<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology current issue</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Jul  1 2008 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3112?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3128?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3229?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3235?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3286?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3112?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Lessons From a Time Capsule: Evolution, Not Revolution, in Therapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3112?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Lessons From a Time Capsule: Evolution, Not Revolution, in Therapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Individualized Treatment Selection in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Do Molecular Markers Meet the Challenge?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, Pfister]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Individualized Treatment Selection in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Do Molecular Markers Meet the Challenge?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Redefining the Role of Induction Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adelstein]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2256</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Redefining the Role of Induction Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Getting a Grip on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hershman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Getting a Grip on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in the Elderly: Old Drugs and New Opportunities]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carver, Schuster, Glick]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in the Elderly: Old Drugs and New Opportunities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Comments and Controversies] Mentoring Junior Faculty in Geriatric Oncology: Report From the Cancer and Aging Research Group]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hurria, Balducci, Naeim, Gross, Mohile, Klepin, Tew, Downey, Gajra, Owusu, Sanati, Suh, Figlin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9771</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Comments and Controversies] Mentoring Junior Faculty in Geriatric Oncology: Report From the Cancer and Aging Research Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3128?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3128?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To prospectively identify markers of response to therapy and outcome in an organ-sparing trial for advanced oropharyngeal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Pretreatment biopsies were examined for expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p16, Bcl-xL, and p53 as well as for <I>p53</I> mutation. These markers were assessed for association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), response to therapy, and survival. Patient variables included smoking history, sex, age, primary site, tumor stage, and nodal status.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>EGFR expression was inversely associated with response to induction chemotherapy (IC) (<I>P</I> = .01), chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CRT; <I>P</I> = .055), overall survival (OS; <I>P</I> = .001), and disease-specific survival (DSS; <I>P</I> = .002) and was directly associated with current smoking (<I>P</I> = .04), female sex (<I>P</I> = .053), and lower HPV titer (<I>P</I> = .03). HPV titer was significantly associated with p16 expression (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001); p16 was significantly associated with response to IC (<I>P</I> = .008), CRT (<I>P</I> = .009), OS (<I>P</I> = .001), and DSS (<I>P</I> = .003). As combined markers, lower HPV titer and high EGFR expression were associated with worse OS (<SUB>EGFR</SUB> = 0.008; <SUB>HPV</SUB> = 0.03) and DSS (<SUB>EGFR</SUB> = 0.01; <SUB>HPV</SUB> = 0.016). In 36 of 42 biopsies, p53 was wild-type, and only one HPV-positive tumor had mutant <I>p53</I>. The combination of low p53 and high Bcl-xL expression was associated with poor OS (<I>P</I> = .005) and DSS (<I>P</I> = .002).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Low EGFR and high p16 (or higher HPV titer) expression are markers of good response to organ-sparing therapy and outcome, whereas high EGFR expression, combined low p53/high Bcl-xL expression, female sex, and smoking are associated with a poor outcome. Smoking cessation and strategies to target EGFR and Bcl-xL are important adjuncts to the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, Cordell, Lee, Worden, Prince, Tran, Wolf, Urba, Chepeha, Teknos, Eisbruch, Tsien, Taylor, D'Silva, Yang, Kurnit, Bauer, Bradford, Carey]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Translational Oncology, H&N, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7662</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] Chemoselection As a Strategy for Organ Preservation in Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: Response and Survival Positively Associated With HPV16 Copy Number]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To test induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or surgery/radiotherapy (RT) for advanced oropharyngeal cancer and to assess the effect of human papilloma virus (HPV) on response and outcome.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Sixty-six patients (51 male; 15 female) with stage III to IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCCOP) were treated with one cycle of cisplatin (100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>) or carboplatin (AUC 6) and with fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d for 5 days) to select candidates for CRT. Those achieving a greater than 50% response at the primary tumor received CRT (70 Gy; 35 fractions with concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> or carboplatin (AUC 6) every 21 days for three cycles). Adjuvant paclitaxel was given to patients who were complete histologic responders. Patients with a response of 50% or less underwent definitive surgery and postoperative radiation. Pretreatment biopsies from 42 patients were tested for high-risk HPV.