<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology Current Issue</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Feb 10 2010 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e65?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e80?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e82?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/709?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/711?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/718?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/744?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/753?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/761?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/767?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/773?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/780?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/793?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/808?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/822?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/835?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/847?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/853?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/866?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/872?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/878?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/884?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/893?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e65?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sirolimus and Temsirolimus for Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e65?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolff, Kabbani, Bradley, Raj, Watumull, Brugarolas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sirolimus and Temsirolimus for Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e68</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma During Therapy With Alemtuzumab for T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sohani, Ferry, Chang, Abramson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Diagnosis & Staging, Chemotherapy, Biologic Therapy, Biology & Immunology, Diagnosis & Staging, Chemotherapy, Biological Therapy, Biology & Immunology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma During Therapy With Alemtuzumab for T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Isolated Ovarian Relapse in a 68-Year-Old Woman With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singhal, Krishnan, Singh, Kumar, Raina]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Incidence trends, Diagnosis & Staging, Ultrasound]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1398</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Isolated Ovarian Relapse in a 68-Year-Old Woman With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e74</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in an Immunocompetent Woman [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pozdnyakova, Spieler, Abraham, Freedman, Kutok]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in an Immunocompetent Woman [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Clouds Apparent Benefit of Longer Hormone Duration [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, Lee, Steinberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selection Bias Clouds Apparent Benefit of Longer Hormone Duration [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e79</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e80?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to K. Lin et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e80?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souhami, Bae, Sandler]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to K. Lin et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metastatic Disease Response to Treatment: How Many Lesions to Measure? [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prassopoulos, Mantatzis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metastatic Disease Response to Treatment: How Many Lesions to Measure? [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e82?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to P. Prassopoulos et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e82?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillman, Sargent]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6736</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to P. Prassopoulos et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization As a Primary Test for HER2 Status in Breast Cancer: Controversies [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arena, Pennacchia, Monego, Carbone, Capelli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1397</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization As a Primary Test for HER2 Status in Breast Cancer: Controversies [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Arena et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sauter, Lee, Slamon, Press]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3930</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Arena et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Concept of Phenotypically Distinct Malignant Pancreatic Stem-Cell Subsets Based on Limiting Dilution Transplantation Assays [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/e89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonnefoix, Callanan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Concept of Phenotypically Distinct Malignant Pancreatic Stem-Cell Subsets Based on Limiting Dilution Transplantation Assays [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/709?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast Conservation Treatment With Radiation: An Ongoing Success Story [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/709?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.1164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast Conservation Treatment With Radiation: An Ongoing Success Story [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>711</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>709</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/711?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Seeing Believing? [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/711?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brundage]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0720</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Seeing Believing? [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>713</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>711</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INTERESTing Biomarker to Select IDEAL Patients for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Yes, for EGFR Mutation Analysis, Others, I PASS [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Govindan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1637</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INTERESTing Biomarker to Select IDEAL Patients for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Yes, for EGFR Mutation Analysis, Others, I PASS [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>715</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/715?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional p53 Status As a Biomarker for Chemotherapy Response in Oral-Cavity Cancer [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/715?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mroz, Rocco]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3475</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional p53 Status As a Biomarker for Chemotherapy Response in Oral-Cavity Cancer [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>717</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>715</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/718?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation of a Web-Based Predictive Nomogram for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast Conserving Therapy [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/718?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>IBTR! version 1.0 is a web-based tool that uses literature-derived relative risk ratios for seven clinicopathologic variables to predict ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Preliminary testing demonstrated over-estimation in high-risk subgroups. This study uses two independent population-based datasets to create and validate a modified nomogram, IBTR! version 2.0.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Cox regression modeling was performed on 7,811 patients treated with BCT at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (median follow-up, 9.4 years). Population-based hazard ratios were generated for the seven variables in the original nomogram. A modified nomogram was then tested against 664 patients from Massachusetts General Hospital (median follow-up, 9.3 years). The mean predicted and observed 10-year estimates were compared for the entire cohort and for four groups predefined by nomogram-predicted risks: group 1: less than 3%; group 2: 3% to 5%; group 3: 5% to 10%; and group 4: more than 10%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>IBTR! version 2.0 predicted an overall 10-year IBTR estimate of 4.0% (95% CI, 3.8 to 4.2), while the observed estimate was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.6 to 4.7; <I>P</I> = .10). The predicted and observed IBTR estimates were: group 1 (n = 283): 2.2% versus 1.3%, <I>P</I> = .40; group 2 (n = 237): 3.8% versus 3.5%, <I>P</I> = .80; group 3 (n = 111): 6.7% versus 3.2%, <I>P</I> = .05; and group 4 (n = 33): 12.5% versus 8.7%, <I>P</I> = .50.