<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology Last Three Issues</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e181?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e191?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e192?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5305?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5337?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5397?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5404?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5410?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5418?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5425?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5431?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5476?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e177?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e180?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5116?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5144?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5160?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5182?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5240?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5262?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5298?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e150?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e152?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e158?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e160?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e164?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4929?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4930?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4932?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4935?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4937?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4939?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4948?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4955?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4961?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4966?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4980?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4986?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4994?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5001?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5008?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5015?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5023?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5039?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5049?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5062?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5068?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5075?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5080?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5094?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5109?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e181?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Synchronous Advanced Pure Seminoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case of Multiple Oncologic Dilemmas [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e181?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[White, DeHaan, Wilson, Zakem, Maatman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Therapy, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8551</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Synchronous Advanced Pure Seminoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case of Multiple Oncologic Dilemmas [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coexistence of Leishmaniasis and Hodgkin's Lymphoma in a Lymph Node [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Domingues, Menezes, Ostronoff, Calixto, Florencio, Sucupira, Souto-Maior, Ostronoff]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lymphoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7835</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coexistence of Leishmaniasis and Hodgkin's Lymphoma in a Lymph Node [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thalidomide Maintenance in Multiple Myeloma: Certainties and Controversies [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cavo, Pantani, Tacchetti, Pallotti, Brioli, Petrucci, Zamagni, Tosi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thalidomide Maintenance in Multiple Myeloma: Certainties and Controversies [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to M. Cavo [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer, Prince, Roberts]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0853</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to M. Cavo [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time to Treatment Does Not Influence Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Mantle-Cell Lymphoma [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eve, Furtado, Hamon, Rule]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9731</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time to Treatment Does Not Influence Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Mantle-Cell Lymphoma [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e190</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e191?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to H.E. Eve et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e191?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, Leonard]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0176</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to H.E. Eve et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e191</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e192?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Does the Medical Profession Mean By "Standard of Care?" [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/e192?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strauss, Thomas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6678</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Does the Medical Profession Mean By "Standard of Care?" [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Could Modification of Lifestyle Factors Prevent Second Primary Breast Cancers? [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ligibel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4517</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Could Modification of Lifestyle Factors Prevent Second Primary Breast Cancers? [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Dilemma of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harris, Morrow]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1489</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Dilemma of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5305?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is It Safe to Treat Endometrial Carcinoma Endoscopically? [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5305?