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3354v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2273v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1077v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2679v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7166v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.4156v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2952v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2655v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6261v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4326v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4300v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4292v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4144v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4110v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4078v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3914v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3757v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1918v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0779v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8013v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7767v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6918v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6009v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5993v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5837v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5217v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4822v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4277v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4137v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3675v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2222v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0317v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0036v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9020v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8592v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8436v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5408v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4252v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2025v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1670v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1613v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8239v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7041v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5151v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4295v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3693v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3370v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1507v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0962v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9766v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7588v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6796v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4577v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8306v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.18.8821v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4284v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3963v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1652v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1371v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6744v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5233v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3808v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3485v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7545v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7461v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7420v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6901v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6067v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4468v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2280v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7942v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7504v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6258v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2232v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.9430v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6931v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6147v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2544v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2221v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0969v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0522v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0282v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9995v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6736v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4004v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3253v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2461v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6406v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4450v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2801v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2470v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8635v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2950v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8784v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8032v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4684v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8199v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4525v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6018v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1738v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0250v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9799v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7769v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6944v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6852v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4329v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4162v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9139v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4809v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1060v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3494v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1860v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1282v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0805v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4436v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3685v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5079v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.0204v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5209v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3683v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6745v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4344v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7868v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7793v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4931v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4386v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4681v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8429v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1223v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer and the Family: The Silent Words of Truth [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1223v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baider, Surbone]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:57:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1223</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer and the Family: The Silent Words of Truth [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0548v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Voogd et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0548v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wildiers, Van Calster, Van Dorpe, Dieudonne, Smeets, Christiaens, Neven]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:57:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0548</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Voogd et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0027v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pessimism Is No Poison [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0027v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schapira, Butow, Brown, Boyle]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:57:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pessimism Is No Poison [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9292v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age-Related Variations in the Use of Axillary Staging May Explain the Increased Risk of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Older Women With Breast Cancer [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9292v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voogd, Nieuwenhuijzen, Coebergh]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:56:59 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9292</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age-Related Variations in the Use of Axillary Staging May Explain the Increased Risk of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Older Women With Breast Cancer [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9045v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oropharyngeal Cancer, Human Papilloma Virus, and Clinical Trials [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9045v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rischin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:56:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oropharyngeal Cancer, Human Papilloma Virus, and Clinical Trials [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8500v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Panacea or Just an Obstacle Course for the Patient? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8500v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khatri]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:56:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Panacea or Just an Obstacle Course for the Patient? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8161v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healing by Cancer [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8161v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silbermann, Dweib Khleif, Balducci]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8161</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healing by Cancer [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5100v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Utility of Serum Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Extracellular Domain Levels: Stop the Shilly-Shally--It Is Time for a Well-Designed, Large-Scale Prospective Study [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5100v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tse, Lamy]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Utility of Serum Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Extracellular Domain Levels: Stop the Shilly-Shally--It Is Time for a Well-Designed, Large-Scale Prospective Study [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4194v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma During Therapy With Alemtuzumab for T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4194v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sohani, Ferry, Chang, Abramson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:36 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma During Therapy With Alemtuzumab for T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2180v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2180v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: We assessed the outcome of a watchful-waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention by using clinical prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or histologic progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: This was a prospective, single-arm, cohort study. Patients were managed with an initial expectant approach. Definitive intervention was offered to those patients with a PSA doubling time of less than 3 years, Gleason score progression (to 4 + 3 or greater), or unequivocal clinical progression. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were applied to the data.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 450 patients have been observed with active surveillance. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 13 years). Overall survival was 78.6%. The 10-year prostate cancer actuarial survival was 97.2%. Overall, 30% of patients have been reclassified as higher risk and have been offered definitive therapy. Of 117 patients treated radically, the PSA failure rate was 50%, which was 13% of the total cohort. PSA doubling time of 3 years or greater was associated with an 8.5-times higher risk of biochemical failure after definitive treatment compared with a doubling time of less than 3 years (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The hazard ratio for nonprostate cancer to prostate cancer mortality was 18.6 at 10 years.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: We observed a low rate of prostate cancer mortality. Among the patients who were reclassified as higher risk and who were treated, PSA failure was relatively common. Other-cause mortality accounted for almost all of the deaths. Additional studies are warranted to improve the identification of patients who harbor more aggressive disease despite favorable clinical parameters at diagnosis.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klotz, Zhang, Lam, Nam, Mamedov, Loblaw]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1455v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone in Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Platinum- and Taxane-Resistant Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1455v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) is a microtubule-stabilizing epothilone B analog with activity in taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer. The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a phase II evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in patients with recurrent or persistent platinum- and taxane-resistant primary ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with measurable platinum- and taxane-resistant ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, defined as progression during or within 6 months of one prior course of treatment with each agent, received intravenous ixabepilone 20 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> administered over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 51 patients entered, 49 were eligible. The objective response rate was 14.3% (95% CI, 5.9% to 27.2%), with three complete and four partial responses. Twenty patients (40.8%) had stable disease, whereas sixteen (32.7%) had increasing disease. The median time to progression was 4.4 months (95% CI, 0.8 to 32.6+ months); median survival was 14.8 months (95% CI, 0.8 to 50.0) months. Patients received a median of two treatment cycles (range, 1 to 29 cycles), and 18.4% of patients received &ge; six cycles. Adverse effects included peripheral grade 2 (28.5%) and grade 3 (6.1%) neuropathy, grades 3 to 4 neutropenia (20.4%), grade 3 fatigue (14.3%), grade 3 nausea/emesis (22%), grade 3 diarrhea (10%), and grade 3 mucositis (4%).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Ixabepilone 20 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle demonstrates antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with platinum- and taxane-resistant recurrent or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Geest, Blessing, Morris, Yamada, Monk, Zweizig, Matei, Muller, Richards]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:14 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1455</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone in Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Platinum- and Taxane-Resistant Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9640v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9640v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This multi-institutional registry study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A multi-institutional data registry that included 405 patients with DMPM treated by a uniform approach that used CRS and HIPEC was established. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was evaluation of prognostic variables for overall survival.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Follow-up was complete in 401 patients (99%). The median follow-up period for the patients who were alive was 33 months (range, 1 to 235 months). The mean age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD], 14 years). Three hundred eighteen patients (79%) had epithelial tumors. Twenty-five patients (6%) had positive lymph nodes. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 20. One hundred eighty-seven patients (46%) had complete or near-complete cytoreduction. Three hundred seventy-two patients (92%) received HIPEC. One hundred twenty-seven patients (31%) had grades 3 to 4 complications. Nine patients (2%) died perioperatively. The mean length of hospital stay was 22 days (SD, 15 days). The overall median survival was 53 months (1 to 235 months), and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 60% and 47%, respectively. Four prognostic factors were independently associated with improved survival in the multivariate analysis: epithelial subtype (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), absence of lymph node metastasis (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), completeness of cytoreduction scores of CC-0 or CC-1 (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), and HIPEC (<I>P</I> = .002).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The data suggest that CRS combined with HIPEC achieved prolonged survival in selected patients with DMPM.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, Deraco, Baratti, Kusamura, Elias, Glehen, Gilly, Levine, Shen, Mohamed, Moran, Morris, Chua, Piso, Sugarbaker]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9640</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9285v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Peritoneal Colorectal Carcinomatosis Treated With Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Retrospective Analysis of 523 Patients From a Multicentric French Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9285v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer traditionally is considered a terminal condition. Approaches that combine cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) have been developed recently. The purpose of this study was to assess early and long-term survival in patients treated with that strategy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A retrospective-cohort, multicentric study from French-speaking countries was performed. All consecutive patients with PC from colorectal cancer who were treated with CRS and PIC (with or without hyperthermia) were included. Patients with PC of appendiceal origin were excluded.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The study included 523 patients from 23 centers in four French-speaking countries who underwent operation between 1990 and 2007. The median follow-up was 45 months. Mortality and grades 3 to 4 morbidity at 30 days were 3% and 31%, respectively. Overall median survival was 30.1 months. Five-year overall survival was 27%, and five-year disease-free survival was 10%. Complete CRS was performed in 84% of the patients, and median survival was 33 months. Positive independent prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis were complete CRS, PC that was limited in extent, no invaded lymph nodes, and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Neither the grade of disease nor the presence of liver metastases had a significant prognostic impact.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This combined treatment approach against PC achieved low postoperative morbidity and mortality, and it provided good long-term survival in patients with peritoneal scores lower than 20. These results should improve in the future, because the different teams involved will gain experience. This approach, when feasible, is now considered the gold standard in the French guidelines.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elias, Gilly, Boutitie, Quenet, Bereder, Mansvelt, Lorimier, Dube, Glehen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:54:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9285</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Peritoneal Colorectal Carcinomatosis Treated With Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Retrospective Analysis of 523 Patients From a Multicentric French Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8667v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to L.T. Chen et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8667v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, Mo, Yeo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:54:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8667</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to L.T. Chen et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8584v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: GORTEC 2006-01 [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8584v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib monotherapy in palliative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Thirty-eight patients with SCCHN having evidence of progressive disease (PD) were treated with sunitinib 37.5 mg/d given continuously until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the rate of disease control, defined as stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) at 6 to 8 weeks after treatment initiation (two-stage design, Simon). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was performed in a subset of patients before and 6 to 8 weeks after treatment. The volume transfer constant of the contrast agent (<I>K</I><I><SUP>trans</SUP></I>) was used to measure changes in the microcirculation blood flow and endothelial permeability of the tumor.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A PR was observed in one patient, SD in 18, and PD in 19 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]), resulting in a disease control rate of 50%. Among the 18 patients with SD, there were five unconfirmed PRs and six additional minor responses. A significant decrease in <I>K</I><I><SUP>trans</SUP></I> was seen in three of the four patients who received DCE-MRI monitoring. Grade 5 head and neck bleeds occurred in four patients. Local complications, including the appearance or worsening of tumor skin ulceration or tumor fistula, were recorded in 15 patients.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Sunitinib demonstrated modest activity in palliative SSCHN. The severity of some of the complications highlights the importance of improved patient selection for future studies with sunitinib in head and neck cancer. Sunitinib should not be used outside clinical trials in SSCHN.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Machiels, Henry, Zanetta, Kaminsky, Michoux, Rommel, Schmitz, Bompas, Dillies, Faivre, Moxhon, Duprez, Guigay]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:54:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8584</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: GORTEC 2006-01 [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8311v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alpha-Fetoprotein Response in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Cytostatic Agent [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8311v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Shiah, Chao, Chang, Cheng, Whang-Peng]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:54:13 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8311</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alpha-Fetoprotein Response in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Cytostatic Agent [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7560v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gastric Recurrence of Extramedullary Granulocytic Sarcoma After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7560v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, Ko, Kim, Jang, Kim, Kang, Jung, Kim]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:54:03 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gastric Recurrence of Extramedullary Granulocytic Sarcoma After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7487v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extraosseous Pericardial Ewing's Sarcoma [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7487v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azribi, Razak, Bough, Lee, Plummer, Rowe, Bown, Dildey, Clark]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:50 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7487</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extraosseous Pericardial Ewing's Sarcoma [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7370v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tumor-Associated Lymphocytes As an Independent Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7370v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Preclinical data suggest a contribution of the immune system to chemotherapy response. In this study, we investigated the prespecified hypothesis that the presence of a lymphocytic infiltrate in cancer tissue predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We investigated intratumoral and stromal lymphocytes in a total of 1,058 pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies from two neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based studies (GeparDuo, n = 218, training cohort; and GeparTrio, n = 840, validation cohort). Molecular parameters of lymphocyte recruitment and activation were evaluated by kinetic polymerase chain reaction in 134 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In a multivariate regression analysis including all known predictive clinicopathologic factors, the percentage of intratumoral lymphocytes was a significant independent parameter for pathologic complete response (pCR) in both cohorts (training cohort: <I>P</I> = .012; validation cohort: <I>P</I> = .001). Lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer responded, with pCR rates of 42% (training cohort) and 40% (validation cohort). In contrast, those tumors without any infiltrating lymphocytes had pCR rates of 3% (training cohort) and 7% (validation cohort). The expression of inflammatory marker genes and proteins was linked to the histopathologic infiltrate, and logistic regression showed a significant association of the T-cell&ndash;related markers <I>CD3D</I> and <I>CXCL9</I> with pCR.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The presence of tumor-associated lymphocytes in breast cancer is a new independent predictor of response to anthracycline/taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy and provides useful information for oncologists to identify a subgroup of patients with a high benefit from this type of chemotherapy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denkert, Loibl, Noske, Roller, Muller, Komor, Budczies, Darb-Esfahani, Kronenwett, Hanusch, von Torne, Weichert, Engels, Solbach, Schrader, Dietel, von Minckwitz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7370</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tumor-Associated Lymphocytes As an Independent Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5903v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S.M. Ali et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5903v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lennon, Barton, Banken, Gianni, Marty, Baselga, Leyland-Jones]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:29 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5903</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S.M. Ali et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5622v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [ASCO Special Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5622v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P>The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (<I>EGFR</I>) mutation; for negative or unknown <I>EGFR</I> mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azzoli, Baker, Temin, Pao, Aliff, Brahmer, Johnson, Laskin, Masters, Milton, Nordquist, Pfister, Piantadosi, Schiller, Smith, Smith, Strawn, Trent, Giaccone]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5622</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [ASCO Special Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>ASCO Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5051v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Further Evidence to Support Its Excellent Prognosis [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5051v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Although tubular carcinoma (TC) is known to have a favorable prognosis, it is still unknown whether this subtype represents a distinct type of breast carcinoma or whether it behaves like other low-grade luminal A&ndash;type breast carcinomas.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of a large well-characterized series of breast cancers (2,608 carcinomas) to assess the clinicopathologic and molecular features and prognostic value of TC compared with grade 1 ductal carcinomas of the breast.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: When compared with grade 1 ductal carcinoma (n = 212), TC (n = 102) was more likely to be detected on mammographic screening, had smaller median size, and less frequently showed lymphovascular invasion. Compared with grade 1 ductal carcinoma, TC was associated with longer disease-free survival (<SUP>2</SUP> = 13.25, <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and breast cancer&ndash;specific survival (<SUP>2</SUP> = 8.8, <I>P</I> = .003). In this study, none of the patients with TC developed distant metastasis or died from the disease without an intervening recurrence as invasive carcinoma of different histologic type.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: We conclude that the biologic behavior of TC is excellent and is more favorable than that of grade 1 ductal carcinoma. Patients with TC may be at risk of developing second primary carcinomas in the contralateral breast, which may be of higher grade and poorer potential prognostic outcome. In addition, patients with TC seem to have a close to normal life expectancy, and as a consequence, adjuvant systemic therapy may not be justified in their routine management.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakha, Lee, Evans, Menon, Assad, Hodi, Macmillan, Blamey, Ellis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Further Evidence to Support Its Excellent Prognosis [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4898v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma of the Sternum [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4898v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zareifar, Bordbar, Karim, Geramizadeh, Rasekhi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:52:51 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4898</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma of the Sternum [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4799v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Final Version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4799v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of data from an expanded American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging Database.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: The melanoma staging recommendations were made on the basis of a multivariate analysis of 30,946 patients with stages I, II, and III melanoma and 7,972 patients with stage IV melanoma to revise and clarify TNM classifications and stage grouping criteria.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Findings and new definitions include the following: (1) in patients with localized melanoma, tumor thickness, mitotic rate (histologically defined as mitoses/mm<SUP>2</SUP>), and ulceration were the most dominant prognostic factors. (2) Mitotic rate replaces level of invasion as a primary criterion for defining T1b melanomas. (3) Among the 3,307 patients with regional metastases, components that defined the N category were the number of metastatic nodes, tumor burden, and ulceration of the primary melanoma. (4) For staging purposes, all patients with microscopic nodal metastases, regardless of extent of tumor burden, are classified as stage III. Micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry are specifically included. (5) On the basis of a multivariate analysis of patients with distant metastases, the two dominant components in defining the M category continue to be the site of distant metastases (nonvisceral <I>v</I> lung <I>v</I> all other visceral metastatic sites) and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Using an evidence-based approach, revisions to the AJCC melanoma staging system have been made that reflect our improved understanding of this disease. These revisions will be formally incorporated into the seventh edition (2009) of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and implemented by early 2010.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balch, Gershenwald, Soong, Thompson, Atkins, Byrd, Buzaid, Cochran, Coit, Ding, Eggermont, Flaherty, Gimotty, Kirkwood, McMasters, Mihm, Morton, Ross, Sober, Sondak]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:52:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Final Version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4674v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Value of Serum Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)/neu Testing for Early Prediction of Response to HER2/neu-Directed Therapies Is Still an Open One and Deserves Further Study in Large Prospective Trials [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4674v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, Leitzel, Lipton, Carney, Kostler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:52:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4674</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Value of Serum Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)/neu Testing for Early Prediction of Response to HER2/neu-Directed Therapies Is Still an Open One and Deserves Further Study in Large Prospective Trials [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1423v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in an Immunocompetent Woman [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1423v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pozdnyakova, Spieler, Abraham, Freedman, Kutok]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:52:14 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in an Immunocompetent Woman [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0953v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[{beta}-Tubulin-II Expression Strongly Predicts Outcome in Patients Receiving Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Companion Analysis of the TAX 324 Trial [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0953v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: TAX 324 was a phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) with cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (LASCCHN). This study evaluates a series of tumor markers in pretreatment biopsies from that trial TAX 324 and correlates expression with survival.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Pretherapy biopsy specimens were available for 265 of 501 participants. Expression of a series of six markers (p53, thymidylate synthase, glutathione s-transferase pi [GST-], Bcl 2, beta tubulin II [&beta;T-2], and HER2 <I>neu</I>) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: For patients with low &beta;T-II expression, median overall survival (OS) was 58.6 months (95% CI, not reached [NR]), compared with 18.2 months for patients with high &beta;T-II expression (95% CI, 13.11 to 30.06: hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.72; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Progression-free survival in patients with low &beta;T-II expression was 43.2 months (95% CI, 24.4 to NR) versus 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.06 to 18.53) for high &beta;T-II expression, with a HR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.43 to 2.77; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The predictive value of &beta;T-II expression was greater in the TPF versus PF arm than in the PF arm.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Increased tumor expression of &beta;T-II is strongly associated with adverse outcome in LASCCHN patients treated with IC, and our data suggest low expression of &beta;T-II may predict patients most likely to benefit from induction TPF therapy. Further, simple models which combine expression of &beta;T-II with a carefully defined set of additional immunohistochemical markers may have significant prognostic impact for patients with LASCCHN.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen, Schumaker, Nikitakis, Goloubeva, Tan, Sarlis, Haddad, Posner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:52:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0953</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[{beta}-Tubulin-II Expression Strongly Predicts Outcome in Patients Receiving Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Companion Analysis of the TAX 324 Trial [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0946v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trastuzumab for Patients With Axillary-Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results of the FNCLCC-PACS 04 Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0946v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy if applicable.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Three thousand ten patients with operable node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without docetaxel. Patients who presented human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -overexpressing tumors were secondary randomly assigned to either a sequential regimen of trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for 1 year or observation. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall 528 patients were randomly assigned between trastuzumab (n = 260) and observation (n = 268) arm. Of the 234 patients (90%) who received at least one administration of trastuzumab, 196 (84%) received at least 6 months of treatment, and 41 (18%) discontinued treatment due to cardiac events (any grade). At the date of analysis (October 2007), 129 DFS events were recorded. Random assignment to the trastuzumab arm was associated with a nonsignificant 14% reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.22; <I>P</I> = .41, log-rank stratified on pathologic node involvement). Three-year DFS rates were 78% (95% CI, 72.3 to 82.5) and 81% (95% CI, 75.3 to 85.4) in the observation and trastuzumab arms, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: After a 47-month median follow-up, 1 year of trastuzumab given sequentially after adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of relapse.