<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology recent issues</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3297?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3324?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3346?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3358?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3372?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3403?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3418?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3426?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3460?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3463?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3463-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3464?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3465-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3468-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3472-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3112?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3128?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3229?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3235?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3286?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3288-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3289-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3291-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3292-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3295-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2927?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2930?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2932?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2934?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2937?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2940?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2943?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2952?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2959?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2966?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2979?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2984?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2992?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/2999?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3015?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3025?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3038?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3046?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3051?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3057?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3063?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3073?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3083?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3085?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3087?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3089?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3092?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3093?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3094?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3095?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3096?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3097?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3098?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3100-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3104?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3110?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3110-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/18/3110-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2795?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2813?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2821?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2828?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2839?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2846?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2871?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2876?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2911?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2916?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/17/2925?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3297?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Malignant Germ Cell Tumors]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3297?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Germ Cell Tumors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5324</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Malignant Germ Cell Tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3298</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Host-Related Factors in Breast Cancer: An Underappreciated Piece of the Puzzle?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodwin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4526</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Host-Related Factors in Breast Cancer: An Underappreciated Piece of the Puzzle?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3300</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Dual-Agent Molecular Targeting of the ErbB2 Receptor: Killing One Bird With Two Stones]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hirte, Hotte]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3972</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Dual-Agent Molecular Targeting of the ErbB2 Receptor: Killing One Bird With Two Stones]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Breast Cancer in Young Women: A New Color or a Different Shade of Pink?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peppercorn, Partridge]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Gene Expression and Profiling]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5621</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Breast Cancer in Young Women: A New Color or a Different Shade of Pink?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Lung Cancer Staging Techniques and Induction Therapy: Maybe Timing Is Everything]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pass]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Lung Cancer Staging Techniques and Induction Therapy: Maybe Timing Is Everything]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Imatinib Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Go Now?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cortes]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Biological Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9870</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Imatinib Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Go Now?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3309</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Risk Factors for the Incidence of Breast Cancer: Do They Affect Survival From the Disease?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Risk factors that influence the incidence of breast cancer may also affect survival after diagnosis.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>Data from 4,560 women with invasive breast cancer who had taken part in the population-based Studies of Epidemiology and Risk Factors in Cancer Heredity (SEARCH) breast cancer study were used to investigate the influence on survival of variables related to pregnancy, menarche and menopause, prior use of exogenous hormones, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, and alcohol intake.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>In univariate analyses, there was no association between prognosis and age at menarche and menopause, menopausal status at diagnosis, smoking history, or prior use of the oral contraceptive pill. Women whose most recent pregnancy was more than 30 years ago had a 35% reduced risk of dying (95% CI, 8% to 54%) compared with women who had a full-term pregnancy in the past 15 years, and the use of hormone replacement therapy for more than 4 years was associated with a similar risk reduction. BMI was associated with a 3% (95% CI, 1% to 4%) increase in mortality per unit increase. Improved prognosis was seen with increasing current alcohol consumption, with a 2% (95% CI, 1% to 3%) reduction in the risk of death per unit of alcohol consumed per week.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The apparent benefit of alcohol intake has not been described before, and our data need to be interpreted with some caution. However, our finding that an increase in BMI is associated with a poorer prognosis supports previously published data and suggests that advice on weight loss should be given to all obese patients with breast cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barnett, Shah, Redman, Easton, Ponder, Pharoah]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Prognostic Studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3168</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Risk Factors for the Incidence of Breast Cancer: Do They Affect Survival From the Disease?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Phase I Dose Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lapatinib in Combination With Trastuzumab in Patients With Advanced ErbB2-Positive Breast Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab has been observed to have a synergistic, antiproliferative effect against ErbB2-positive breast cancer cells in vitro. This phase I study assessed the safety, clinical feasibility, optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary clinical activity of this combination in patients with ErbB2-positive advanced breast cancer.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Cohorts of three patients with ErbB2-positive advanced breast cancer were treated with escalating doses of lapatinib (750 to 1,500 mg) administered once daily (continuous) in combination with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly) to determine the OTR. Once the OTR was determined, additional patients were enrolled to provide the PK profile of both agents alone and in combination.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>A total of 54 patients were treated: 27 in the dose-escalation group and 27 in the PK group. Overall, adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, with no drug-related grade 4 events. The most frequent drug-related grade 3 events included diarrhea (17%), fatigue (11%), and rash (6%). The OTR was 1,000 mg lapatinib with standard weekly trastuzumab. One patient had a complete response and seven patients had partial responses. The PK parameters (maximum concentration in plasma and area under the curve) of lapatinib and trastuzumab in combination were not significantly different than when either was administered alone.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The OTR of the lapatinib/trastuzumab combination was lapatinib 1,000 mg per day with standard weekly trastuzumab. At these doses, the regimen was well tolerated and clinically active in this heavily pretreated ErbB2-positive breast cancer population.