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Fifty-four of 66 patients (81%) had a greater than 50% response after IC. Of these, 53 (98%) received CRT, and 49 (92%) obtained complete histologic response with a 73.4% (47 of 64) rate of organ preservation. The 4-year overall survival (OS) was 70.4%, and the disease-specific survival (DSS) was 75.8% (median follow-up, 64.1 months). HPV16, found in 27 of 42 (64.3%) biopsies, was associated with younger age (median, 55 <I>v</I> 63 years; <I>P</I> = .016), sex (22 of 30 males [73.3%] and five of 12 females [41.7%]; <I>P</I> = .08), and nonsmoking status (<I>P</I> = .037). HPV titer was significantly associated with IC response (<I>P</I> = .001), CRT response (<I>P</I> = .005), OS (<I>P</I> = .007), and DSS (<I>P</I> = .008).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Although the numbers in this study are small, IC followed by CRT is an effective treatment for SCCOP, especially in patients with HPV-positive tumors; however, for patients who do not respond to treatment, alternative treatments must be developed.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Worden, Kumar, Lee, Wolf, Cordell, Taylor, Urba, Eisbruch, Teknos, Chepeha, Prince, Tsien, D'Silva, Yang, Kurnit, Mason, Miller, Wallace, Bradford, Carey]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Translational Oncology, H&N, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7597</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] Chemoselection As a Strategy for Organ Preservation in Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: Response and Survival Positively Associated With HPV16 Copy Number]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3146</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prospective Study to Assess Short-Term Intra-Articular and Tenosynovial Changes in the Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia Syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Arthralgia is an adverse class effect of aromatase inhibitors (AIs). To date, its exact mechanism remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in clinical rheumatologic features and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hands and wrists in AI and tamoxifen users.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>This is a prospective single-center study including 17 consecutive postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer receiving either tamoxifen (n = 5) or an AI (n = 12). At baseline and after 6 months, patients filled in a rheumatologic history questionnaire and a rheumatologic examination including a grip strength test was done. At the same time points, MRI of both hands and wrists was performed. The primary end point was tenosynovial changes from baseline on MRI. Secondary end points were changes from baseline for morning stiffness, grip strength, and intra-articular fluid on MRI. Wilcoxon signed ranks was used to test changes from baseline and the Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the association between rheumatologic and MRI changes from baseline.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>At 6 months, patients on AI had a decrease in grip strength (<I>P</I> = .0049) and an increase in tenosynovial changes (<I>P</I> = .0010). The decrease in grip strength correlated well with the tenosynovial changes on MRI (<I>P</I> = .0074). Only minor changes were seen in patients on tamoxifen. AI users reported worsening of morning stiffness and showed an increase in intra-articular fluid on MRI.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The functional impairment of hands in the AI-associated arthralgia syndrome is characterized by tenosynovial changes on MRI correlating with a significant decrease in hand grip strength.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morales, Pans, Verschueren, Van Calster, Paridaens, Westhovens, Timmerman, De Smet, Vergote, Christiaens, Neven]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prospective Study to Assess Short-Term Intra-Articular and Tenosynovial Changes in the Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia Syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prognostic Significance of Nottingham Histologic Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The three strongest prognostic determinants in operable breast cancer used in routine clinical practice are lymph node (LN) stage, primary tumor size, and histologic grade. However, grade is not included in the recent revision of the TNM staging system of breast cancer as its value is questioned in certain settings.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Materials and Methods</ST> 
<P>This study is based on a large and well-characterized consecutive series of operable breast cancer (2,219 cases), treated according to standard protocols in a single institution, with a long-term follow-up (median, 111 months) to assess the prognostic value of routine assessment of histologic grade using Nottingham histologic grading system.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Histologic grade is strongly associated with both breast cancer&ndash;specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the whole series as well as in different subgroups based on tumor size (pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, and pT2) and LN stages (pN0 and pN1 and pN2). Differences in survival were also noted between different individual grades (1, 2, and 3). Multivariate analyses showed that histologic grade is an independent predictor of both BCSS and DFS in operable breast cancer as a whole as well as in all studied subgroups.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Histologic grade, as assessed by the Nottingham grading system, provides a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated in breast cancer staging systems.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakha, El-Sayed, Lee, Elston, Grainge, Hodi, Blamey, Ellis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5986</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prognostic Significance of Nottingham Histologic Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3159?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Treatment-Related Complications] Doxorubicin, Cardiac Risk Factors, and Cardiac Toxicity in Elderly Patients With Diffuse B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3159?