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spielmann, Roche, Delozier, Canon, Romieu, Bourgeois, Extra, Serin, Kerbrat, Machiels, Lortholary, Orfeuvre, Campone, Hardy-Bessard, Coudert, Maerevoet, Piot, Kramar, Martin, Penault-Llorca]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:55 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0946</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trastuzumab for Patients With Axillary-Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results of the FNCLCC-PACS 04 Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0425v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Induction Chemotherapy and Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Results From a Phase II Prospective Trial [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0425v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine the potential efficacy of combining cetuximab with chemotherapy in patients with advanced nodal disease, we conducted a phase II trial with induction chemotherapy (ICT) consisting of six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 135 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and carboplatin (area under the curve = 2) with cetuximab 400 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> in week 1 and then 250 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> (PCC).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Forty-seven previously untreated patients (41 with oropharynx primaries; 33 men, 14 women; median age, 53 years; performance status of 0 or 1) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN; T1-4, N2b/c/3) were treated and evaluated for clinical and radiographic response. After ICT, patients underwent risk-based local therapy, which consisted of either radiation, concomitant chemoradiotherapy, or surgery, based on tumor stage and site at diagnosis.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: After induction PCC, nine patients (19%) achieved a complete response, and 36 patients (77%) achieved a partial response. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was skin rash (45%), followed by neutropenia (21%) without fever. At a median follow-up time of 33 months, locoregional or systemic disease progression was observed in six patients. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87% (95% CI, 78% to 97%) and 91% (95% CI, 84% to 99%), respectively. Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16, found in 12 (46%) of 26 biopsies, was associated with improved PFS (<I>P</I> = .012) and OS (<I>P</I> = .046).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: ICT with weekly PCC followed by risk-based local therapy seems to be feasible, effective, and well tolerated. PFS is promising, and this sequential treatment strategy should be further investigated. Patients with HPV-positive tumors have an excellent prognosis.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kies, Holsinger, Lee, William, Glisson, Lin, Lewin, Ginsberg, Gillaspy, Massarelli, Byers, Lippman, Hong, El-Naggar, Garden, Papadimitrakopoulou]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0425</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Induction Chemotherapy and Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Results From a Phase II Prospective Trial [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9427v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With Either Daily Oral Cediranib or Placebo in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group BR24 Study [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9427v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This phase II/III double-blind study assessed efficacy and safety of cediranib with standard chemotherapy as initial therapy for advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Paclitaxel (200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>) and carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve 6) were given every 3 weeks, with daily oral cediranib or placebo at 30 mg (first 45 patients received 45 mg). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome of the phase II interim analysis; phase III would proceed if the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS &le; 0.77 and toxicity were acceptable.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 296 patients were enrolled, 251 to the 30-mg cohort. The phase II interim analysis demonstrated a significantly higher response rate (RR) for cediranib than for placebo, HR of 0.77 for PFS, no excess hemoptysis, and a similar number of deaths in each arm. The study was halted to review imbalances in assigned causes of death. In the primary phase II analysis (30-mg cohort), the adjusted HR for PFS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.08) with a higher RR for cediranib than for placebo (38% <I>v</I> 16%; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Cediranib patients had more hypertension, hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome, and GI toxicity. Hypoalbuminemia, age &ge; 65 years, and female sex predicted increased toxicity. Survival update (N = 296) 10 months after study unblinding favored cediranib over placebo (median of 10.5 months <I>v</I> 10.1 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.06; <I>P</I> = .11). Causes of death in the cediranib 30-mg cohort were NSCLC (81%), protocol toxicity &plusmn; NSCLC (13%), and other (6%); for the placebo group, they were 98%, 0%, and 2%, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The addition of cediranib to carboplatin/paclitaxel results in improved response and PFS, but does not appear tolerable at a 30-mg dose. Consequently, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cediranib 20 mg with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goss, Arnold, Shepherd, Dediu, Ciuleanu, Fenton, Zukin, Walde, Laberge, Vincent, Ellis, Laurie, Ding, Frymire, Gauthier, Leighl, Ho, Noble, Lee, Seymour]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9427</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With Either Daily Oral Cediranib or Placebo in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group BR24 Study [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8718v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Two Supportive Care Interventions on Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, and Unmet Needs in Patients With Nonlocalized Breast and Colorectal Cancers [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8718v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Patients with cancer experience considerable symptom burden, psychological morbidity, and unmet psychosocial needs. Research suggests that feedback of patient-reported outcomes to clinicians or caseworkers, alongside management strategies, may result in improved patient functioning. Two intervention models were developed to test this effect in a randomized, controlled trial against usual care (UC): a telephone caseworker (TCW) model and an oncologist/general practitioner (O/GP) model. Primary end points included anxiety, depression, physical/emotional functioning, and unmet supportive care needs.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Participants with nonlocalized breast or colorectal cancers were surveyed by computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) at three time points: baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Data collected from participant CATIs in the supportive care models were used to generate feedback to either each participant's designated TCW, or their nominated O/GPs. Data obtained from participants in the UC model were used only to assess the impact of supportive care models. In total, 356 participants consented to study participation, completed the baseline CATI, and were randomly assigned to the UC, TCW, or O/GP groups.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: No overall intervention effect was observed. Physical functioning was significantly improved at the third CATI for participants in the TCW model (<I>P</I> = .01), and there was a trend toward fewer participants with unmet needs (<I>P</I> = .07). TCW group participants also were more likely to have the following: identified issues of need discussed (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001); referrals made (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001); and strong agreement that the intervention improved communication with their health care team (<I>P</I> = .0005).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The TCW model holds some promise; however, additional work in at-risk populations is required before we recommend implementation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girgis, Breen, Stacey, Lecathelinais]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8718</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Two Supportive Care Interventions on Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, and Unmet Needs in Patients With Nonlocalized Breast and Colorectal Cancers [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7900v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Bevacizumab With Maintenance Bevacizumab As First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Mullerian Tumors [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7900v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: New strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor but is associated with GI perforations (GIPs) in patients with recurrent disease.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: An open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted in newly diagnosed patients with stage &ge; IC epithelial m&uuml;llerian tumors. Patients received intravenous (IV) carboplatin (area under the curve = 5), paclitaxel (175 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> IV), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV) for six to eight cycles on day 1 every 21 days. Bevacizumab was omitted in the first cycle and continued as a single agent for 1 year.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Sixty-two women participated in this study. Fifty-one patients (82%) were optimally surgically cytoreduced before treatment. The median age was 58 years (range, 18 to 77 years). Forty-five women (73%) had ovarian cancer, 10 (16%) had peritoneal cancer, four (6%) had fallopian tube cancers, and three (5%) had uterine papillary serous tumors. The majority of patients (90%) had stage III or IV disease. A median of 17 maintenance cycles (range, 0 to 25+ cycles) of bevacizumab (556 cycles) were administered with mild toxicity. Treatment was associated with two pulmonary embolisms and two GIPs, all occurring during the chemotherapy phase of treatment (364 total cycles). No grade 4 toxicities were seen during maintenance bevacizumab treatment. Radiographic responses were documented in 21 (75%) of 28 women with measurable disease (11 complete responses and 10 partial responses), with CA-125 responses in 76% of patients (11 complete responses, 21%; and 35 partial responses, 55%). The progression-free survival rate at 36 months was 58%.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with maintenance bevacizumab is feasible, safe, and worthy of future study in advanced ovarian cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penson, Dizon, Cannistra, Roche, Krasner, Berlin, Horowitz, DiSilvestro, Matulonis, Lee, King, Campos]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7900</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Bevacizumab With Maintenance Bevacizumab As First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Mullerian Tumors [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5060v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Late-Occurring Neurologic Sequelae in Adult Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5060v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are often cured, but the therapies they receive may be neurotoxic. Little is known about the incidence and severity of late-occurring neurologic sequelae in ALL survivors. Data were analyzed to determine the incidence of adverse long-term neurologic outcomes and treatment-related risk factors.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We analyzed adverse neurologic outcomes that occurred after diagnosis in 4,151 adult survivors of childhood ALL who participated in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), a retrospective cohort of 5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed between 1970 and 1986. A randomly selected cohort of the survivors' siblings served as a comparison group. Self-reported auditory-vestibular-visual sensory deficits, focal neurologic dysfunction, seizures, and serious headaches were assessed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The median age at outcome assessment was 20.2 years for survivors. The median follow-up time to death or last survey since ALL diagnosis was 14.1 years. Of the survivors, 64.5% received cranial radiation and 94% received intrathecal chemotherapy. Compared with the sibling cohort, survivors were at elevated risk for late-onset auditory-vestibular-visual sensory deficits (rate ratio [RR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.2), coordination problems (RR, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.1 to 5.3), motor problems (RR, 5.0; 95% CI, 3.8 to 6.7), seizures (RR, 4.6; 95% CI, 3.4 to 6.2), and headaches (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7). In multivariable analysis, relapse was the most influential factor that increased risk of late neurologic complications.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Children treated with regimens that include cranial radiation for ALL and those who suffer a relapse are at increased risk for late-onset neurologic sequelae.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldsby, Liu, Nathan, Bowers, Yeaton-Massey, Raber, Hill, Armstrong, Yasui, Zeltzer, Robison, Packer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Late-Occurring Neurologic Sequelae in Adult Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2554v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immunochemotherapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Untreated Patients With Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: CALGB 59909 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2554v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a poor prognosis. We explored the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of an aggressive immunochemotherapy treatment program that included autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients up to age 69 years with newly diagnosed MCL.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). A successful trial would yield a 2-year PFS of at least 50% and an event rate (early progression plus nonrelapse mortality) less than 20% at day +100 following ASCT. Seventy-eight patients were treated with two or three cycles of rituximab combined with methotrexate and augmented CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). This treatment was followed by intensification with high doses of cytarabine and etoposide combined with rituximab and filgrastim to mobilize autologous peripheral-blood stem cells. Patients then received high doses of carmustine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide followed by ASCT and two doses of rituximab.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There were two nonrelapse mortalities, neither during ASCT. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the 2-year PFS was 76% (95% CI, 64% to 85%), and the 5-year PFS was 56% (95% CI, 43% to 68%). The 5-year overall survival was 64% (95% CI, 50% to 75%). The event rate by day +100 of ASCT was 5.1%.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 59909 regimen is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with newly diagnosed MCL. The incorporation of rituximab with aggressive chemotherapy and ASCT may be responsible for the encouraging outcomes demonstrated in this study, which produced results comparable to similar treatment regimens.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon, Johnson, Niedzwiecki, Cheson, Hurd, Bartlett, LaCasce, Blum, Byrd, Kelly, Stock, Linker, Canellos]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2554</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immunochemotherapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Untreated Patients With Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: CALGB 59909 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0400v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining the Optimal Treatment for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer Using Decision Analysis [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0400v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: There is equipoise regarding the optimal treatment of clinical stage (CS) I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer (NSGCT). Formal mechanisms that enable patients to consider cancer outcomes, treatment-related morbidity, and personal preferences are needed to facilitate decision making between retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), primary chemotherapy, and surveillance.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Decision analysis was performed using a Markov model that incorporated likelihoods of survival, treatment-related morbidity, and utilities for seven undesired post-treatment health states to estimate the quality-adjusted survival (QAS) for each treatment option. Utilities were obtained from 24 hypothetical NSGCT patients using a visual analog (rating) scale and standard gamble.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall, QAS associated with each treatment was high and differences in QAS were small. Surveillance was the preferred intervention for patients with a risk of relapse less than 33% and 37% using the rating scale and standard-gamble method of utility assessment, respectively. Active treatment was favored over surveillance for patients with relapse risk on surveillance greater than 33% and 37% by the rating scale (RPLND preferred) and standard-gamble methods (primary chemotherapy preferred), respectively. Substantial differences in average utilities were seen depending on the method used. By the rating scale, patients substantially devalued life in six of seven undesired health states but they were surprisingly tolerant of treatment-related morbidity using standard gamble.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A decision model has been developed for CS I NSGCT that estimates QAS for RPLND, primary chemotherapy, and surveillance by considering cancer outcomes, morbidity, and patient preferences. Surveillance was the preferred intervention for all except those patients at high risk for relapse.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, Fu, Gilligan, Wells, Klein, Kattan, Stephenson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:36 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0400</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining the Optimal Treatment for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer Using Decision Analysis [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9972v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Infantile Fibrosarcoma: Management Based on the European Experience [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9972v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To retrospectively analyze the clinical features and results of treatment in 56 infants with fibrosarcoma enrolled onto cooperative European protocols between 1979 and 2005 and treated with a combination of surgery and chemotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a retrospective case review of infants under the age of 2 years with fibrosarcoma treated between 1979 and 2005 in six European studies. Patients were staged according to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Staging System international classification as a function of the type of initial surgery and the extent of disease and were treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Primary tumor site was the limbs in 66% of patients; median tumor diameter was more than 5 cm in 63% of patients; and postoperative staging was as follows: group I, 22%; group II, 27%; group III, 47%; and group IV, 4%. Response rate to chemotherapy was 75%, and the specific response rate to vincristine-dactinomycin was 71%. Local control was obtained in 84% of patients. At the end of follow-up, 45% of survivors had been treated by surgery alone, 6% by chemotherapy alone, 46% by surgery and chemotherapy, and 2% by surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89%. The 5-year OS and event-free survival rates for localized patients were 89% and 81%, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Although complete resection is rarely feasible at diagnosis, conservative surgery remains the mainstay treatment for infantile fibrosarcoma. An alkylating agent&ndash;free and anthracycline-free regimen is usually effective and should be chosen as first-line chemotherapy for inoperable tumors. Overall prognosis is good, but progression or relapse, mainly local, remains possible.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orbach, Rey, Cecchetto, Oberlin, Casanova, Thebaud, Scopinaro, Bisogno, Carli, Ferrari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9972</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Infantile Fibrosarcoma: Management Based on the European Experience [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5988v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors: Expression Profiling Evidences a Role for AKT-mTOR Pathway [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5988v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: We investigated the global gene expression in a large panel of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) aimed at identifying new potential targets for therapy and biomarkers to predict patient outcome.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Using a custom microarray, we analyzed 72 primary PETs, seven matched metastases, and 10 normal pancreatic samples. Relevant differentially expressed genes were validated by either quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Our data showed that: tuberous sclerosis 2 (TSC2) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) were downregulated in most of the primary tumors, and their low expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival; somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) was absent or very low in insulinomas compared with nonfunctioning tumors; and expression of fibroblast growth factor 13 (<I>FGF13</I>) gene was significantly associated with the occurrence of liver metastasis and shorter disease-free survival. TSC2 and PTEN are two key inhibitors of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and the specific inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin or RAD001 inhibited cell proliferation of PET cell lines.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Our results strongly support a role for PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in PET, which ties in with the fact that mTOR inhibitors have reached phase III trials in neuroendocrine tumors. The finding of differential SSTR expression raises the potential for SSTR expression to be evaluated as a marker of response to somatostatin analogs. Finally, we identified <I>FGF13</I> as a new prognostic marker that predicted poorer outcome in patients who were clinically considered free from disease.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Missiaglia, Dalai, Barbi, Beghelli, Falconi, della Peruta, Piemonti, Capurso, Di Florio, delle Fave, Pederzoli, Croce, Scarpa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5988</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors: Expression Profiling Evidences a Role for AKT-mTOR Pathway [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.6755v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a Home Care Nursing Program in the Symptom Management of Patients With Colorectal and Breast Cancer Receiving Oral Chemotherapy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.6755v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To assess the effectiveness of a symptom-focused home care program in patients with cancer who were receiving oral chemotherapy in relation to toxicity levels, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and service utilization.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A randomized, controlled trial was carried out with 164 patients with a diagnosis of colorectal (n = 110) and breast (n = 54) cancers who were receiving oral capecitabine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a home care program by a nurse or standard care for 18 weeks (ie, six cycles of chemotherapy). Toxicity assessments were carried out weekly for the duration of the patients' participation in the trial, and validated self-report tools assessed anxiety, depression, and quality of life.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Significant improvements were observed in the home care group in relation to the symptoms of oral mucositis, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, pain, fatigue (first four cycles), and insomnia (all <I>P</I> &lt; .05). This improvement was most significant during the initial two cycles. Unplanned service utilization, particularly the number of inpatient days (57 <I>v</I> 167 days; <I>P</I> = .02), also was lower in the home care group.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A symptom-focused home care program was able to assist patients to manage their treatment adverse effects more effectively than standard care. It is imperative that patients receiving oral chemotherapy are supported with such programs, particularly during initial treatment cycles, to improve their treatment and symptom experiences.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molassiotis, Brearley, Saunders, Craven, Wardley, Farrell, Swindell, Todd, Luker]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6755</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a Home Care Nursing Program in the Symptom Management of Patients With Colorectal and Breast Cancer Receiving Oral Chemotherapy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.3075v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Multicenter Trial of Maintenance Biotherapy After Induction Concurrent Biochemotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.3075v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Biochemotherapy improves responses in metastatic melanoma, but not overall survival, in randomized trials. We developed a maintenance biotherapy regimen after induction biochemotherapy in an attempt to improve durability of responses and overall survival.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: One hundred thirty-three chemotherapy-na&iuml;ve patients with metastatic melanoma without CNS metastases were treated at 10 melanoma centers. The biochemotherapy induction regimen included cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, decrescendo interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon alfa-2b with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cytokine support. Patients not experiencing disease progression were eligible for maintenance biotherapy with low-dose IL-2 and GM-CSF followed by intermittent pulses of decrescendo IL-2 over 12 months. Patients were observed for response, progression-free survival, toxicity, and overall survival.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The response rate to induction biochemotherapy was 44% (95% CI, 35% to 52%; complete response, 8%; partial response, 36%; stable disease, 29%). The median number of biochemotherapy cycles was four, and the median number of maintenance biotherapy cycles was five. The median progression-free survival was 9 months, and the median survival was 13.5 months. The 12-month and 24-month survival rates were 57% and 23%, respectively. Twenty percent of patients remain alive (12 without disease), with median follow-up of 30 months (95% CI, 25+ to 45+ months). Thirty-nine percent of patients developed CNS metastases. The median times to CNS progression and death were 8 months and 5 months, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Maintenance biotherapy after induction biochemotherapy seems to prolong progression-free survival and improve overall survival compared with recent multicenter trials of biochemotherapy or chemotherapy. The regimen should be studied in a randomized clinical trial in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. CNS progression remains a formidable challenge.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Day, Atkins, Boasberg, Wang, Thompson, Anderson, Gonzalez, Lutzky, Amatruda, Hersh, Weber]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Multicenter Trial of Maintenance Biotherapy After Induction Concurrent Biochemotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.26.6171v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Advances 2009: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening--A Report From the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO Special Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.26.6171v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petrelli, Winer, Brahmer, Dubey, Smith, Thomas, Vahdat, Obel, Vogelzang, Markman, Sweetenham, Pfister, Kris, Schuchter, Sawaya, Raghavan, Ganz, Kramer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:50 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.6171</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Advances 2009: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening--A Report From the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO Special Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>ASCO Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8632v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to C. Kollmannsberger et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8632v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, Saigal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to C. Kollmannsberger et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8319v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Claims From Claims-Based Data [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.8319v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nichols, Kollmannsberger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8319</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Claims From Claims-Based Data [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6669v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to M. Chao et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6669v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson, Sargent, Tsikitis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6669</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to M. Chao et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6156v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Caution Is Required Before Recommending Routine Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Imaging Follow-Up for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.6156v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chao, Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Caution Is Required Before Recommending Routine Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Imaging Follow-Up for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.5091v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Cardiac Safety of Dose-Dense Anthracycline Therapy Cannot Be Predicted From Early Ejection Fraction Data [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.5091v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ewer, Ewer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:47 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Cardiac Safety of Dose-Dense Anthracycline Therapy Cannot Be Predicted From Early Ejection Fraction Data [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4342v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to D.L. Raunig [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4342v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodd, Korn, Freidlin, Rubinstein, Dancey, Jaffe, Mooney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:38 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4342</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to D.L. Raunig [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3765v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Balancing Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Adolescents With Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3765v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Metzger, Hudson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3765</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Balancing Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Adolescents With Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3716v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are Onsite Image Evaluations the Solution or Are We Trading One Problem for Another? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3716v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raunig]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:16 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are Onsite Image Evaluations the Solution or Are We Trading One Problem for Another? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1173v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S.J. Faivre et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1173v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhu, Sahani, Duda, Jain]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:45:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1173</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S.J. Faivre et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0670v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sunitinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Redefining Appropriate Dosing, Schedule, and Activity End Points [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0670v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faivre, Bouattour, Dreyer, Raymond]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sunitinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Redefining Appropriate Dosing, Schedule, and Activity End Points [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7353v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tracheoesophageal Fistula Formation in Patients With Lung Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Bevacizumab [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7353v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Tracheoesophageal fistulae are rare complications of thoracic cancers and their treatments. Novel antiangiogenic agents in cancer treatment such as bevacizumab potentially impact wound healing and may contribute to tracheoesophageal fistula development.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We conducted two independent phase II clinical trials in small-cell lung cancer and non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer using bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy and radiation. Both trials were intended to assess preliminary efficacy and safety outcomes.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: For the limited-stage small-cell lung cancer trial, 29 patients were enrolled beginning April 2006, and closed early due to toxicity in March 2007 (14-month median follow-up). The locally advanced, non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer trial opened with enrollment limited to five patients in February 2007, and closed early due to safety in December 2007. In each trial, we observed tracheoesophageal fistulae development and related morbidity and mortality, prompting early trial closures, US Food and Drug Administration warnings, and a change in bevacizumab labeling.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The current data from the final reports from these two trials suggest bevacizumab and chemoradiotherapy are associated with a relatively high incidence of tracheoesophageal fistulae formation in both small-cell lung cancer and non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer settings. Strategies to safely incorporate novel antiangiogenic agents into combined-modality therapy in lung cancer are needed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spigel, Hainsworth, Yardley, Raefsky, Patton, Peacock, Farley, Burris, Greco]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7353</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tracheoesophageal Fistula Formation in Patients With Lung Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Bevacizumab [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5985v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anaplastic Gliomas [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5985v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeAngelis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:42 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5985</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anaplastic Gliomas [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5647v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Pregabalin for Alleviating Hot Flashes, N07C1 [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5647v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Hot flashes are a common problem for which effective and safe treatments are needed. The current trial was conducted on the basis of preliminary promising data that pregabalin decreased hot flashes.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial design was used to compare pregabalin at target doses of 75 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily with a placebo. Hot flash frequencies and scores (frequency times mean severity) were recorded daily during a baseline week and for six treatment weeks. The primary end point for this study was the change-from-baseline hot flash score during treatment week 6 between the 150 mg twice daily target pregabalin treatment and placebo. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests, two-sample <I>t</I> tests, and <SUP>2</SUP> tests were used to compare the primary and secondary hot flash efficacy end points between pregabalin treatments and placebo.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Hot flash score changes available for 163 patients during the sixth treatment week compared with a baseline week decreased by 50%, 65%, and 71% in the placebo, and target 75 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily pregabalin arms, respectively (<I>P</I> = .009 and <I>P</I> = .007, comparing respective pregabalin arms to the placebo arm). While some toxicities were significantly more common in the pregabalin arms, being more evident with the higher dose, pregabalin was generally well tolerated by most patients.