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Storniolo, Pegram, Overmoyer, Silverman, Peacock, Jones, Loftiss, Arya, Koch, Paul, Pandite, Fleming, Lebowitz, Ho, Burris]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Phase I Dose Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lapatinib in Combination With Trastuzumab in Patients With Advanced ErbB2-Positive Breast Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3323</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3324?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Young Age at Diagnosis Correlates With Worse Prognosis and Defines a Subset of Breast Cancers With Shared Patterns of Gene Expression]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3324?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Breast cancer arising in young women is correlated with inferior survival and higher incidence of negative clinicopathologic features. The biology driving this aggressive disease has yet to be defined.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Clinically annotated, microarray data from 784 early-stage breast cancers were identified, and prospectively defined, age-specific cohorts (young: &le; 45 years, n = 200; older: &ge; 65 years, n = 211) were compared by prognosis, clinicopathologic variables, mRNA expression values, single-gene analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Using clinicopathologic variables, young women illustrated lower estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (immunohistochemistry [IHC], <I>P</I> = .027), larger tumors (<I>P</I> = .012), higher human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) overexpression (IHC, <I>P</I> = .075), lymph node positivity (<I>P</I> = .008), higher grade tumors (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), and trends toward inferior disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio = 1.32; <I>P</I> = .094). Using genomic expression analysis, tumors arising in young women had significantly lower ER mRNA (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), ER&beta; (<I>P</I> = .02), and progesterone receptor (PR) expression (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001), but higher HER-2 (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Exploratory analysis (GSEA) revealed 367 biologically relevant gene sets significantly distinguishing breast tumors arising in young women. Combining clinicopathologic and genomic variables among tumors arising in young women demonstrated that younger age and lower ER&beta; and higher EGFR mRNA expression were significant predictors of inferior DFS.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>This large-scale genomic analysis illustrates that breast cancer arising in young women is a unique biologic entity driven by unifying oncogenic signaling pathways, is characterized by less hormone sensitivity and higher HER-2/EGFR expression, and warrants further study to offer this poor-prognosis group of women better preventative and therapeutic options.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anders, Hsu, Broadwater, Acharya, Foekens, Zhang, Wang, Marcom, Marks, Febbo, Nevins, Potti, Blackwell]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Breast Cancer, Gene Expression and Profiling]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2471</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Young Age at Diagnosis Correlates With Worse Prognosis and Defines a Subset of Breast Cancers With Shared Patterns of Gene Expression]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3330</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3324</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Effect of Esthetic Outcome After Breast-Conserving Surgery on Psychosocial Functioning and Quality of Life]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Although breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is often assumed to result in minimal deformity, many patients report postoperative breast asymmetry. Understanding the effect of asymmetry on psychosocial functioning is essential for patients to make an informed choice for surgery.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>All women who underwent BCS at the University of Michigan Medical Center (Ann Arbor, MI) during a 4-year period were surveyed using a mailed questionnaire (N = 714; response rate = 79.5%). Women were queried regarding five aspects of psychosocial functioning: quality of life (QOL), depression, fear of recurrence, stigmatization, and perceived change in health status. Postoperative breast asymmetry was assessed using items from the Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes Survey. Multiple regression was used to examine the relationship between breast asymmetry and each outcome, controlling for age, time from surgery in years, race, education level, disease stage, surgical treatment, and the occurrence of postoperative complications.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Women with pronounced breast asymmetry were significantly more likely to feel stigmatized as a result of their breast cancer treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 4.58; 95% CI, 2.77 to 7.55) and less likely to report unchanged or improved health after treatment (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). Minimal breast asymmetry was associated with higher QOL scores (86.3 <I>v</I> 82.4, <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Finally, women with pronounced breast asymmetry were more likely to exhibit depressive symptoms (minimal asymmetry, 16.2%; moderate asymmetry, 18.0%; pronounced asymmetry, 33.7%, Wald test = 16.6; <I>P</I> = .002).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Pronounced breast asymmetry after BCS is significantly correlated with poor psychosocial functioning. Identifying patients at risk for postoperative asymmetry at the time of consultation may allow for improved referral for supportive counseling, prosthetics, and reconstruction.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waljee, Hu, Ubel, Smith, Newman, Alderman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Quality of Life]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Effect of Esthetic Outcome After Breast-Conserving Surgery on Psychosocial Functioning and Quality of Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3337</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3338?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Novel Intraoperative Molecular Test for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3338?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>An accurate, intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) test could decrease delayed axillary dissections. Molecular tests may be more sensitive than current intraoperative tests but historically have not been rapid enough and have not been properly validated. We present the results from a large, prospective evaluation of the first rapid molecular SLN test, the Breast Lymph Node (BLN) Assay.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>A beta trial (n = 304) to determine the threshold levels of mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19 correlating with metastasis greater than 0.2 mm and a validation trial (n = 416) to validate the threshold cutoffs were conducted. Alternating portions from each SLN were processed for histology and the BLN Assay.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>BLN Assay performance against extensive permanent-section histology verified by central pathology review was similar to that expected of standard permanent-section histology: sensitivity, 87.6%; specificity, 94.2%; positive predictive value, 86.2%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 94.9%. In 319 patients with both frozen-section hematoxylin and eosin results and BLN Assay results, the BLN Assay had higher sensitivity (95.6%) and NPV (98.2%) than frozen section (sensitivity, 85.6%; NPV, 94.5%). The assay can be performed in approximately 36 to 46 minutes for one to three nodes.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The BLN Assay allows a rapid evaluation of 50% of each SLN. Comparison with permanent-section histology on adjacent node pieces evaluated by expert pathologists indicated that the BLN Assay was more sensitive than current intraoperative techniques while maintaining high specificity. These data indicate that the assay may be clinically useful for intraoperative or postoperative axillary lymph node dissection decisions.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian, Blumencranz, Deck, Whitworth, Berry, Berry, Rosenberg, Chagpar, Reintgen, Beitsch, Simmons, Saha, Mamounas, Giuliano]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0665</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Novel Intraoperative Molecular Test for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3345</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3338</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3346?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Endobronchial Ultrasound With Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Restaging the Mediastinum in Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3346?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound&ndash;guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for restaging the mediastinum after induction chemotherapy in patients with non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with tissue-proven stage IIIA-N2 disease who were treated with induction chemotherapy and who had undergone mediastinal restaging by EBUS-TBNA were reviewed. On the basis of computed tomography, 58 patients were classified as having stable disease and 66 were judged to have had a partial response. All patients subsequently underwent thoracotomy with attempted curative resection and a lymph node dissection regardless of EBUS-TBNA findings.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Persistent nodal metastases were detected by using EBUS-TBNA in 89 patients (72%). Of the 35 patients in whom no metastases were assessed by EBUS-TBNA, 28 were found to have residual stage IIIA-N2 disease at thoracotomy. The majority (91%) of these false negative results were due to nodal sampling error rather than detection error. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal restaging after induction chemotherapy were 76%, 100%, 100%, 20%, and 77%, respectively.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>EBUS-TBNA is a sensitive, specific, accurate, and minimally invasive test for mediastinal restaging of patients with NSCLC. However, because of the low negative predictive value, tumor-negative findings should be confirmed by surgical staging before thoracotomy.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herth, Annema, Eberhardt, Yasufuku, Ernst, Krasnik, Rintoul]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Endobronchial Ultrasound With Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Restaging the Mediastinum in Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3350</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3346</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Increased EGFR Gene Copy Number Detected by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Predicts Outcome in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab and Chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Epidermal growth factor receptor (<I>EGFR</I>) gene copy number detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has proven to be useful for selection of non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we evaluate <I>EGFR</I> FISH as a predictive marker in NSCLC patients receiving the EGFR monoclonal antibody inhibitor cetuximab plus chemotherapy.