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Anthracycline-based chemotherapy, which improves survival for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is often withheld from elderly patients because of its cardiotoxicity. We studied the cardiac effects of doxorubicin in a population-based sample of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Among patients age &ge; 65 years diagnosed with DLBCL from 1991 to 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results&ndash;Medicare database, we developed logistic regression models of the associations of doxorubicin with demographic, clinical, and cardiac variables. We then developed Cox proportional hazards models of the association between doxorubicin and subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF), taking predictors of CHF into account.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Of 9,438 patients with DLBCL, 3,164 (42%) received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Any doxorubicin use was associated with a 29% increase in risk of CHF (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.62); CHF risk increased with number of doxorubicin claims, increasing age, prior heart disease, comorbidities, diabetes, and hypertension; hypertension intensified the effect of doxorubicin on risk of CHF (hazard ratio = 1.8; <I>P</I> &lt; .01). In the 8 years after diagnosis, the adjusted CHF-free survival rate was 74% in doxorubicin-treated patients versus 79% in patients not treated with doxorubicin.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Among patients receiving chemotherapy for DLBCL, those with prior heart disease were less likely than others to be treated with doxorubicin, and those who received doxorubicin were more likely than others to develop CHF. Various cardiac risk factors increased CHF risk, but only hypertension was synergistic with doxorubicin. Doxorubicin has dramatically improved survival of DLBCL patients; nonetheless, some subgroups may benefit from efforts to reduce doxorubicin-related CHF risk.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hershman, McBride, Eisenberger, Tsai, Grann, Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Outcomes Research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1242</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Treatment-Related Complications] Doxorubicin, Cardiac Risk Factors, and Cardiac Toxicity in Elderly Patients With Diffuse B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Bone Marrow Transplantation] Rituximab Improves the Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autograft for High-Risk Follicular and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi Survey]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R&ndash;) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R&ndash; and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>A total of 355 R&ndash; (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R&ndash; and 2.8% for R+ (<I>P</I> = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R&ndash; groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R&ndash; were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarella, Zanni, Magni, Benedetti, Patti, Barbui, Pileri, Boccadoro, Ciceri, Gallamini, Cortelazzo, Majolino, Mirto, Corradini, Passera, Pizzolo, Gianni, Rambaldi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lymphoma, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Bone Marrow Transplantation] Rituximab Improves the Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autograft for High-Risk Follicular and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi Survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Bone Marrow Transplantation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gynecologic Cancer] Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The management of recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Single-agent topotecan is an established treatment option, and preliminary evidence suggests improved tumor control by combining topotecan with etoposide or gemcitabine.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Women with relapsed ovarian cancer after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to topotecan monotherapy 1.25 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d, topotecan 1.0 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> plus oral etoposide 50 mg/d, or topotecan 0.5 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on day 1 and 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on day 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive disease according to a recurrence-free interval of less or more than 12 months, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rates, toxicity, and quality of life (as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 30-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The trial enrolled 502 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years (&plusmn; 10.2 years), 208 of whom were platinum resistant. Median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 21.9 months) with topotecan, 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 20.0 months) with topotecan plus etoposide (log-rank <I>P</I> = .7647), and 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.9 months) with topotecan plus gemcitabine (log-rank <I>P</I> = .2344). Platinum-sensitive patients lived significantly longer than platinum-refractory patients (21.9 <I>v</I> 10.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.0, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Objective response rates were 27.8%, 36.1%, and 31.6%, respectively. Patients under combined treatment were at higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Nonplatinum topotecan combinations do not provide a survival advantage over topotecan alone in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sehouli, Stengel, Oskay-Oezcelik, Zeimet, Sommer, Klare, Stauch, Paulenz, Camara, Keil, Lichtenegger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gynecologic Cancer] Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Identical Outcome After Autologous or Allogeneic Genoidentical Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in First Remission of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia Carrying Inversion 16 or t(8;21): A Retrospective Study From the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Patients with acute myelocytic leukemia carrying inversion 16 (inv16) or t(8;21) have a better initial response to high-dose cytarabine than patients without these chromosomal abnormalities. They presently do not undergo transplantation in first remission (CR1), but there is concern about late relapses.