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>IBTR! version 2.0 is accurate in the majority of patients with a low to moderate risk of in-breast recurrence. The nomogram still overestimates risk in a minority of patients with higher risk features. Validation in a larger prospective data set is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanghani, Truong, Raad, Niemierko, Lesperance, Olivotto, Wazer, Taghian]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6662</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of a Web-Based Predictive Nomogram for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast Conserving Therapy [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>722</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>718</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/723?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I/II Trial of Metronomic Chemotherapy With Daily Dalteparin and Cyclophosphamide, Twice-Weekly Methotrexate, and Daily Prednisone As Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Levels As Markers of Response [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/723?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Preclinical studies indicate that metronomic chemotherapy is antiangiogenic and synergistic with other antiangiogenic agents. We designed a phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and activity of adding dalteparin and prednisone to metronomic cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in women with measurable metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients received daily dalteparin and oral cyclophosphamide, twice-weekly methotrexate, and daily prednisone (dalCMP). The primary study end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR), a combination of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and prolonged stable disease for &ge; 24 weeks (pSD). Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), duration of response, and overall survival (OS). Biomarker response to treatment was assessed by using plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble VEGF receptors (sVEGFRs) &ndash;1 and &ndash;2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty-one eligible patients were accrued. Sixteen (39%) had no prior chemotherapy for MBC; 15 (37%) had two or more chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Toxicities were minimal except for transient grade 3 elevation of liver transaminases in 11 patients (27%) and grade 3 vomiting in one patient (2%). One patient (2%) had CR, six (15%) had PR, and three (7%) had pSD, for a CBR of 10 (24%) of 41 patients. Median TTP was 10 weeks (95% CI, 8 to 17 weeks), and median OS was 48 weeks (95% CI, 32 to 79 weeks). VEGF levels decreased but not significantly, whereas sVEGFR-1 and -2 levels increased significantly after 2 weeks of therapy. There was no correlation between response and VEGF, sVEGFR-1, or sVEGFR-2 levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Metronomic dalCMP is safe, well tolerated, and clinically active in MBC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, Buckman, Clemons, Verma, Dent, Trudeau, Roche, Ebos, Kerbel, DeBoer, Sutherland, Emmenegger, Slingerland, Gardner, Pritchard]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Translational Oncology, Clinical Trials, Breast Cancer, Growth Factors & Receptor]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I/II Trial of Metronomic Chemotherapy With Daily Dalteparin and Cyclophosphamide, Twice-Weekly Methotrexate, and Daily Prednisone As Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Levels As Markers of Response [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>730</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>723</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of Axillary Clearance After a Tumor-Positive Sentinel Node in the Administration of Adjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The After Mapping of the Axilla: Radiotherapy or Surgery? (AMAROS) phase III study compares axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and axillary radiation therapy (ART) in early breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes. In the ART arm, the extent of nodal involvement remains unknown, which could have implications on the administration of adjuvant therapy. In this preliminary analysis, we studied the influence of random assignment to ALND or ART on the choice for adjuvant treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>In the first 2,000 patients enrolled in the AMAROS trial, we analyzed the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy. Multivariate analysis was used to assess variables affecting the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy was applied according to institutional guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 2,000 patients, 566 patients had a positive sentinel node and were treated per random assignment. There was no significant difference in the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy. In the ALND and ART arms, 58% (175 of 300) and 61% (162 of 266) of the patients, respectively, received chemotherapy. Endocrine therapy was administered in 78% (235 of 300) of the patients in the ALND arm and in 76% (203 of 266) of the patients in the ART arm. Treatment arm was not a significant factor in the decision, and no interactions between treatment arm and other factors were observed. Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor grade, multifocality, and size of the sentinel node metastasis significantly affected the administration of chemotherapy. Within the ALND arm, the extent of nodal involvement remained not significant in a sensitivity multivariate analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Absence of knowledge regarding the extent of nodal involvement in the ART arm appears to have no major impact on the administration of adjuvant therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Straver, Meijnen, van Tienhoven, van de Velde, Mansel, Bogaerts, Demonty, Duez, Cataliotti, Klinkenbijl, Westenberg, van der Mijle, Hurkmans, Rutgers]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7554</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of Axillary Clearance After a Tumor-Positive Sentinel Node in the Administration of Adjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>737</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/738?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communicating the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials: Do Patients Understand Multidimensional Patient-Reported Outcomes? [Clinical Practice]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/738?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Evidence suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from randomized trials in oncology may not influence clinical decision making and patient choice. Reasons for this are currently unclear and little is known about patients' interpretation of PROs. This study assessed patients' understanding of multidimensional PROs in a graphical format.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews in which patients interpreted a series of graphs depicting simple, then multiple different hypothetical PROs associated with two treatments with identical chances of survival were audio recorded. The interviewer and a blinded observer (listening to audio recordings) scored patients' understanding of the graphs. Logistic regression examined the associations between patient understanding of the graphs and clinical and sociodemographic details.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>One hundred thirty-two patients with esophageal and gastric cancer were interviewed and 115 understood the first two graphs depicting different PROs of two treatments (87%; 95% CI,81 to 93). Simultaneous interpretation of adverse and beneficial treatment effects was achieved by 74 (66%; 95% CI, 57 to 75). Graphs showing complex, longitudinal data were correctly interpreted by 97 (73%; 95% CI, 66 to 81) and 108 (81%; 95% CI, 75 to 88), respectively. Univariable analyses demonstrated associations between patient understanding and patient age, educational level, and cancer site (<I>P</I> &le; .02 for all); however, in a multivariable model each of these associations was attenuated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most patients understand graphical multidimensional PROs, although a smaller majority were able to interpret more complex, or simultaneous, presentations. Additional work is needed to define methods for communicating clinical and PRO data from trials to allow patients to make informed treatment choices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNair, Brookes, Davis, Argyropoulos, Blazeby]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Life]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communicating the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials: Do Patients Understand Multidimensional Patient-Reported Outcomes? [Clinical Practice]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>743</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>738</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/744?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular Predictors of Outcome With Gefitinib and Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Data From the Randomized Phase III INTEREST Trial [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/744?