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Two hundred twenty-nine chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage NSCLC were enrolled onto a phase II selection trial evaluating sequential or concurrent chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin) with cetuximab.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P><I>EGFR</I> FISH was assessable in 76 patients with available tumor tissue and classified as positive (four or more gene copies per cell in &ge; 40% of the cells or gene amplification) in 59.2%. Response (complete response/partial response) was numerically higher in FISH-positive (45%) versus FISH-negative (26%) patients (<I>P</I> = .14), whereas disease control rate (complete response/partial response plus stable disease) was statistically superior (81% <I>v</I> 55%, respectively; <I>P</I> = .02). Patients with FISH-positive tumors had a median progression-free survival time of 6 months compared with 3 months for FISH-negative patients (<I>P</I> = .0008). Median survival time was 15 months for the FISH-positive group compared with 7 months for patients who were FISH negative. (<I>P</I> = .04). Furthermore, survival favored FISH-positive patients receiving concurrent therapy.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>These results are the first to suggest that <I>EGFR</I> FISH is a predictive factor for selection of NSCLC patients for cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hirsch, Herbst, Olsen, Chansky, Crowley, Kelly, Franklin, Bunn, Varella-Garcia, Gandara]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Translational Oncology, Combined Modality, Cancer Biomarkers, Lung, Thoracic]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Increased EGFR Gene Copy Number Detected by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Predicts Outcome in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab and Chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3358?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Incidence of Sustained Responses in an Intention-to-Treat Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3358?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Imatinib is remarkably effective in treating newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). To date, most of the available data come from a single multicenter study in which some of the patients were censored for diverse reasons. Here, we report our experience in treating patients at a single institution in a setting where all events were recorded.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>A total of 204 consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed CML in CP received imatinib from June 2000 until August 2006. Response (hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular), progression-free survival (PFS) and survival were evaluated.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>At 5 years, cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) were 82.7% and 50.1%, respectively. Estimated overall survival and PFS were 83.2% and 82.7%, respectively. By 5 years, 25% of patients had discontinued imatinib treatment because of an unsatisfactory response and/or toxicity. The 5-year probability of remaining in major cytogenetic response while still receiving imatinib was 62.7%. Patients achieving a CCyR at 1 year had a better PFS and overall survival than those failing to reach CCyR, but achieving a MMR conferred no further advantage. The identification of a kinase domain mutation was the only factor predicting for loss of CCyR.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Imatinib is highly effective in most patients with CML-CP; patients who respond are likely to live substantially longer than those treated with earlier therapies. Achieving CCyR correlated with PFS and overall survival, but achieving MMR had no further predictive value. However, approximately one third of patients still need better therapy.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Lavallade, Apperley, Khorashad, Milojkovic, Reid, Bua, Szydlo, Olavarria, Kaeda, Goldman, Marin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Incidence of Sustained Responses in an Intention-to-Treat Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3358</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Primary Cutaneous Small/Medium CD4+ T-Cell Lymphomas: A Heterogeneous Group of Tumors With Different Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To define the clinical and pathologic characteristics of primary cutaneous small/medium CD4<SUP>+</SUP> T-cell lymphoma (PCSM-TCL) and identify parameters of prognostic significance.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>We have investigated 24 patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas composed of small/medium mature T-cells with a &beta;F1, CD3, CD4<SUP>+</SUP> and/or noncytotoxic, CD8<SUP>&ndash;</SUP> and CD30<SUP>&ndash;</SUP> phenotype. The proliferation index and CD8<SUP>+</SUP> infiltrating cells were quantified with an automated image analysis system.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Sixteen patients presenting with solitary or localized plaques or small nodules (&lt; 3 cm) had an indolent course. Only three patients experienced repeated cutaneous relapses, and none of them died as a result of the disease after 1 to 168 months (median, 17 months) of follow-up. The tumors had a low proliferation (median Ki-67, 9% &plusmn; 5%) and an intense infiltrate of reactive CD8<SUP>+</SUP> (median, 20% &plusmn; 11.7%). Five patients presenting with rapidly evolving large tumors or nodules (&ge; 5 cm) had an aggressive disease and died with extracutaneous dissemination 18 to 36 months after diagnosis (median, 23 months). These tumors had a significantly higher proliferation (median Ki-67, 22% &plusmn; 11.3%; <I>P</I> &lt; .05) and lower number of infiltrating CD8<SUP>+</SUP> (median, 1% &plusmn; 3%; <I>P</I> &lt; .05) than the previous group. A third group of three patients had a peculiar clinical presentation with multifocal relapsing lesions without extracutaneous dissemination after a long period of follow-up ranging from 41 to 92 months. Histologically, these cases had an intense infiltrate of eosinophils.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>PCSM-TCL is a heterogeneous group of tumors with differentiated clinical and pathological characteristics with impact in the outcome of the patients.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Herrera, Colomo, Camos, Carreras, Balague, Martinez, Lopez-Guillermo, Estrach, Campo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Primary Cutaneous Small/Medium CD4+ T-Cell Lymphomas: A Heterogeneous Group of Tumors With Different Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3371</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3372?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Clinical Practice] Disclosure of Incurable Illness to Spouses: Do They Want to Know? A Swedish Population-Based Follow-Up Study]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3372?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Awareness of the cancer patient's terminal state decreases the risk of psychological morbidity of the bereaved. We wanted to determine whether male spouses of cancer patients who died from their disease had received information that the illness was incurable and to determine their preferences of disclosure.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Participants and Methods</ST> 
<P>The study included 907 widowers whose wives had died of cancer. In an anonymous questionnaire, we asked whether the widower had received information that his wife's illness was incurable and about his attitudes towards receiving this information.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Six hundred ninety-one widowers (76%) participated. Eighty percent of the widowers reported that they were never told that the wife's cancer was incurable, and 21% reported that they had been informed within 1 week before the patient's death. Although 14% of the widowers did not think the next of kin should be told immediately when the patient's cancer is beyond cure, 39% of the men did not want the patient to be immediately informed. Furthermore, 71% of the men who were never informed about the incurable illness believed that the next of kin should receive that information immediately.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Although a large majority of men prefer an immediate disclosure about the incurable stage of their wife's illness, 41% of the husbands received this information during the last week of the patient's life or not at all. These findings indicate that there is room for improvement in the level of communication between health providers and the husbands of women with incurable cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dahlstrand, Hauksdottir, Valdimarsdottir, Furst, Bergmark, Steineck]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of Life]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Clinical Practice] Disclosure of Incurable Illness to Spouses: Do They Want to Know? A Swedish Population-Based Follow-Up Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3372</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Clinical Trials] Analysis of Maryland Cancer Patient Participation in National Cancer Institute-Supported Cancer Treatment Clinical Trials]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>We examined the relationship of sociodemographic factors, urban/rural residence, and county-level socioeconomic factors on accrual of Maryland patients with cancer to National Cancer Institute (NCI) &ndash;sponsored cancer treatment clinical trials.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Data were analyzed for the period 1999 to 2002 for 2,240 Maryland patients with cancer accrued onto NCI-sponsored treatment trials. The extent to which Maryland patients with cancer and patients residing in lower socioeconomic and/or rural areas were accrued to cancer trials and were representative of all patients with cancer in Maryland was determined. Data were obtained from several sources, including NCI's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program for Maryland patients with cancer in Cooperative Group therapeutic trials, Maryland Cancer Registry data on cancer incidence, and United States Census and the Department of Agriculture.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>For Maryland patients with cancer accrued onto NCI-sponsored treatment trials between 1999 and 2002, subgroups accrued at a higher rate included pediatric and adolescent age groups, white patients, female patients (for sex-specific tumors), patients with private health insurance, and patients residing in the Maryland National Capitol region. Moreover, between 1999 and 2002, there was an estimated annual decline (8.9% per year; <I>P</I> &lt; .05) in the percentage of black patients accrued onto cancer treatment trials. Logistic regression models uncovered different patterns of accrual for female patients and male patients on county-level socioeconomic factors.