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Pregabalin decreases hot flashes and is reasonably well tolerated. A target dose of 75 mg twice daily is recommended. Its effects appear to be roughly comparable to what has been reported with gabapentin and with some newer antidepressants.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loprinzi, Qin, Baclueva, Flynn, Rowland, Graham, Erwin, Dakhil, Jurgens, Burger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5647</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Pregabalin for Alleviating Hot Flashes, N07C1 [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3238v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Esophageal Carcinoma in a 16-Year-Old Girl 8 Years After Gastrotomy [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3238v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, Gupta, Baghel, Shukla, Paramhans, Mathur]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3238</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Esophageal Carcinoma in a 16-Year-Old Girl 8 Years After Gastrotomy [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1034v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MGMT Promoter Methylation Is Prognostic but Not Predictive for Outcome to Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors: A Report From EORTC Brain Tumor Group Study 26951 [Neurooncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.1034v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I><I>)</I> promoter methylation has been shown to predict survival of patients with glioblastomas if temozolomide is added to radiotherapy (RT). It is unknown if <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation is also predictive to outcome to RT followed by adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors (AOT).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer study 26951, 368 patients with AOT were randomly assigned to either RT alone or to RT followed by adjuvant PCV. From 165 patients of this study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was available for <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation analysis. This was investigated with methylation specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In 152 cases, an MGMT result was obtained, in 121 (80%) cases <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was observed. Methylation strongly correlated with combined loss of chromosome 1p and 19q loss (<I>P</I> = .00043). In multivariate analysis, <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation, 1p/19q codeletion, tumor necrosis, and extent of resection were independent prognostic factors. The prognostic significance of <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was equally strong in the RT arm and the RT/PCV arm for both progression-free survival and overall survival. In tumors diagnosed at central pathology review as glioblastoma, no prognostic effect of <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In this study, on patients with AOT <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was of prognostic significance and did not have predictive significance for outcome to adjuvant PCV chemotherapy. The biologic effect of <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation or pathogenetic features associated with <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation may be different for AOT compared with glioblastoma.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Bent, Dubbink, Sanson, van der Lee-Haarloo, Hegi, Jeuken, Ibdaih, Brandes, Taphoorn, Frenay, Lacombe, Gorlia, Dinjens, Kros]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:17 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MGMT Promoter Methylation Is Prognostic but Not Predictive for Outcome to Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors: A Report From EORTC Brain Tumor Group Study 26951 [Neurooncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8527v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aortic Stiffness Increases Upon Receipt of Anthracycline Chemotherapy [Cancer Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8527v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cancer survivors exposed to anthracyclines experience an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. We hypothesized that anthracycline use may increase aortic stiffness, a known predictor of CV events.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a prospective, case-control study involving 53 patients: 40 individuals who received an anthracycline for the treatment of breast cancer, lymphoma, or leukemia (cases), and 13 age- and sex-matched controls. Each participant underwent phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of pulse wave velocity (PWV) and aortic distensibility (AoD) in the thoracic aorta at baseline, and 4 months after initiation of chemotherapy. Four one-way analyses of covariance models were fit in which factors known to influence thoracic aortic stiffness were included as covariates in the models.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At the 4-month follow-up visit, aortic stiffness remained similar to baseline in the control participants. However, in the participants receiving anthracyclines, aortic stiffness increased markedly (relative to baseline), as evidenced by a decrease in AoD (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) and an increase in PWV (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). These changes in aortic stiffness persisted after accounting for age, sex, cardiac output, administered cardioactive medications, and underlying clinical conditions known to influence aortic stiffness, such as hypertension or diabetes (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A significant increase in aortic stiffness occurs within 4 months of exposure to an anthracycline which was not seen in an untreated control group. These results indicate that previously regarded cardiotoxic cancer therapy adversely increases thoracic aortic stiffness, a known independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaosuwannakit, D'Agostino, Hamilton, Lane, Ntim, Lawrence, Melin, Ellis, Torti, Little, Hundley]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:44:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8527</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aortic Stiffness Increases Upon Receipt of Anthracycline Chemotherapy [Cancer Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cancer Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7958v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nodal Staging Score: A Tool to Assess Adequate Staging of Node-Negative Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7958v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Adequate nodal staging of colon cancer has been defined as pathologic examination of at least 12 lymph nodes. We sought to refine this definition by quantifying the likelihood that a pathologically node-negative patient has, indeed, no positive nodes.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the colon between 1994 and 2005 and had at least one lymph node pathologically examined were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n = 131,953). We estimated the sensitivity of the pathologic staging of locoregional spread using a beta-binomial model and developed the nodal staging score (NSS), which is the probability that a patient is correctly staged as node negative. NSS is a function of T stage and the number of examined nodes.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The probability of missing a positive node that is in fact truly present is 29.7% if five nodes are examined, 20.0% if eight are examined, and drops to 13.6% for 12 nodes are examined. An NSS of 90% can be achieved by examining a single node for T1 and four nodes for T2 tumors. To maintain similar levels of NSS for T3, 13 nodes need to be examined and for T4 lesions, 21 nodes need to be examined. Graphical and tabular tools are provided to facilitate calculation of NSS and treatment decision making in practice.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The minimum number of examined nodes for adequate staging depends on the T stage. The score we developed indicates the adequacy of nodal staging for patients with no positive nodes and can assist clinical decision making in the patient without nodal metastasis.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonen, Schrag, Weiser]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7958</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nodal Staging Score: A Tool to Assess Adequate Staging of Node-Negative Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7511v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Factors Influencing Outcome in Patients With In-Transit Malignant Melanoma Undergoing Isolated Limb Perfusion Using Modern Treatment Parameters [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7511v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: In-transit disease afflicts approximately 10% of patients with extremity melanoma; no single treatment approach has been uniformly accepted as the most effective. We report long-term outcomes in patients with in-transit extremity melanoma who underwent isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in an era of increasingly accurate staging, uniform operative and treatment conditions, and regular long-term follow-up.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Between May 1992 and February 2005, 91 patients (median age, 57 years; 50 women, 41 men) underwent a 90-minute hyperthermic ILP (melphalan, 10 to 13 mg/L limb volume, tumor necrosis factor [TNF; n = 44], or interferon [n = 38]) using uniform operative technique and intraoperative leak monitoring. Patients were prospectively followed for response, in-field progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Parameters associated with in-field PFS and OS were analyzed by standard statistical methods.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There was one operative death (1.1%). There were 62 complete responses (69%) and 23 partial responses (26%) in 90 assessable patients. At a median potential follow-up of 11 years, median in-field PFS was 12.4 months and median OS was 47.4 months; 5 and 10-year actuarial OS probabilities were 43% and 34%, respectively. Female sex and low tumor burden (&le; 20 lesions) were associated with prolonged in-field PFS (male:female hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.38; 21+ <I>v</I> &le; 20 tumors HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.34; <I>P</I> &lt; .011 for both). Female sex was associated with improved OS (<I>P</I> = .027; male:female HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.09).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In appropriately selected patients, ILP has clinical benefit. The use of TNF was not associated with improved in-field PFS, while female sex was associated with better survival.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander, Fraker, Bartlett, Libutti, Steinberg, Soriano, Beresnev]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:42 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Factors Influencing Outcome in Patients With In-Transit Malignant Melanoma Undergoing Isolated Limb Perfusion Using Modern Treatment Parameters [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7503v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mutations of E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl Family Members Constitute a Novel Common Pathogenic Lesion in Myeloid Malignancies [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7503v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Acquired somatic uniparental disomy (UPD) is commonly observed in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), or secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML) and may point toward genes harboring mutations. Recurrent UPD11q led to identification of homozygous mutations in <I>c-Cbl</I>, an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in attenuation of proliferative signals transduced by activated receptor tyrosine kinases. We examined the role and frequency of <I>Cbl</I> gene family mutations in MPN and related conditions.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We applied high-density SNP-A karyotyping to identify loss of heterozygosity of 11q in 442 patients with MDS, MDS/MPN, MPN, sAML evolved from these conditions, and primary AML. We sequenced <I>c-Cbl</I>, <I>Cbl-b</I>, and <I>Cbl-c</I> in patients with or without corresponding UPD or deletions and correlated mutational status with clinical features and outcomes.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: We identified <I>c-Cbl</I> mutations in 5% and 9% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and sAML, and also in CML blast crisis and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). Most mutations were homozygous and affected <I>c-Cbl</I>; mutations in <I>Cbl-b</I> were also found in patients with similar clinical features. Patients with <I>Cbl</I> family mutations showed poor prognosis, with a median survival of 5 months. Pathomorphologic features included monocytosis, monocytoid blasts, aberrant expression of phosphoSTAT5, and c-kit overexpression. Serial studies showed acquisition of <I>c-Cbl</I> mutations during malignant evolution.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Mutations in the <I>Cbl</I> family RING finger domain or linker sequence constitute important pathogenic lesions associated with not only preleukemic CMML, JMML, and other MPN, but also progression to AML, suggesting that impairment of degradation of activated tyrosine kinases constitutes an important cancer mechanism.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makishima, Cazzolli, Szpurka, Dunbar, Tiu, Huh, Muramatsu, O'Keefe, Hsi, Paquette, Kojima, List, Sekeres, McDevitt, Maciejewski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7503</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mutations of E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl Family Members Constitute a Novel Common Pathogenic Lesion in Myeloid Malignancies [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6976v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myeloid Sarcoma and Eosinophilia: Prolonged Remission and Molecular Response to Imatinib [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6976v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vedy, Muehlematter, Rausch, Stalder, Jotterand, Spertini]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6976</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myeloid Sarcoma and Eosinophilia: Prolonged Remission and Molecular Response to Imatinib [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6497v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NOA-04 Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Radiochemotherapy of Anaplastic Glioma With Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine or Temozolomide [Neurooncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6497v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The standard of care for anaplastic gliomas is surgery followed by radiotherapy. The NOA-04 phase III trial compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy at progression with the reverse sequence in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (N = 318) were randomly assigned 2:1:1 (A:B1:B2) to receive conventional radiotherapy (arm A); procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV; arm B1); or temozolomide (arm B2) at diagnosis. At occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression, patients in arm A were treated with PCV or temozolomide (1:1 random assignment), whereas patients in arms B1 or B2 received radiotherapy. The primary end point was time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as progression after radiotherapy and one chemotherapy in either sequence.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patient characteristics in the intention-to-treat population (n = 274) were balanced between arms. All histologic diagnoses were centrally confirmed. Median TTF (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.8), progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.3, and overall survival (HR = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.9) were similar for arms A and B1/B2. Extent of resection was an important prognosticator. Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas share the same, better prognosis than anaplastic astrocytomas. Hypermethylation of the O<SUP>6</SUP>-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I>) promoter (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.0), mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (<I>IDH1</I>) gene (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.77), and oligodendroglial histology (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.55) reduced the risk of progression. Hypermethylation of the <I>MGMT</I> promoter was associated with prolonged PFS in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Initial radiotherapy or chemotherapy achieved comparable results in patients with anaplastic gliomas. <I>IDH1</I> mutations are a novel positive prognostic factor in anaplastic gliomas, with a favorable impact stronger than that of 1p/19q codeletion or <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wick, Hartmann, Engel, Stoffels, Felsberg, Stockhammer, Sabel, Koeppen, Ketter, Meyermann, Rapp, Meisner, Kortmann, Pietsch, Wiestler, Ernemann, Bamberg, Reifenberger, von Deimling, Weller]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6497</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NOA-04 Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Radiochemotherapy of Anaplastic Glioma With Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine or Temozolomide [Neurooncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5101v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Shows Similar Response in Patients With Inflammatory or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer When Compared With Operable Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the GeparTrio Trial Data [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5101v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by mastectomy is the treatment of choice in patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), but it is considered less effective in these diseases than in operable breast cancer (OBC). We report a prospective comparison of the GeparTrio trial of patients with IBC (cT4 days) or LABC (cT4a-c or cN3; stage IIIB or IIIC) and patients with OBC (cT2-3).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Participants were stratified by stage and were randomly assigned to six or eight cycles of docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) or to two cycles of TAC followed by four cycles of vinorelbine/capecitabine. We present results of a secondary aim of the study, which was to compare pathologic complete response (pCR; ie, no remaining invasive/noninvasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes) in different stage groups.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 287 patients with IBC (n = 93) or LABC (n = 194) and 1,777 patients with OBC were entered onto the trial. At baseline, parameters were as follows for the three types of cancer, respectively: median tumor sizes: 8.0 cm, 7.0 cm, and 4.0 cm (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); multiple lesions: 31.2%, 27.3%, and 19.6% (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); nodal involvement: 86.6%, 71.2%, and 51.6% (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); grade 3: 44.4%, 30.4%, and 39.9% (<I>P</I> = .178); lobular-invasive type: 7.5%, 17.5%, and 13.3% (<I>P</I> = .673); negative hormone receptor status: 38.0%, 20.0%, and 36.4% (<I>P</I> = .008); and positive human growth factor receptor 2 status: 45.1%, 38.9%, and 35.7% (<I>P</I> = .158). Response rates for IBC, LABC, and OBC, respectively, were 8.6%, 11.3%, and 17.7% for pCR (<I>P</I> = .002); 71.0%, 69.6%, and 83.4% for overall response by physical or sonographic examination (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); and 12.9%, 33.0%, and 69.9% for breast conservation (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). All <I>P</I> values were for IBC and LABC versus OBC. However, tumor stage itself was not an independent predictor for pCR in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.88 to 2.59; <I>P</I> = .13).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: No evidence of a difference in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was found by tumor stage when analysis was adjusted for baseline characteristics.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costa, Loibl, Kaufmann, Zahm, Hilfrich, Huober, Eidtmann, du Bois, Blohmer, Ataseven, Weiss, Tesch, Gerber, Baumann, Thomssen, Breitbach, Ibishi, Jackisch, Mehta, von Minckwitz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Shows Similar Response in Patients With Inflammatory or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer When Compared With Operable Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the GeparTrio Trial Data [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3890v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Cause of a Malignant Chylous Pleural Effusion [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3890v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malinowska-Kolodziej, Finlay, Campbell, Garcia-Moliner, Weinstein, Doughty, Qin, Butterfield, Short, Seyama, Kwiatkowski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3890</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Cause of a Malignant Chylous Pleural Effusion [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2793v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Care for Imminently Dying Cancer Patients: Family Members' Experiences and Recommendations [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2793v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The aim of this study was to clarify the level of emotional distress experienced by bereaved family members and the perceived necessity for improvement in the care for imminently dying patients and to explore possible causes of distress and alleviating measures.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: A cross-sectional nationwide survey was performed in 2007 of bereaved families of cancer patients at 95 palliative care units across Japan.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Questionnaires were sent to 670 families, and 76% responded. Families reported their experiences as very distressing in 45% of cases. Regarding care, 1.2% of respondents believed that a lot of improvement was needed, compared with 58% who believed no improvement was needed. Determinants of high-level distress were a younger patient age, being a spouse, and overhearing conversations between the medical staff outside the room at the time of the patient's death; those reporting high-level necessity of improvement were less likely to have encountered attempts to ensure the patient's comfort, received less family coaching on how to care for the patient, and felt that insufficient time was allowed for the family to grieve after the patient's death.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A considerable number of families experienced severe emotional distress when their family member died. Thus, we propose that a desirable care concept for imminently dying cancer patients should include relief of patient suffering, family advisement on how to care for the patient, allowance of enough time for the family to grieve, and ensuring that family members cannot overhear medical staff conversations at the time of the patient's death.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinjo, Morita, Hirai, Miyashita, Sato, Tsuneto, Shima]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Care for Imminently Dying Cancer Patients: Family Members' Experiences and Recommendations [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0169v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival Effect of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide and High-Dose Dexamethasone [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0169v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the survival effect of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Two identically designed, multicenter, double-blind, phase III clinical trials (MM-009 and MM-010) were conducted in Europe and the United States to assess the effect of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone versus dexamethasone plus placebo in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, after failing at least one prior line of treatment. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated incidence and survival effect of thromboembolism in 353 patients randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle, plus 40 mg of oral dexamethasone on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 for the first four cycles; after the fourth cycle, 40 mg of dexamethasone was administered on days 1 through 4 only.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Seventeen percent of patients experienced a thromboembolic episode. The development of VTE did not significantly affect overall survival (<I>P</I> = .90) or time to progression (<I>P</I> = .34). No significant survival impact was observed in a subgroup of patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation (overall survival <I>P</I> = .7, time to progression <I>P</I> = .1).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with MM treated with lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone who developed a VTE did not experience shorter overall survival or time to progression.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zangari, Tricot, Polavaram, Zhan, Finlayson, Knight, Fu, Weber, Dimopoulos, Niesvizky, Fink]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival Effect of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide and High-Dose Dexamethasone [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3354v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Activity of Gemcitabine Plus Pertuzumab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3354v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Pertuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) heterodimerization and has single-agent activity in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. The primary objective of this phase II study was to characterize the safety and estimate progression-free survival (PFS) of pertuzumab with gemcitabine in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with advanced, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had received a maximum of one prior treatment for recurrent cancer were randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus either pertuzumab or placebo. Collection of archival tissue was mandatory to permit exploration of biomarkers that would predict benefit from pertuzumab in this setting.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: One hundred thirty patients (65 per arm) were treated. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03; <I>P</I> = .07) in favor of gemcitabine + pertuzumab. The objective response rate was 13.8% in patients who received gemcitabine + pertuzumab compared with 4.6% in patients who received gemcitabine + placebo. In patients whose tumors had low HER3 mRNA expression (&lt; median, n = 61), an increased treatment benefit was observed in the gemcitabine + pertuzumab arm compared with the gemcitabine alone arm (PFS HR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.59; <I>P</I> = .0002). Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, diarrhea, and back pain were increased in patients treated with gemcitabine + pertuzumab. Symptomatic congestive heart failure was reported in one patient in the gemcitabine + pertuzumab arm.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Pertuzumab may add activity to gemcitabine for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Low HER3 mRNA expression may predict pertuzumab clinical benefit and be a valuable prognostic marker.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makhija, Amler, Glenn, Ueland, Gold, Dizon, Paton, Lin, Januario, Ng, Strauss, Kelsey, Sliwkowski, Matulonis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:03 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Activity of Gemcitabine Plus Pertuzumab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2273v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effective Strategies for Management of Hypertension After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Inhibition Therapy: Results From a Phase II Randomized, Factorial, Double-Blind Study of Cediranib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2273v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Hypertension is a commonly reported adverse effect after administration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Cediranib is a highly potent and selective VEGF signaling inhibitor of all three VEGFRs. This study prospectively investigated hypertension management to help minimize dose interruptions/reductions to maximize cediranib dose intensity.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (n = 126) with advanced solid tumors were randomly assigned to one of four groups: cediranib 30 or 45 mg/d with or without antihypertensive prophylaxis. All patients developing hypertension on cediranib treatment were treated with a standardized, predefined hypertension management protocol.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Cediranib was generally well tolerated, and all groups achieved high-dose intensities in the first 12 weeks (&gt; 74% in all groups). Antihypertensive prophylaxis did not result in fewer dose reductions or interruptions. Increases in blood pressure, including moderate and severe readings of hypertension, were seen early in treatment in all groups and successfully managed. Severe hypertension occurred in one patient receiving prophylaxis versus 18 in the nonprophylaxis groups. Overall, there were nine partial responses, and 38 patients experienced stable disease &ge; 8 weeks.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective investigation of hypertension management during administration of a VEGF signaling inhibitor. All four regimens were well tolerated with high-dose intensities and no strategy was clearly superior. The current cediranib hypertension management protocol appears to be effective in managing hypertension compared with previous cediranib studies where no plan was in place, and early recognition and treatment of hypertension is likely to reduce the number of severe hypertension events. This protocol is included in all ongoing cediranib clinical studies.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Langenberg, van Herpen, De Bono, Schellens, Unger, Hoekman, Blum, Fiedler, Drevs, Le Maulf, Fielding, Robertson, Voest]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2273</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effective Strategies for Management of Hypertension After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Inhibition Therapy: Results From a Phase II Randomized, Factorial, Double-Blind Study of Cediranib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1077v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Node-Positive or High-Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1077v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) are commonly used adjuvant regimens in women with early breast cancer. In a previous trial in women with locally advanced breast cancer, 3 months of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) administered every 2 weeks (dose-dense) was equivalent to 6 months of CEF. We hypothesized that 3 months of paclitaxel after dose-dense EC (EC/T) would be superior to CEF or AC/T.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: After lumpectomy or mastectomy, women 60 years of age or younger with axillary node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive CEF, EC/T, or AC/T for 6 months. This article reports the interim analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS), which was planned after 227 recurrences.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 30.4 months. Hazard ratios for recurrence are as follows: AC/T versus CEF, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.99), <I>P</I> = .005; AC/T versus EC/T, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.25 to 2.27), <I>P</I> = .0006; and EC/T versus CEF, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.22), <I>P</I> = .46. Three-year RFS rates for CEF, EC/T, and AC/T are 90.1%, 89.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. There was more febrile neutropenia with CEF (22.3%) and EC/T (16.4%) compared with AC/T (4.8%), but more neuropathy with the last two regimens.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Three-weekly AC/T is significantly inferior to CEF or EC/T in terms of RFS. It is too early to detect any difference between CEF and dose-dense EC/T.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burnell, Levine, Chapman, Bramwell, Gelmon, Walley, Vandenberg, Chalchal, Albain, Perez, Rugo, Pritchard, O'Brien, Shepherd]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Node-Positive or High-Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2679v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicenter, Phase I, Dose-Escalation Trial of Lenalidomide Plus Bortezomib for Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2679v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Lenalidomide and bortezomib are active in relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). In preclinical studies, lenalidomide sensitized MM cells to bortezomib and dexamethasone. This phase I, dose-escalation study (ie, NCT00153933) evaluated safety and determined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide plus bortezomib in patients with relapsed or with relapsed and refractory MM.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients received lenalidomide 5, 10, or 15 mg/d on days 1 through 14 and received bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles. Dexamethasone (20mg or 40 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12) was added for progressive disease after two cycles. Primary end points were safety and MTD determination.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled across six dose cohorts. The MTD was lenalidomide 15 mg/d plus bortezomib 1.0 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. Dose-limiting toxicities (n = 1 for each) were grade 3 hyponatremia and herpes zoster reactivation and grade 4 neutropenia. The most common treatment-related, grades 3 to 4 toxicities included reversible neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and leukopenia. Among 36 response-evaluable patients, 61% (90% CI, 46% to 75%) achieved minimal response or better. Among 18 patients who had dexamethasone added, 83% (90% CI, 62% to 95%) achieved stable disease or better. Median overall survival was 37 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Lenalidomide plus bortezomib was well tolerated and showed promising activity with durable responses in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory MM, including patients previously treated with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or thalidomide. The combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is being investigated in a phase II study in this setting and in newly diagnosed MM.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richardson, Weller, Jagannath, Avigan, Alsina, Schlossman, Mazumder, Munshi, Ghobrial, Doss, Warren, Lunde, McKenney, Delaney, Mitsiades, Hideshima, Dalton, Knight, Esseltine, Anderson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicenter, Phase I, Dose-Escalation Trial of Lenalidomide Plus Bortezomib for Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7166v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conjugated Equine Estrogen Influence on Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women in a Substudy of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7166v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Increased mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk and reduced sensitivity of screening mammography and is related to hormone exposure. However, the effects of conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs) alone on mammographic density in diverse racial/ethnic populations are not established. We examined the effect of CEE alone on mammographic density in a subsample of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial participants.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In the WHI trial, women were randomly assigned to daily CEE 0.625 mg or placebo. The effect of CEE on mammographic percent density was determined over 1 and 2 years in a stratified random sample of 435 racially and ethnically diverse participants from 15 of 40 WHI clinics.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Use of CEE resulted in mean increase in mammographic percent density of 1.6 percentage points (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.4) at year 1 compared with a mean decrease of 1.0 percentage point (95% CI, -1.7 to -0.4) in the placebo group (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). The effect persisted for 2 years, with a mean increase of 1.7 percentage points (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.7) versus a mean decrease of 1.2 percentage points (95% CI, -1.8 to -0.5; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) in the hormone and placebo groups, respectively. These effects were greater in women age 60 to 79 years (<I>P</I> = .03 for interaction across age).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Use of CEE results in a modest but statistically significant increase in mammographic density that is sustained over at least a 2-year period. The clinical significance of the CEE effect on mammographic density remains to be determined.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McTiernan, Chlebowski, Martin, Peck, Aragaki, Pisano, Wang, Johnson, Manson, Wallace, Vitolins, Heiss]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conjugated Equine Estrogen Influence on Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women in a Substudy of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.4156v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Germline Genetic Variation in an Organic Anion Transporter Polypeptide Associated With Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.4156v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Methotrexate plasma concentration is related to its clinical effects. Our aim was to identify the genetic basis of interindividual variability in methotrexate pharmacokinetics in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a genome-wide analysis of 500,568 germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify how inheritance affects methotrexate plasma disposition among 434 children with ALL who received 3,014 courses of methotrexate at 2 to 5 g/m<SUP>2</SUP>. SNPs were validated in an independent cohort of 206 patients.