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>In the phase III INTEREST trial, 1,466 pretreated patients with advanced non&ndash;small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or docetaxel. As a preplanned analysis, we prospectively analyzed available tumor biopsies to investigate the relationship between biomarkers and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Biomarkers included epidermal growth factor receptor <I>(EGFR)</I> copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (374 assessable samples), EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (n = 380), and <I>EGFR</I> (n = 297) and <I>KRAS</I> (n = 275) mutations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For all biomarker subgroups analyzed, survival was similar for gefitinib and docetaxel, with no statistically significant differences between treatments and no significant treatment by biomarker status interaction tests. <I>EGFR</I> mutation&ndash;positive patients had longer progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.49; <I>P</I> = .001) and higher objective response rate (ORR; 42.1% <I>v</I> 21.1%; <I>P</I> = .04), and patients with high <I>EGFR</I> copy number had higher ORR (13.0% <I>v</I> 7.4%; <I>P</I> = .04) with gefitinib versus docetaxel.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These biomarkers do not appear to be predictive factors for differential survival between gefitinib and docetaxel in this setting of previously treated patients; however, subsequent treatments may have influenced the survival results. For secondary end points of PFS and ORR, some advantages for gefitinib over docetaxel were seen in <I>EGFR</I> mutation&ndash;positive and high <I>EGFR</I> copy number patients. There was no statistically significant difference between gefitinib and docetaxel in biomarker-negative patients. This suggests gefitinib can provide similar overall survival to docetaxel in patients across a broad range of clinical subgroups and that EGFR biomarkers such as mutation status may additionally identify which patients are likely to gain greatest PFS and ORR benefit from gefitinib.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douillard, Shepherd, Hirsh, Mok, Socinski, Gervais, Liao, Bischoff, Reck, Sellers, Watkins, Speake, Armour, Kim]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Cancer Biomarkers, Lung]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular Predictors of Outcome With Gefitinib and Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Data From the Randomized Phase III INTEREST Trial [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>752</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>744</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/753?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Followed by Gefitinib Compared With Continued Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG0203) [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/753?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Gefitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. We conducted a phase III trial to evaluate whether gefitinib improves survival as sequential therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Chemotherapy-na&iuml;ve patients with advanced stage (IIIB/IV) NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to either platinum-doublet chemotherapy up to six cycles (arm A) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for three cycles followed by gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily, until disease progression (arm B). Patients were stratified by disease stage, sex, histology, and chemotherapy regimens. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included progression-free survival, tumor response, safety, and quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between March 2003 and May 2005, 604 patients were randomly assigned. There was a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80; <I>P</I> &lt; .001); however, overall survival results did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.03; <I>P</I> = .11). In an exploratory subset analysis of overall survival by histologic group, patients in arm B with adenocarcinoma did significantly better than patients in arm A with adenocarcinoma (n = 467; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98; <I>P</I> = .03).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This trial failed to meet the primary end point of OS in patients with NSCLC. The exploratory subset analyses demonstrate a possible survival prolongation for sequential therapy of gefitinib, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takeda, Hida, Sato, Ando, Seto, Satouchi, Ichinose, Katakami, Yamamoto, Kudoh, Sasaki, Matsui, Takayama, Kashii, Iwamoto, Sawa, Okamoto, Kurata, Nakagawa, Fukuoka]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3445</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Phase III Trial of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Followed by Gefitinib Compared With Continued Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG0203) [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>760</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>753</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/761?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[TP53 Mutations and Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy in Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/761?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To find out if <I>TP53</I> functional status predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and thus may be helpful during treatment decision making of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We analyzed the predictive value of <I>TP53</I> mutations and their functional status on the basis of the transactivation activity of p53 mutant proteins in 53 pretreatment biopsies of oral cavity SCC patients receiving primary cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy followed by surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The surgical specimens showed that 15 patients (28%) achieved a pathologic complete remission (pCR) at both T and N sites, and 38 patients had residual tumor cells. Among the 53 pretreatment biopsies, 24 (45%) displayed <I>TP53</I> mutations: 22 single-nucleotide substitutions and two deletions. According to functional status that could be determined only for the 22 substitutions, 21 mutations were nonfunctional and one was partially functional.</p>
<p><I>TP53</I> mutation was found in four (27%) of 15 patients who achieved a pCR and in 20 (53%) of 38 nonresponder patients; the difference was not statistically significant (<I>P</I> = .12). In contrast, two (14%) of 14 cases with pCR carried a nonfunctional TP53 mutation, a frequency significantly less than that found in the nonresponders (19 [51%] of 37; <I>P</I> = .02). <I>TP53</I> mutation predicted pCR in four (17%) of 24 patients and a nonfunctional mutation in only two (9%) of 22 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results indicate that the loss of function (transactivation activities) of <I>p53</I> mutant proteins may predict a significant low pCR rate and suboptimal response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with oral cavity SCC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrone, Bossi, Cortelazzi, Locati, Quattrone, Pierotti, Pilotti, Licitra]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Translational Oncology, H&N]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[TP53 Mutations and Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy in Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>766</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>761</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/767?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vandetanib for the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/767?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>There is no effective therapy for patients with distant metastasis of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Activating mutations in the <I>RET</I> proto-oncogene cause hereditary MTC, which provides a strong therapeutic rationale for targeting RET kinase activity. This open-label, phase II study assessed the efficacy of vandetanib, a selective oral inhibitor of RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, in patients with advanced hereditary MTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic hereditary MTC received initial treatment with once-daily oral vandetanib 300 mg. The dose was adjusted additionally in some patients on the basis of observed toxicity until disease progression or any other withdrawal criterion was met. The primary assessment was objective tumor response (by RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors]).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirty patients received initial treatment with vandetanib 300 mg/d. On the basis of investigator assessments, 20% of patients (ie, six of 30 patients) experienced a confirmed partial response (median duration of response at data cutoff, 10.2 months). An additional 53% of patients (ie, 16 of 30 patients) experienced stable disease at &ge; 24 weeks, which yielded a disease control rate of 73% (ie, 22 of 30 patients). In 24 patients, serum calcitonin levels showed a 50% or greater decrease from baseline that was maintained for at least 4 weeks; 16 patients showed a similar reduction in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (70%), rash (67%), fatigue (63%), and nausea (63%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this study, vandetanib demonstrated durable objective partial responses and disease control with a manageable adverse event profile. These results demonstrate that vandetanib may provide an effective therapeutic option in patients with advanced hereditary MTC, a rare disease for which there has been no effective therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wells, Gosnell, Gagel, Moley, Pfister, Sosa, Skinner, Krebs, Vasselli, Schlumberger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Translational Oncology, Oncogenes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vandetanib for the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Cancer [Head and Neck Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>772</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>767</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/773?