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Results highlight disparities in the accrual of Maryland patients with cancer onto NCI-sponsored treatment trials based on patient age, race/ethnicity, geography of residence, and county-level socioeconomic factors. Findings provide the basis for development of innovative tailored and targeted educational efforts to improve trial accrual, particularly for the underserved.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baquet, Ellison, Mishra]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Clinical Trials] Analysis of Maryland Cancer Patient Participation in National Cancer Institute-Supported Cancer Treatment Clinical Trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3386</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Trials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Neurooncology] Functional Diffusion Map As an Early Imaging Biomarker for High-Grade Glioma: Correlation With Conventional Radiologic Response and Overall Survival]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Assessment of radiologic response (RR) for brain tumors utilizes the Macdonald criteria 8 to 10 weeks from the start of treatment. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a functional diffusion map (fDM) may provide an earlier measure to predict patient survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Sixty patients with high-grade glioma were enrolled onto a study of intratreatment MRI at 1, 3, and 10 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate imaging parameters as a function of patient survival at 1 year. Both log-rank and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to assess overall survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Greater increases in diffusion in response to therapy over time were observed in those patients alive at 1 year compared with those who died as a result of disease. The volume of tumor with increased diffusion by fDM at 3 weeks was the strongest predictor of patient survival at 1 year, with larger fDM predicting longer median survival (52.6 <I>v</I> 10.9 months; log-rank, <I>P</I> &lt; .003; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.9). Radiologic response at 10 weeks had similar prognostic value (median survival, 31.6 <I>v</I> 10.9 months; log-rank <I>P</I> &lt; .0007; HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.2). Radiologic response and fDM differed in 25% of cases. A composite index of response including fDM and RR provided a robust predictor of patient survival and may identify patients in whom RR does not correlate with clinical outcome.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Compared with conventional neuroimaging, fDM provided an earlier assessment of equal predictive value, and the combination of fDM and RR provided a more accurate prediction of patient survival than either metric alone.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamstra, Galban, Meyer, Johnson, Sundgren, Tsien, Lawrence, Junck, Ross, Rehemtulla, Ross, Chenevert]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, CT & MRI, Cancer Biomarkers, Neuro]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2363</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Neurooncology] Functional Diffusion Map As an Early Imaging Biomarker for High-Grade Glioma: Correlation With Conventional Radiologic Response and Overall Survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Neurooncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Epidemiology] Obesity and Risk of Cancer in Postmenopausal Korean Women]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To evaluate an association between obesity, measured by body mass index (BMI; kg/m<SUP>2</SUP>), and risk of cancer at individual and all sites in postmenopausal women.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>A cohort of 170,481 postmenopausal Korean women who were age 40 to 64 years at baseline measurement of BMI was observed prospectively from 1994 to 2003 for cancer incidence. Multivariable adjusted proportional hazard models were used for evaluating the association.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Women with a BMI of 30 kg/m<SUP>2</SUP> or higher had a 23% higher risk of cancer than women with a BMI between 21.0 and 22.9 kg/m<SUP>2</SUP> (hazard ratio = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.41). According to the increase in BMI level, significant positive trends existed in cancers of colon, breast, corpus uteri, and kidney with hazard ratios of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.08), 1.07 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.10), 1.13 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.20), and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.15), respectively, for the increase of BMI by 1 kg/m<SUP>2</SUP>. When the analysis was limited to never-smokers, women with a BMI of 25 kg/m<SUP>2</SUP> or higher showed a significantly increased risk of cancers of the colon, breast, corpus uteri, and kidney and leukemia compared with the normal BMI (18.5 to 22.9 kg/m<SUP>2</SUP>) group.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Although variations exist between the individual cancer sites, obesity was associated with an overall increased risk of cancer in postmenopausal Korean women. To reduce the risk of cancer, active strategies to prevent obesity should be implemented in postmenopausal women.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Song, Sung, Ha]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Behavioral and Lifestyle Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7867</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Epidemiology] Obesity and Risk of Cancer in Postmenopausal Korean Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3402</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3403?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Activity of Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3403?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited efficacy in metastatic neuroendocrine tumor patients. Neuroendocrine tumors express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR). Sunitinib malate, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has activity against VEGFRs as well as platelet-derived growth factor receptors, stem-cell factor receptor, glial cell line&ndash;derived neurotrophic factor, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3. We evaluated the efficacy of sunitinib in a two-cohort, phase II study of advanced carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Patients were treated with repeated 6-week cycles of oral sunitinib (50 mg/d for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment). Patients were observed for response, survival, and adverse events. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Among 109 enrolled patients, 107 received sunitinib (carcinoid, n = 41; pancreatic endocrine tumor, n = 66). Overall objective response rate (ORR) in pancreatic endocrine tumor patients was 16.7% (11 of 66 patients), and 68% (45 of 66 patients) had stable disease (SD). Among carcinoid patients, ORR was 2.4% (one of 41 patients), and 83% (34 of 41 patients) had SD. Median time to tumor progression was 7.7 months in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients and 10.2 months in carcinoid patients. One-year survival rate was 81.1% in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients and 83.4% in carcinoid patients. No significant differences from baseline in patient-reported quality of life or fatigue were observed during treatment.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Sunitinib has antitumor activity in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; its activity against carcinoid tumors could not be definitively determined in this nonrandomized study. Randomized trials of sunitinib in patients with neuroendocrine tumors are warranted.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kulke, Lenz, Meropol, Posey, Ryan, Picus, Bergsland, Stuart, Tye, Huang, Li, Baum, Fuchs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Tumor Suppressors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Activity of Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3410</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3403</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Severe Sequence-Specific Toxicity When Capecitabine Is Given After Fluorouracil and Leucovorin]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Options for single-agent fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy after bowel cancer resection include intravenous fluorouracil with leucovorin (FU/LV) or oral capecitabine. These treatments have similar efficacy but differ in convenience and toxicity. We therefore wished to compare their overall acceptability to patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Patients scheduled for adjuvant single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly FU/LV (425 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> FU, 45 mg LV) for 6 weeks, followed by two 3-week cycles of capecitabine (1,250 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> twice daily, days 1 through 14), or the same treatments but in reverse order. After 12 weeks, the patients were asked which treatment they preferred, and received the preferred treatment for an additional 12 weeks. The primary end point was patient preference.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>After 40 of the planned 74 patients had been randomly assigned, real-time adverse event monitoring led to early trial closure because of excess sequence-specific toxicity. Eleven of 14 patients (79%) receiving capecitabine as their second treatment experienced grade &ge; 3 toxicity. This compared with five of 18 patients (28%) receiving capecitabine as the first treatment, and no patients receiving FU/LV as the first treatment (zero of 16) or the second treatment (zero of 12). Similar imbalances were seen in the proportion of patients requiring interruption of treatment.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>In chemotherapy-na&iuml;ve patients, capecitabine produced more toxicity than FU/LV, but at levels in line with previously reported data. However, treatment with capecitabine after FU/LV caused markedly increased toxicity, indicating a sequence-specific interaction. The mechanism has not been determined, but interaction with intracellularly retained folate after FU/LV therapy is a possibility. Oncologists need to be aware of this risk if considering crossing patients over from FU/LV to capecitabine-based regimens.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hennig, Naik, Brown, Szubert, Anthoney, Jackson, Melcher, Crawford, Bradley, Brown, Seymour]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9426</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Severe Sequence-Specific Toxicity When Capecitabine Is Given After Fluorouracil and Leucovorin]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3417</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3418?