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>From 1990 to 2004, 325 adult patients received transplantations in CR1 (159 patients with inv16 and 166 patients with t(8;21), including 35 and 60 patients, respectively, with additional chromosomal abnormalities). Genoidentical allografts were performed in 64 patients with inv16 and 81 patients with t(8;21), and autografts were performed in 95 patients with inv16 and 85 patients with t(8;21).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>In patients with inv16, after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, the 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 59% and 66% (<I>P</I> = .5), the relapse incidence (RI) rates were 27% and 32% (<I>P</I> = .45), and the transplantation-related mortality (TRM) rates were 14% and 2% (<I>P</I> = .003), respectively. Female patients had a lower RI and a higher LFS. Additional chromosomal abnormalities, compared with no additional abnormalities, were associated with lower RI rate (12% <I>v</I> 34%, respectively; <I>P</I> = .01) and higher 5-year LFS rate (78% <I>v</I> 59%, respectively; <I>P</I> = .04). In patients with t(8;21), after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, the 5-year LFS rates were 60% and 66% (<I>P</I> = .69), the RI rates were 15% and 28% (<I>P</I> = .03), and the TRM rates were 24% and 6% (<I>P</I> = .003), respectively. Younger age and a lower WBC count at diagnosis were associated with a lower TRM and a better LFS. The TRM was lower and the RI was higher in patients with autologous transplantations versus allogeneic transplantations.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Both autologous and allogeneic transplantation resulted in similar outcomes.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorin, Labopin, Frassoni, Milpied, Attal, Blaise, Meloni, Iori, Michallet, Willemze, Deconninck, Harousseau, Polge, Rocha]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Leukemia, Combined Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Identical Outcome After Autologous or Allogeneic Genoidentical Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in First Remission of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia Carrying Inversion 16 or t(8;21): A Retrospective Study From the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Retrospective Analysis of Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Rituximab-Containing Chemotherapy As Reported by the IVL Study Group in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab-containing chemotherapies for intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>We retrospectively analyzed 106 patients (59 men, 47 women) with IVLBCL who received chemotherapy either with rituximab (R-chemotherapy, n = 49) or without rituximab (chemotherapy, n = 57) between 1994 and 2007 in Japan. The median patient age was 67 years (range, 34 to 84 years). The International Prognostic Index was high-intermediate/high in 97% of patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The complete response rate was higher for patients in the R-chemotherapy group (82%) than for those in the chemotherapy group (51%; <I>P</I> = .001). The median duration of follow-up for surviving patients was 18 months (range, 1 to 95 months). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years after diagnosis were significantly higher for patients in the R-chemotherapy group (PFS, 56%; OS, 66%) than for patients in the chemotherapy group (PFS, 27% with <I>P</I> = .001; OS, 46% with <I>P</I> = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of rituximab was favorably associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.80; <I>P</I> = .006) and OS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.85; <I>P</I> = .016). Treatment-related death was observed in three patients (6%) who received R-chemotherapy and in five patients (9%) who received chemotherapy.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Our data suggest improved clinical outcomes for patients with IVLBCL in the rituximab era. Future prospective studies of rituximab-containing chemotherapies are warranted.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shimada, Matsue, Yamamoto, Murase, Ichikawa, Okamoto, Niitsu, Kosugi, Tsukamoto, Miwa, Asaoku, Kikuchi, Matsumoto, Saburi, Masaki, Yamaguchi, Nakamura, Naoe, Kinoshita]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4278</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Retrospective Analysis of Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Rituximab-Containing Chemotherapy As Reported by the IVL Study Group in Japan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Phase I, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Anti-Insulinlike Growth Factor Type 1 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody CP-751,871 in Patients With Multiple Myeloma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>A phase I first-in-human study was conducted to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the anti&ndash;insulinlike growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-IR) monoclonal antibody CP-751,871.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>After informed consent and screening, 47 patients with multiple myeloma in relapse or refractory phase were enrolled into 11 dose-escalation cohorts of CP-751,871 at doses from 0.025 to 20 mg/kg for 4 weeks. Patients with less than a partial response to CP-751,871 treatment were eligible to receive CP-751,871 in combination with oral dexamethasone at the discretion of the investigator. Treatment with CP-751,871 and rapamycin with or without dexamethasone was also offered to patients enrolled in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts with less than a partial response to initial therapy with single-agent CP-751,871.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>No CP-751,871-related dose-limiting toxicities were identified. Plasma CP-751,871 concentrations increased with dose and concentration-time profiles were consistent with those of antibodies with target-mediated disposition. Importantly, CP-751,871 administration led to a decrease in granulocyte IGF-IR expression and serum insulinlike growth factor 1 accumulation at high doses, suggesting systemic IGF-IR inhibition. Tumor response was assessed according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria. Nine responses were reported in 27 patients treated with CP-751,871 in combination with dexamethasone. Of interest, two of the patients with a partial response were progressing from dexamethasone treatment at study entry.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>These data indicate that CP-751,871 is well tolerated and may constitute a novel agent in the treatment of multiple myeloma.