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating Serum Free Light Chains As Predictive Markers of AIDS-Related Lymphoma [Aids-Related Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/773?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>HIV-infected persons have an elevated risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL); this risk remains increased in the era of effective HIV therapy. We evaluated serum immunoglobulin (Ig) proteins as predictors of NHL risk among HIV-infected individuals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>By using three cohorts of HIV-infected persons (from 1982 to 2005), we identified 66 individuals who developed NHL and 225 matched (by cohort, sex, ethnicity, age, and CD4 count), HIV-infected, lymphoma-free controls who had available stored prediagnostic blood samples. Serum/plasma samples obtained 0 to 2 years and 2 to 5 years before diagnosis/selection were assayed for IgG, IgM, and IgA levels; monoclonal (M) Igs; and  and  free light chain (FLC) levels. Patients and matched controls were compared by using conditional logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The  and  FLCs were both significantly higher in patients (eg, in 2- to 5-year window: median , 4.24 <I>v</I> 3.43 mg/dL; median , 4.04 <I>v</I> 3.09 mg/dL) and strongly predicted NHL in a dose-response manner up to 2 to 5 years before diagnosis/selection (eg, NHL risk 3.76-fold higher with  concentration at least 2.00 times the upper limit of normal, and 8.13-fold higher with  concentration at least 2.00 times the upper limit of normal compared with normal levels). In contrast, IgG, IgM, and IgA levels were similar in patients and controls. M proteins were detected in only two patients with NHL (3%) and in nine controls (4%), and they were not significantly associated with NHL risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Elevated FLCs may represent sensitive markers of polyclonal B-cell activation and dysfunction and could be useful for identifying HIV-infected persons at increased NHL risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landgren, Goedert, Rabkin, Wilson, Dunleavy, Kyle, Katzmann, Rajkumar, Engels]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Diagnosis & Staging, Biology & Immunology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1322</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating Serum Free Light Chains As Predictive Markers of AIDS-Related Lymphoma [Aids-Related Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>779</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>773</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Aids-Related Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/780?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I Pharmacologic and Biologic Study of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a Fully Human Immunoglobulin G1 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/780?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To evaluate the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anticancer activity of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G<SUB>1</SUB> monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated once weekly with escalating doses of ramucirumab. Blood was sampled for PK studies throughout treatment. The effects of ramucirumab on circulating vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), soluble VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, tumor perfusion, and vascularity using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirty-seven patients were treated with 2 to 16 mg/kg of ramucirumab. After one patient each developed dose-limiting hypertension and deep venous thrombosis at 16 mg/kg, the next lower dose (13 mg/kg) was considered the MTD. Nausea, vomiting, headache, fatigue, and proteinuria were also noted. Four (15%) of 27 patients with measurable disease had a partial response (PR), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients had either a PR or stable disease lasting at least 6 months. PKs were characterized by dose-dependent elimination and nonlinear exposure consistent with saturable clearance. Mean trough concentrations exceeded biologically relevant target levels throughout treatment at all dose levels. Serum VEGF-A increased 1.5 to 3.5 times above pretreatment values and remained in this range throughout treatment at all dose levels. Tumor perfusion and vascularity decreased in 69% of evaluable patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Objective antitumor activity and antiangiogenic effects were observed over a wide range of dose levels, suggesting that ramucirumab may have a favorable therapeutic index in treating malignancies amenable to VEGFR-2 inhibition.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spratlin, Cohen, Eadens, Gore, Camidge, Diab, Leong, O'Bryant, Chow, Serkova, Meropol, Lewis, Chiorean, Fox, Youssoufian, Rowinsky, Eckhardt]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:39 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Solid Tumors (Adult), Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology, MRI, Angiogenesis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7537</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I Pharmacologic and Biologic Study of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a Fully Human Immunoglobulin G1 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>787</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>780</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/788?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Absolute Risk of Endometrial Carcinoma During 20-Year Follow-Up Among Women With Endometrial Hyperplasia [Epidemiology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/788?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The severity of endometrial hyperplasia (EH)&mdash;simple (SH), complex (CH), or atypical (AH)&mdash;influences clinical management, but valid estimates of absolute risk of clinical progression to carcinoma are lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a case-control study nested in a cohort of 7,947 women diagnosed with EH (1970-2002) at one prepaid health plan who remained at risk for at least 1 year. Patient cases (N = 138) were diagnosed with carcinoma, on average, 6 years later (range, 1 to 24 years). Patient controls (N = 241) were matched to patient cases on age at EH, date of EH, and duration of follow-up, and they were counter-matched to patient cases on EH severity. After we independently reviewed original slides and medical records of patient controls and patient cases, we combined progression relative risks (AH <I>v</I> SH, CH, or disordered proliferative endometrium [ie, equivocal EH]) from the case-control analysis with clinical censoring information (ie, hysterectomy, death, or left the health plan) on all cohort members to estimate interval-specific (ie, 1 to 4, 5 to 9, and 10 to 19 years) and cumulative (ie, through 4, 9, and 19 years) progression risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For nonatypical EH, cumulative progression risk increased from 1.2% (95% CI, 0.6% to 1.9%) through 4 years to 1.9% (95% CI, 1.2% to 2.6%) through 9 years to 4.6% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.8%) through 19 years after EH diagnosis. For AH, cumulative risk increased from 8.2% (95% CI, 1.3% to 14.6%) through 4 years to 12.4% (95% CI, 3.0% to 20.8%) through 9 years to 27.5% (95% CI, 8.6% to 42.5%) through 19 years after AH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Cumulative 20-year progression risk among women who remain at risk for at least 1 year is less than 5% for nonatypical EH but is 28% for AH.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lacey, Sherman, Rush, Ronnett, Ioffe, Duggan, Glass, Richesson, Chatterjee, Langholz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1315</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Absolute Risk of Endometrial Carcinoma During 20-Year Follow-Up Among Women With Endometrial Hyperplasia [Epidemiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>792</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>788</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/793?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transformation to Aggressive Lymphoma in Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/793?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Prior observations suggest a higher risk of transformation of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma (NLPHL) to aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), than in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. We evaluated the frequency of transformation in all patients diagnosed with NLPHL at the British Columbia Cancer Agency with long-term follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>The Lymphoid Cancer Database of the British Columbia Cancer Agency was searched to identify all patients diagnosed with NLPHL between 1965 and 2006. After pathologic review, 95 patients with NLPHL were confirmed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients with NLPHL had the following characteristics at diagnosis: median age of 37 years, 73% male, and 68% stage I or II disease. With a median follow-up time for living patients of 6.5 years (range, 2.5 to 33 years), 13 patients (14%) experienced transformation to aggressive lymphoma (median time to transformation, 8.1 years; range, 0.35 to 20.3 years). The actuarial risk of transformation to aggressive lymphoma was 7% and 30% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. Transformation was more likely in patients with initial splenic involvement (<I>P</I> = .006) at the time of diagnosis of NLPHL. The 10-year progression-free and overall survival rates in patients with transformed lymphoma were 52% and 62%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The risk of transformation in patients with NLPHL to DLBCL is substantial and underappreciated. Because transformation can occur years after the primary diagnosis of NLPHL, long-term follow-up of these individuals is necessary to accurately estimate the risk of development of secondary DLBCL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Mansour, Connors, Gascoyne, Skinnider, Savage]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Biology & Immunology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9516</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transformation to Aggressive Lymphoma in Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>799</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>793</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/800?