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gynecologic Cancer] Phase II Evaluation of Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3418?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>This phase II trial assessed the activity and tolerability of an oral dose of imatinib mesylate 400 mg twice daily in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. The association between the expression of certain markers and clinical outcome was investigated.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Primary measure of clinical efficacy was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Mutational analysis of <I>KIT</I>, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for markers (KIT, platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF] receptor [-R], AKT2, phosphorylated AKT [p-AKT], stem cell factor [SCF], and PDGF) were performed.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Fifty-six eligible patients were evaluated. Nine patients were progression free for at least 6 months including one complete responder. The median PFS and survival were 2 and 16 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia, GI, dermatologic effects, pain, and electrolyte disturbances. At least one target of imatinib (KIT, PDGFR-, or PDGFR-&beta;) was expressed in all tumors, and most tumors expressed all three receptors. Higher expression of p-AKT and PDGFR-&beta; were associated with shorter PFS, and higher IHC scores (% immunopositive cells <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> staining intensity) of SCF and p-AKT were associated with decreased overall survival. No sequence mutations were detected in the <I>KIT</I> gene. Higher pretreatment plasma concentrations of PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were individually associated with shorter PFS and survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Imatinib mesylate was well tolerated but had minimal single-agent activity in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. No marker was identified that would predict activity of imatinib; however, tumor p-AKT and plasma VEGF levels were associated with poor outcome.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schilder, Sill, Lee, Shaw, Senterman, Klein-Szanto, Miner, Vanderhyden]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.3420</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gynecologic Cancer] Phase II Evaluation of Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3425</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3418</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3426?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Immunotherapy] Results of the First Phase I Clinical Trial of the Novel Ii-Key Hybrid Preventive HER-2/neu Peptide (AE37) Vaccine]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3426?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>HER-2/<I>neu</I> is overexpressed in breast cancer and is the source of immunogenic peptides. CD4<SUP>+</SUP> T-helper peptides for HER-2/<I>neu</I> are being evaluated in vaccine trials. The addition of Ii-Key, a four&ndash;amino-acid LRMK modification, increases vaccine potency when compared with unmodified class II epitopes. We present the results of the first human phase I trial of the Ii-Key hybrid HER-2/<I>neu</I> peptide (AE37) vaccine in disease-free, node-negative breast cancer patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>The dose escalation trial included five dose groups, to determine safety and optimal dose of the hybrid peptide (100 &micro;g, 500 &micro;g, 1,000 &micro;g) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; range, 0 to 250 &micro;g). In the event of significant local toxicity, GM-CSF (or peptide in absence of GM-CSF) was reduced by 50%. Immunologic response was monitored by delayed-type hypersensitivity and [<SUP>3</SUP>H]thymidine proliferative assays for both the hybrid AE37 (LRMK-positive HER-2/<I>neu</I>:776-790) and AE36 (unmodified HER-2/<I>neu</I>:776-790).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>All 15 patients completed the trial with no grade 3 to 5 toxicities. Dose reductions occurred in 47% of patients. In the second group (peptide, 500 &micro;g; GM-CSF, 250 &micro;g), all patients required dose reductions, prompting peptide-only inoculations in the third group. The vaccine induced dose-dependent immunologic responses in vitro and in vivo to AE37, as well as AE36.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The hybrid AE37 vaccine seems safe and well tolerated with minimal toxicity if properly dosed. AE37 is capable of eliciting HER-2/<I>neu</I>&ndash;specific immune responses, even without the use of an adjuvant. This trial represents the first human experience with the Ii-Key modification, and to our knowledge, AE37 is the first peptide vaccine to show potency in the absence of an immunoadjuvant.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmes, Benavides, Gates, Carmichael, Hueman, Mittendorf, Murray, Amin, Craig, von Hofe, Ponniah, Peoples]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology, Immunotherapy JCO articles, Breast Cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7842</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Immunotherapy] Results of the First Phase I Clinical Trial of the Novel Ii-Key Hybrid Preventive HER-2/neu Peptide (AE37) Vaccine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3433</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Immunotherapy</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3434?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Prevention] Prevalence of Adenomas and Hyperplastic Polyps in Mismatch Repair Mutation Carriers Among CAPP2 Participants: Report by the Colorectal Adenoma/Carcinoma Prevention Programme 2]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3434?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To determine the prevalence of adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps in a large cohort of individuals with a germline mutation in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene, the major genetic determinant of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). These prevalences have been estimated previously in smaller studies, and the results have been found to be variable.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Colorectal Adenoma/Carcinoma Prevention Programme 2 trial is a chemoprevention trial in people classified as having HNPCC. The 695 patients with a proven germline MMR mutation and documented screening history before the chemoprevention study were the focus of this study. The number, histology, size, and location of polyps found at the participants' first ever colonoscopy were analyzed in a cross-sectional study.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Seventy-four patients (10.6%) were found to have at least one adenoma at first colonoscopy, whereas 37 (5.3%) had at least one hyperplastic polyp. The frequency of an adenoma at first colonoscopy increased from 5.0% (95% CI, 2.8% to 8.3%) in patients younger than 35 years old to 18.9% (95% CI, 9.4% to 32.0%) in patients age at least 55 years (<I>P</I> = .0001 for trend). No such trend was observed for hyperplastic polyps. No sex differences were found for either type of polyp. A marginal association was found between the co-occurrence of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Adenomas tended to be more proximally distributed through the colon, whereas hyperplastic polyps tended to be located in the distal colon.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Adenoma prevalence increases with age among MMR mutation carriers, whereas hyperplastic polyp prevalence is consistent. No sex differences were observed for either type of lesion.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liljegren, Barker, Elliott, Bertario, Bisgaard, Eccles, Evans, Macrae, Maher, Lindblom, Rotstein, Nilsson, Mecklin, Moslein, Jass, Fodde, Mathers, Burn, Bishop]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemoprevention studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.2795</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Prevention] Prevalence of Adenomas and Hyperplastic Polyps in Mismatch Repair Mutation Carriers Among CAPP2 Participants: Report by the Colorectal Adenoma/Carcinoma Prevention Programme 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3439</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3434</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Prevention</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3440?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Radiation Oncology] Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy on Local Control in Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3440?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>One of the concerns about intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is that its tight dose distribution, an advantage in reducing RT morbidity to surrounding normal structures, might compromise tumor coverage. The purpose of this study is to determine if such concern is warranted in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>Between 02/02 and 05/05, 41 adult patients with primary STS of the extremity were treated with limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant IMRT. The margins were positive/within 1 mm in 21. Tumor size was more than 10 cm in 68% of patients and grade was high in 83%. Preoperative IMRT was given to 7 patients (50 Gy) and postoperative IMRT (median dose, 63 Gy) was given to 34 patients. Complete gross resection including periosteal stripping/bone resection was required in 11, and neurolysis/nerve resection in 24.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>With a median follow-up time of 35 months, two (4.8%) of 41 patients developed local recurrence. The 5-year actuarial local control rate was 94% (95% CI, 86% to 100%). The local control rate was also 94% for patients with negative or positive/close margin. Other prognostic factors such as age, size, and grade did not impact local control either. The 5-year distant control rate was 61% (95% CI, 45% to 76%) and the overall survival rate was 64% (95% CI, 45% to 84%).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>IMRT in STS of the extremity provides excellent local control in a group of patients with high risk features. This suggests that the precision with which IMRT dose is distributed has a beneficiary effect in sparing normal tissue and improving local control.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alektiar, Brennan, Healey, Singer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiation Oncology, Radiation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6249</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Radiation Oncology] Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy on Local Control in Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3444</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3440</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Radiation Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review Article] Next Generation of Immunotherapy for Melanoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Immunotherapy has a long history with striking but limited success in patients with melanoma. To date, interleukin-2 and interferon-alfa2b are the only approved immunotherapeutic agents for melanoma in the United States.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Design</ST> 