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lacy, Alsina, Fonseca, Paccagnella, Melvin, Yin, Sharma, Enriquez Sarano, Pollak, Jagannath, Richardson, Gualberto]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Myeloma, Biological Therapy, Translational Oncology, Signal Transduction, Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9319</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Phase I, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Anti-Insulinlike Growth Factor Type 1 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody CP-751,871 in Patients With Multiple Myeloma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3203</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Intermittent Target Inhibition With Dasatinib 100 mg Once Daily Preserves Efficacy and Improves Tolerability in Imatinib-Resistant and -Intolerant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Dasatinib is a <I>BCR-ABL</I> inhibitor, 325-fold more potent than imatinib against unmutated BCR-ABL in vitro. Phase II studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety with dasatinib 70 mg twice daily in chronic-phase (CP) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) after imatinib treatment failure. In phase I, responses occurred with once-daily administration despite only intermittent BCR-ABL inhibition. Once-daily treatment resulted in less toxicity, suggesting that toxicity results from continuous inhibition of unintended targets. Here, a dose- and schedule-optimization study is reported.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>In this open-label phase III trial, 670 patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CP-CML were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 between four dasatinib treatment groups: 100 mg once daily, 50 mg twice daily, 140 mg once daily, or 70 mg twice daily.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>With minimum follow-up of 6 months (median treatment duration, 8 months; range, &lt; 1 to 15 months), marked and comparable hematologic (complete, 86% to 92%) and cytogenetic (major, 54% to 59%; complete, 41% to 45%) response rates were observed across the four groups. Time to and duration of cytogenetic response were similar, as was progression-free survival (8% to 11% of patients experienced disease progression or died). Compared with the approved 70-mg twice-daily regimen, dasatinib 100 mg once daily resulted in significantly lower rates of pleural effusion (all grades, 7% <I>v</I> 16%; <I>P</I> = .024) and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (22% <I>v</I> 37%; <I>P</I> = .004), and fewer patients required dose interruption (51% <I>v</I> 68%), reduction (30% <I>v</I> 55%), or discontinuation (16% <I>v</I> 23%).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Dasatinib 100 mg once daily retains the efficacy of 70 mg twice daily with less toxicity. Intermittent target inhibition with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may preserve efficacy and reduce adverse events.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, Kantarjian, Kim, Rea, Dorlhiac-Llacer, Milone, Vela-Ojeda, Silver, Khoury, Charbonnier, Khoroshko, Paquette, Deininger, Collins, Otero, Hughes, Bleickardt, Strauss, Francis, Hochhaus]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Intermittent Target Inhibition With Dasatinib 100 mg Once Daily Preserves Efficacy and Improves Tolerability in Imatinib-Resistant and -Intolerant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Relationship of Circulating Tumor Cells to Tumor Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>As treatment options expand for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a blood marker with a prognostic and predictive role could guide treatment. We tested the hypothesis that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>In a prospective multicenter study, CTCs were enumerated in the peripheral blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and after starting first-, second-, or third-line therapy. CTCs were measured using an immunomagnetic separation technique.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of three or more or less than three CTCs/7.5 mL, respectively. Patients with unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.5 <I>v</I> 7.9 months; <I>P</I> = .0002) and overall survival (OS; 9.4 <I>v</I> 18.5 months; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Differences persisted at 1 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 20 weeks after therapy. Conversion of baseline unfavorable CTCs to favorable at 3 to 5 weeks was associated with significantly longer PFS and OS compared with patients with unfavorable CTCs at both time points (PFS, 6.2 <I>v</I> 1.6 months; <I>P</I> = .02; OS, 11.0 <I>v</I> 3.7 months; <I>P</I> = .0002). Among nonprogressing patients, favorable compared with unfavorable CTCs within 1 month of imaging was associated with longer survival (18.8 <I>v</I> 7.1 months; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Baseline and follow-up CTC levels remained strong predictors of PFS and OS after adjustment for clinically significant factors.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The number of CTCs before and during treatment is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. CTCs provide prognostic information in addition to that of imaging studies.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cohen, Punt, Iannotti, Saidman, Sabbath, Gabrail, Picus, Morse, Mitchell, Miller, Doyle, Tissing, Terstappen, Meropol]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8923</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Relationship of Circulating Tumor Cells to Tumor Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Prediagnostic Plasma Folate and the Risk of Death in Patients With Colorectal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Although previous studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between folate intake and colorectal cancer risk, a recent trial suggests that supplemental folic acid may accelerate tumorigenesis among patients with a history of colorectal adenoma. Therefore, high priority has been given to research investigating the influence of folate on cancer progression in patients with colorectal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>To investigate whether prediagnostic levels of plasma folate are associated with colorectal cancer&ndash;specific and overall mortality, we performed a prospective, nested observational study within two large US cohorts: the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. We measured folate levels among 301 participants who developed colorectal cancer 2 or more years after their plasma was collected and compared participants using Cox proportional hazards models by quintile of plasma folate.