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bortezomib As Induction Before Autologous Transplantation, Followed by Lenalidomide As Consolidation-Maintenance in Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/800?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To evaluate the effect of bortezomib as induction therapy before autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide as consolidation-maintenance in myeloma patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Newly diagnosed patients age 65 to 75 years were eligible. Induction (bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone [PAD]) included four 21-day cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 4), and dexamethasone (40 mg/d; cycle 1: days 1 to 4, 8 to 11, and 15 to 18; cycles 2 to 4: days 1 to 4). Autologous transplantation was tandem melphalan 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (MEL100) and stem-cell support. Consolidation included four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg/d on days 1 to 21 every 28 days) plus prednisone (50 mg every other day), followed by maintenance with lenalidomide (LP-L; 10 mg/d on days 1 to 21) until relapse. Primary end points were safety (incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events [AEs]) and efficacy (response rate).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 102 patients were enrolled. In a per-protocol analysis, after PAD, 58% of patients had very good partial response (VGPR) or better, including 13% with complete response (CR); after MEL100, 82% of patients had at least VGPR and 38% had CR; and after LP-L, 86% of patients had at least VGPR and 66% had CR. After median follow-up time of 21 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 69%, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 86%. During induction, treatment-related mortality was 3%; grade 3 to 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (17%), neutropenia (10%), peripheral neuropathy (16%), and pneumonia (10%). During consolidation-maintenance, grade 3 to 4 AEs were neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (6%), pneumonia (5%), and cutaneous rash (4%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Bortezomib as induction before autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide as consolidation-maintenance, is an effective regimen.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palumbo, Gay, Falco, Crippa, Montefusco, Patriarca, Rossini, Caltagirone, Benevolo, Pescosta, Guglielmelli, Bringhen, Offidani, Giuliani, Petrucci, Musto, Liberati, Rossi, Corradini, Boccadoro]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Myeloma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7561</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bortezomib As Induction Before Autologous Transplantation, Followed by Lenalidomide As Consolidation-Maintenance in Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>807</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>800</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/808?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Study of Intensified Anthracycline Doses for Induction and Recombinant Interleukin-2 for Maintenance in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Age 50 to 70 Years: Results of the ALFA-9801 Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/808?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), induction chemotherapy is based on standard doses of anthracyclines and cytarabine. High doses of cytarabine have been reported as being too toxic for patients older than age 50 years, but few studies have evaluated intensified doses of anthracyclines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>In this randomized Acute Leukemia French Association 9801 (ALFA-9801) study, high doses of daunorubicin (DNR; 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 3 days) or idarubicin (IDA4; 12 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 4 days) were compared with standard doses of idarubicin (IDA3; 12 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 3 days) for remission induction in patients age 50 to 70 years, with an event-free survival (EFS) end point. After two consolidation courses based on intermediate doses of cytarabine, patients in continuous remission were randomly assigned to receive or not receive maintenance therapy with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2; 5 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>6</sup> U/m<sup>2</sup> <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 5 days each month) for a total duration of 12 months. A total of 468 patients entered the study (median age, 60 years).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall complete remission rate was 77% with significant differences among the three randomization arms (83%, 78%, and 70% in the IDA3, IDA4, and DNR arms, respectively; <I>P</I> = .04). However, no significant differences were observed in relapse incidence, EFS, or overall survival among the three arms. In the 161 patients randomly assigned for maintenance therapy, no difference in outcome was observed between the rIL-2 and the no further treatment arms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Neither intensification of anthracycline doses nor maintenance with rIL-2 showed a significant impact on AML course, at least as scheduled in this trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pautas, Merabet, Thomas, Raffoux, Gardin, Corm, Bourhis, Reman, Turlure, Contentin, de Revel, Rousselot, Preudhomme, Bordessoule, Fenaux, Terre, Michallet, Dombret, Chevret, Castaigne]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2652</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Study of Intensified Anthracycline Doses for Induction and Recombinant Interleukin-2 for Maintenance in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Age 50 to 70 Years: Results of the ALFA-9801 Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>814</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>808</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Single-Agent Laromustine, A Novel Alkylating Agent, Has Significant Activity in Older Patients With Previously Untreated Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>An international phase II study of laromustine (VNP40101M), a sulfonylhydrazine alkylating agent, was conducted in patients age 60 years or older with previously untreated poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Laromustine 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> was administered as a single 60-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were age 70 years or older or 60 years or older with at least one additional risk factor&mdash;unfavorable AML karyotype, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2, and/or cardiac, pulmonary, or hepatic comorbidities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eighty-five patients (median age, 72 years; range, 60 to 87 years) were treated. Poor-risk features included age 70 years or older, 78%; adverse karyotype, 47%; PS of 2, 41%; pulmonary disease, 77%; cardiac disease, 73%; and hepatic disease, 3%. Ninety-six percent of patients had at least two risk factors, and 39% had at least four risk factors. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32%, with 20 patients (23%) achieving complete response (CR) and seven (8%) achieving CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). ORR was 20% in patients with adverse cytogenetics; 32% in those age 70 years or older; 32% in those with PS of 2; 32% in patients with baseline pulmonary dysfunction; 34% in patients with baseline cardiac dysfunction; and 27% in 33 patients with at least four risk factors. Twelve (14%) patients died within 30 days of receiving laromustine therapy. Median overall survival was 3.2 months, with a 1-year survival of 21%; the median duration of survival for those who achieved CR/CRp was 12.4 months, with a 1-year survival of 52%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Laromustine has significant single-agent activity in elderly patients with poor-risk AML. Adverse events are predominantly myelosuppressive or respiratory. Response rates are consistent across a spectrum of poor-risk features.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schiller, O'Brien, Pigneux, DeAngelo, Vey, Kell, Solomon, Stuart, Karsten, Cahill, Albitar, Giles]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Single-Agent Laromustine, A Novel Alkylating Agent, Has Significant Activity in Older Patients With Previously Untreated Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>821</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/822?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma in the Prerituximab Era: Effect of Response Quality on Survival--A Study From the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/822?