<P>Tumor evasion of host immune responses, and strategies for overcoming tumor-induced immunosuppression are reviewed. Several novel immunotherapies currently in worldwide phase III clinical testing for melanoma are discussed.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The limitations of immunotherapy for melanoma stem from tumor-induced mechanisms of immune evasion that render the host tolerant of tumor antigens. For example, melanoma inhibits the maturation of antigen-presenting cells, preventing full T-cell activation and downregulating the effector antitumor immune response. New immunotherapies targeting critical regulatory elements of the immune system may overcome tolerance and promote a more effective antitumor immune response. These include monoclonal antibodies that block the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonists. Blockade of CTLA4 prevents inhibitory signals that downregulate T-cell activation. TLR9 agonists stimulate dendritic cell maturation and ultimately induce a more effective immune response. These approaches have been shown to stimulate acute immune activation with concomitant appearance of transient adverse events mediated by the immune system. The pattern and duration of immune responses associated with these new modalities differ from those associated with cytokines and cytotoxic agents. In addition, vaccines are being developed that may ultimately target melanoma either alone or in combination with these immunomodulatory therapies.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The successes of cytokine and interferon therapy of melanoma, coupled with an array of new approaches, are generating new enthusiasm for the immunotherapy of melanoma.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirkwood, Tarhini, Panelli, Moschos, Zarour, Butterfield, Gogas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review Article] Next Generation of Immunotherapy for Melanoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3455</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Lung Carcinoma Associated With Excessive Eosinophilia]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El-Osta, El-Haddad, Nabbout]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Paraneoplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8899</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Lung Carcinoma Associated With Excessive Eosinophilia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3457</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Sirolimus in Metatastic Renal Cell Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brugarolas, Lotan, Watumull, Kabbani]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Sirolimus in Metatastic Renal Cell Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3460</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3460?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Trichomegaly of the Eyelashes After Lung Cancer Treatment with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Erlotinib]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3460?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braiteh, Kurzrock, Johnson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Diagnosis & Staging, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9391</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Trichomegaly of the Eyelashes After Lung Cancer Treatment with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Erlotinib]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3462</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3460</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3463?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Folate in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Chemoprevention: Purposely Left Out?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3463?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bossi, Locati, Licitra, Tagliabue]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Folate in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Chemoprevention: Purposely Left Out?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3463</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3463</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3463-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3463-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khuri, Shin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3464</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3463</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3464?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Opioid-Induced Pain]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3464?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prommer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3633</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Opioid-Induced Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3465</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, Angst]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4185</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3465</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3465-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Is There Really No Value?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3465-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peters, van den Bosch, Peeters, Mali, Borel Rinkes]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3765</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Is There Really No Value?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3466</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solin, Orel, Schnall, Hwang, Harris]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4946</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3467</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Polymorphisms: Genomic Predictors of Clinical Response to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Females]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pare, Salazar, del Rio, Baiget, Altes, Marcuello, Paez, Barnadas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.6479</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Polymorphisms: Genomic Predictors of Clinical Response to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Females]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3468</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3468-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3468-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Lurje, Lenz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3469</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3469?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Efficacy of Sunitinib and Sorafenib in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From Expanded Access Studies]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3469?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strumberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7410</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Efficacy of Sunitinib and Sorafenib in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From Expanded Access Studies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3471</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3469</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3471?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3471?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choueiri, Bukowski, Escudier]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.8475</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3471</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3471</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3472?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3472?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.4747</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3472</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Errata</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3472-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/20/3472-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.4754</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Errata] ERRATUM]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>20</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3472</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Errata</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3112?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Lessons From a Time Capsule: Evolution, Not Revolution, in Therapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3112?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Lessons From a Time Capsule: Evolution, Not Revolution, in Therapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Individualized Treatment Selection in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Do Molecular Markers Meet the Challenge?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, Pfister]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Individualized Treatment Selection in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Do Molecular Markers Meet the Challenge?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Redefining the Role of Induction Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adelstein]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2256</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Redefining the Role of Induction Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Getting a Grip on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hershman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Getting a Grip on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in the Elderly: Old Drugs and New Opportunities]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carver, Schuster, Glick]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in the Elderly: Old Drugs and New Opportunities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Comments and Controversies] Mentoring Junior Faculty in Geriatric Oncology: Report From the Cancer and Aging Research Group]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hurria, Balducci, Naeim, Gross, Mohile, Klepin, Tew, Downey, Gajra, Owusu, Sanati, Suh, Figlin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9771</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Comments and Controversies] Mentoring Junior Faculty in Geriatric Oncology: Report From the Cancer and Aging Research Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3128?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3128?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To prospectively identify markers of response to therapy and outcome in an organ-sparing trial for advanced oropharyngeal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Pretreatment biopsies were examined for expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p16, Bcl-xL, and p53 as well as for <I>p53</I> mutation. These markers were assessed for association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), response to therapy, and survival. Patient variables included smoking history, sex, age, primary site, tumor stage, and nodal status.