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Adjusting for age, race, sex, and methotrexate regimen, the most significant associations were with SNPs in the organic anion transporter polypeptide, <I>SLCO1B1</I>. Two SNPs in <I>SLCO1B1</I>, rs11045879 (<I>P</I> = 1.7 x 10<SUP>-10</SUP>) and rs4149081 (<I>P</I> = 1.7 x 10<SUP>-9</SUP>), were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with each other (<I>r</I><SUP>2</SUP> = 1) and with a functional polymorphism in <I>SLCO1B1</I>, T521C (rs4149056; <I>r</I><SUP>2</SUP> &gt; 0.84). rs11045879 and rs4149081 were validated in an independent cohort of 206 patients (<I>P</I> = .018 and <I>P</I> = .017), as were other <I>SLCO1B1</I> SNPs residing in different LD blocks. SNPs in <I>SLCO1B1</I> were also associated with GI toxicity (odds ratio, 15.3 to 16.4; <I>P</I> = .03 to .004).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A genome-wide interrogation identified inherited variations in a plausible, yet heretofore low-priority candidate gene, <I>SLCO1B1</I>, as important determinants of methotrexate's pharmacokinetics and clinical effects.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevino, Shimasaki, Yang, Panetta, Cheng, Pei, Chan, Sparreboom, Giacomini, Pui, Evans, Relling]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:41:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Germline Genetic Variation in an Organic Anion Transporter Polypeptide Associated With Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2952v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dose-Dense Adjuvant Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Is Not Associated With Frequent Short-Term Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2952v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) every 3 weeks has been associated with frequent asymptomatic declines in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Dose-dense (dd) AC followed by paclitaxel (P) is superior to the same regimen given every third week. Herein, we report the early cardiac safety of three sequential studies of ddAC alone or with bevacizumab (B).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with <I>HER2</I>-positive breast cancer were treated on two trials: ddAC followed by P and trastuzumab (T) and ddAC followed by PT and lapatinib. Patients with <I>HER2</I>-normal breast cancer were treated with B and ddAC followed by B and nanoparticle albumin&ndash;bound P. Prospective LVEF measurement by multigated radionuclide angiography scan before and after every 2 week AC for 4 cycles and at month 6 from all three trials were aggregated to determine the early risks of cardiac dysfunction.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: From January 2005 to May 2008, 245 patients were enrolled. The median age was 47 years (range, 27 to 75 years). Median LVEF pre-ddAC was 68% (range, 52% to 82%). LVEF post-ddAC was available in 241 patients (98%) and the median was unchanged at 68% (range, 47% to 81%). Per protocol no patients were ineligible for subsequent targeted biologic therapy based on LVEF decline post-ddAC. In addition, LVEF was available in 222 patients (92%) at 6 months, at which time the median LVEF was similar at 65% (range, 24% to 80%). Within 6 months of initiating chemotherapy, three patients (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.25% to 3.54%) developed CHF, all of whom received T.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Dose-dense AC with or without concurrent bevacizumab is not associated with frequent acute or short-term declines in LVEF.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morris, Dickler, McArthur, Traina, Sugarman, Lin, Moy, Come, Godfrey, Nulsen, Chen, Steingart, Rugo, Norton, Winer, Hudis, Dang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2952</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dose-Dense Adjuvant Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Is Not Associated With Frequent Short-Term Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2655v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Adolescents Treated With Adult Protocols: A Report From the German Hodgkin Study Group [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.2655v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The standard of care for adolescent patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is undefined, particularly the choice between pediatric and adult protocols. Thus, we compared risk factors and outcome of adolescents and young adults treated within study protocols of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Three thousand seven hundred eighty-five patients treated within the GHSG studies HD4 to HD9 were analyzed; 557 patients were adolescents age 15 to 20 years, and 3,228 patients were young adults age 21 to 45 years.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Large mediastinal mass and involvement of three or more lymph node areas were more frequent in adolescents (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). The incidence of other risk factors did not differ significantly between age groups. With a median observation time of 81 months for freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and 85 months for overall survival (OS), log-rank test showed no significant differences between age groups regarding FFTF (<I>P</I> = .305) and a superior OS (<I>P</I> = .008) for adolescents. Six-year estimates for FFTF and OS were 80% and 94%, respectively, for adolescents and 80% and 91%, respectively, for young adults. After adjustment for other predictive factors, Cox regression analysis revealed age as a significant predictor for OS (<I>P</I> = .004), with a higher mortality risk for young adults. Secondary malignancies were more common in young adults (<I>P</I> = .037).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Outcome of adolescent and young adult patients treated within GHSG study protocols is comparable. These data suggest that adult treatment protocols exhibit a safe and effective treatment option for adolescent patients with HL. However, longer follow-up, including assessment of late toxicity, is necessary for final conclusions.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eichenauer, Bredenfeld, Haverkamp, Muller, Franklin, Fuchs, Borchmann, Muller-Hermelink, Eich, Muller, Diehl, Engert]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:44 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Adolescents Treated With Adult Protocols: A Report From the German Hodgkin Study Group [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6261v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Y-Box-Binding Protein YB-1 Identifies High-Risk Patients With Primary Breast Cancer Benefiting From Rapidly Cycled Tandem High-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6261v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To investigate the potential of Y-box&ndash;binding protein YB-1, a multifunctional protein linked to tumor aggressiveness and multidrug resistance, to identify patients with breast cancer likely to benefit from dose-intensified chemotherapy regimens.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: YB-1 was immunohistochemically determined in 211 primary tumors from the prospective, randomized West German Study Group WSG-AM-01 trial in high-risk (&ge; 10 involved lymph-nodes) breast cancer (HRBC). Predictive impact of YB-1 was assessed by multivariate survival analysis, including time-varying factor-therapy interactions.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At median follow-up of 61.7 months, patients receiving rapidly cycled tandem high-dose therapy (HD; two cycles [2x] epirubicin 90 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 14 days, followed by 2x epirubicin 90 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, and thiotepa 400 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 21 days) had better disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.89) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.89) than those receiving conventional dose-dense chemotherapy (DD; 4x epirubicin 90 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, followed by 3x cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, methotrexate 40 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 14 days). High YB-1 was associated with aggressive tumor phenotype (negative steroid hormone receptor status, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and <I>p53</I> status, high MIB-1, unfavorable tumor grade) and poor OS (median 78 <I>v</I> 97 months; <I>P</I> = .01). In patients with high YB-1, HD yielded a 63-month median DFS (<I>P</I> = .001) and a 46-month median OS advantage (<I>P</I> = .002) versus DD. In multivariate models, patients with high B-1 receiving HD (<I>v</I> DD) had one third the hazard rate after 20 months for DFS and one sixth after 40 months for OS.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In a randomized prospective cancer therapy trial, for the first time, a strong predictive impact of YB-1 on survival has been demonstrated: enhanced benefit from HD (<I>v</I> DD) therapy occurs in HRBC with high YB-1. Future trials could therefore address optimal chemotherapeutic strategies,taking YB-1 into account.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gluz, Mengele, Schmitt, Kates, Diallo-Danebrock, Neff, Royer, Eckstein, Mohrmann, Ting, Kiechle, Poremba, Nitz, Harbeck]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:40:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6261</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Y-Box-Binding Protein YB-1 Identifies High-Risk Patients With Primary Breast Cancer Benefiting From Rapidly Cycled Tandem High-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4326v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sanchez-Munoz et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4326v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montemurro, Del Mastro, Aglietta]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:53:15 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4326</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sanchez-Munoz et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4300v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to Aragon-Ching [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4300v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alibhai]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:53:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to Aragon-Ching [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4292v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to T. Grenader et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4292v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiralerspong, Gonzalez-Angulo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:56 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4292</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to T. Grenader et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4144v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to K. Satharasinghe et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4144v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kushner, Kramer, Modak, Cheung]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:47 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to K. Satharasinghe et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4110v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metformin As an Addition to Conventional Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4110v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grenader, Goldberg, Shavit]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:33 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metformin As an Addition to Conventional Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4078v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Disease With Androgen Deprivation: The (forgotten) Role of Testosterone [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4078v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aragon-Ching]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Disease With Androgen Deprivation: The (forgotten) Role of Testosterone [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3914v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Versus Disease-Free Survival As a Primary End Point in Clinical Practice [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3914v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez-Munoz, Ribelles, Marquez, Perez-Ruiz, Alba]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:14 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3914</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Versus Disease-Free Survival As a Primary End Point in Clinical Practice [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3757v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sasse et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3757v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soon, Stockler, Askie, Boyer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3757</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to A. Sasse et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1918v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Duration of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: More May Be Not Better [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1918v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sasse, Lima, Sasse, Santos]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1918</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Duration of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: More May Be Not Better [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0779v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0779v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To review and update the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including monitoring, response definition, and first- and second-line therapy.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: These recommendations are based on a critical and comprehensive review of the relevant papers up to February 2009 and the results of four consensus conferences held by the panel of experts appointed by ELN in 2008.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Cytogenetic monitoring was required at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Molecular monitoring was required every 3 months. On the basis of the degree and the timing of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular results, the response to first-line imatinib was defined as optimal, suboptimal, or failure, and the response to second-generation TKIs was defined as suboptimal or failure.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Initial treatment was confirmed as imatinib 400 mg daily. Imatinib should be continued indefinitely in optimal responders. Suboptimal responders may continue on imatinb, at the same or higher dose, or may be eligible for investigational therapy with second-generation TKIs. In instances of imatinib failure, second-generation TKIs are recommended, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation only in instances of failure and, sometimes, suboptimal response, depending on transplantation risk.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baccarani, Cortes, Pane, Niederwieser, Saglio, Apperley, Cervantes, Deininger, Gratwohl, Guilhot, Hochhaus, Horowitz, Hughes, Kantarjian, Larson, Radich, Simonsson, Silver, Goldman, Hehlmann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:50 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0779</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8013v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Forest and the Trees: Pathways and Proteins As Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.8013v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bertagnolli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:42 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Forest and the Trees: Pathways and Proteins As Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7767v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to N. Magne et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7767v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halyard, Pisansky, Dueck, Suman, Pierce, Solin, Marks, Davidson, Martino, Kaufman, Kutteh, Dakhil, Perez]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7767</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to N. Magne et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6918v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact on Cardiac Toxicity With Trastuzumab and Radiotherapy: The Question Is Still Ongoing [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6918v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magne, Vedrine, Chargari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6918</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact on Cardiac Toxicity With Trastuzumab and Radiotherapy: The Question Is Still Ongoing [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6009v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Dalmau [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6009v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rauer, Veelken]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Dalmau [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5993v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognition and Treatment of Sleep Disturbances in Cancer [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5993v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ancoli-Israel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:51:03 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5993</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognition and Treatment of Sleep Disturbances in Cancer [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5837v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unique Localization of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Hepatic Metastases [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5837v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: There are few data on the impact of immediate and differing surgical interventions on circulating tumor cells (CTCs), nor their compartmentalization or localization in different anatomic vascular sites.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: CTCs from consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases were quantified before and immediately after open surgery, laparoscopic resection, open radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or percutaneous RFA. For individuals undergoing open surgery, either hepatic resections or open RFA, CTCs were examined in both systemic and portal circulation by measuring CTCs in samples derived from the peripheral vein, an artery, the hepatic portal vein, and the hepatic vein.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 29 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases with a median age of 55 years (range, 30 to 88 years) were included. CTCs were localized to the hepatic portosystemic macrocirculation with significantly greater numbers than in the systemic vasculature. Surgical procedures led to a statistically significant fall in CTCs at multiple sites measured. Conversely, RFA, either open or percutaneous, was associated with a significant increase in CTCs.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Surgical resection of metastases, but not RFA, immediately decreases CTC levels. In patients with colorectal liver metastases, CTCs appear localized to the hepatic (and pulmonary) macrocirculations. This may explain why metastases in sites other than the liver and lungs are infrequently observed in cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiao, Apostolopoulos, Jacob, Szydlo, Johnson, Tsim, Habib, Coombes, Stebbing]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:51 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5837</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unique Localization of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Hepatic Metastases [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5217v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Williams et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5217v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souhami, Bae, Sandler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5217</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Williams et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4822v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognizing Paraneoplastic Limbic Encephalitis [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4822v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dalmau]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4822</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognizing Paraneoplastic Limbic Encephalitis [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4277v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multimodality Screening of High-Risk Women: A Prospective Cohort Study [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4277v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Mammography has been established as the primary imaging screening method for breast cancer; however, the sensitivity of mammography is limited, especially in women with dense breast tissue. Given the limitations of mammography, interest has developed in alternative screening techniques. This interest has led to numerous studies reporting mammographically occult breast cancers detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. In addition, digital mammography was shown to be more sensitive than film mammography in selected populations. Our goal was to prospectively compare cancer detection of digital mammography (DM), whole-breast ultrasound (WBUS), and contrast-enhanced MRI in a high-risk screening population previously screened negative by film screen mammogram (FSM).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: During a 2-year period, 609 asymptomatic high-risk women with nonactionable FSM examinations presented for a prospective multimodality screening consisting of DM, WBUS, and MRI. The FSM examinations were reinterpreted by study radiologists. Patients had benign or no suspicious findings on clinical examination. The cancer yield by modality was evaluated.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Twenty cancers were diagnosed in 18 patients (nine ductal carcinomas in situ and 11 invasive breast cancers). The overall cancer yield on a per-patient basis was 3.0% (18 of 609 patients). The cancer yield by modality was 1.0% for FSM (six of 597 women), 1.2% for DM (seven of 569 women), 0.53% for WBUS (three of 567 women), and 2.1% for MRI (12 of 571 women). Of the 20 cancers detected, some were only detected on one imaging modality (FSM, n = 1; DM, n = 3; WBUS, n = 1; and MRI, n = 8).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The addition of MRI to mammography in the high-risk group has the greatest potential to detect additional mammographically occult cancers. The incremental cancer yield of WBUS and DM is much less.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weinstein, Localio, Conant, Rosen, Thomas, Schnall]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4277</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multimodality Screening of High-Risk Women: A Prospective Cohort Study [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4137v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Prostate Cancer Duration [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4137v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, Pickles, Buyyounouski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:14 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Prostate Cancer Duration [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3675v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Clinical Trial of a Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Encoding, Second-Generation Oncolytic Herpesvirus in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3675v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Treatment options for metastatic melanoma are limited. We conducted this phase II trial to assess the efficacy of JS1/34.5-/47-/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in stages IIIc and IV disease.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Treatment involved intratumoral injection of up to 4 mL of 10<SUP>6</SUP> pfu/mL of JS1/34.5-/47-/GM-CSF followed 3 weeks later by up to 4 mL of 10<SUP>8</SUP> pfu/mL every 2 weeks for up to 24 treatments. Clinical activity (by RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors]), survival, and safety parameters were monitored.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Fifty patients (stages IIIc, n = 10; IVM1a, n = 16; IVM1b, n = 4; IVM1c, n = 20) received a median of six injection sets; 74% of patients had received one or more nonsurgical prior therapies for active disease, including dacarbazine/temozolomide or interleukin-2 (IL-2). Adverse effects were limited primarily to transient flu-like symptoms. The overall response rate by RECIST was 26% (complete response [CR], n = 8; partial response [PR], n = 5), and regression of both injected and distant (including visceral) lesions occurred. Ninety-two percent of the responses had been maintained for 7 to 31 months. Ten additional patients had stable disease (SD) for greater than 3 months, and two additional patients had surgical CR. On an extension protocol, two patients subsequently achieved CR by 24 months (one previously PR, one previously SD), and one achieved surgical CR (previously PR). Overall survival was 58% at 1 year and 52% at 24 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The 26% response rate, with durability in both injected and uninjected lesions including visceral sites, together with the survival rates, are evidence of systemic effectiveness. This effectiveness, combined with a limited toxicity profile, warrants additional evaluation of JS1/34.5-/47-/GM-CSF in metastatic melanoma. A US Food and Drug Administration&ndash;approved phase III investigation is underway.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senzer, Kaufman, Amatruda, Nemunaitis, Reid, Daniels, Gonzalez, Glaspy, Whitman, Harrington, Goldsweig, Marshall, Love, Coffin, Nemunaitis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:50:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Clinical Trial of a Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Encoding, Second-Generation Oncolytic Herpesvirus in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2222v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Refining Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: T Stands for Trastuzumab, Tumor Size, and Treatment Strategy [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2222v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burstein, Winer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Refining Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: T Stands for Trastuzumab, Tumor Size, and Treatment Strategy [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0317v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MicroRNAs in Cancer: Small Molecules With a Huge Impact [Biology of Neoplasia]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0317v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P>Every cellular process is likely to be regulated by microRNAs, and an aberrant microRNA expression signature is a hallmark of several diseases, including cancer. MicroRNA expression profiling has indeed provided evidence of the association of these tiny molecules with tumor development and progression. An increasing number of studies have then demonstrated that microRNAs can function as potential oncogenes or oncosuppressor genes, depending on the cellular context and on the target genes they regulate. Here we review our current knowledge about the involvement of microRNAs in cancer and their potential as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iorio, Croce]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0317</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MicroRNAs in Cancer: Small Molecules With a Huge Impact [Biology of Neoplasia]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Biology of Neoplasia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0036v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[False-Positive MIBG Scans With Normal Computed Tomography Imaging In Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.0036v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satharasinghe, Trahair, Barbaric, O'Brien, Russell, Cohn, Marshall, Ziegler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[False-Positive MIBG Scans With Normal Computed Tomography Imaging In Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9020v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical Review of the Determination Process by the Japanese Reviewing Authority in Approving the Additional Efficacy of Fludarabine Phosphate [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.9020v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narimatsu, Oiso, Ono, Kami]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical Review of the Determination Process by the Japanese Reviewing Authority in Approving the Additional Efficacy of Fludarabine Phosphate [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8592v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8592v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: On the basis of the benefits of frontline radiation in early-stage, extranodal, natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), we conducted a phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by three cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (VIPD).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Thirty patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL received CCRT (ie radiation 40 to 52.8 Gy and cisplatin 30 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> weekly). Three cycles of VIPD (etoposide 100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> days 1 through 3, ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> days 1 through 3, cisplatin 33 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> days 1 through 3, and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1 through 4) were scheduled after CCRT.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: All patients completed CCRT, which resulted in 100% response that included 22 complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs). The CR rate after CCRT was 73.3% (ie, 22 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 57.46 to 89.13). Twenty-six of 30 patients completed the planned three cycles of VIPD, whereas four patients did not because they withdrew (n = 2) or because they had an infection (n = 2). The overall response rate and the CR rate were 83.3% (ie; 25 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 65.28 to 94.36) and 80.0% (ie, 24 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 65.69 to 94.31), respectively. Only one patient experienced grade 3 toxicity during CCRT (nausea), whereas 12 of 29 patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The estimated 3-year, progression-free and overall survival rates were 85.19% (95% CI, 72.48 to 97.90) and 86.28% (95% CI, 73.97 to 98.59), respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL are best treated with frontline CCRT.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Suh, Huh, Lee, Kim, Cho, Lee, Kang, Eom, Pyo, Ahn, Ko, Kim]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:55 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8436v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bilateral Occipital Lobe Invasion in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.8436v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kakimoto, Nakazato, Hayashi, Hayashi, Hayashi, Ishiyama, Asada, Ishida]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:44 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bilateral Occipital Lobe Invasion in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5408v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Neurocognitive Functioning in Children Previously Randomly Assigned to Intrathecal Methotrexate Compared With Triple Intrathecal Therapy for the Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.5408v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: For the majority of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CNS prophylaxis consists of either intrathecal (IT) methotrexate or triple IT therapy (ie, methotrexate with both cytarabine and hydrocortisone). The long-term neurotoxicities of these two IT strategies have not yet been directly compared.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In this multisite study, 171 children with standard-risk ALL, age 1 to 9.99 years at diagnosis, previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate (n = 82) or to triple IT therapy (n = 89) on CCG 1952, underwent neurocognitive evaluation by a licensed psychologist at a mean of 5.9 years after random assignment.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patients who received IT methotrexate had a mean Processing Speed Index that was 3.6 points lower, about one fourth of a standard deviation, than those who received triple IT therapy (<I>P</I> = .04) after analysis was adjusted for age, sex, and time since diagnosis. Likewise, 19.5% of children in the IT methotrexate group had a Processing Speed Index score in the below-average range compared with 6.9% in the triple IT therapy group (<I>P</I> = .02). Otherwise, the groups performed similarly on tests of full-scale intelligence quotient, academic achievement, attention/concentration, memory, and visual motor integration. The association of treatment with measures of cognitive functioning was not modified by sex or age at diagnosis. In the post-therapy period, there were no group differences in special education services, neurologic events, or use of psychotropic medications.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This study did not show any clinically meaningful differences in neurocognitive functioning between patients previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate or triple IT therapy except for a small difference in processing speed in the IT methotrexate group.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kadan-Lottick, Brouwers, Breiger, Kaleita, Dziura, Northrup, Chen, Nicoletti, Bostrom, Stork, Neglia]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5408</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Neurocognitive Functioning in Children Previously Randomly Assigned to Intrathecal Methotrexate Compared With Triple Intrathecal Therapy for the Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4252v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sorafenib-Induced Bilateral Osteonecrosis of Femoral Heads [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4252v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillet, Walter, Scoazec, Vial, Lombard-Bohas, Dumortier]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4252</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sorafenib-Induced Bilateral Osteonecrosis of Femoral Heads [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2025v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High Risk of Recurrence for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Node-Negative Tumors 1 cm or Smaller [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2025v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the risk of recurrence in women diagnosed with T1a and T1b, node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) &ndash;positive breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We reviewed 965 T1a,bN0M0 breast cancers diagnosed at our institution between 1990 and 2002. Dedicated breast pathologists confirmed HER2 positivity if 3+ by immunohistochemistry or if it had a ratio of 2.0 or greater by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or trastuzumab were excluded. Kaplan-Meier product was used to calculate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant recurrence&ndash;free survival (DRFS). Cox proportional hazard models were fit to determine associations between HER2 status and survival after adjustment for patient and disease characteristics. Additionally, 350 breast cancers from two other institutions were used for validation.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Ten percent of patients had HER2-positive tumors. At a median follow-up of 74 months, there were 72 recurrences. The 5-year RFS rates were 77.1% and 93.7% in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumors, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). The 5-year DRFS rates were 86.4% and 97.2% in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumors, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). In multivariate analysis, patients with HER2-positive tumors had higher risks of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.68; 95% CI, 1.44 to 5.0; <I>P</I> = .002) and distant recurrence (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.23 to 12.62; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) than those with HER2-negative tumors. Patients with HER2-positive tumors had 5.09 times (95% CI, 2.56 to 10.14; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) the rate of recurrences and 7.81 times (95% CI, 3.17 to 19.22; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) the rate of distant recurrences at 5 years compared with patients who had hormone receptor&ndash;positive tumors.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with HER2-positive T1abN0M0 tumors have a significant risk of relapse and should be considered for systemic, anti-HER2, adjuvant therapy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez-Angulo, Litton, Broglio, Meric-Bernstam, Rakkhit, Cardoso, Peintinger, Hanrahan, Sahin, Guray, Larsimont, Feoli, Stranzl, Buchholz, Valero, Theriault, Piccart-Gebhart, Ravdin, Berry, Hortobagyi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High Risk of Recurrence for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Node-Negative Tumors 1 cm or Smaller [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1670v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative Prognostic Value of HPV16 E6 mRNA Compared With In Situ Hybridization for Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1670v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: A significant proportion of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) are associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV), particularly HPV16. The optimal method for HPV determination on archival materials however, remains unclear. We compared a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay for HPV16 mRNA to a DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) method, and evaluated their significance for overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Matched, archival biopsies from 111 patients with OSCC were evaluated for HPV16 using a qRT-PCR for E6 mRNA and ISH for DNA. Immunohistochemistry for p16, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor were also performed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: HPV16 E6 mRNA was positive in 73 (66%) of 111 samples; ISH was positive in 62 of 106 samples (58%), with 86% concordance. P16 was overexpressed in 72 samples (65%), which was strongly associated with HPV16 status by either method. E6 mRNA presence or p16 overexpression were significantly associated with superior OS; E6 mRNA, HPV16 ISH, or p16 were all significantly associated with DFS. On multivariate analysis adjusted for age, stage, and treatment, positive E6 mRNA was the only independent predictor for superior OS; for DFS, p16 expression or HPV16 status determined by either method was significant.