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>First-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) still remains debated, even in the rituximab-based combination therapy era. Few studies have addressed the question whether complete remission (CR) translates into better survival. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term follow-up of prospectively treated patients with FL and the potential correlation between response quality to first-line treatment and overall survival (OS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Data from 536 patients with FL with low (n = 193) or high (n = 343) tumor burden enrolled from October 1986 to May 1995 in the French and Belgian GELF86 studies were analyzed. Data from these trials have been previously reported for low&ndash;tumor burden and high&ndash;tumor burden patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median follow-up was 14.9 years, and median OS was 9.8 years. Treated patients who achieved a complete response (CR; n = 194; 45%) had a significant longer OS than those only reaching a partial response (PR; n = 168; 39%) throughout treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.72; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) in an univariate time-dependent Cox model. Similar findings were found when response to treatment (CR <I>v</I> PR) was adjusted for potentially confounding factors in a multivariate model (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73; <I>P</I> &lt; .001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These data provide a long follow-up of these patients' cohorts and indicate that a better response to first-line treatment translates into an improved survival for patients with FL. Therefore, response-adapted therapy aiming to achieve a CR should be considered as first-line treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bachy, Brice, Delarue, Brousse, Haioun, Le Gouill, Delmer, Bordessoule, Tilly, Corront, Allard, Foussard, Bosly, Coiffier, Gisselbrecht, Solal-Celigny, Salles]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7819</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma in the Prerituximab Era: Effect of Response Quality on Survival--A Study From the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>829</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>822</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/830?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns of Improved Survival in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Twenty-First Century: A Population-Based Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/830?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Randomized multiple myeloma (MM) studies show improved response rates and better progression-free survival for newer therapies. However, a less pronounced effect has been found for overall survival (OS). Using population-based data including detailed treatment information for individual patients, we assessed survival patterns for all patients diagnosed with MM in Malm&ouml;, Sweden from 1950 to 2005.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We identified 773 patients with MM (48% males). On the basis of the age limit used for treatment with high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell support (HDM-ASCT; &le; 65 years old) in Sweden, we constructed Kaplan-Meier curves and used the Breslow generalized Wilcoxon test to evaluate OS patterns (diagnosed in six calendar periods) for patients 65 years old or younger and patients older than 65 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Including all age groups, patients diagnosed from 1960 to 1969 had a better survival than patients diagnosed from 1950 to 1959. In subsequent 10-year calendar periods, median OS increased from 24.3 to 56.3 months (<I>P</I> = .036) in patients &le; 65 years old. In contrast, OS did not improve among patients older than age 65 years (21.2 to 26.7 months, <I>P</I> = .7).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>With the establishment of HDM-ASCT as the standard therapy for younger patients with MM, OS has improved significantly for this age group in the general MM population. With novel therapies being commonly used at disease progression, presumably it becomes increasingly difficult to confirm survival differences between defined induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapies in the future. Consequently, in the era of novel MM therapies, population-based studies will serve as a necessary complement to randomized trials.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turesson, Velez, Kristinsson, Landgren]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4177</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns of Improved Survival in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Twenty-First Century: A Population-Based Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>834</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>830</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/835?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Activity of mTOR Inhibition With Sirolimus in Malignant Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors: Targeting the Pathogenic Activation of mTORC1 in Tumors [Sarcomas]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/835?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of mesenchymal neoplasms, mechanistically linked through activation of the mTOR signaling pathway. There is no known effective therapy for PEComa, and the molecular pathophysiology of aberrant mTOR signaling provided us with a scientific rationale to target this pathway therapeutically. On this mechanistic basis, we treated three consecutive patients with metastatic PEComa with an oral mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with advanced PEComa were treated with sirolimus and consented to retrospective collection of data from their medical records and analysis of archival tumor specimens. Tumor response was determined by computed tomography scans obtained at the clinical discretion of the treating physicians. Tumors were assessed for immunohistochemical evidence of mTORC1 activation and genetic evidence of alterations in <I>TSC1</I> and <I>TSC2</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Radiographic responses to sirolimus were observed in all patients. PEComas demonstrated loss of TSC2 protein expression and evidence of baseline mTORC1 activation. Homozygous loss of <I>TSC1</I> was identified in one PEComa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Inhibition of mTORC1, pathologically activated by loss of the TSC1/TSC2 tumor suppressor complex, is a rational mechanistic target for therapy in PEComas. The clinical activity of sirolimus in PEComa additionally strengthens the pathobiologic similarities linking PEComas to other neoplasms related to the tuberous sclerosis complex.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wagner, Malinowska-Kolodziej, Morgan, Qin, Fletcher, Vena, Ligon, Antonescu, Ramaiya, Demetri, Kwiatkowski, Maki]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2981</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Activity of mTOR Inhibition With Sirolimus in Malignant Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors: Targeting the Pathogenic Activation of mTORC1 in Tumors [Sarcomas]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>840</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>835</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Sarcomas</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/841?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of Low-Dose Interferon {alpha}2a 18 Versus 60 Months of Treatment in Patients With Primary Melanoma of >= 1.5 mm Tumor Thickness: Results of a Randomized Phase III DeCOG Trial [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/841?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Low-dose (LD) interferon (IFN) alfa (LDI) has demonstrated a consistent disease-free survival benefit for patients with clinically lymph node&ndash;negative melanoma in clinical trials. However, the optimal duration of treatment is still under discussion, and no previous trial has evaluated this question specifically. A prolongation of LDI from 18 months to 60 months might be of clinical benefit for patients with intermediate or high-risk melanoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Eight hundred fifty patients with resected cutaneous melanoma of at least 1.5 mm tumor thickness were included in this prospective randomized, multicenter trial in Germany and Austria. Patients had to be clinically lymph node&ndash;negative, and sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) was performed in a majority of cases. They were randomly assigned to receive 3 MU IFN2a three times a week subcutaneously for either 18 months (arm A) or 60 months (arm B).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 850 randomly assigned patients, 840 were eligible for evaluation after a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Tumor thickness and other relevant prognostic factors were well balanced between both groups. SLNB was performed in 635 patients (75.6%), with a positivity rate of 18.0% in arm A and 17.5% in arm B. Neither relapse-free survival (arm A, 75.6% <I>v</I> arm B, 72.6%; <I>P</I> = .72; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.39) nor distant-metastasis&ndash;free survival (81.9% <I>v</I> 79.7%; <I>P</I> = .56; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.52) or overall survival (85.9% <I>v</I> 84.9%; <I>P</I> = .86; HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.50) showed significant differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A prolongation of conventional LDI therapy from 18 to 60 months showed no clinical benefit in patients with intermediate and high-risk primary melanoma.