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>EGFR expression was inversely associated with response to induction chemotherapy (IC) (<I>P</I> = .01), chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CRT; <I>P</I> = .055), overall survival (OS; <I>P</I> = .001), and disease-specific survival (DSS; <I>P</I> = .002) and was directly associated with current smoking (<I>P</I> = .04), female sex (<I>P</I> = .053), and lower HPV titer (<I>P</I> = .03). HPV titer was significantly associated with p16 expression (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001); p16 was significantly associated with response to IC (<I>P</I> = .008), CRT (<I>P</I> = .009), OS (<I>P</I> = .001), and DSS (<I>P</I> = .003). As combined markers, lower HPV titer and high EGFR expression were associated with worse OS (<SUB>EGFR</SUB> = 0.008; <SUB>HPV</SUB> = 0.03) and DSS (<SUB>EGFR</SUB> = 0.01; <SUB>HPV</SUB> = 0.016). In 36 of 42 biopsies, p53 was wild-type, and only one HPV-positive tumor had mutant <I>p53</I>. The combination of low p53 and high Bcl-xL expression was associated with poor OS (<I>P</I> = .005) and DSS (<I>P</I> = .002).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Low EGFR and high p16 (or higher HPV titer) expression are markers of good response to organ-sparing therapy and outcome, whereas high EGFR expression, combined low p53/high Bcl-xL expression, female sex, and smoking are associated with a poor outcome. Smoking cessation and strategies to target EGFR and Bcl-xL are important adjuncts to the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, Cordell, Lee, Worden, Prince, Tran, Wolf, Urba, Chepeha, Teknos, Eisbruch, Tsien, Taylor, D'Silva, Yang, Kurnit, Bauer, Bradford, Carey]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Translational Oncology, H&N, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7662</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] Chemoselection As a Strategy for Organ Preservation in Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: Response and Survival Positively Associated With HPV16 Copy Number]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To test induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or surgery/radiotherapy (RT) for advanced oropharyngeal cancer and to assess the effect of human papilloma virus (HPV) on response and outcome.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Sixty-six patients (51 male; 15 female) with stage III to IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCCOP) were treated with one cycle of cisplatin (100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>) or carboplatin (AUC 6) and with fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d for 5 days) to select candidates for CRT. Those achieving a greater than 50% response at the primary tumor received CRT (70 Gy; 35 fractions with concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> or carboplatin (AUC 6) every 21 days for three cycles). Adjuvant paclitaxel was given to patients who were complete histologic responders. Patients with a response of 50% or less underwent definitive surgery and postoperative radiation. Pretreatment biopsies from 42 patients were tested for high-risk HPV.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Fifty-four of 66 patients (81%) had a greater than 50% response after IC. Of these, 53 (98%) received CRT, and 49 (92%) obtained complete histologic response with a 73.4% (47 of 64) rate of organ preservation. The 4-year overall survival (OS) was 70.4%, and the disease-specific survival (DSS) was 75.8% (median follow-up, 64.1 months). HPV16, found in 27 of 42 (64.3%) biopsies, was associated with younger age (median, 55 <I>v</I> 63 years; <I>P</I> = .016), sex (22 of 30 males [73.3%] and five of 12 females [41.7%]; <I>P</I> = .08), and nonsmoking status (<I>P</I> = .037). HPV titer was significantly associated with IC response (<I>P</I> = .001), CRT response (<I>P</I> = .005), OS (<I>P</I> = .007), and DSS (<I>P</I> = .008).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Although the numbers in this study are small, IC followed by CRT is an effective treatment for SCCOP, especially in patients with HPV-positive tumors; however, for patients who do not respond to treatment, alternative treatments must be developed.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Worden, Kumar, Lee, Wolf, Cordell, Taylor, Urba, Eisbruch, Teknos, Chepeha, Prince, Tsien, D'Silva, Yang, Kurnit, Mason, Miller, Wallace, Bradford, Carey]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Translational Oncology, H&N, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7597</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] Chemoselection As a Strategy for Organ Preservation in Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: Response and Survival Positively Associated With HPV16 Copy Number]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3146</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prospective Study to Assess Short-Term Intra-Articular and Tenosynovial Changes in the Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia Syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Arthralgia is an adverse class effect of aromatase inhibitors (AIs). To date, its exact mechanism remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in clinical rheumatologic features and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hands and wrists in AI and tamoxifen users.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>This is a prospective single-center study including 17 consecutive postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer receiving either tamoxifen (n = 5) or an AI (n = 12). At baseline and after 6 months, patients filled in a rheumatologic history questionnaire and a rheumatologic examination including a grip strength test was done. At the same time points, MRI of both hands and wrists was performed. The primary end point was tenosynovial changes from baseline on MRI. Secondary end points were changes from baseline for morning stiffness, grip strength, and intra-articular fluid on MRI. Wilcoxon signed ranks was used to test changes from baseline and the Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the association between rheumatologic and MRI changes from baseline.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>At 6 months, patients on AI had a decrease in grip strength (<I>P</I> = .0049) and an increase in tenosynovial changes (<I>P</I> = .0010). The decrease in grip strength correlated well with the tenosynovial changes on MRI (<I>P</I> = .0074). Only minor changes were seen in patients on tamoxifen. AI users reported worsening of morning stiffness and showed an increase in intra-articular fluid on MRI.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The functional impairment of hands in the AI-associated arthralgia syndrome is characterized by tenosynovial changes on MRI correlating with a significant decrease in hand grip strength.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morales, Pans, Verschueren, Van Calster, Paridaens, Westhovens, Timmerman, De Smet, Vergote, Christiaens, Neven]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prospective Study to Assess Short-Term Intra-Articular and Tenosynovial Changes in the Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia Syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prognostic Significance of Nottingham Histologic Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The three strongest prognostic determinants in operable breast cancer used in routine clinical practice are lymph node (LN) stage, primary tumor size, and histologic grade. However, grade is not included in the recent revision of the TNM staging system of breast cancer as its value is questioned in certain settings.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Materials and Methods</ST> 
<P>This study is based on a large and well-characterized consecutive series of operable breast cancer (2,219 cases), treated according to standard protocols in a single institution, with a long-term follow-up (median, 111 months) to assess the prognostic value of routine assessment of histologic grade using Nottingham histologic grading system.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Histologic grade is strongly associated with both breast cancer&ndash;specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the whole series as well as in different subgroups based on tumor size (pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, and pT2) and LN stages (pN0 and pN1 and pN2). Differences in survival were also noted between different individual grades (1, 2, and 3). Multivariate analyses showed that histologic grade is an independent predictor of both BCSS and DFS in operable breast cancer as a whole as well as in all studied subgroups.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Histologic grade, as assessed by the Nottingham grading system, provides a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated in breast cancer staging systems.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakha, El-Sayed, Lee, Elston, Grainge, Hodi, Blamey, Ellis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5986</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Prognostic Significance of Nottingham Histologic Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3159?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Treatment-Related Complications] Doxorubicin, Cardiac Risk Factors, and Cardiac Toxicity in Elderly Patients With Diffuse B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3159?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Anthracycline-based chemotherapy, which improves survival for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is often withheld from elderly patients because of its cardiotoxicity. We studied the cardiac effects of doxorubicin in a population-based sample of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Among patients age &ge; 65 years diagnosed with DLBCL from 1991 to 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results&ndash;Medicare database, we developed logistic regression models of the associations of doxorubicin with demographic, clinical, and cardiac variables. We then developed Cox proportional hazards models of the association between doxorubicin and subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF), taking predictors of CHF into account.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Of 9,438 patients with DLBCL, 3,164 (42%) received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Any doxorubicin use was associated with a 29% increase in risk of CHF (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.62); CHF risk increased with number of doxorubicin claims, increasing age, prior heart disease, comorbidities, diabetes, and hypertension; hypertension intensified the effect of doxorubicin on risk of CHF (hazard ratio = 1.8; <I>P</I> &lt; .01). In the 8 years after diagnosis, the adjusted CHF-free survival rate was 74% in doxorubicin-treated patients versus 79% in patients not treated with doxorubicin.