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The prevalence of HPV16 in OSCC ranges from 58% to 66%, in a recently treated Canadian cohort. Classification of HPV-positivity by HPV16 E6 mRNA, HPV16 ISH or p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is associated with improved DFS. However, the latter two assays are technically easier to perform; hence, HPV16 ISH or p16 IHC should become standard evaluations for all patients with OSCC.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, Kato, Perez-Ordonez, Pintilie, Huang, Hui, O'Sullivan, Waldron, Cummings, Kim, Ringash, Dawson, Gullane, Siu, Gillison, Liu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative Prognostic Value of HPV16 E6 mRNA Compared With In Situ Hybridization for Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1613v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Breast [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1613v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoimes, Selbst, Shafi, Rose, Rosado]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1613</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Breast [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8239v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Melanoma Prognostic Model Using Tissue Microarrays and Genetic Algorithms [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8239v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: As a result of the questionable risk-to-benefit ratio of adjuvant therapies, stage II melanoma is currently managed by observation because available clinicopathologic parameters cannot identify the 20% to 60% of such patients likely to develop metastatic disease. Here, we propose a multimarker molecular prognostic assay that can help triage patients at increased risk of recurrence.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Protein expression for 38 candidates relevant to melanoma oncogenesis was evaluated using the automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method for immunofluorescence-based immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from a cohort of 192 primary melanomas collected during 1959 to 1994. The prognostic assay was built using a genetic algorithm and validated on an independent cohort of 246 serial primary melanomas collected from 1997 to 2004.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Multiple iterations of the genetic algorithm yielded a consistent five-marker solution. A favorable prognosis was predicted by ATF2 ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of more than &ndash;0.052, p21<SUP>WAF1</SUP> nuclear compartment AQUA score of more than 12.98, p16<SUP>INK4A</SUP> ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of &le; -0.083, &beta;-catenin total AQUA score of more than 38.68, and fibronectin total AQUA score of &le; 57.93. Primary tumors that met at least four of these five conditions were considered a low-risk group, and those that met three or fewer conditions formed a high-risk group (log-rank <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Multivariable proportional hazards analysis adjusting for clinicopathologic parameters shows that the high-risk group has significantly reduced survival on both the discovery (hazard ratio = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.49; <I>P</I> = .002) and validation (hazard ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.58; <I>P</I> = .027) cohorts.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This multimarker prognostic assay, an independent determinant of melanoma survival, might be beneficial in improving the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant therapy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gould Rothberg, Berger, Molinaro, Subtil, Krauthammer, Camp, Bradley, Ariyan, Kluger, Rimm]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8239</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Melanoma Prognostic Model Using Tissue Microarrays and Genetic Algorithms [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7041v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Mortality in Randomized Controlled Trials on Mammography Screening [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7041v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: We assessed changes in advanced cancer incidence and cancer mortality in eight randomized trials of breast cancer screening.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Depending on published data, advanced cancer was defined as cancer &ge; 20 mm in size (four trials), stage II+ (four trials), and &ge; one positive lymph node (one trial). For each trial, we obtained the estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% CI between the intervention and control groups, for both breast cancer mortality and diagnosis of advanced breast cancer. Using a meta-regression approach, log(RR-mortality) was regressed on log(RR-advanced cancer), weighting each trial by the reciprocal of the square of the standard error of log(RR) for mortality.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: RR for advanced breast cancer ranged from 0.69 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.78) in the Swedish Two-County Trial to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.25) in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1 (NBSS-1) trial. Log(RR)s for advanced cancer were highly predictive of log(RR)s for mortality (<I>R</I><SUP>2</SUP> = 0.95; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001), and the linear regression curve had a slope of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.25) after fixing the intercept to zero. The slope changed only slightly after excluding the Two-County Trial and the Canadian NBSS-1 and NBSS-2 trials.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In trials on breast cancer screening, for each unit decrease in incidence of advanced breast cancer, there was an equal decrease in breast cancer mortality. Monitoring of incidence of advanced breast cancer may provide information on the current impact of screening on breast cancer mortality in the general population.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Autier, Hery, Haukka, Boniol, Byrnes]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:16 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Mortality in Randomized Controlled Trials on Mammography Screening [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5151v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients' Supportive Care Needs Beyond the End of Cancer Treatment: A Prospective, Longitudinal Survey [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.5151v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To estimate prevalence and severity of patients' self-perceived supportive care needs in the immediate post-treatment phase and identify predictors of unmet need.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal survey was conducted. Sixty-six centers recruited patients for 12 weeks. Patients receiving treatment for the following cancers were recruited: breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Measures of supportive care needs, anxiety and depression, fear of recurrence, and positive and negative affect were completed at the end of treatment (T0) and 6 months later (T1).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 1,850 patients given questionnaire packs, 1,425 (79%) returned questionnaires at T0, and 1,152 (62%) returned questionnaires at T1. Mean age was 61 years; and most respondents were female (69%) and had breast cancer (57%). Most patients had no or few moderate or severe unmet supportive care needs. However, 30% reported more than five unmet needs at baseline, and for 60% of these patients, the situation did not improve. At both assessments, the most frequently endorsed unmet needs were psychological needs and fear of recurrence. Logistic regression revealed several statistically significant predictors of unmet need, including receipt of hormone treatment, negative affect, and experiencing an unrelated significant event between assessments.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Most patients do not express unmet needs for supportive care after treatment. Thirty percent reported more than five moderate or severe unmet needs at both assessments. Unmet needs were predicted by hormone treatment, negative mood, and experiencing a significant event. Our results suggest that there is a proportion of survivors with unmet needs who might benefit from the targeted application of psychosocial resources.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armes, Crowe, Colbourne, Morgan, Murrells, Oakley, Palmer, Ream, Young, Richardson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:04 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients' Supportive Care Needs Beyond the End of Cancer Treatment: A Prospective, Longitudinal Survey [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4295v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4295v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Activating mutation of the <I>KRAS</I> oncogene is an established predictive biomarker for resistance to anti&ndash;epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We wanted to determine whether <I>KRAS</I> and/or <I>BRAF</I> mutation is also a predictive biomarker for other aCRC therapies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The Medical Research Council Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS) trial compared treatment sequences including first-line fluorouracil (FU), FU/irinotecan or FU/oxaliplatin in aCRC. Tumor blocks were obtained from 711 consenting patients. DNA was extracted and <I>KRAS</I> codons 12, 13, and 61 and <I>BRAF</I> codon 600 were assessed by pyrosequencing. Mutation (mut) status was assessed first as a prognostic factor and then as a predictive biomarker for the benefit of adding irinotecan or oxaliplatin to FU. The association of <I>BRAF</I>-mut with loss of MLH1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Three hundred eight (43.3%) of 711 patients had <I>KRAS</I>-mut and 56 (7.9%) of 711 had <I>BRAF</I>-mut. Mutation of <I>KRAS</I>, <I>BRAF</I>, or both was present in 360 (50.6%) of 711 patients. Mutation in either <I>KRAS</I> or <I>BRAF</I> was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) but had minimal impact on progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.36; <I>P</I> = .05). Mutation status did not affect the impact of irinotecan or oxaliplatin on PFS or OS. <I>BRAF</I>-mut was weakly associated with loss of MLH1 staining (<I>P</I> = .012).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: <I>KRAS/BRAF</I> mutation is associated with poor prognosis but is not a predictive biomarker for irinotecan or oxaliplatin. There is no evidence that patients with <I>KRAS/BRAF</I> mutated tumors are less likely to benefit from these standard chemotherapy agents.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richman, Seymour, Chambers, Elliott, Daly, Meade, Taylor, Barrett, Quirke]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4295</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3693v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Epoetin Alfa on Survival and Cancer Treatment-Related Anemia and Fatigue in Patients Receiving Radical Radiotherapy With Curative Intent for Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3693v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa on local disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer treatment&ndash;related anemia and fatigue in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radical radiotherapy with curative intent.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients (N = 301) with hemoglobin (Hb) less than 15 g/dL were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive radiotherapy plus epoetin alfa (10,000 U subcutaneously [SC] three times weekly if baseline Hb was &lt; 12.5 g/dL; 4,000 U SC three times weekly if baseline Hb &ge; 12.5 g/dL) or radiotherapy alone. Hb levels were monitored weekly. The primary end point was local DFS, defined as the time from random assignment to local disease recurrence or death. Secondary efficacy end points included OS, local tumor response, and local tumor control. Patients were followed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postradiotherapy and annually for 5 years. Cancer treatment&ndash;related anemia and fatigue were evaluated with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck. Adverse events were recorded up to 12 weeks postradiotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Hb levels increased from baseline with epoetin alfa. The median duration of local DFS was not statistically different between groups (observation, 35.42 months; epoetin alfa, 31.47 months; hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.41). Groups did not significantly differ in DFS, OS, tumor outcomes, or cancer treatment&ndash;related anemia or fatigue. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Addition of epoetin alfa to radical radiotherapy did not affect survival, tumor outcomes, anemia, or fatigue positively or negatively in patients with head and neck cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoskin, Robinson, Slevin, Morgan, Harrington, Gaffney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3693</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Epoetin Alfa on Survival and Cancer Treatment-Related Anemia and Fatigue in Patients Receiving Radical Radiotherapy With Curative Intent for Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3370v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Preoperative Gefitinib in Clinical Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3370v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have proven efficacy in advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their role in early-stage NSCLC has not been established. Our purpose was to explore the use of preoperative gefitinib in clinical stage I NSCLC to assess tumor response, toxicity, and clinical and molecular predictors of response.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients received gefitinib 250 mg/d for up to 28 days, followed by mediastinoscopy and surgical resection in an open-label, single-arm study. Tumor response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Blood samples and tumor biopsies were collected and analyzed for transforming growth factor  level, EGFR protein expression, <I>EGFR</I> gene copy number, and <I>EGFR</I> (exon 19 to 21) and <I>KRAS</I> mutations.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Thirty-six patients completed preoperative treatment (median duration, 28 days; range, 27 to 30 days). Median follow-up time is 2.1 years (range, 0.86 to 3.46 years). Three patients experienced grade 3 toxicities (rash, diarrhea, and elevated ALT). Tumors demonstrated EGFR-positive protein expression in 83%, high gene copy number in 59%, <I>EGFR</I> mutations in 17%, and <I>KRAS</I> mutations in 17%. Tumor shrinkage was more frequent among women and nonsmokers. Partial response was seen in four patients (11%), and disease progression was seen in three patients (9%). The strongest predictor of response was <I>EGFR</I> mutation.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Preoperative window therapy with gefitinib is a safe and feasible regimen in early NSCLC and provides a trial design that may better inform predictors of treatment response or sensitivity.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lara-Guerra, Waddell, Salvarrey, Joshua, Chung, Paul, Boerner, Sakurada, Ludkovski, Ma, Squire, Liu, Shepherd, Tsao, Leighl]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3370</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Preoperative Gefitinib in Clinical Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1507v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the Mechanisms Behind Trastuzumab Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.1507v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Targeted therapy with the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has become a mainstay for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) &ndash;positive breast cancer (BC). The mechanisms of action of trastuzumab have not been fully elucidated, and data available to date are reviewed here. The impact of the mechanisms of action on clinical benefit also is discussed.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: An extensive literature review of trastuzumab and proposed mechanisms of action was performed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At least five potential extracellular and intracellular antitumor mechanisms of trastuzumab have been identified in the preclinical setting. These include activation of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, inhibition of extracellular domain cleavage, abrogation of intracellular signaling, reduction of angiogenesis, and decreased DNA repair. These effects lead to tumor cell stasis and/or death. Clinical benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy in both early and advanced BC has been demonstrated. The benefit of trastuzumab use beyond progression has also been shown, which indicates the need for continuous suppression of the HER2 pathway. Targeting both HER2, with various approaches, and other pathways may enhance the clinical benefit observed with trastuzumab and overcome potential resistance. Novel combinations include pertuzumab (a HER2 dimerization inhibitor), lapatinib (a HER1/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor), bevacizumab (an antiangiogenic agent), tanespimycin (a heat shock protein inhibitor), antiestrogen therapies, and an antibody-drug conjugate (trastuzumab-DM1).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Trastuzumab is the foundation of care for patients with HER2-positive BC. Emerging data from studies of other targeted agents may provide alternative treatment combinations to maximize the clinical benefit from trastuzumab and prevent or delay resistance. The continued development of trastuzumab highlights promising treatment approaches for the future.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spector, Blackwell]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1507</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the Mechanisms Behind Trastuzumab Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0962v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients With Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.0962v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To assess the prognostic role of <I>HER2</I> overexpression/amplification in patients with node-negative, pT1a-b breast cancers.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: All patients with <I>HER2</I>-positive breast cancer were identified among a population of 2,130 patients whose diseases were staged as pT1a-b, pN0 and who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology from 1999 to 2006. A matched cohort was selected by using variables of hormone receptor status, age, and year of surgery. We estimated rates of local and distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two groups.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: We identified 150 consecutive patients with pT1a-b, pN0, <I>HER2</I>-positive tumors. No patient received adjuvant trastuzumab. The median follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 1.0 to 9.0 years). In the hormone receptor&ndash;positive group, 5-year DFS rates were 99% (95% CI, 96% to 100%) for <I>HER2</I>-negative disease and 92% (95% CI, 86% to 99%) for <I>HER2</I>-positive disease. In the hormone receptor&ndash;negative group, 5-year DFS rates were 92% (95% CI, 84% to 100%) for <I>HER2</I>-negative disease and 91% (95% CI, 84% to 99%) for <I>HER2</I>-positive disease. Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) associated with <I>HER2</I> overexpression was 2.4 (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.5; <I>P</I> = .09). After analysis was adjusted for pT1 stage, hormone receptor&ndash;positive disease with <I>HER2</I>-positive status was associated with a worse prognosis (HR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 25.7). OS in <I>HER2</I>-positive, pT1a-b, pN0 breast cancer was similar irrespective of the hormone receptor status (<I>P</I> = .93).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Patients with node-negative, <I>HER2</I> positive, pT1a-b breast cancer have a low risk of recurrence at 5 years of follow-up. In patients with hormone receptor&ndash;positive disease and pT1a-b, N0 tumors, <I>HER2</I> overexpression was associated with a worse DFS.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curigliano, Viale, Bagnardi, Fumagalli, Locatelli, Rotmensz, Ghisini, Colleoni, Munzone, Veronesi, Zurrida, Nole, Goldhirsch]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0962</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients With Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9766v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy With In Situ RRM1 and ERCC1 Protein Levels for Response Prediction in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9766v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: We evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) of 2 and assessed if tumoral RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels are predictive of response to therapy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A randomized phase III trial was conducted in community-based oncology practices. Tumor specimens were collected a priori and shipped to a single laboratory for blinded determination of in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein expression levels by an automated quantitative immunofluorescent-based technology.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: One hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned. Overall median survival was 5.1 months for gemcitabine and 6.7 months for gemcitabine and carboplatin (<I>P</I> = .24). RRM1 (range, 5.3 to 105.6; median, 34.1) and ERCC1 (range, 5.2 to 131.3; median, 34.7) values were significantly and inversely correlated with disease response (<I>r</I> = -0.41; <I>P</I> = .001 for RRM1; <I>r</I> = -0.39; <I>P</I> = .003 for ERCC1; ie, response was better for patients with low levels of expression). A model for response prediction that included RRM1, ERCC1, and treatment arm, was highly predictive of the treatment response observed (<I>P</I> = .0005). We did not find statistically significant associations between survival and RRM1 or ERCC1 levels.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC and poor PS. Quantitative analysis of RRM1 and ERCC1 protein expression in routinely collected tumor specimens in community oncology practices is predictive of response to gemcitabine and gemcitabine and carboplatin therapy. Oncologists should consider including in situ expression analysis for these proteins into their therapeutic decisions.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reynolds, Obasaju, Schell, Li, Zheng, Boulware, Caton, DeMarco, O'Rourke, Shaw Wright, Boehm, Asmar, Bromund, Peng, Monberg, Bepler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:46:02 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9766</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy With In Situ RRM1 and ERCC1 Protein Levels for Response Prediction in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7588v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of Screening Principles to the Reconstructed Breast [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.7588v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P>A significant number of women choose mastectomy for the treatment of early and locally advanced breast cancer. Advances in reconstruction techniques and greater awareness of options have led to an increased use of immediate breast reconstruction, which has resulted in uncertainty for the management of surveillance for local recurrence. In this article, we review mastectomy and reconstruction trends and how these techniques affect the frequency and location of local recurrence. The data on surveillance imaging of the reconstructed breast are extremely limited. However, by assessing the potential role for imaging in this setting and applying the principles of screening, we have identified that there is a potential theoretic advantage of surveillance imaging in a very small subset of women: those with autologous tissue reconstructions and moderate to high risk of recurrence. A prospective registry study of surveillance imaging in this target population would be the appropriate way to determine its benefit and its impact on survival outcomes. In this review article, we will detail the reasons that should allow clinicians to forego routine surveillance imaging in the majority of women who undergo mastectomy and reconstruction.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakhireh, Fowble, Esserman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7588</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of Screening Principles to the Reconstructed Breast [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6796v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR Status in Determining Benefit From Cetuximab Therapy in Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.6796v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: The occurrence of <I>KRAS</I> mutation is predictive of nonresponse and shorter survival in patients treated by anti&ndash;epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), leading the European Medicine Agency to limit its use to patients with wild-type <I>KRAS</I> tumors. However, only half of these patients will benefit from treatment, suggesting the need to identify additional biomarkers for cetuximab-based treatment efficacy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We retrospectively collected tumors from 173 patients with mCRC. All but one patient received a cetuximab-based regimen as second-line or greater therapy. <I>KRAS</I> and <I>BRAF</I> status were assessed by allelic discrimination. EGFR amplification was assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescent in situ hybridization, and the expression of PTEN was assessed by immunochemistry.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In patients with <I>KRAS</I> wild-type tumors (n = 116), <I>BRAF</I> mutations (n = 5) were weakly associated with lack of response (<I>P</I> = .063) but were strongly associated with shorter progression-free survival (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) and shorter overall survival (OS; <I>P</I> &lt; .001). A high EGFR polysomy or an EGFR amplification was found in 17.7% of the patients and was associated with response (<I>P</I> = .015). PTEN null expression was found in 19.9% of the patients and was associated with shorter OS (<I>P</I> = .013). In multivariate analysis, <I>BRAF</I> mutation and PTEN expression status were associated with OS.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: <I>BRAF</I> status, <I>EGFR</I> amplification, and cytoplasmic expression of PTEN were associated with outcome measures in <I>KRAS</I> wild-type patients treated with a cetuximab-based regimen. Subsequent studies in clinical trial cohorts will be required to confirm the clinical utility of these markers.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurent-Puig, Cayre, Manceau, Buc, Bachet, Lecomte, Rougier, Lievre, Landi, Boige, Ducreux, Ychou, Bibeau, Bouche, Reid, Stone, Penault-Llorca]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:43 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6796</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR Status in Determining Benefit From Cetuximab Therapy in Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4577v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide With Either Docetaxel or Vinorelbine, With or Without Trastuzumab, As Adjuvant Treatments of Breast Cancer: Final Results of the FinHer Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4577v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Docetaxel has not been compared with vinorelbine as adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Efficacy and long-term safety of a short course of adjuvant trastuzumab administered concomitantly with chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (<I>HER2</I>) &ndash;positive cancer are unknown.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: One thousand ten women with axillary node&ndash;positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of docetaxel or vinorelbine, followed in both groups by three cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC). Women with <I>HER2</I>-positive cancer (n = 232) were further assigned to either receive or not receive trastuzumab for 9 weeks with docetaxel or vinorelbine. The median follow-up time was 62 months after random assignment.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Women assigned to docetaxel had better distant disease&ndash;free survival (DDFS) than those assigned to vinorelbine (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.91; <I>P</I> = .010). In the subgroup of <I>HER2</I>-positive disease, patients treated with trastuzumab tended to have better DDFS than those treated with chemotherapy only (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.12; <I>P</I> = .12; with adjustment for presence of axillary nodal metastases, HR = 0.57; <I>P</I> = .047). In exploratory analyses, docetaxel, trastuzumab, and FEC improved DDFS compared with docetaxel plus FEC (HR = 0.32; <I>P</I> = .029) and vinorelbine, trastuzumab, and FEC (HR = 0.31; <I>P</I> = .020). The median left ventricular ejection fraction of trastuzumab-treated patients remained unaltered during the 5-year follow-up; only one woman treated with trastuzumab was diagnosed with a heart failure.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Adjuvant treatment with docetaxel improves DDFS compared with vinorelbine. A brief course of trastuzumab administered concomitantly with docetaxel is safe and effective and warrants further evaluation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joensuu, Bono, Kataja, Alanko, Kokko, Asola, Utriainen, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Jyrkkio, Moykkynen, Helle, Ingalsuo, Pajunen, Huusko, Salminen, Auvinen, Leinonen, Leinonen, Isola, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:29 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide With Either Docetaxel or Vinorelbine, With or Without Trastuzumab, As Adjuvant Treatments of Breast Cancer: Final Results of the FinHer Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8306v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[One-Year Outcomes of a Behavioral Therapy Intervention Trial on Sleep Quality and Cancer-Related Fatigue [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8306v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine 1-year outcomes of a four-component behavioral therapy (BT) sleep intervention (Individualized Sleep Promotion Plan [ISPP]) versus a healthy eating control (HEC) on cancer-related fatigue in women receiving breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (CTX).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A total of 219 participants from 12 oncology clinics were randomly assigned in a clinical trial. Before CTX, research nurses coached intervention participants to develop a BT plan including stimulus control, modified sleep restriction, relaxation therapy, and sleep hygiene. BT plans were revised before each CTX and 30, 60, and 90 days after the last CTX and reinforced 7 to 9 days later. HEC participants received nutritional information and equal attention. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Daily Diary, Wrist Actigraph, and Piper Fatigue Scale measures and Repeated Linear Mixed Model analysis following the Intent to Treat paradigm were used.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Sleep quality differed over 1 years time (F [4,162] = 7.7, <I>P</I> &lt; .001; by group, F [1,173] = 4.8, <I>P</I> = .029; and over time by group, F [4,162] = 3.3, <I>P</I> = .013). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between groups at 90 days (<I>P</I> = .002) but not at 1 year (<I>P</I> = .052). Seven days of diary and actigraphy data did not corroborate with monthly reflections (PSQI). The night awakenings (Actigraph) pattern was significantly different by group over time (<I>P</I> = .046), with no differences between groups at 90 days or at 1 year. Fatigue was lower at 1 year than before CTX; no group effects were found.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The BT group, on average, experienced significant improvement on global sleep quality compared with the HEC group, but not on objective sleep or fatigue outcomes.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berger, Kuhn, Farr, Von Essen, Chamberlain, Lynch, Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[One-Year Outcomes of a Behavioral Therapy Intervention Trial on Sleep Quality and Cancer-Related Fatigue [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.18.8821v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Papillary Histology Renal Cell Cancer: SWOG S0317 [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.18.8821v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><P><B>Purpose</B>: Patients with advanced papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC) have poor survival after systemic therapy; the reported median survival time is 7 to 17 months. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced pRCC, a tumor type associated with wild-type von Hippel Lindau gene.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with histologically confirmed, advanced, or metastatic pRCC were treated with erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily. A RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) response rate (RR) of &ge; 20% was considered a promising outcome. Secondary end points included overall survival and 6-month probability of treatment failure.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 52 patients registered, 45 were evaluable. The overall RR was 11% (five of 45 patients; 95% CI, 3% to 24%), and the disease control rate was 64% (ie five partial response and 24 stable disease). The median overall survival time was 27 months (95% CI, 13 to 36 months). Probability of freedom from treatment failure at 6 months was 29% (95% CI, 17% to 42%). There was one grade 5 adverse event (AE) of pneumonitis, one grade 4 thrombosis, and nine other grade 3 AEs.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Although the RECIST RR of 11% did not exceed prespecified estimates for additional study, single-agent erlotinib yielded disease control and survival outcomes of interest with an expected toxicity profile. The design of future trials of the EGFR axis in pRCC should be based on preclinical or molecular data that define appropriate patient subgroups, new drug combinations, or potentially more active alternative schedules.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon, Hussey, Nagle, Lara, Mack, Dutcher, Samlowski, Clark, Quinn, Pan, Crawford]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:45:07 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8821</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Papillary Histology Renal Cell Cancer: SWOG S0317 [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4284v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to R. Memmott et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.4284v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodwin, Ligibel, Stambolic]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:51:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4284</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to R. Memmott et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3963v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LKB1 and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin As Predictive Factors for the Anticancer Efficacy of Metformin [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.3963v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memmott, Dennis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:51:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3963</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LKB1 and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin As Predictive Factors for the Anticancer Efficacy of Metformin [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1652v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The Story of the Other Side [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1652v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garber, Golshan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:51:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1652</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The Story of the Other Side [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1371v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Hardest Job in Medicine [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.1371v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Hardest Job in Medicine [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to L.H. Jensen et al and S. Jahn et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.7015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hampel, Frankel, de la Chapelle]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:19 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to L.H. Jensen et al and S. Jahn et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6744v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular Screening for Lynch Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6744v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jensen, Lindebjerg, Kolvraa, Cruger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6744</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular Screening for Lynch Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5233v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Thiele et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5233v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, Bareford, Erber, Wilkins, Wright, Buck, Wheatley, Harrison, Green]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to J. Thiele et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3808v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Treat Pelvic Nodes or Not: Could the Greater Testicular Scatter Dose From Whole Pelvic Fields Confound Results of Prostate Cancer Trials? [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3808v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[King, Kapp]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3808</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Treat Pelvic Nodes or Not: Could the Greater Testicular Scatter Dose From Whole Pelvic Fields Confound Results of Prostate Cancer Trials? [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3485v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bone Marrow Fibrosis and Diagnosis of Essential Thrombocythemia [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3485v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thiele, Kvasnicka, Vardiman, Orazi, Franco, Gisslinger, Birgegard, Griesshammer, Tefferi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:49:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3485</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bone Marrow Fibrosis and Diagnosis of Essential Thrombocythemia [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7545v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Cisplatin Plus Etoposide and Bevacizumab for Previously Untreated, Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3501 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7545v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus cisplatin and etoposide in patients with extensive-stage disease, small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In this phase II trial, 63 patients were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg plus cisplatin 60 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and etoposide 120 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, which was followed by bevacizumab alone until death or disease progression occurred. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive at 6 months without disease progression (ie, progression-free survival [PFS]). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and toxicity. Correlative studies were performed to explore the relationship between baseline and changes in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble cell adhesion molecules (ie, vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM], intercellular cell adhesion molecule [ICAM], and E-selectin) and basic fibroblast growth factor and outcome.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The 6-month PFS was 30.2%, the median PFS was 4.7 months, and OS was 10.9 months. The response rate was 63.5%. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (57.8%). Only one patient had grade 3 pulmonary hemorrhage. Patients who had high baseline VCAM had a higher risk of progression or death compared with those who had low baseline VCAM levels. No relationships between outcome and any other biomarkers were seen.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin and etoposide in patients with ED-SCLC results in improved PFS and OS relative to historical controls who received this chemotherapy regimen without bevacizumab. This regimen appears to be well tolerated and has minimal increase in toxicities compared with chemotherapy alone. Baseline VCAM levels predicted survival, but no other relationships among treatment, biomarkers, and outcome were identified.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horn, Dahlberg, Sandler, Dowlati, Moore, Murren, Schiller]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Cisplatin Plus Etoposide and Bevacizumab for Previously Untreated, Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3501 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7461v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Solitary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the Vocal Cord in an Adolescent [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7461v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanan, Redner, Atlas, Marin, Kadkade, Bandovic, Jaffe]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:48:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Solitary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the Vocal Cord in an Adolescent [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7420v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of Life Supersedes the Classic Prognosticators for Long-Term Survival in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of RTOG 9801 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.7420v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine the added value of quality of life (QOL) as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG-9801.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Two hundred forty-three patients with stage II/IIIAB NSCLC received induction paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) and then concurrent weekly PC and hyperfractionated radiation (to 69.6 Gy). Patients were randomly assigned to amifostine (AM) or no AM during chemoradiotherapy. The following pretreatment factors were analyzed as prognostic factors for OS: Karnofsky performance status, stage, sex, age, race, marital status, histology, tumor location, hemoglobin, tobacco use, treatment arm (AM <I>v</I> no AM) and QOL scores (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 [QLQ-C30] and Lung Cancer 13 [LC-13]). A multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards model was performed using a backwards selection process.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of the 239 analyzable patients, 91% had a baseline global QOL score. Median follow-up time was 59 months for patients still alive and 17 months for all patients. Median baseline QLQ-C30 global QOL score was 66.7 on both treatment arms. Whether the global QOL score was treated as a dichotomized variable (based on the median score) or a continuous variable, all other variables fell out of the MVA for OS. Patients with a global QOL score less than 66.7 had an approximately 70% higher rate of death than patients with scores &ge; 66.7 (<I>P</I> = .004). A 10-point higher baseline global QOL score corresponded to a decrease in the hazard of death by approximately 10% (<I>P</I> = .004). The other independent QOL predictors for OS were the QLQ-C30 physical functioning (<I>P</I> = .011) and LC-13 dyspnea scores (<I>P</I> = .012).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In this analysis, baseline global QOL score replaced known prognostic factors as the sole predictor of long-term OS for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Movsas, Moughan, Sarna, Langer, Werner-Wasik, Nicolaou, Komaki, Machtay, Wasserman, Bruner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7420</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of Life Supersedes the Classic Prognosticators for Long-Term Survival in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of RTOG 9801 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6901v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bladder Cancer: Narrowing the Gap Between Evidence and Practice [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6901v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hussain, Wood, Bajorin, Bochner, Dreicer, Lamm, O'Donnell, Siefker-Radtke, Theodorescu, Dinney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6901</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bladder Cancer: Narrowing the Gap Between Evidence and Practice [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6067v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the Combined Effect of Comorbidity and Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics on the Risk of Death in Men After Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6067v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: We examined whether time-dependent continuous prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity at recurrence was associated with all cause mortality (ACM) adjusting for comorbidity levels among men treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone with or without androgen suppression therapy (AST) in the setting of a randomized controlled trial.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: From 1995 to 2001, 206 men with localized, unfavorable prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive RT alone or RT and AST combined. Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between PSA velocity at recurrence and ACM, adjusting for known prostate cancer prognostic factors, including Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 comorbidity level.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: With a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 89 biochemical recurrences and 74 ACM deaths occurred. Among all patients, higher PSA velocity was associated with increased ACM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.44; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) after adjusting for age, treatment arm, comorbidity score, and salvage AST. For 89 patients with biochemical recurrence, increasing PSA velocity at recurrence (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.09; <I>P</I> &le; .001) and moderate to severe comorbidity score (HR, 7.94; 95% CI, 1.55 to 40.52; <I>P</I> = .01) were associated with increased ACM. PSA velocity at recurrence was associated with significantly higher risk of ACM among patients with no or minimal comorbidity (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), but not moderate to severe comorbidity (<I>P</I> = .12).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Rapid PSA velocity at recurrence is significantly associated with an increased risk of ACM among patients with no or minimal comorbidity but not moderate to severe comorbidity. These findings support judicious use of salvage AST, particularly in men with moderate to severe comorbidities, where prospective surveillance protocols are needed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wo, Chen, Nguyen, Renshaw, Loffredo, Kantoff, D'Amico]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:33 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the Combined Effect of Comorbidity and Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics on the Risk of Death in Men After Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4468v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Left Thumb [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4468v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Longo, Castellana, Gasparini]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4468</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Left Thumb [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2280v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do Male Lymphoma Survivors Have Impaired Sexual Function? [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2280v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Sexual function in male lymphoma survivors was examined and compared with that of age-matched controls.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: This cross-sectional study included serum gonadal hormone levels (testosterone, sex hormone&ndash;binding globulin, luteinizing hormone [LH], and follicle-stimulating hormone) and responses to questionnaires assessing sexual function (Brief Sexual Function Inventory [BSFI]), socioeconomic factors, quality of life, emotional distress, and fatigue. The lymphoma group included 246 men &le; 50 years old at diagnosis who were diagnosed from 1980 to 2002 and treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. For each lymphoma survivor, two age-matched controls (n = 492) were drawn from a normative sample with BSFI scores.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The lymphoma survivors had a mean age at survey of 47.4 years, the mean duration of follow-up was 14.8 years, and 79% lived in committed relationships. All BSFI domain scores decreased significantly with age. Lymphoma survivors having low testosterone and/or elevated LH had lower BSFI scores than survivors with normal gonadal hormones. Multivariate analyses showed that increasing age, more emotional distress, poor physical health, and low testosterone and/or elevated LH were significantly associated with reduced sexual function within the lymphoma group. Lymphoma survivors had significantly lower BSFI domain scores than did controls on erection, ejaculation, and sexual satisfaction.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Lymphoma survivors had significantly poorer sexual function than normative controls. It is unclear whether the abnormal hormone levels directly cause the reduced sexual function within the lymphoma group or if a mediating factor is involved, such as aging, emotional distress, or perceived health status.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiserud, Schover, Dahl, Fossa, Bjoro, Loge, Holte, Yuan, Fossa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:09 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2280</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do Male Lymphoma Survivors Have Impaired Sexual Function? [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7942v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tracheal Glomangioma in a Patient With Asthma and Chest Pain [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7942v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker, Zervos, Donington, Shukla, Bizekis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7942</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tracheal Glomangioma in a Patient With Asthma and Chest Pain [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7504v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Multicenter Trial of Anthracycline Rechallenge With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide for First-Line Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Adjuvant Anthracyclines [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7504v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Anthracyclines are a component of breast cancer chemotherapy regimens in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Anthracycline rechallenge for metastatic disease, for those previously exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines, may not be considered because of concerns about efficacy, tolerability, and cumulative cardiotoxicity.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial examined the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) 35 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> as first-line therapy, delivered every 3 weeks, in 70 patients who developed metastatic disease more than 12 months after completion of an adjuvant anthracycline-containing regimen. Seven patients discontinued treatment early and were excluded from the efficacy analysis.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: After a median of six cycles, the objective response rate was 38%. An additional 33% of patients achieved stable disease lasting more than 6 months, for an overall clinical benefit rate of 71%. The estimated median time to progression was 12.2 months. Median overall survival time was 16.5 months. Clinical response was equally robust in patients with and without prior taxane exposure. Treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 10%), dyspnea (9%), and neutropenia (9%). One (1.4%) of 70 patients discontinued treatment as a result of PPE. One patient (1.4%) experienced an infusion reaction requiring discontinuation. No symptomatic cardiac events were observed.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: PLD plus cyclophosphamide is effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received prior adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The majority of patients experienced a clinical benefit without any significant impact on cardiac function.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trudeau, Clemons, Provencher, Panasci, Yelle, Rayson, Latreille, Vandenberg, Goel, Zibdawi, Rahim, Pouliot]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7504</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Multicenter Trial of Anthracycline Rechallenge With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide for First-Line Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Adjuvant Anthracyclines [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6258v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative PCR Analysis for Bcl-2/IgH in a Phase III Study of Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan As Consolidation of First Remission in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6258v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The randomized First-Line Indolent Trial (FIT) was conducted in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL), to evaluate the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 (<SUP>90</SUP>Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan given as consolidation of complete or partial remission. This study of minimal residual disease was undertaken in parallel, to determine the rate of conversion from <I>bcl-2</I> polymerase chain reaction (PCR) &ndash;detectable to &ndash;undetectable status and the corresponding effect on progression-free survival (PFS).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Blood samples from 414 patients (<SUP>90</SUP>Y-ibritumomab, n = 208; control, n = 206) were evaluated using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR); 186 were found to have the <I>bcl-2</I> rearrangement and were thus eligible for inclusion in the RQ-PCR analysis.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall, 90% of treated patients converted from <I>bcl-2</I> PCR&ndash;detectable to &ndash;undetectable disease status, compared with 36% in the control group. Treatment significantly prolonged median PFS in patients converting to <I>bcl-2</I> PCR-undetectable status (40.8 <I>v</I> 24.0 months in the control group; <I>P</I> &lt; .01, hazard ratio [HR], 0.399). In patients who had <I>bcl-2</I> PCR-detectable disease at random assignment, treatment significantly prolonged median PFS (38.4 <I>v</I> 8.2 months in the control group; <I>P</I> &lt; .01, HR, 0.293).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Eradication of PCR-detectable disease occurred more frequently after treatment with <SUP>90</SUP>Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and was associated with prolongation of PFS.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goff, Summers, Iqbal, Kuhlmann, Kunz, Louton, Hagenbeek, Morschhauser, Putz, Lister, Rohatiner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:46:18 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative PCR Analysis for Bcl-2/IgH in a Phase III Study of Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan As Consolidation of First Remission in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2232v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[VMP (Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone) Is Active and Well Tolerated in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Moderately Impaired Renal Function, and Results in Reversal of Renal Impairment: Cohort Analysis of the Phase III VISTA Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2232v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To assess bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) and melphalan and prednisone (MP) in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with renal impairment enrolled on the phase III VISTA study, and to evaluate renal impairment reversibility.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients received nine 6-week cycles of VMP (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, melphalan 9 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>, prednisone 60 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>) or MP. Patients with serum creatinine higher than 2 mg/dL were excluded.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: In the VMP/MP arms, 6%/4%, 27%/30%, and 67%/66% of patients had baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of &le; 30, 31 to 50, and higher than 50 mL/min, respectively. Response rates were higher and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) longer with VMP versus MP across renal cohorts. Response rates with VMP and TTP in both arms did not appear significantly different between patients with GFR &le; 50 or higher than 50 mL/min; OS appeared somewhat longer in patients with normal renal function in both arms. Renal impairment reversal (baseline GFR &lt; 50 improving to &gt; 60 mL/min) was seen in 49 (44%) of 111 patients receiving VMP versus 40 (34%) of 116 patients receiving MP. By multivariate analysis, younger age (&lt; 75 years; <I>P</I> = .006) and less severe impairment (GFR &ge; 30 mL/min; <I>P</I> = .027) were associated with higher reversal rates. In addition, treatment with VMP approached significance (<I>P</I> = .07). In both arms, rates of grade 4 and 5 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs appeared higher in patients with renal impairment; with VMP, rates of discontinuations/bortezomib dose reductions due to AEs did not appear affected.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: VMP is a feasible, active, and well-tolerated treatment option for previously untreated patients with MM with moderate renal impairment, resulting in 44% renal impairment reversal.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimopoulos, Richardson, Schlag, Khuageva, Shpilberg, Kastritis, Kropff, Petrucci, Delforge, Alexeeva, Schots, Masszi, Mateos, Deraedt, Liu, Cakana, van de Velde, San Miguel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:45:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2232</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[VMP (Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone) Is Active and Well Tolerated in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Moderately Impaired Renal Function, and Results in Reversal of Renal Impairment: Cohort Analysis of the Phase III VISTA Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.9430v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.9430v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To estimate the risk for contralateral breast cancer in members of <I>BRCA1</I>- and <I>BRCA2</I>-positive families and to determine predictive risk factors.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed from 1996 until 2008 and comprised 2,020 women with unilateral breast cancer (index patients, n = 978; relatives, n = 1,42) from 978 families who had a <I>BRCA1</I> or <I>BRCA2</I> mutation. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the association of age at first breast cancer with time from first to contralateral breast cancer, stratified by the affected <I>BRCA</I> gene.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The cumulative risk for contralateral breast cancer 25 years after first breast cancer was 47.4% (95% CI, 38.8% to 56.0%) for patients from families with <I>BRCA1</I> or <I>BRCA2</I> mutations. Members of families with <I>BRCA1</I> mutations had a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.2-fold to 2.3-fold) higher risk of contralateral breast cancer than members of families with <I>BRCA2</I> mutations. Younger age at first breast cancer was associated with a significantly higher risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients with <I>BRCA1</I> mutation, and a trend was observed in patients with <I>BRCA2</I> mutation. After 25 years, 62.9% (95% CI, 50.4% to 75.4%) of patients with <I>BRCA1</I> mutation who were younger than 40 years of age at first breast cancer developed contralateral breast cancer, compared with only 19.6% (95% CI, 5.3% to 33.9%) of those who were older than 50 years of age at first breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Contralateral breast cancer risk depends on age at first breast cancer and on the affected <I>BRCA</I> gene, and this risk should be considered in treatment planning.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeser, Engel, Rhiem, Gadzicki, Bick, Kast, Froster, Schlehe, Bechthold, Arnold, Preisler-Adams, Nestle-Kraemling, Zaino, Loeffler, Kiechle, Meindl, Varga, Schmutzler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:44:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9430</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6931v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6931v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: A growing number of patients with testicular cancer (TC) become long-term survivors. As a consequence, quality-of-life (QOL) issues become increasingly important. The objective of this study was to investigate QOL among Danish TC survivors.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: A long-term follow-up assessment of all patients with TC treated at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark between 1990 and 2000 was conducted. A total of 401 survivors (response rate, 66%) completed questionnaires concerning QOL (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30), depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20), and health-related issues such as neurotoxic symptoms and Raynaud-like phenomena. On the basis of their treatment, participants were categorized as having received surveillance, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: QOL among patients with TC was equal to that of men from the general population. Although patients who received chemotherapy reported higher levels of peripheral sensory neuropathy, ototoxicity, and Raynaud-like phenomena, treatment strategies were generally unrelated to QOL and depressive symptoms.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Overall, the patients in this study reported high levels of QOL. The results suggest that patients treated for TC should be informed about the anticipated good post-therapeutic QOL and the low risk of psychosocial and physical long-term effects.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossen, Pedersen, Zachariae, von der Maase]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:43:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6147v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In Situ Cytotoxic and Memory T Cells Predict Outcome in Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.19.6147v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Many patients who present with early-stage colorectal cancer (International Union Against Cancer TNM stages I and II) are nevertheless at high risk of relapse. We hypothesized that intratumoral immune reaction could influence their prognosis.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The intratumoral immune reaction was investigated in 29 tumors by large-scale real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cytotoxic (CD8) and memory (CD45RO) T cells were quantified by immunohistochemical analyses of tissue microarrays from the center (CT) and the invasive margin (IM) of the 602 tumors from two independent cohorts. The results were correlated with tumor recurrence and patient survival.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patients with a strong infiltration of CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cells in the tumor exhibited an increased expression of T-helper 1 and cytotoxicity-related genes. Densities of CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> and CD8<SUP>+</SUP> cells in tumor regions (CT/IM) classified the patients into four distinct prognostic groups based on the presence of high density of each marker in each tumor region. The four groups were associated with dramatic differences in disease-free, disease-specific, and overall survival (all <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Five years after diagnosis, only 4.8% (95% CI, 0.6% to 8.8%) of patients with high densities of CD8<SUP>+</SUP> plus CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cells had tumor recurrence, and 86.2% (CI, 79.4% to 93.6%) survived. In contrast, the tumor recurred in 75% (95% CI, 17% to 92.5%) of patients with low densities of these cells, and only 27.5% (95% CI, 10.5% to 72%) survived (all <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Multivariate analyses showed that the immune criteria had independent effects on the rates of complete remission and survival.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The combined analysis of CD8<SUP>+</SUP> plus CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cells in specific tumor regions could provide a useful criterion for the prediction of tumor recurrence and survival in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pages, Kirilovsky, Mlecnik, Asslaber, Tosolini, Bindea, Lagorce, Wind, Marliot, Bruneval, Zatloukal, Trajanoski, Berger, Fridman, Galon]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:43:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In Situ Cytotoxic and Memory T Cells Predict Outcome in Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2544v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward Efficient Trials in Colorectal Cancer: The ARCAD Clinical Trials Program [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2544v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Gramont, Haller, Sargent, Tabernero, Matheson, Schilsky]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:55:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2544</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward Efficient Trials in Colorectal Cancer: The ARCAD Clinical Trials Program [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2221v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to Lin et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.2221v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souhami, Bae, Sandler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to Lin et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0969v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Clouds Apparent Benefit of Longer Hormone Duration [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0969v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Lee, Steinberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Clouds Apparent Benefit of Longer Hormone Duration [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0522v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Nagai et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0522v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grimwade, Jovanovic, Hills, Solomon, Lo-Coco, Wheatley, Burnett]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to S. Nagai et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0282v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Concept of Phenotypically Distinct Malignant Pancreatic Stem-Cell Subsets Based on Limiting Dilution Transplantation Assays [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.25.0282v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonnefoix, Callanan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:29 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Concept of Phenotypically Distinct Malignant Pancreatic Stem-Cell Subsets Based on Limiting Dilution Transplantation Assays [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9995v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How Should We Prevent Hematologic Relapse of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.9995v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagai, Takahashi, Kurokawa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9995</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How Should We Prevent Hematologic Relapse of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6736v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to P. Prassopoulos et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.6736v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillman, Sargent]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:54:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6736</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to P. Prassopoulos et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4004v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metastatic Disease Response to Treatment: How Many Lesions to Measure? [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4004v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prassopoulos, Mantatzis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metastatic Disease Response to Treatment: How Many Lesions to Measure? [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3253v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Arena et al [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3253v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zurrida, Viale, Veronesi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3253</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Arena et al [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2461v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast Cancer Classification: The Dialogue Is Open [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.2461v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arena, Pennacchia, Monego, Carbone, Capelli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast Cancer Classification: The Dialogue Is Open [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6406v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Bevacizumab for Second-Line Therapy of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NCCTG and SWOG Study N0426 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6406v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed combined with bevacizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to correlate allelic variants in pemetrexed-metabolizing genes with clinical outcome.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with previously treated NSCLC received pemetrexed (500 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> intravenous) combined with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenous) every 3 weeks. The primary end point, evaluated using a one-stage Fleming design for detecting a true success rate of at least 70%, was the proportion of patients who were progression free and on treatment at 3 months. Polymorphisms in genes responsible for pemetrexed transport (reduced folate carrier [<I>SLC19A1</I>]) and metabolism (folylpolyglutamate synthase [<I>FPGS</I>] and gamma-glutamyl hydrolase [<I>GGH</I>]) evaluated in germline DNA (blood) were correlated with treatment outcome.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-eight evaluable patients (14 females and 34 males) received a median of four cycles (range, one to 20 cycles). The most common grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (13%), dyspnea (10%), and thrombosis (10%). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs were neutropenia (19%) and lymphopenia (13%). Twenty-four (57%; 95% CI, 41% to 72%) of the first 42 patients met the success criteria. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 8.6 and 4.0 months, respectively. The exon 6 (2522)C-&gt;T polymorphism in <I>SLC19A1</I> correlated with 3-month progression-free status (<I>P</I> = .01) and with PFS (<I>P</I> = .05). The IVS1(1307)C-&gt;T polymorphism in <I>GGH</I> correlated with OS (<I>P</I> = .04).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The study did not meet it's primary end point. However, the median PFS time of 4 months is promising. Pharmacogenetic studies in larger cohorts are needed to definitively identify polymorphisms that predict for survival and toxicity of pemetrexed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adjei, Mandrekar, Dy, Molina, Adjei, Gandara, Allen Ziegler, Stella, Rowland, Schild, Zinner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6406</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Bevacizumab for Second-Line Therapy of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NCCTG and SWOG Study N0426 [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4450v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Clinical Evidence Review on Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [ASCO Special Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4450v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To review the evidence about the efficacy and utility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRHM).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and analyze a comprehensive systematic review of the RFA literature from Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Because data were considered insufficient to form the basis of a practice guideline, ASCO has instead published a clinical evidence review. The evidence is from single-arm, retrospective, and prospective trials. No randomized controlled trials have been included. The following three clinical issues were considered by the panel: the efficacy of surgical hepatic resection versus RFA for resectable tumors; the utility of RFA for unresectable tumors; and RFA approaches (open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous). Evidence suggests that hepatic resection improves overall survival (OS), particularly for patients with resectable tumors without extrahepatic disease. Careful patient and tumor selection is discussed at length in the literature. RFA investigators report a wide variability in the 5-year survival rate (14% to 55%) and local tumor recurrence rate (3.6% to 60%). The reported mortality rate was low (0% to 2%), and the major complications rate was commonly reported to be between 6% and 9%. RFA is currently performed with all three approaches.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: There is a compelling need for more research to determine the efficacy and utility of RFA to increase local recurrence-free, progression-free, and disease-free survival as well as OS for patients with CRHM. Clinical trials have established that hepatic resection can improve OS for patients with resectable CRHM.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, Mangu, Choti, Crocenzi, Dodd, Dorfman, Eng, Fong, Giusti, Lu, Marsland, Michelson, Poston, Schrag, Seidenfeld, Benson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4450</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Clinical Evidence Review on Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [ASCO Special Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>ASCO Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2801v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer During Pregnancy: An Analysis of 215 Patients Emphasizing the Obstetrical and the Neonatal Outcomes [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2801v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The aim of this study was to assess the management and the obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: In an international collaborative setting, patients with invasive cancer diagnosed during pregnancy between 1998 and 2008 were identified. Clinical data regarding the cancer diagnosis and treatment and the obstetric and neonatal outcomes were collected and analyzed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 215 patients, five (2.3%) had a pregnancy that ended in a spontaneous miscarriage and 30 (14.0%) pregnancies were interrupted. Treatment was initiated during pregnancy in 122 (56.7%) patients and postpartum in 58 (27.0%) patients. The most frequently encountered cancer types were breast cancer (46%), hematologic malignancies (18%), and dermatologic malignancies (10%). The mean gestational age at delivery was 36.3 &plusmn; 2.9 weeks. Delivery was induced in 71.7% of pregnancies, and 54.2% of children were born preterm. In the group of patients prenatally exposed to cytotoxic treatment, the prevalence of preterm labor was increased (11.8%; <I>P</I> = .012). Furthermore, in this group a higher proportion of small-for-gestational-age children (birth weight below 10th percentile) was observed (24.2%; <I>P</I> = .001). Of all neonates, 51.2% were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit, mainly (85.2%) because of prematurity. There was no increased incidence of congenital malformations.