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hauschild, Weichenthal, Rass, Linse, Berking, Bottjer, Vogt, Spieth, Eigentler, Brockmeyer, Stein, Naher, Schadendorf, Mohr, Kaatz, Tronnier, Hein, Schuler, Egberts, Garbe]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1704</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of Low-Dose Interferon {alpha}2a 18 Versus 60 Months of Treatment in Patients With Primary Melanoma of >= 1.5 mm Tumor Thickness: Results of a Randomized Phase III DeCOG Trial [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>846</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>841</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/847?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultrasound Morphology Criteria Predict Metastatic Disease of the Sentinel Nodes in Patients With Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/847?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>We have shown that ultrasound (US) -guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can accurately identify the sentinel node (SN). Moreover, US-guided FNAC before the surgical SN procedure could identify up to 65% of all SN metastases. Herein we analyzed in detail the different US morphologic patterns of SN metastases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>From July 2001 to December 2007, a total of 650 patients with melanoma scheduled for sentinel lymph node dissection were examined. We present the first 400 with sufficient follow-up (mean 40, median 39 months). Several morphologic characteristics were scored. In case of suspicious/clearly malignant US patterns a FNAC was performed. The final histology was considered the gold standard.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median Breslow was 1.8 mm. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the most important factors were: peripheral perfusion (PP) present (77% and 52%, respectively), loss of central echoes (LCE; 60% and 65% respectively), and balloon shape (BS; 30% and 96% respectively). Together these factors have a sensitivity of 82% and PPV of 52% (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). PP identified more patients with lower volume disease. PP and combined BS and LCE were independent prognostic factors for survival (hazard ratio, 2.19; <I>P</I> &lt; .015; and hazard ratio, 5.50; <I>P</I> &lt; .001, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Preoperative US and FNAC can identify 65% of SN metastases and thus reduce the need for surgical SN procedures. Peripheral perfusion is an early sign of involvement and of crucial importance to achieve a high identification rate. Balloon shape and loss of central echoes are late signs of metastases. We recommend US evaluation to identify those patients, who can directly proceed to a complete lymph node dissection after a positive US-guided FNAC of the SN.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voit, Van Akkooi, Schafer-Hesterberg, Schoengen, Kowalczyk, Roewert, Sterry, Eggermont]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.7428</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultrasound Morphology Criteria Predict Metastatic Disease of the Sentinel Nodes in Patients With Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>852</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>847</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/853?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alternating Systemic and Hepatic Artery Infusion Therapy for Resected Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG)/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Phase II Intergroup Trial, N9945/CI-66 [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/853?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Prior trials have shown that surgery followed by hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUDR) alternating with systemic fluorouracil improves survival rates. Oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine has demonstrated activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Based on this observation a trial was conducted to assess the potential benefit of systemic oxaliplatin and capecitabine alternating with HAI of FUDR. The primary end point was 2-year survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with liver-only metastases from colorectal cancer amenable to resection or cryoablation were eligible. HAI and systemic therapy was initiated after metastasectomy. Alternating courses of HAI consisted of 0.2 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d FUDR and dexamethasone, day 1 through 14 weeks 1 and 2. Systemic therapy included oxaliplatin 130 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1 with capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice daily, days 1 through 14, weeks 4 and 5. Two additional 3-week courses of systemic therapy were given. Capecitabine was reduced to 850 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice daily after interim review of toxicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fifty-five of 76 eligible patients were able to initiate protocol-directed therapy and completed median of six cycles (range, one to six). Three postoperative or treatment-related deaths were reported. Overall, 88% of evaluable patients were alive at 2 years. With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, a total of 30 patients have had disease recurrence, 11 involving the liver. Median disease-free survival was 32.7 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Alternating HAI of FUDR and systemic capecitabine and oxaliplatin met the prespecified end point of higher than 85% survival at 2 years and was clinically tolerable. However, the merits of this approach need to be established with a phase III trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alberts, Roh, Mahoney, O'Connell, Nagorney, Wagman, Smyrk, Weiland, Lai, Schwarz, Molina, Dentchev, Bolton]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6728</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alternating Systemic and Hepatic Artery Infusion Therapy for Resected Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG)/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Phase II Intergroup Trial, N9945/CI-66 [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>858</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>853</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II, Randomized Study of Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) Compared With Induction CAPOX Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Grupo Cancer de Recto 3 Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The optimal therapeutic sequence of the adjuvant chemotherapy component of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is controversial. Induction chemotherapy before preoperative CRT may be associated with better efficacy and compliance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>A total of 108 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were randomly assigned to arm A&mdash;preoperative CRT with capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and concurrent radiation followed by surgery and four cycles of postoperative adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX)&mdash;or arm B&mdash;induction CAPOX followed by CRT and surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response rate (pCR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>On an intention-to-treat basis, the pCR for arms A and B were 13.5% (95% CI, 5.6% to 25.8%) and 14.3% (95% CI, 6.4% to 26.2%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in other end points, including downstaging, tumor regression, and R0 resection. Overall, chemotherapy treatment exposure was higher in arm B than in arm A for both oxaliplatin (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) and capecitabine (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). During CRT, grades 3 to 4 adverse events were similar in both arms but were significantly higher in arm A during postoperative adjuvant CT than with induction CT in arm B. There were three deaths in each arm during the treatment period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Compared with postoperative adjuvant CAPOX, induction CAPOX before CRT had similar pCR and complete resection rates. It did achieve more favorable compliance and toxicity profiles. On the basis of these findings, a phase III study to definitively test the induction strategy is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez-Martos, Pericay, Aparicio, Salud, Safont, Massuti, Vera, Escudero, Maurel, Marcuello, Mengual, Saigi, Estevan, Mira, Polo, Hernandez, Gallen, Arias, Serra, Alonso]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8541</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II, Randomized Study of Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) Compared With Induction CAPOX Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Grupo Cancer de Recto 3 Study [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>865</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/866?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genotype-Driven Phase I Study of Irinotecan Administered in Combination With Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/866?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>We aimed to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan in patients with cancer with UGT1A1*1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes. We hypothesize that the patients without the *28/*28 genotype tolerate higher doses of irinotecan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients undergoing first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) eligible for treatment with irinotecan plus infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) were screened for the UGT1A1*28/*28 genotype and excluded from the study. Fifty-nine white patients with either the *1/*1 or the *1/*28 genotype were eligible for dose escalation of irinotecan. The starting dose of biweekly irinotecan was 215 mg/m<sup>2</sup> for both genotype groups, whereas the dose of infusional fluorouracil was fixed. Pharmacokinetic data of irinotecan and metabolites were also obtained.