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Among patients receiving chemotherapy for DLBCL, those with prior heart disease were less likely than others to be treated with doxorubicin, and those who received doxorubicin were more likely than others to develop CHF. Various cardiac risk factors increased CHF risk, but only hypertension was synergistic with doxorubicin. Doxorubicin has dramatically improved survival of DLBCL patients; nonetheless, some subgroups may benefit from efforts to reduce doxorubicin-related CHF risk.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hershman, McBride, Eisenberger, Tsai, Grann, Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Outcomes Research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1242</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Treatment-Related Complications] Doxorubicin, Cardiac Risk Factors, and Cardiac Toxicity in Elderly Patients With Diffuse B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Bone Marrow Transplantation] Rituximab Improves the Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autograft for High-Risk Follicular and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi Survey]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R&ndash;) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R&ndash; and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>A total of 355 R&ndash; (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R&ndash; and 2.8% for R+ (<I>P</I> = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R&ndash; groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R&ndash; were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarella, Zanni, Magni, Benedetti, Patti, Barbui, Pileri, Boccadoro, Ciceri, Gallamini, Cortelazzo, Majolino, Mirto, Corradini, Passera, Pizzolo, Gianni, Rambaldi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lymphoma, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Bone Marrow Transplantation] Rituximab Improves the Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autograft for High-Risk Follicular and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi Survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Bone Marrow Transplantation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gynecologic Cancer] Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The management of recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Single-agent topotecan is an established treatment option, and preliminary evidence suggests improved tumor control by combining topotecan with etoposide or gemcitabine.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Women with relapsed ovarian cancer after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to topotecan monotherapy 1.25 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d, topotecan 1.0 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> plus oral etoposide 50 mg/d, or topotecan 0.5 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/d plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on day 1 and 600 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> on day 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive disease according to a recurrence-free interval of less or more than 12 months, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rates, toxicity, and quality of life (as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 30-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The trial enrolled 502 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years (&plusmn; 10.2 years), 208 of whom were platinum resistant. Median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 21.9 months) with topotecan, 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 20.0 months) with topotecan plus etoposide (log-rank <I>P</I> = .7647), and 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.9 months) with topotecan plus gemcitabine (log-rank <I>P</I> = .2344). Platinum-sensitive patients lived significantly longer than platinum-refractory patients (21.9 <I>v</I> 10.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.0, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Objective response rates were 27.8%, 36.1%, and 31.6%, respectively. Patients under combined treatment were at higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Nonplatinum topotecan combinations do not provide a survival advantage over topotecan alone in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sehouli, Stengel, Oskay-Oezcelik, Zeimet, Sommer, Klare, Stauch, Paulenz, Camara, Keil, Lichtenegger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gynecologic Cancer] Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Identical Outcome After Autologous or Allogeneic Genoidentical Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in First Remission of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia Carrying Inversion 16 or t(8;21): A Retrospective Study From the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Patients with acute myelocytic leukemia carrying inversion 16 (inv16) or t(8;21) have a better initial response to high-dose cytarabine than patients without these chromosomal abnormalities. They presently do not undergo transplantation in first remission (CR1), but there is concern about late relapses.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>From 1990 to 2004, 325 adult patients received transplantations in CR1 (159 patients with inv16 and 166 patients with t(8;21), including 35 and 60 patients, respectively, with additional chromosomal abnormalities). Genoidentical allografts were performed in 64 patients with inv16 and 81 patients with t(8;21), and autografts were performed in 95 patients with inv16 and 85 patients with t(8;21).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>In patients with inv16, after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, the 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 59% and 66% (<I>P</I> = .5), the relapse incidence (RI) rates were 27% and 32% (<I>P</I> = .45), and the transplantation-related mortality (TRM) rates were 14% and 2% (<I>P</I> = .003), respectively. Female patients had a lower RI and a higher LFS. Additional chromosomal abnormalities, compared with no additional abnormalities, were associated with lower RI rate (12% <I>v</I> 34%, respectively; <I>P</I> = .01) and higher 5-year LFS rate (78% <I>v</I> 59%, respectively; <I>P</I> = .04). In patients with t(8;21), after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, the 5-year LFS rates were 60% and 66% (<I>P</I> = .69), the RI rates were 15% and 28% (<I>P</I> = .03), and the TRM rates were 24% and 6% (<I>P</I> = .003), respectively. Younger age and a lower WBC count at diagnosis were associated with a lower TRM and a better LFS. The TRM was lower and the RI was higher in patients with autologous transplantations versus allogeneic transplantations.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Both autologous and allogeneic transplantation resulted in similar outcomes.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorin, Labopin, Frassoni, Milpied, Attal, Blaise, Meloni, Iori, Michallet, Willemze, Deconninck, Harousseau, Polge, Rocha]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Leukemia, Combined Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Identical Outcome After Autologous or Allogeneic Genoidentical Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in First Remission of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia Carrying Inversion 16 or t(8;21): A Retrospective Study From the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Retrospective Analysis of Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Rituximab-Containing Chemotherapy As Reported by the IVL Study Group in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab-containing chemotherapies for intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>We retrospectively analyzed 106 patients (59 men, 47 women) with IVLBCL who received chemotherapy either with rituximab (R-chemotherapy, n = 49) or without rituximab (chemotherapy, n = 57) between 1994 and 2007 in Japan. The median patient age was 67 years (range, 34 to 84 years). The International Prognostic Index was high-intermediate/high in 97% of patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The complete response rate was higher for patients in the R-chemotherapy group (82%) than for those in the chemotherapy group (51%; <I>P</I> = .001). The median duration of follow-up for surviving patients was 18 months (range, 1 to 95 months). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years after diagnosis were significantly higher for patients in the R-chemotherapy group (PFS, 56%; OS, 66%) than for patients in the chemotherapy group (PFS, 27% with <I>P</I> = .001; OS, 46% with <I>P</I> = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of rituximab was favorably associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.80; <I>P</I> = .006) and OS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.85; <I>P</I> = .016). Treatment-related death was observed in three patients (6%) who received R-chemotherapy and in five patients (9%) who received chemotherapy.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Our data suggest improved clinical outcomes for patients with IVLBCL in the rituximab era. Future prospective studies of rituximab-containing chemotherapies are warranted.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shimada, Matsue, Yamamoto, Murase, Ichikawa, Okamoto, Niitsu, Kosugi, Tsukamoto, Miwa, Asaoku, Kikuchi, Matsumoto, Saburi, Masaki, Yamaguchi, Nakamura, Naoe, Kinoshita]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4278</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Retrospective Analysis of Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Rituximab-Containing Chemotherapy As Reported by the IVL Study Group in Japan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>19</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hematologic Malignancies] Phase I, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Anti-Insulinlike Growth Factor Type 1 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody CP-751,871 in Patients With Multiple Myeloma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/19/3196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>A phase I first-in-human study was conducted to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the anti&ndash;insulinlike growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-IR) monoclonal antibody CP-751,871.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>After informed consent and screening, 47 patients with multiple myeloma in relapse or refractory phase were enrolled into 11 dose-escalation cohorts of CP-751,871 at doses from 0.025 to 20 mg/kg for 4 weeks. Patients with less than a partial response to CP-751,871 treatment were eligible to receive CP-751,871 in combination with oral dexamethasone at the discretion of the investigator. Treatment with CP-751,871 and rapamycin with or without dexamethasone was also offered to patients enrolled in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts with less than a partial response to initial therapy with single-agent CP-751,871.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<S