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Higher levels of plasma folate were not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer&ndash;specific or overall mortality. Compared with participants in the lowest quintile of plasma folate, those in the highest quintile experienced a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for colorectal cancer&ndash;specific mortality of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.20 0.88) and overall mortality of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.24 0.88). When the analysis was limited to participants whose plasma was collected within 5 years of cancer diagnosis, no detrimental effect of high plasma folate was noted. In subgroup analyses, no subgroup demonstrated worse survival among participants with higher plasma folate levels.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>In two large prospective cohorts, higher prediagnostic levels of plasma folate were not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer&ndash;specific or overall mortality.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolpin, Wei, Ng, Meyerhardt, Chan, Selhub, Giovannucci, Fuchs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1943</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Prediagnostic Plasma Folate and the Risk of Death in Patients With Colorectal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3228</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3229?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Induction Therapy for Poor-Prognosis Anal Canal Carcinoma: A Phase II Study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9281)]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3229?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Although most patients with anal canal cancer are cured with sphincter-preserving, nonsurgical, combined-modality therapy, those with large tumors and lymph node involvement have a poor prognosis. To establish the safety and efficacy of induction chemotherapy with infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus cisplatin followed by FU plus mitomycin C with concurrent radiation in patients with poor-prognosis squamous cell cancers of the anal canal.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>Patients with previously untreated anal canal cancers with T3 or T4 tumors and/or extensive nodal involvement (bulky N2 or N3) received two 28-day cycles of induction treatment with infusional FU plus cisplatin followed by two 28-day cycles of FU plus mitomycin C with concurrent split-course radiation. A third cycle of FU and cisplatin with radiation boost was given to patients with persistent primary site disease or bulky N2 or N3 disease at presentation.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Forty-five assessable patients received protocol therapy. Treatment was generally well tolerated, and gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common. Induction chemotherapy resulted in eight complete and 21 partial responses. After induction, combined-modality, and boost therapy, 37 (82%) of 45 assessable high-risk patients achieved a complete response. After 4 years of follow-up, 68% of patients are alive, 61% are disease-free, and 50% are colostomy- and disease-free.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>A combined-modality approach that includes induction treatment with FU and cisplatin followed by combined-modality therapy with FU, mitomycin C, and concurrent radiation results in long-term disease control in the majority of patients with poor-prognosis anal canal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meropol, Niedzwiecki, Shank, Colacchio, Ellerton, Valone, Budinger, Day, Hopkins, Tepper, Goldberg, Mayer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.2339</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Induction Therapy for Poor-Prognosis Anal Canal Carcinoma: A Phase II Study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9281)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3235?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Melanoma] Phenotypic and Functional Analysis of Dendritic Cells and Clinical Outcome in Patients With High-Risk Melanoma Treated With Adjuvant Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3235?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can induce differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs) in preclinical models. We hypothesized that GM-CSF&ndash;stimulated DC differentiation may result in clinical benefit in patients with high-risk melanoma.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>We conducted a prospective trial in patients with high-risk (stage III B/C, IV), resected melanoma, with GM-CSF 125 &micro;g/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d administered for 14 days every 28 days. Patients underwent clinical restaging every four cycles, with DC analysis performed at baseline and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Of 42 patients enrolled, 39 were assessable for clinical outcome and DC analysis. Median overall survival was 65 months (95% CI, 43 to 67 months) and recurrence-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3 to 11 months). GM-CSF treatment caused an increase in mature DCs, first identified after 2 weeks of treatment, normalizing by 4 weeks. Patients with decreased DCs at baseline had significant increases in DC number and function compared with those with "normal" parameters at baseline. No change was observed in the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Early recurrence (&lt; 90 days) correlated with a decreased effect of GM-CSF on host DCs, compared with late or no (evidence of) recurrence.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>GM-CSF treatment was associated with a transient increase in mature DCs, but not MDSCs. Greater increase of DCs was associated with remission or delayed recurrence. The prolonged overall survival observed warrants further exploration.