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Pregnant cancer patients should be treated in a multidisciplinary setting with access to maternal and neonatal intensive care units. Prevention of iatrogenic prematurity appears to be an important part of the treatment strategy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Calsteren, Heyns, De Smet, Van Eycken, Gziri, Van Gemert, Halaska, Vergote, Ottevanger, Amant]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer During Pregnancy: An Analysis of 215 Patients Emphasizing the Obstetrical and the Neonatal Outcomes [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2470v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Costs and Benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board [Economic Analysis]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.2470v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: In 2001, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) formed the Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) to conduct a single human subjects review for its multisite phase III oncology trials. The goal of this study was to assess whether NCI's CIRB was associated with lower effort, time, and cost in processing adult phase III oncology trials.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We conducted an observational study and compared sites affiliated with the NCI CIRB to unaffiliated sites that used their local IRB for review. Oncology research staff and IRB staff were surveyed to understand effort and timing. Response rates were 60% and 42%, respectively. Analysis of these survey data yielded information on effort, timing, and costs. We combined these data with CIRB operational data to determine the net savings of the CIRB using a societal perspective.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: CIRB affiliation was associated with faster reviews (33.9 calendar days faster on average), and 6.1 fewer hours of research staff effort. CIRB affiliation was associated with a savings of $717 per initial review. The estimated cost of running the CIRB was $161,000 per month. The CIRB yielded a net cost of approximately $55,000 per month from a societal perspective. Whether the CIRB results in higher or lower quality reviews was not assessed because there is no standard definition of review quality.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The CIRB was associated with decreases in investigator and IRB staff effort and faster protocol reviews, although savings would be higher if institutions used the CIRB as intended.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wagner, Murray, Goldberg, Adler, Abrams]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2470</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Costs and Benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board [Economic Analysis]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Economic Analysis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8635v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suicide Ideation in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8635v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To evaluate risk of suicide ideation (SI) after childhood cancer, prevalence of SI in a cohort of adult survivors of pediatric cancers was compared with prevalence in a sibling comparison group. The relationship of SI to cancer treatment and current health was examined, and the hypothesis that poor physical health is significantly associated with suicidality, after adjusting for depression, was specifically tested.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Nine thousand one hundred twenty-six adult survivors of childhood cancer and 2,968 siblings enrolled onto the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study completed a survey describing their demographics and medical and psychological functioning, including SI in the prior week.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of survivors, 7.8% reported SI compared with 4.6% of controls (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4). Suicidality was unrelated to age, age at diagnosis, sex, cancer therapy, recurrence, time since diagnosis, or second malignancy. SI was associated with primary CNS cancer diagnosis, depression, and poor health outcomes including chronic conditions, pain, and poor global health rating. A logistic regression analysis showed that poor current physical health was significantly associated with SI even after adjusting for cancer diagnosis and depression.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Adult survivors of childhood cancers are at increased risk for SI. Risk of SI is related to cancer diagnosis and post-treatment mental and physical health, even many years after completion of therapy. The association of suicidal symptoms with physical health problems is important because these may be treatable conditions for which survivors seek follow-up care and underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to survivor care.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recklitis, Diller, Li, Najita, Robison, Zeltzer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:29 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suicide Ideation in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2950v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome of Patients Treated for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.2950v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Despite improvements in treatment, approximately 20% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) experience relapse and do poorly. The Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia (TACL) Consortium was assembled to assess novel drugs for children with resistant leukemia. We hypothesize that novel agents and combinations that fail to improve baseline complete remission rates in comparable populations are unlikely to contribute to better outcomes and should be abandoned. We sought to define response rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates in patients treated at TACL institutions, which could serve as a comparator for future studies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We performed a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed and refractory ALL previously treated at TACL institutions between the years of 1995 and 2004. Data regarding initial and relapsed disease characteristics, disease response, and survival were collected and compared with those of published reports.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Complete remission (CR) rates (mean &plusmn; SE) were 83% &plusmn; 4% for early first marrow relapse, 93% &plusmn; 3% for late first marrow relapse, 44% &plusmn; 5% for second marrow relapse, and 27% &plusmn; 6% for third marrow relapse. Five-year DFS rates in CR2 and CR3 were 27% &plusmn; 4% and 15% &plusmn; 7% respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: We generally confirm a 40% CR rate for second and subsequent relapse, but our remission rate for early first relapse seems better than that reported in the literature (83% <I>v</I> approximately 70%). Our data may allow useful modeling of an expected remission rate for any population of patients who experience relapse.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ko, Ji, Barnette, Bostrom, Hutchinson, Raetz, Seibel, Twist, Eckroth, Sposto, Gaynon, Loh]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:19 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2950</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome of Patients Treated for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8784v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility Trial of Letrozole in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8784v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Preclinical models suggest that the use of anti&ndash;vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with antiestrogens may prevent or delay the development of endocrine therapy resistance. We therefore performed a feasibility study to evaluate the safety of letrozole plus bevacizumab in patients with hormone receptor&ndash;positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC were treated with the aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole (2.5 mg orally daily) and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks). The primary end point was safety, defined by grade 4 toxicity using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0. Secondary end points included response rate, clinical benefit rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). Prior nonsteroidal AIs (NSAIs) were permitted in the absence of progressive disease.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-three patients were treated. After a median of 13 cycles (range, 1 to 71 cycles), select treatment-related toxicities included hypertension (58%; grades 2 and 3 in 19% and 26%), proteinuria (67%; grades 2 and 3 in 14% and 19%), headache (51%; grades 2 and 3 in 16% and 7%), fatigue (74%; grades 2 and 3 in 19% and 2%), and joint pain (63%; grades 2 and 3 in 19% and 0%). Eighty-four percent of patients had at least stable disease on an NSAI, confounding efficacy results. Partial responses were seen in 9% of patients and stable disease &ge; 24 weeks was noted in 67%. Median PFS was 17.1 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Combination letrozole and bevacizumab was feasible with expected bevacizumab-related events of hypertension, headache, and proteinuria. Phase III proof-of-efficacy trials of endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab are in progress (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503).</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traina, Rugo, Caravelli, Patil, Yeh, Melisko, Park, Geneus, Paulson, Grothusen, Seidman, Fornier, Lake, Dang, Robson, Theodoulou, Flombaum, Norton, Hudis, Dickler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:09 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8784</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility Trial of Letrozole in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8032v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinically Driven Diagnostic Antifungal Approach in Neutropenic Patients: A Prospective Feasibility Study [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.8032v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Preemptive strategies in neutropenic patients based on serum galactomannan (GM) &ndash;guided triggering of diagnostic work-up may be time-consuming and expensive when applied to the entire population. We have assessed the feasibility of a clinically driven diagnostic strategy without GM screening.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with neutropenic fever underwent a baseline diagnostic work-up (BDWU; three blood cultures and other examinations as indicated). An intensive diagnostic work-up (IDWU; GM for 3 days, chest computed tomography and other examinations as indicated) was reserved for patients with 4 days of persisting or relapsing fever or with other clinical findings possibly related to an invasive fungal diseaser (IFD). Antifungal therapy was administered to patients diagnosed with IFD and empirically (negative IDWU) only to those with persisting neutropenic fever and worsening clinical conditions.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of 220 neutropenia episodes, fever occurred in 159 cases and recurred in 28 cases. Overall, 49 IFDs were diagnosed (two by BDWU and 47 by IDWU) during 48 episodes (21.8%). Diagnostic-driven therapy was administered to 48 patients with IFDs; one patient with zygomycosis died without treatment. Only one patient received empirical therapy. IDWU was required in 40% of neutropenia episodes, and only 1.4 mean blood samples per neutropenia episode were tested for GM. Our strategy allowed a 43% reduction in antifungal treatments compared with a standard empirical approach. At 3-month follow-up, 63% of patients with IFD survived, and no undetected IFDs were found.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: A clinically driven diagnostic approach in selected neutropenia episodes offered effective antifungal control and reduced the exposure to unnecessary antifungal treatment.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girmenia, Micozzi, Gentile, Santilli, Arleo, Cardarelli, Capria, Minotti, Cartoni, Brocchieri, Guerrisi, Meloni, Foa, Martino]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinically Driven Diagnostic Antifungal Approach in Neutropenic Patients: A Prospective Feasibility Study [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4684v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventing Future Cancers by Testing Women With Ovarian Cancer for BRCA Mutations [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4684v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Women with ovarian cancer have a 10% probability of carrying a <I>BRCA</I> mutation. If a mutation is identified, unaffected family members can undergo genetic testing and cancer risk-reducing strategies. We estimated the net health benefits and cost-effectiveness of different criteria for <I>BRCA</I> mutation testing in women with ovarian cancer, and the downstream benefits for their first-degree relatives (FDRs).</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We developed a Markov Monte Carlo simulation model to compare four criteria for <I>BRCA</I> testing in women with ovarian cancer: no testing (reference); only if personal history of breast cancer, family history of breast/ovarian cancer, or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry; only if invasive serous cancer; any invasive nonmucinous epithelial cancer. Net health benefit was life expectancy for FDRs and primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The model estimated the number of future breast and ovarian cancer cases in FDRs.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: <I>BRCA</I> testing based on personal/family history and ancestry could prevent future cases in FDRs with an ICER of $32,018 per year of life (LY) gained compared with the reference strategy. <I>BRCA</I> testing based on serous or any nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer could prevent more cancer cases, but at ICERs of $128,465 and $148,363 per LY gained, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: <I>BRCA</I> testing of women with ovarian cancer based on personal/family history of cancer or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry is a cost-effective strategy to prevent future breast and ovarian cancers among FDRs. More inclusive testing strategies prevent additional cancer cases but at significant cost.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwon, Daniels, Sun, Lu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventing Future Cancers by Testing Women With Ovarian Cancer for BRCA Mutations [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8199v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial on Gemcitabine Versus Mytomicin in Recurrent Superficial Bladder Cancer: Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.8199v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Approximately 30% to 40% patients with a superficial bladder cancer treated with Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or epirubicin do not respond; of the initial responders, 35% have a relapse within 5 years. We compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of intravescical infusions of gemcitabine (GEM) with mitomycin (MMC) in patients with a recurrent superficial bladder cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with a history of a previously treated, recurrent Ta-T1, G1-G3 bladder transitional cell carcinoma were enrolled in the study. The patients received a 6-week course of GEM infusions or 4-week course of MMC. In both arms, for the initial responders who remained free of recurrences, maintenance therapy consisted of 10 monthly treatments during the first year.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 120 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the MMC or GEM treatment arm. At the end of the study, 109 patients (55 in MMC and 54 in GEM) were assessable. The median duration of follow-up was 36 months for either arm. In the GEM arm, 39 (72%) of 54 patients remained free of recurrence versus 33 (61%) of 55 in MMC arm. Among patients with recurrences, 10 in the MMC arm and six in the GEM arm also had a progressive disease by stage. The incidence of chemical cystitis in the MMC arm was statistically higher than in the GEM arm (<I>P</I> = .012).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This study demonstrates that GEM has better efficacy and lower toxicity than MMC; therefore, GEM appears as a logical candidate for intrabladder therapy in patients with refractory transitional cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addeo, Caraglia, Bellini, Abbruzzese, Vincenzi, Montella, Miragliuolo, Guarrasi, Lanna, Cennamo, Faiola, Del Prete]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8199</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial on Gemcitabine Versus Mytomicin in Recurrent Superficial Bladder Cancer: Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4525v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting the Risk of Axillary Nodal Metastases and Their Use in Selecting Breast Surgery Options [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4525v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobs, Balch, Soong]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4525</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting the Risk of Axillary Nodal Metastases and Their Use in Selecting Breast Surgery Options [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6018v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultimate Fate of Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without a Randomized Trial [Review Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6018v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To approve a new anticancer drug, the US Food and Drug Administration often requires randomized trials. However, several oncology drugs have been approved on the basis of objective end points without a randomized trial. We reviewed the long-term safety and efficacy of such agents.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We searched the Web site of the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and MEDLINE for initial applications of investigational anticancer drugs from 1973 through 2006.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Overall, 68 oncology drugs, excluding hormone therapy and supportive care, were approved, including 31 without a randomized trial. For these 31 drugs, a median of two clinical trials (range, one to seven) and 79 patients (range, 40 to 413) were used per approval. Objective response was the most common end point used for approval; median response rate was 33% (range, 11% to 90%). Thirty drugs are still fully approved. United States marketing authorization for one drug, gefitinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] inhibitor), was rescinded after a randomized trial showed no survival improvement; however, this trial was performed in unselected patients, and it was subsequently demonstrated that patients with EGFR mutation are more likely to respond. Nineteen of the 31 drugs have additional uses (per National Comprehensive Cancer Network or National Cancer Institute Physician Data Query guidelines), and subsequent formal US Food and Drug Administration approvals were obtained for 11 of these (range, one to 18 new indications). No drug has demonstrated safety concerns.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Nonrandomized clinical trials with definitive end points can yield US Food and Drug Administration approvals, and these drugs have a reassuring record of long-term safety and efficacy.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsimberidou, Braiteh, Stewart, Kurzrock]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:59 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultimate Fate of Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without a Randomized Trial [Review Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1738v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Polymorphisms in the CASPASE Genes and Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1738v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This study was conducted to determine the impact of potentially functional polymorphisms in the <I>CASPASE</I> (<I>CASP</I>) genes on the survival of early-stage non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Four hundred eleven consecutive patients with surgically resected NSCLC were enrolled. Nine potentially functional polymorphisms in the <I>CASP3, CASP7, CASP8, CASP9</I>, and <I>CASP10</I> genes were investigated. The genotype and haplotype associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Patients with the rs2227310 GG genotype had a significantly decreased OS and DFS compared with patients with the CC + CG genotype (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] for OS, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.35; <I>P</I> = .003; aHR for DFS, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.22; <I>P</I> = .002). The rs4645981C&gt;T genotype also had a significant effect on OS and DFS (under a recessive model; aHR for OS, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.85; <I>P</I> = .04; aHR for DFS, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.58 to 4.80; <I>P</I> = .0003). When the rs2227310 and rs4645981 genotypes were combined, patients with one or two bad genotypes had worse OS and DFS compared with those who had zero bad genotypes (aHR for OS, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.45; <I>P</I> = .001; aHR for DFS, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.26; <I>P</I> = .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The <I>CASP7</I> rs2227310 and <I>CASP9</I> rs4645981 polymorphisms may affect survival in early-stage NSCLC. The analysis of these polymorphisms can help identify patients at high risk for a poor disease outcome.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoo, Choi, Lee, Choi, Kam, Kim, Jeon, Lee, Kim, Lee, Kim, Jheon, Park]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1738</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Polymorphisms in the CASPASE Genes and Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0250v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physician Referral for Fertility Preservation in Oncology Patients: A National Study of Practice Behaviors [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0250v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Cancer survival rates are improving, and the focus is moving toward quality survival. Fertility is a key aspect of quality of life for cancer patients of childbearing age. Although cancer treatment may impair fertility, some patients may benefit from referral to a specialist before treatment. However, the majority of studies examining patient recall of discussion and referral for fertility preservation (FP) show that less than half receive this information. This study examined the referral practices of oncologists in the United States.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: This study examined oncologists' referral practice patterns for FP among US physicians using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database. A 53-item survey was administered via mail and Internet to a stratified random sample of US physicians.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty-seven percent of respondents routinely refer cancer patients of childbearing age to a reproductive endocrinologist. Referrals were more likely among female physicians (<I>P</I> = .004), those with favorable attitudes (<I>P</I> = .043), and those whose patients routinely ask about FP (odds ratio = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.33).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Less than half of US physicians are following the guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which suggest that all patients of childbearing age should be informed about FP.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quinn, Vadaparampil, Lee, Jacobsen, Bepler, Lancaster, Keefe, Albrecht]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physician Referral for Fertility Preservation in Oncology Patients: A National Study of Practice Behaviors [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health Services and Outcomes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9799v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Acceptance and the Well-Being of Patients Receiving Palliative Care for Cancer [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.9799v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To identify the impact of prognostic acceptance/nonacceptance on the physical, psychological, and existential well-being of patients with advanced cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: A Canadian multicenter prospective national survey was conducted of patients diagnosed with advanced cancer with an estimated survival duration of 6 months or less (n = 381) receiving palliative care services.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Of the total number of participants, 74% reported accepting their situation and 8.6% reported accepting with "moderate" to "extreme" difficulty. More participants with acceptance difficulties than without acceptance difficulties met diagnostic criteria for a depressive or anxiety disorder (<SUP>2</SUP> = 8.67; <I>P</I> &lt; .01). Nonacceptors were younger (<I>t</I> = 4.13; <I>P</I> &lt; .000), had more than high school education (<SUP>2</SUP> = 4.69; <I>P</I> &lt; .05), and had smaller social networks (<I>t</I> = 2.53; <I>P</I> &lt; .05) than Acceptors. Of the Nonacceptors, 42% described their experience as one of "moderate" to "extreme" suffering compared with 24.1% of Acceptors (<SUP>2</SUP> = 5.28; <I>P</I> &lt; .05). More than one third (37.5%) of Nonacceptors reported feeling hopeless compared with 8.6% who had no difficulty accepting (<SUP>2</SUP> = 24.76; <I>P</I> &lt; .000). Qualitatively, participants described active and passive coping strategies that helped them accept what was happening to them, as well as barriers that made it difficult to come to terms with their current situation.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The challenge of coming to terms with a terminal prognosis is a complex interplay between one's basic personality, the availability of social support, and one's spiritual and existential views on life. Nonacceptance appears to be highly associated with feelings of hopelessness, a sense of suffering, depression, and anxiety, along with difficulties in terms of social&ndash;relational concerns.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thompson, Chochinov, Wilson, McPherson, Chary, O'Shea, Kuhl, Fainsinger, Gagnon, Macmillan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9799</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Acceptance and the Well-Being of Patients Receiving Palliative Care for Cancer [Palliative and Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7769v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidental Detection of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia on [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7769v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ennishi, Maeda, Niiya, Shinagawa, Tanimoto]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7769</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidental Detection of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia on [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6944v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Flavopiridol in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Demonstrating High Response Rates in Genetically High-Risk Disease [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6944v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with high-risk genomic features achieve poor outcomes with traditional therapies. A phase I study of a pharmacokinetically derived schedule of flavopiridol suggested promising activity in CLL, irrespective of high-risk features. Given the relevance of these findings to treating genetically high-risk CLL, a prospective confirmatory study was initiated.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with relapsed CLL were treated with single-agent flavopiridol, with subsequent addition of dexamethasone to suppress cytokine release syndrome (CRS). High-risk genomic features were prospectively assessed for response to therapy.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Sixty-four patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years, median number of prior therapies was four, and all patients had received prior purine analog therapy. If patients tolerated treatment during week 1, dose escalation occurred during week 2. Dose escalation did not occur in four patients, as a result of severe tumor lysis syndrome; three of these patients required hemodialysis. Thirty-four patients (53%) achieved response, including 30 partial responses (PRs; 47%), three nodular PRs (5%), and one complete response (1.6%). A majority of high-risk patients responded; 12 (57%) of 21 patients with del(17p13.1) and 14 (50%) of 28 patients with del(11q22.3) responded irrespective of lymph node size. Median progression-free survival among responders was 10 to 12 months across all cytogenetic risk groups. Reducing the number of weekly treatments per cycle from four to three and adding prophylactic dexamethasone, which abrogated interleukin-6 release and CRS (<I>P</I> &le; .01), resulted in improved tolerability and treatment delivery.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Flavopiridol achieves significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed CLL, including those with high-risk genomic features and bulky lymphadenopathy. Subsequent clinical trials should use the amended treatment schedule developed herein and prophylactic corticosteroids.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Ruppert, Johnson, Fischer, Heerema, Andritsos, Blum, Flynn, Jones, Hu, Moran, Mitchell, Smith, Wagner, Raymond, Schaaf, Phelps, Villalona-Calero, Grever, Byrd]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6944</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Flavopiridol in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Demonstrating High Response Rates in Genetically High-Risk Disease [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6852v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paraneoplastic Acrokeratosis (Bazex Syndrome) in Lung Cancer [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.6852v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crucitti, Feliciani, Grossi, La Greca, Porziella, Giustacchini, Congedo, Fronterre, Granone]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6852</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paraneoplastic Acrokeratosis (Bazex Syndrome) in Lung Cancer [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4329v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of Sensitivity Analyses in Assessing Progression-Free Survival in Late-Stage Oncology Trials [Clinical Trials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4329v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P>Sensitivity analysis is an important statistical technique that assesses whether the results of phase III trials are robust and likely to be generalizable. Until recently, sensitivity analyses were rarely included in phase III trials, and they remain poorly understood by many oncologists. Sensitivity analyses are critical to understanding the strength of conclusions made in the primary analysis of a late-stage clinical trial. They examine the influence of protocol design errors, unintended biases, deviations from assumptions underlying statistical models, and any unanticipated treatment delivery or practice patterns on trial results. In trials with complex or subjective end points, they also allow an understanding of the extent to which a positive outcome is driven by a single, possibly subjective, and therefore biased, element of an end point. The purposes of this article are to explain how sensitivity analyses are performed, to discuss areas of a clinical trial where sensitivity analyses should focus, and to illuminate the importance of this technique in the rigorous evaluation of late-stage clinical trial data, using specific examples. This article focuses on late-stage trials that use progression-free survival or time to progression as their primary end point, because sensitivity analyses are particularly important in these cases for which the end point is potentially subject to bias. Three sources of potential bias are explored: assessment time, symptomatic (ie, nonradiologic) disease progression, and missing data. For each source of potential bias, case studies are presented to highlight the role that sensitivity analyses play in determining whether the trial's conclusions are robust.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhattacharya, Fyfe, Gray, Sargent]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4329</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of Sensitivity Analyses in Assessing Progression-Free Survival in Late-Stage Oncology Trials [Clinical Trials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Trials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4162v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incremental Advance or Seismic Shift? The Need to Raise the Bar of Efficacy for Drug Approval [Comments and Controversies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4162v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sobrero, Bruzzi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:33 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incremental Advance or Seismic Shift? The Need to Raise the Bar of Efficacy for Drug Approval [Comments and Controversies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9139v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Models to Predict Four or More Involved Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer With One to Three Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.21.9139v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Three models have been developed to predict four or more involved axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in patients with breast cancer with one to three involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Two scores were developed by Chagpar et al (Louisville scores excluding or including method of detection), and a nomogram was developed by Katz et al. The purpose of our investigation was to compare these models in a prospective, multicenter study.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Our study involved a cohort of 536 patients having one to three involved SLNs who underwent ALN dissection. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration (for the Katz nomogram only), false-negative (FN) rate, and clinical utility of the three models. Results were compared with the optimal logistic regression (OLR) model that was developed from the validation cohort.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Among the 536 patients, 57 patients (10.6%) had &ge; four involved ALNs. The AUC for the Katz nomogram was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.86). The Louisville score excluding method of detection was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.78). The Louisville score including method of detection was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.79). The FN rates were 2.5% (eight of 321 patients), 1.8% (two of 109 patients), and 0% (zero of 27 patients) for the Katz nomogram and the Louisville scores excluding and including method of detection, respectively. The Katz nomogram was well calibrated. Optimism-corrected bootstrap estimate AUC of the OLR model was 0.86. Using this result as a reasonable target for an external model, the performance of the Katz nomogram was remarkable.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: We validated the three models for their use in clinical practice. The Katz nomogram outperformed the two other models.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Werkoff, Lambaudie, Fondrinier, Leveque, Marchal, Uzan, Barranger, Guillemin, Darai, Uzan, Houvenaeghel, Rouzier, Coutant]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Models to Predict Four or More Involved Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer With One to Three Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4809v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents: Results From a Large, Multicenter Study [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.4809v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: There are no robust data on prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) &ndash;targeted therapy.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: Baseline characteristics and outcomes on 645 patients with anti-VEGF therapy&ndash;na&iuml;ve metastatic RCC were collected from three US and four Canadian cancer centers. Cox proportional hazards regression, followed by bootstrap validation, was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The median OS for the whole cohort was 22 months (95% CI, 20.2 to 26.5 months), and the median follow-up was 24.5 months. Overall, 396, 200, and 49 patients were treated with sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab, respectively. Four of the five adverse prognostic factors according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were independent predictors of short survival: hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), corrected calcium greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN; <I>P</I> = .0006), Karnofsky performance status less than 80% (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), and time from diagnosis to treatment of less than 1 year (<I>P</I> = .01). In addition, neutrophils greater than the ULN (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) and platelets greater than the ULN (<I>P</I> = .01) were independent adverse prognostic factors. Patients were segregated into three risk categories: the favorable-risk group (no prognostic factors; n = 133), in which median OS (mOS) was not reached and 2-year OS (2y OS) was 75%; the intermediate-risk group (one or two prognostic factors; n = 301), in which mOS was 27 months and 2y OS was 53%; and the poor-risk group (three to six prognostic factors; n = 152), in which mOS was 8.8 months and 2y OS was 7% (log-rank <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The C-index was 0.73.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: This model validates components of the MSKCC model with the addition of platelet and neutrophil counts and can be incorporated into patient care and into clinical trials that use VEGF-targeted agents.