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The dose of irinotecan was escalated to 370 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in patients with the *1/*28 genotype and to 420 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in those with the *1/*1 genotype. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in two of four of *1/*28 patients at 370 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and in two of three of *1/*1 patients at 420 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. No DLTs were observed in 10 *1/*28 patients at 310 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and in 10 *1/*1 patients at 370 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; hence these dose levels were the MTD for each genotype group. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38 exhibit linear kinetics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The recommended dose of 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> for irinotecan in FOLFIRI is considerably lower than the dose that can be tolerated when patients with the UGT1A1*28/*28 genotype are excluded. Prospective genotype-driven studies should test the efficacy of higher irinotecan doses in the FOLFIRI schedule.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toffoli, Cecchin, Gasparini, D'Andrea, Azzarello, Basso, Mini, Pessa, De Mattia, Lo Re, Buonadonna, Nobili, De Paoli, Innocenti]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genotype-Driven Phase I Study of Irinotecan Administered in Combination With Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>871</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>866</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/872?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does Childhood Cancer Affect Parental Divorce Rates? A Population-Based Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/872?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Cancer in children may profoundly affect parents' personal relationships in terms of psychological stress and an increased care burden. This could hypothetically elevate divorce rates. Few studies on divorce occurrence exist, so the effect of childhood cancers on parental divorce rates was explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Data on the entire Norwegian married population, age 17 to 69 years, with children age 0 to 20 years in 1974 to 2001 (N = 977,928 couples) were retrieved from the Cancer Registry, the Central Population Register, the Directorate of Taxes, and population censuses. Divorce rates for 4,590 couples who were parenting a child with cancer were compared with those of otherwise similar couples by discrete-time hazard regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Cancer in a child was not associated with an increased risk of parental divorce overall. An increased divorce rate was observed with Wilms tumor (odds ratio [OR], 1.52) but not with any of the other common childhood cancers. The child's age at diagnosis, time elapsed from diagnosis, and death from cancer did not influence divorce rates significantly. Increased divorce rates were observed for couples in whom the mothers had an education greater than high school level (OR, 1.16); the risk was particularly high shortly after diagnosis, for CNS cancers and Wilms tumors, for couples with children 0 to 9 years of age at diagnosis, and after a child's death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This large, registry-based study shows that cancer in children is not associated with an increased parental divorce rate, except with Wilms tumors. Couples in whom the wife is highly educated appear to face increased divorce rates after a child's cancer, and this may warrant additional study.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Syse, Loge, Lyngstad]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Supportive Care, Long Term Survival & Late Effects, Outcomes Research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0556</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does Childhood Cancer Affect Parental Divorce Rates? A Population-Based Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>877</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>872</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/878?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physician Preferences and Knowledge Gaps Regarding the Care of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Mailed Survey of Pediatric Oncologists [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/878?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Little is known about physicians' attitudes and knowledge regarding the health care needs of childhood cancer survivors (CCS). We sought to obtain pediatric cancer physicians' self-reported attitudes and knowledge regarding this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A mailed survey was sent to 1,159 pediatric oncologists in the United States.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 655 surveys were returned (ie, 57% response rate). Median age of respondents was 47 years (range, 31 to 82 years); 57% were men. Respondents practiced for a median 14 years (range, 1 to 50 years) and reported seeing a median of 21 patients per week (range, 0 to 250 patients per week). When comfort levels in caring for CCS were described (ie, 1 = very uncomfortable; 7 = very comfortable), respondents were most comfortable with survivors &le; 21 years (mean &plusmn; standard deviation, 6.2 &plusmn; 1.3 level), were less comfortable (5.0 &plusmn; 1.5 level) with those older than 21 years but less than 30 years old, and were uncomfortable with CCS &ge; 30 years (2.9 &plusmn; 1.7 level). In response to a clinical vignette of a 29-year-old woman treated with mantle radiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma at 16 years of age, and on the basis of available guidelines, 34% of respondents did not appropriately recommend yearly breast cancer surveillance; 43% of respondents did not appropriately recommend cardiac surveillance; and 24% of respondents did not appropriately recommend yearly thyroid surveillance. Those with greater self-reported familiarity with available long-term follow-up (LTFU) guidelines (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.54) and with receipt of training in the care of CCS (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.52) were more likely to have answered all three questions correctly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Pediatric oncologists express a range of preferences with regard to LTFU of CCS. Many appear unfamiliar with LTFU surveillance guidelines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henderson, Hlubocky, Wroblewski, Diller, Daugherty]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Long Term Survival & Late Effects, Quality of Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physician Preferences and Knowledge Gaps Regarding the Care of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Mailed Survey of Pediatric Oncologists [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>883</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>878</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/884?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigational Immunotherapeutics for B-Cell Malignancies [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/884?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The use of rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy regimens has remarkably improved the response rates, long-term outcomes, and quality of life of patients with B-cell malignancies. However, a substantial number of patients exhibit either primary or acquired resistance to rituximab, which suggests that novel immunotherapeutics with distinct mechanisms of action are necessary. A series of monoclonal antibodies with specificity against different surface antigens expressed on malignant B cells (eg, CD22, CD23, CD40, CD70) and novel immunotherapeutics (eg, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, small-modular immunopharmaceuticals, T-cell engagers) are currently in clinical or final preclinical stages of development. Although these agents offer reason for optimism, considerable challenges lie ahead in establishing their real clinical value, as well as in integrating them into current therapeutic algorithms for patients with B-cell malignancies. This review describes some of the most promising investigational immunotherapeutics for the treatment of B-cell malignancies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quintas-Cardama, Wierda, O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Leukemia, Biological Therapy, Hematologic, Immunology/Immunobiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8254</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigational Immunotherapeutics for B-Cell Malignancies [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>892</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>884</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility [ASCO SPECIAL ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/28/5/893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robson, Storm, Weitzel, Wollins, Offit]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[ASCO Guidelines, Notes from the Editors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0660</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility [ASCO SPECIAL ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>901</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ASCO SPECIAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>