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daud, Mirza, Lenox, Andrews, Urbas, Gao, Lee, Sondak, Riker, DeConti, Gabrilovich]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Melanoma, Immunology/Immunobiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Melanoma] Phenotypic and Functional Analysis of Dendritic Cells and Clinical Outcome in Patients With High-Risk Melanoma Treated With Adjuvant Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Statistical/Economic Analysis] Current and Future Utilization of Services From Medical Oncologists]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>There is limited information on the current use of oncologists and projections of future need. This analysis assesses current utilization patterns and projects the number of people with cancer and their use of oncologists&rsquo; services through 2020.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries and Medicare physician claims were used to estimate oncologists&rsquo; services from 1998 to 2003. We estimated the portion of patients with cancer who saw an oncologist, the mean number of visits, and the clinical setting where care was provided. Care was divided into initial, continuing, and last-year-of-life phases. Projections for future number of patients with cancer and visits were calculated by applying incidence and prevalence rates derived from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to census population projections through 2020.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The percentage of patients who saw an oncologist was 47% during the initial-care phase, 36% during the continuing-care phase, and 70% in the last year of life. The number of visits varied by age, sex, cancer site, and phase. The total number of cancer patients in the United States is projected to increase 55%, from 11.8 million in 2005 to 18.2 million in 2020. Total oncology visits are projected to increase from 38 million in 2005 to 57 million in 2020.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Utilization of oncologists&rsquo; services will increase appreciably between 2005 and 2020; this will be driven predominantly by an increase in survivors of cancer and by the aging of the population. The United States may face an acute shortage of medical oncologists if efforts are not taken to meet this growing need.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren, Mariotto, Meekins, Topor, Brown]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Incidence trends]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6357</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Statistical/Economic Analysis] Current and Future Utilization of Services From Medical Oncologists]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Statistical/Economic Analysis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review Article] Accuracy and Surgical Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Staging: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Detection of Multifocal and Multicentric Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>We review the evidence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging the affected breast to determine its accuracy and impact on treatment.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI in detection of multifocal (MF) and/or multicentric (MC) cancer not identified on conventional imaging. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves, positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive (TP) to false positive (FP) ratio, and examined their variability according to quality criteria. Pooled estimates of the proportion of women whose surgery was altered were calculated.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Data from 19 studies showed MRI detects additional disease in 16% of women with breast cancer (N = 2,610). MRI incremental accuracy differed according to the reference standard (RS; <I>P</I> = .016) decreasing from 99% to 86% as the quality of the RS increased. Summary PPV was 66% (95% CI, 52% to 77%) and TP:FP ratio was 1.91 (95% CI, 1.09 to 3.34). Conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to mastectomy was 8.1% (95% CI, 5.9 to 11.3), from WLE to more extensive surgery was 11.3% in MF/MC disease (95% CI, 6.8 to 18.3). Due to MRI-detected lesions (in women who did not have additional malignancy on histology) conversion from WLE to mastectomy was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3 to 3.6) and from WLE to more extensive surgery was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.5).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>MRI staging causes more extensive breast surgery in an important proportion of women by identifying additional cancer, however there is a need to reduce FP MRI detection. Randomized trials are needed to determine the clinical value of detecting additional disease which changes surgical treatment in women with apparently localized breast cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Houssami, Ciatto, Macaskill, Lord, Warren, Dixon, Irwig]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review Article] Accuracy and Surgical Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Staging: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Detection of Multifocal and Multicentric Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3258</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Biology of Neoplasia] Sporadic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Clinical Relevance of BRCA1 Inhibition in the DNA Damage and Repair Pathway]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<P>Among the most promising pathways for molecular targets in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer (SEOC) are those involving the BRCA1 protein. Because somatic mutations in <I>BRCA1</I> are rare in SEOC, it was originally postulated that BRCA1 plays a limited role in the pathogenesis of this disease. However, inactivation of BRCA1 through various mechanisms is a relatively frequent event in ovarian cancer. This is important because BRCA1 is involved in the cellular response to DNA damage and repair and has an essential role in the maintenance of genomic stability. The BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein is known to interact with genes and proteins known collectively as the BRCA1 pathway, and defects in this pathway are believed to be a driving force for cancer progression. As a result, there is compelling evidence to suggest that the dysfunction of BRCA1 may be a central mechanism in all ovarian carcinogenesis, and this has clinical and molecular significance beyond the management of patients with hereditary ovarian cancer. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence for BRCA1 dysfunction in SEOC and to link this dysfunction to a defective DNA repair pathway and ultimately the promotion of genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Furthermore, we advocate the continued need to study BRCA1 and its pathway by prospectively correlating clinicopathologic data with molecular aberrations. This will determine whether BRCA1 has relevance as a predictive and prognostic marker in SEOC and whether aberrations in the BRCA1 pathway warrant further study as potential therapeutic targets.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weberpals, Clark-Knowles, Vanderhyden]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Translational Oncology, Tumor Suppressors, Gynecologic, Cancer Biomarkers, Gene Expression and Profiling]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3902</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Biology of Neoplasia] Sporadic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Clinical Relevance of BRCA1 Inhibition in the DNA Damage and Repair Pathway]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3267</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Biology of Neoplasia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[History of Oncology] Evarts A. Graham and the First Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horn, Johnson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.8260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[History of Oncology] Evarts A. Graham and the First Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>History of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3276?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Art of Oncology] In Defense of Futile Gestures]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3276?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bloom]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Leukemia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1266</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Art of Oncology] In Defense of Futile Gestures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Recurrent Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Presenting As a Sacral Nerve Root Mass]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kesari, Drappatz, Akar, Vergilio, Wen, Soiffer, Stone, DeAngelo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6729</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Recurrent Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Presenting As a Sacral Nerve Root Mass]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Diagnosing Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis With Negative CSF Cytology in Advanced Prostate Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernstein, Kemp, Kim, Johnson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Causality, Risk factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4533</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Diagnosing Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis With Negative CSF Cytology in Advanced Prostate Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Transmission of Glioblastoma Multiforme After Bilateral Lung Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Shah, Girgis, Grossman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Risk factors, Brain Tumors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3543</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Transmission of Glioblastoma Multiforme After Bilateral Lung Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3286?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Dose-Dense and/or Metronomic Schedules of Specific Chemotherapies Consolidate the Chemosensitivity of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Step Toward Reversing Triple-Negative Paradox]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3286?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehta]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Dose-Dense and/or Metronomic Schedules of Specific Chemotherapies Consolidate the Chemosensitivity of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Step Toward Reversing Triple-Negative Paradox]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liedtke, Pusztai]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Late Cardiac Effects of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coccaro, Gallucci]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Late Cardiac Effects of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ganz, Moinpour, Unger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3289</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Polymorphisms in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, Ailawadhi, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Wilding]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3880</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Polymorphisms in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heist, Christiani]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Method to Test Whether Late Extended Letrozole, Rather Than Self- Selection, Improves the Outcome in Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Completed 5 Years of Tamoxifen]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaidya]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2809</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Method to Test Whether Late Extended Letrozole, Rather Than Self- Selection, Improves the Outcome in Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Completed 5 Years of Tamoxifen]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goss]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Skin-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy of the Breast]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vordermark]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3690</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Skin-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy of the Breast]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pignol, Rakovitch, Olivotto]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4177</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Just Say Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Giorgi, De Padova, Carla, Accettura, Lorusso]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4979</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Just Say Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3294</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Errata</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Errata</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>