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heng, Xie, Regan, Warren, Golshayan, Sahi, Eigl, Ruether, Cheng, North, Venner, Knox, Chi, Kollmannsberger, McDermott, Oh, Atkins, Bukowski, Rini, Choueiri]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:58:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents: Results From a Large, Multicenter Study [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1060v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Achievement of at Least Very Good Partial Response Is a Simple and Robust Prognostic Factor in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With High-Dose Therapy: Long-Term Analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.1060v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The prognostic impact of complete response (CR) achievement in multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown mostly in the context of autologous stem-cell transplantation. Other levels of response have been defined because, even with high-dose therapy, CR is a relatively rare event. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic impact of very good partial response (VGPR) in patients treated with high-dose therapy.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: All patients were included in the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 99-02 and 99-04 trials and treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) induction therapy followed by double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Best post-ASCT response assessment was available for 802 patients.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: With a median follow-up of 67 months, median event-free survival (EFS) and 5-year EFS were 42 months and 34%, respectively, for 405 patients who achieved at least VGPR after ASCT versus 32 months and 26% in 288 patients who achieved only partial remission (<I>P</I> = .005). Five-year overall survival (OS) was significantly superior in patients achieving at least VGPR (74% <I>v</I> 61% <I>P</I> = .0017). In multivariate analysis, achievement of less than VGPR was an independent factor predicting shorter EFS and OS. Response to VAD had no impact on EFS and OS. The impact of VGPR achievement on EFS and OS was significant in patients with International Staging System stages 2 to 3 and for patients with poor-risk cytogenetics t(4;14) or del(17p).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: In the context of ASCT, achievement of at least VGPR is a simple prognostic factor that has importance in intermediate and high-risk MM and can be informative in more patients than CR.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harousseau, Avet-Loiseau, Attal, Charbonnel, Garban, Hulin, Michallet, Facon, Garderet, Marit, Ketterer, Lamy, Voillat, Guilhot, Doyen, Mathiot, Moreau]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:58:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Achievement of at Least Very Good Partial Response Is a Simple and Robust Prognostic Factor in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With High-Dose Therapy: Long-Term Analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3494v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Timed Sequential Treatment With Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and an Allogeneic Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Secreting Breast Tumor Vaccine: A Chemotherapy Dose-Ranging Factorial Study of Safety and Immune Activation [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.3494v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) &ndash;secreting tumor vaccines have demonstrated bioactivity but may be limited by disease burdens and immune tolerance. We tested the hypothesis that cyclophosphamide (CY) and doxorubicin (DOX) can enhance vaccine-induced immunity in patients with breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We conducted a 3 x 3 factorial (response surface) dose-ranging study of CY, DOX, and an HER2-positive, allogeneic, GM-CSF&ndash;secreting tumor vaccine in 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients received three monthly immunizations, with a boost 6 to 8 months from study entry. Primary objectives included safety and determination of the chemotherapy doses that maximize HER2-specific immunity.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Twenty-eight patients received at least one immunization, and 16 patients received four immunizations. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. HER2-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity developed in most patients who received vaccine alone or with 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> CY. HER2-specific antibody responses were enhanced by 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> CY and 35 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> DOX, but higher CY doses suppressed immunity. Analyses revealed that CY at 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and DOX at 35 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> is the combination that produced the highest antibody responses.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: First, immunotherapy with an allogeneic, HER2-positive, GM-CSF&ndash;secreting breast tumor vaccine alone or with CY and DOX is safe and induces HER2-specific immunity in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Second, the immunomodulatory activity of low-dose CY has a narrow therapeutic window, with an optimal dose not exceeding 200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. Third, factorial designs provide an opportunity to identify the most active combination of interacting drugs in patients. Further investigation of the impact of chemotherapy on vaccine-induced immunity is warranted.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emens, Asquith, Leatherman, Kobrin, Petrik, Laiko, Levi, Daphtary, Biedrzycki, Wolff, Stearns, Disis, Ye, Piantadosi, Fetting, Davidson, Jaffee]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:31 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Timed Sequential Treatment With Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and an Allogeneic Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Secreting Breast Tumor Vaccine: A Chemotherapy Dose-Ranging Factorial Study of Safety and Immune Activation [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1860v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practical Application of a Calculator for Conditional Survival in Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1860v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Conditional survival (CS) estimates provide important prognostic information for clinicians and patients who have survived a period after diagnosis. In this study we performed a contemporary evaluation of conditional survival among colon cancer patients and created a browser-based tool for real-time determination of conditional survival expectancies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1988 and 2000 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) registry. Conditional survival estimates were calculated by using the multiplicative law of probability after adjustment for age; sex; ethnicity; grade; and American Joint Commission on Cancer, sixth edition stage. A browser-based calculator was constructed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: A total of 83,419 patients were analyzed. As the time alive after initial treatment increased from 0 to 5 years, significant improvements in CS were observed for patients in all stages except stage I, which was associated with good CS even at diagnosis and which reflected the high likelihood of cure. Notably, adjusted 5-year CS rates improved from 42% to 80% for stage IIIC cancers and from 5% to 48% for stage IV cancers during the first 5 years. Differences in cancer-related CS at diagnosis were identified on the basis of age, ethnicity, and grade, but these differences decreased over time. A browser-based CS calculator was implemented by using the multivariate survival model (concordance index, 0.81).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: For patients with colon cancer who survive over time, 5-year, cancer-specific CS improved dramatically, and the greatest improvements were among patients with poorer initial prognoses. These prognostic data are critical to inform patients for non&ndash;treatment-related life decisions and to inform treating physicians for planning of follow-up and surveillance strategies.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, Hu, Eng, Skibber, Rodriguez-Bigas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1860</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practical Application of a Calculator for Conditional Survival in Colon Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1282v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alpha-Fetoprotein Response After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Oncologic Marker of Radiologic Response, Progression, and Survival [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.1282v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is considered to be an indicator of tumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We present a novel correlation of AFP response to radiologic response, time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with locoregional therapies.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Four hundred sixty-three patients with HCC were treated with chemoembolization or radioembolization at our institution. One hundred twenty-five patients with baseline AFP higher than 200 ng/mL were studied for this analysis. AFP response was defined as more than 50% decrease from baseline. One hundred nineteen patients with follow-up imaging were studied for the AFP imaging correlation analysis. AFP response was correlated to radiologic response, TTP, PFS, and OS. Multivariate analyses were performed.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Eighty-one patients (65%) showed AFP response. AFP response was seen in 26 (55%) of 47 and 55 (70%) of 78 of patients treated with chemoembolization and radioembolization, respectively (<I>P</I> = .12). WHO response was seen in 41 (53%) of 77 and 10 (24%) of 42 of AFP responders and nonresponders, respectively (<I>P</I> = .002). The hazard ratio (HR) for TTP in AFP nonresponders compared with responders was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5 to 5.1). The HR for PFS was 4.2 (95% CI, 2.4 to 7.2) in AFP nonresponders compared with responders. The HR for OS in AFP nonresponders compared with responders was 5.5 (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.9) and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 4.6) on univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The data presented support the use of AFP response seen after locoregional therapy as an ancillary method of assessing tumor response and survival, as well as an early objective screening tool for progression by imaging.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riaz, Ryu, Kulik, Mulcahy, Lewandowski, Minocha, Ibrahim, Sato, Baker, Miller, Newman, Omary, Abecassis, Benson, Salem]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alpha-Fetoprotein Response After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Oncologic Marker of Radiologic Response, Progression, and Survival [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0805v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular Predictors of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Translational Study of the German Glioma Network [Neurooncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.0805v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The prognostic value of genetic alterations characteristic of glioblastoma in patients treated according to present standards of care is unclear.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Three hundred one patients with glioblastoma were prospectively recruited between October 2004 and December 2006 at the clinical centers of the German Glioma Network. Two hundred fifty-eight patients had radiotherapy, 199 patients had temozolomide, 189 had both, and seven had another chemotherapy as the initial treatment. The tumors were investigated for <I>TP53</I> mutation, p53 immunoreactivity, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinase <I>CDK</I> <I>4</I> or murine double minute <I>2</I> amplification, <I>CDKN2A</I> homozygous deletion, allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 9p, 10q, and 19q, O<SUP>6</SUP>-methylguanine methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I>) promoter methylation, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (<I>IDH1</I>) mutations.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 12.5 months. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, higher performance score, <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation, and temozolomide radiochemotherapy as independent factors associated with longer OS. <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation was associated with longer PFS (relative risk [RR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and OS (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) in patients receiving temozolomide. <I>IDH1</I> mutations were associated with prolonged PFS (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.91; <I>P</I> = .028) and a trend for prolonged OS (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.19; <I>P</I> = .10). No other molecular factor was associated with outcome.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Molecular changes associated with gliomagenesis do not predict response to therapy in glioblastoma patients managed according to current standards of care. <I>MGMT</I> promoter methylation and <I>IDH</I><I>1</I> mutational status allow for stratification into prognostically distinct subgroups.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weller, Felsberg, Hartmann, Berger, Steinbach, Schramm, Westphal, Schackert, Simon, Tonn, Heese, Krex, Nikkhah, Pietsch, Wiestler, Reifenberger, von Deimling, Loeffler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0805</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular Predictors of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Translational Study of the German Glioma Network [Neurooncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4436v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Underweight and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Death: A Report From the Korean Breast Cancer Society [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4436v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: The association between body mass index and breast cancer outcome is controversial. Furthermore, the impact of underweight on breast cancer recurrence and death has not been adequately addressed.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: We investigated this issue using a large nationwide database of 24,698 Korean breast cancer patients. The association between body weight status and breast cancer recurrence was further explored using a single-institution database containing information on 4,345 patients.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: The results from the nationwide database showed significantly lower overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in underweight patients compared with survival in patients of normal weight after adjusting for known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, hormone receptor status, histologic grade, and lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.90 for OS; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.93 for BCSS), which were not observed in obese patients. In an analysis of recurrence data from the single institution, underweight women had a significantly higher risk of both distant metastasis and local recurrence of breast cancer (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.58 and HR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.66 to 9.90, respectively).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Our study suggests that underweight should be considered to be a high risk factor for death and recurrence after breast cancer surgery, especially in Asian breast cancer patients.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moon, Han, Noh]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Underweight and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Death: A Report From the Korean Breast Cancer Society [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3685v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reporting of Time-to-Event End Points and Tracking of Failures in Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy With or Without Any Concomitant Anticancer Agent for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.3685v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: For multiple reasons, including complexities in anatomy and management, locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHNs) represent a challenging disease for the reporting of end points and the tracking of failures.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We retrieved all randomized trials published in English that began accrual on or after 1978 and enrolled previously untreated patients with nonmetastatic SCCHN receiving primary radiotherapy with or without any concomitant anticancer agent. The reporting of time-to-event end points and the tracking of failures in these trials were analyzed. Failures were defined as events meeting a prespecified end point definition.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Forty trials involving a total of 125 time-to-event end points were identified. A total of 17 different types of end points were reported. Locoregional control and overall survival accounted for 70% of primary end points. Except for survival, the definitions used for all other end points were heterogeneous. Among 72 end points tracking locoregional failures, 29% did not define the term, whereas 64% specified the absence of complete response as a failure. Overall, the specification of details related to elective neck dissection or salvage surgery to define locoregional failures was deficient. Furthermore, it was rarely stated whether residual disease found during these procedures represents a failure. The methods and timing specifications to assess failures were frequently missing in published reports. The tracking of other types of failure beyond the first failure was reported in only one trial.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: These results support the need to standardize the selection, definition, and reporting of time-to-event end points in clinical trials of locally advanced SCCHN.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Tourneau, Michiels, Gan, Siu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:48:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3685</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reporting of Time-to-Event End Points and Tracking of Failures in Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy With or Without Any Concomitant Anticancer Agent for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5079v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Novel Breast Tissue Feature Strongly Associated With Risk of Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.21.5079v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Accurate, individualized risk prediction for breast cancer is lacking. Tissue-based features may help to stratify women into different risk levels. Breast lobules are the anatomic sites of origin of breast cancer. As women age, these lobular structures should regress, which results in reduced breast cancer risk. However, this does not occur in all women.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: We have quantified the extent of lobule regression on a benign breast biopsy in 85 patients who developed breast cancer and 142 age-matched controls from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort, by determining number of acini per lobule and lobular area. We also calculated Gail model 5-year predicted risks for these women.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There is a step-wise increase in breast cancer risk with increasing numbers of acini per lobule (<I>P</I> = .0004). Adjusting for Gail model score, parity, histology, and family history did not attenuate this association. Lobular area was similarly associated with risk. The Gail model estimates were associated with risk of breast cancer (<I>P</I> = .03). We examined the individual accuracy of these measures using the concordance (c) statistic. The Gail model c statistic was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.70); the acinar count c statistic was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.75). Combining acinar count and lobular area, the c statistic was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.78). Adding the Gail model to these measures did not improve the c statistic.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Novel, tissue-based features that reflect the status of a woman's normal breast lobules are associated with breast cancer risk. These features may offer a novel strategy for risk prediction.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKian, Reynolds, Visscher, Nassar, Radisky, Vierkant, Degnim, Boughey, Ghosh, Anderson, Minot, Caudill, Vachon, Frost, Pankratz, Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:46:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Novel Breast Tissue Feature Strongly Associated With Risk of Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.0204v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Trying to Be a Good Parent" As Defined By Interviews With Parents Who Made Phase I, Terminal Care, and Resuscitation Decisions for Their Children [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2008.20.0204v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: When a child's cancer progresses beyond current treatment capability, the parents are likely to participate in noncurative treatment decision making. One factor that helps parents to make these decisions and remain satisfied with them afterward is deciding as they believe a good parent would decide. Because being a good parent to a child with incurable cancer has not been formally defined, we conducted a descriptive study to develop such a definition.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: In face-to-face interviews, 62 parents who had made one of three decisions (enrollment on a phase I study, do not resuscitate status, or terminal care) for 58 patients responded to two open-ended questions about the definition of a good parent and about how clinicians could help them fulfill this role. For semantic content analysis of the interviews, a rater panel trained in this method independently coded all responses. Inter-rater reliability was excellent.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Among the aspects of the definition qualitatively identified were making informed, unselfish decisions in the child's best interest, remaining at the child's side, showing the child that he is cherished, teaching the child to make good decisions, advocating for the child with the staff, and promoting the child's health. We also identified 15 clinician strategies that help parents be a part of making these decisions on behalf of a child with advanced cancer.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The definition and the strategies may be used to guide clinicians in helping parents fulfill the good parent role and take comfort afterward in having acted as a good parent.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hinds, Oakes, Hicks, Powell, Srivastava, Spunt, Harper, Baker, West, Furman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:45:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Trying to Be a Good Parent" As Defined By Interviews With Parents Who Made Phase I, Terminal Care, and Resuscitation Decisions for Their Children [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5209v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stop and Go: Yes or No? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.5209v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hochster]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5209</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stop and Go: Yes or No? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3683v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relapse/Refractory Myeloma Patient: Potential Treatment Guidelines [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.3683v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Miguel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:37 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3683</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relapse/Refractory Myeloma Patient: Potential Treatment Guidelines [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6745v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of AMG 479, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor 1 [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.6745v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and evidence of antitumor activity of AMG 479, a fully human monoclonal antibody to insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R).</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Patients with advanced solid malignancies or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received escalating doses of AMG 479 intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (Q2W). Blood samples were assayed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters and IGF-1R occupancy on neutrophils; fluorodeoxyglucose&ndash;positron emission tomography scans were used to assess tumor metabolic effects.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Fifty-three patients received 312 infusions of AMG 479 Q2W. Overall, the most common grades 1 to 2 toxicities were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, fever, rash, chills, and anorexia. One dose-limiting toxicity (ie, grade 3 thrombocytopenia) occurred in a patient at 20 mg/kg during course 1; grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 8) and grade 3 transaminitis elevations (n = 1) also were reported but not in the escalation phase. The maximum-planned dose of 20 mg/kg was safely administered; thus, an MTD was not reached. High levels of neutrophil IGF-1R binding and increases from baseline in serum IGF-1 levels were observed in the 12- and 20-mg/kg cohorts. Tumor responses included one durable complete response (CR) and one unconfirmed partial response (PR) in two patients with Ewing/primitive neuroectodermal tumors and included one PR and one minor response in two patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The patients with Ewing/PNET who had a CR have remained disease free on therapy after 28 months.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: AMG 479 can be administered safely at 20 mg/kg IV Q2W. The absence of severe toxicities, attainment of serum concentrations associated with high levels of IGF-1R binding on neutrophils, and provocative antitumor activity warrant additional studies of this agent.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tolcher, Sarantopoulos, Patnaik, Papadopoulos, Lin, Rodon, Murphy, Roth, McCaffery, Gorski, Kaiser, Zhu, Deng, Friberg, Puzanov]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6745</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of AMG 479, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor 1 [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4344v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can Chemotherapy Be Discontinued in Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.23.4344v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: This study compared chemotherapy discontinuation with maintenance therapy with leucovorin and fluorouracil after six cycles of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: Two hundred two patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) followed by simplified leucovorin plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil until progression (arm 1 or maintenance arm, n = 98) or six cycles of mFOLFOX7 before a complete stop of chemotherapy (arm 2 or chemotherapy-free interval [CFI] arm, n = 104). Reintroduction of mFOLFOX7 was scheduled after tumor progression in both arms. The primary study end point was duration of disease control (DDC).</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Median DDC was 13.1 months in patients assigned to the maintenance arm and 9.2 months in patients assigned to the CFI arm (<I>P</I> = .046). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 8.6 and 23.8 months, respectively, in the maintenance arm and 6.6 and 19.5 months, respectively, in the CFI arm. Median duration of maintenance therapy (arm 1) and CFIs (arm 2) were 4.8 months and 3.9 months, respectively. Overall response rates were 59.2% and 59.6% for the initial FOLFOX chemotherapy and 20.4% and 30.3% for FOLFOX reintroduction in arms 1 and 2, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The planned complete discontinuation of chemotherapy had a negative impact on DDC and PFS compared with the maintenance therapy strategy. These results suggest that chemotherapy discontinuation cannot be decided before therapy is initiated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chibaudel, Maindrault-Goebel, Lledo, Mineur, Andre, Bennamoun, Mabro, Artru, Carola, Flesch, Dupuis, Colin, Larsen, Afchain, Tournigand, Louvet, de Gramont]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:58 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4344</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can Chemotherapy Be Discontinued in Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7868v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geographic Distribution of Lapatinib-Induced Skin Rash: Sparing of Abdominal Skin Persists in the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7868v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Kasparian, Morganstern, Beard]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7868</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geographic Distribution of Lapatinib-Induced Skin Rash: Sparing of Abdominal Skin Persists in the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7793v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Tell or Not to Tell: The Community Wants to Know About Expensive Anticancer Drugs As a Potential Treatment Option [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.7793v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Many new cancer treatments are available only at significant financial cost to the patient. We previously reported that Australian medical oncologists commonly do not discuss unsubsidized, expensive anticancer drugs (EACD) because of concern about causing distress. We argued that this position was not consistent with modern ethical principals but wanted to seek the community viewpoint.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: A cross-sectional telephone survey of the Australian general public was performed. Respondents' views were sought about three hypothetical scenarios in which they were diagnosed with incurable cancer and an EACD treatment (out-of-pocket cost US$25,000) was available.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: Responses were obtained from 1,255 respondents (response rate, 43%). One hundred thirty-seven (11%) had a prior cancer diagnosis. Ninety-one percent of respondents wanted to be told by their doctor about an EACD that could improve survival by an additional 4 to 6 months, with 51% prepared to pay for it. People were more willing to pay if the drug could improve quality of life (71%) or if there was no effective standard treatment (76%). Sixty-eight percent believed the government should pay. Cost would be a significant financial burden for 31% of those willing to pay. Those more likely to want to be informed were younger, employed, better-educated, or had higher income levels (<I>P</I> &lt; .05). Responses did not vary with the person's personal experience of cancer. Of the 9% who did not wish to be informed, half of these were concerned about the information causing distress.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: The Australian general public wants to be informed about EACD as potential treatment options, even if they are not willing or readily able to pay for them.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mileshkin, Schofield, Jefford, Agalianos, Levine, Herschtal, Savulescu, Thomson, Zalcberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:06 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Tell or Not to Tell: The Community Wants to Know About Expensive Anticancer Drugs As a Potential Treatment Option [Health Services and Outcomes]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health Services and Outcomes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4931v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid Clinical Deterioration and Leukemoid Reaction After Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Possible Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4931v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez, Fligner, Yu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:47 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid Clinical Deterioration and Leukemoid Reaction After Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Possible Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor [Diagnosis in Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4386v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival After Second Primary Neoplasms of the Brain or Spinal Cord in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results From the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.4386v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Survival after brain or spinal cord neoplasms is poor and varies by diagnostic group, age, grade, treatment and pretreatment factors, and location and size of tumor. We carried out a study to investigate survival and factors affecting survival of all diagnostic types of second primary brain or spinal cord neoplasms.</P>
<P><B>Patients and Methods</B>: The British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (BCCSS) is a long-term population-based follow-up study of 17,980 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. We used relative survival and multivariate Cox regression analysis to determine 5-year relative survival and factors affecting survival in second primary meningiomas and gliomas that developed in survivors included in the BCCSS.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: There were 247 second primary brain or spinal cord neoplasms, including 137 meningiomas and 73 gliomas in a young adult population. Five-year relative survival after meningiomas was similar for males (84.0%; 95% CI, 72.6% to 91.1%) and females (81.7%; 95% CI, 69.9% to 89.3%). For gliomas, 5-year relative survival was 19.5% (95% CI, 8.6% to 33.7%) for males and females. Multivariate analysis showed significant heterogeneity by decade of treatment (<I>P</I> = .04), grade (<I>P</I> = .03), and genetic risk (<I>P</I> = .03) for rate of mortality after a meningioma. For gliomas, survival was significantly affected by grade (<I>P</I> &lt; .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Our results indicate survival is poor after second primary glioma in this young adult population, although survival after second primary meningioma is good. Our study has clinical implications for the surveillance of childhood cancer survivors at risk of developing second primary brain tumors, in particular survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia or childhood brain tumors.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, Frobisher, Ellison, Reulen, Winter, Taylor, Stiller, Lancashire, Tudor, Baggott, May, Hawkins]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4386</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival After Second Primary Neoplasms of the Brain or Spinal Cord in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results From the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4681v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Homecoming [Art of Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.24.4681v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majhail]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:58:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Homecoming [Art of Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8429v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pancreatic Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/JCO.2009.22.8429v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>
<P><B>Purpose</B>: Conventional medicine has had little to offer patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma; thus, many patients seek alternative treatments. The National Cancer Institute, in 1998, sponsored a randomized, phase III, controlled trial of proteolytic enzyme therapy versus chemotherapy. Because most eligible patients refused random assignment, the trial was changed in 2001 to a controlled, observational study.</P>
<P><B>Methods</B>: All patients were seen by one of the investigators at Columbia University, and patients who received enzyme therapy were seen by the participating alternative practitioner. All met strict clinical criteria for eligibility. Of 55 patients who had inoperable pancreatic cancer, 23 elected gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, and 32 elected enzyme treatment, which included pancreatic enzymes, nutritional supplements, detoxification, and an organic diet. Primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival and quality of life, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Results</B>: At enrollment, the treatment groups had no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, pathology, quality of life, or clinically meaningful laboratory values. Kaplan-Meier analysis found a 9.7-month difference in median survival between the chemotherapy group (median survival, 14 months) and enzyme treatment groups (median survival, 4.3 months) and found an adjusted-mortality hazard ratio of the enzyme group compared with the chemotherapy group of 6.96 (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). At 1 year, 56% of chemotherapy-group patients were alive, and 16% of enzyme-therapy patients were alive. The quality of life ratings were better in the chemotherapy group than in the enzyme-treated group (<I>P</I> &lt; .01).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion</B>: Among patients who have pancreatic cancer, those who chose gemcitabine-based chemotherapy survived more than three times as long (14.0 <I>v</I> 4.3 months) and had better quality of life than those who chose proteolytic enzyme treatment.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chabot, Tsai, Fine, Chen, Kumah, Antman, Grann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:48:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8429</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pancreatic Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>