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vergote, Amant, Neven]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9822</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is It Safe to Treat Endometrial Carcinoma Endoscopically? [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative Age Interactions in Breast Cancer Studies: Mind the Gap [COMMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, Jatoi, Sherman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Translational Oncology, Clinical Trials, Risk factors, Cancer Etiology, Breast Cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9450</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative Age Interactions in Breast Cancer Studies: Mind the Gap [COMMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COMMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relationship Between Potentially Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Risk of Second Primary Contralateral Breast Cancer Among Women Diagnosed With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>An outcome of considerable concern among breast cancer survivors is the development of second primary breast cancer. However, evidence regarding how potentially modifiable lifestyle factors modulate second breast cancer risk is limited. We evaluated the relationships between obesity, alcohol consumption, and smoking on risk of second primary invasive contralateral breast cancer among breast cancer survivors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Utilizing a population-based nested case-control study design, we enrolled 365 patients diagnosed with an estrogen receptor&ndash;positive (ER+) first primary invasive breast cancer and a second primary contralateral invasive breast cancer, and 726 matched controls diagnosed with only an ER+ first primary invasive breast cancer. Obesity, alcohol use, and smoking data were ascertained from medical record reviews and participant interviews. Using conditional logistic regression we evaluated associations between these three exposures and second primary contralateral breast cancer risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Obesity, consumption of &ge; 7 alcoholic beverages per week, and current smoking were all positively related to risk of contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.2; and OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0, respectively). Compared with women who consumed fewer than seven alcoholic beverages per week and were never or former smokers, women who consumed &ge; 7 drinks per week and were current smokers had a 7.2-fold (95% CI, 1.9 to 26.5) elevated risk of contralateral breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our population-based study adds to the limited available literature and suggests that obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption influence contralateral breast cancer risk, affording breast cancer survivors three means of potentially reducing this risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Daling, Porter, Tang, Malone]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Behavioral and Lifestyle Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1597</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relationship Between Potentially Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Risk of Second Primary Contralateral Breast Cancer Among Women Diagnosed With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Local Excision Alone Without Irradiation for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To determine the risk of ipsilateral breast events in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with local excision without irradiation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with either low- or intermediate-grade DCIS measuring 2.5 cm or smaller, or high-grade DCIS measuring 1 cm or smaller who had microscopic margin widths of 3 mm or wider and no residual calcifications on postoperative mammograms were eligible for a prospective trial conducted from 1997 to 2002 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Patients entered in 2000 and later could take tamoxifen if they wished. Median age at last surgery for the entire population was 60 years (range, 28 to 88 years), and median tumor sizes in the two strata were 6 mm and 5 mm, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>With a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the 5-year rate of ipsilateral breast events in the 565 eligible patients in the low/intermediate grade stratum was 6.1% (95% CI, 4.1% to 8.2%). With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, this incidence for the 105 eligible patients in the high-grade stratum was 15.3% (95% CI, 8.2% to 22.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Rigorously evaluated and selected patients with low- to intermediate-grade DCIS with margins 3 mm or wider had an acceptably low rate of ipsilateral breast events at 5 years after excision without irradiation. Patients with high-grade lesions had a much higher rate, suggesting that excision alone is inadequate treatment. Further follow-up is necessary to document long-term results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hughes, Wang, Page, Gray, Solin, Davidson, Lowen, Ingle, Recht, Wood]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:18 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Local Excision Alone Without Irradiation for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5324</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Results From a Population- Based Study [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>There is concern that minority women have limited access to breast reconstruction. We described patterns of use, experiences with clinicians, and patients' satisfaction with treatment decisions for women of different race/ethnicities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 3,252 patients with breast cancer from Los Angeles and Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were surveyed near the time of diagnosis (n = 2,260, response rate 72.2%). The primary outcomes were receipt of reconstruction, access to information about reconstruction, and decisional satisfaction. The primary independent variable was race/ethnicity (white, African American [AA], highly acculturated Latina [Latina-high], and less acculturated Latina [Latina-low]). Control variables included other sociodemographic and clinical factors. <sup>2</sup> and multivariate logistic regression were used for the analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Receipt of reconstruction varied significantly by patient race/ethnicity&mdash;40.9% of whites, 33.5% of AAs, 41.2% of Latina-high, and only 13.5% of Latina-low (<I>P</I> &lt; .001)&mdash;and persisted when we controlled for demographic and clinical factors. Minority women were significantly less likely than whites to see a plastic surgeon before initial surgery and were more likely to desire more information about reconstruction (17.0% of whites <I>v</I> 27.0% of AAs, 30.0% of Latina-high, and 55.9% of Latina-low; <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Decisional satisfaction was lowest among minority women without reconstruction (<I>P</I> &lt; .001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Minority women, particularly less acculturated Latinas, had low receipt of breast reconstruction, which may be related to limited information about the procedure and less access to plastic surgeons. Greater desire for information and lower satisfaction with surgical decisions among these patients motivate greater attention to treatment support for these patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alderman, Hawley, Janz, Mujahid, Morrow, Hamilton, Graff, Katz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2455</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Results From a Population- Based Study [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5330</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2 [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The objective was to compare laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with clinical stage I to IIA uterine cancer were randomly assigned to laparoscopy (n = 1,696) or open laparotomy (n = 920), including hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic cytology, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The main study end points were 6-week morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, recurrence-free survival, site of recurrence, and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Laparoscopy was initiated in 1,682 patients and completed without conversion in 1,248 patients (74.2%). Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy was secondary to poor visibility in 246 patients (14.6%), metastatic cancer in 69 patients (4.1%), bleeding in 49 patients (2.9%), and other cause in 70 patients (4.2%). Laparoscopy had fewer moderate to severe postoperative adverse events than laparotomy (14% <I>v</I> 21%, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 204 <I>v</I> 130 minutes, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Hospitalization of more than 2 days was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (52% <I>v</I> 94%, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Pelvic and para-aortic nodes were not removed in 8% of laparoscopy patients and 4% of laparotomy patients (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). No difference in overall detection of advanced stage (stage IIIA, IIIC, or IVB) was seen (17% of laparoscopy patients <I>v</I> 17% of laparotomy patients; <I>P</I> = .841).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Laparoscopic surgical staging for uterine cancer is feasible and safe in terms of short-term outcomes and results in fewer complications and shorter hospital stay. Follow-up of these patients will determine whether surgical technique impacts pattern of recurrence or disease-free survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, Piedmonte, Spirtos, Eisenkop, Schlaerth, Mannel, Spiegel, Barakat, Pearl, Sharma]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2 [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5336</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5337?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of Life of Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging Compared With Laparotomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5337?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The study's objective was to compare the quality of life (QoL) of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing surgical staging via laparoscopy versus laparotomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>The first 802 eligible patients (laparoscopy, n = 535; laparotomy, n = 267) participated in the QoL study in a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) randomized trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy (GOG 2222). Patients completed QoL assessments at baseline; at 1, 3, and 6 weeks; and at 6 months postsurgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In an intent-to-treat analysis, laparoscopy patients reported significantly higher Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy&ndash;General (FACT-G) scores (<I>P</I> = .001), better physical functioning (<I>P</I> = .006), better body image (BI; <I>P</I> &lt; .001), less pain (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) and its interference with QoL (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), and an earlier resumption of normal activities (<I>P</I> = .003) and return to work (<I>P</I> = .04) over the 6-week postsurgery period, as compared with laparotomy patients. However, the differences in BI and return to work between groups were modest, and the adjusted FACT-G scores did not meet the minimally important difference (MID) between the two surgical arms over 6 weeks. By 6 months, except for better BI in laparoscopy patients (<I>P</I> &lt; .001), the difference in QoL between the two surgical techniques was not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Although the FACT-G did not show a MID between the two surgical groups, and only modest differences in return to work and BI were found between the two groups, statistically significantly better QoL across many parameters in the laparoscopy arm at 6 weeks provides modest support for the QoL advantage of using laparoscopy to stage patients with early endometrial cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kornblith, Huang, Walker, Spirtos, Rotmensch, Cella]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3529</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of Life of Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging Compared With Laparotomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5342</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5337</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Iodine-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) Scan and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Evaluate Response After Iodine-131 MIBG Therapy for Relapsed Neuroblastoma [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Children with relapsed neuroblastoma have poor survival. It is crucial to have a reliable method for evaluating functional response to new therapies. In this study, we compared two functional imaging modalities for neuroblastoma: metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan for uptake by the norepinephrine transporter and [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) uptake for glucose metabolic activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients enrolled onto a phase I study of sequential infusion of iodine-131 (<sup>131</sup>I) MIBG (NANT-2000-01) were eligible for inclusion if they had concomitant FDG-PET and MIBG scans. <sup>131</sup>I-MIBG therapy was administered on days 0 and 14. For each patient, we compared all lesions identified on concomitant FDG-PET and MIBG scans and gave scans a semiquantitative score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall concordance of positive lesions on concomitant MIBG and FDG-PET scans was 39.6% when examining the 139 unique anatomic lesions. MIBG imaging was significantly more sensitive than FDG-PET overall and for the detection of bone lesions (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). There was a trend for increased sensitivity of FDG-PET for detection of soft tissue lesions. Both modalities showed similar improvement in number of lesions identified from day 0 to day 56 scan and in semiquantitative scores that correlated with overall response. FDG-PET scans became completely negative more often than MIBG scans after treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>MIBG scan is significantly more sensitive for individual lesion detection in relapsed neuroblastoma than FDG-PET, though FDG-PET can sometimes play a complementary role, particularly in soft tissue lesions. Complete response by FDG-PET metabolic evaluation did not always correlate with complete response by MIBG uptake.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taggart, Han, Quach, Groshen, Ye, Villablanca, Jackson, Mari Aparici, Carlson, Maris, Hawkins, Matthay]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neuroblastoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5732</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Iodine-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) Scan and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Evaluate Response After Iodine-131 MIBG Therapy for Relapsed Neuroblastoma [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Evaluation of Ifosfamide-Related Nephrotoxicity in Children [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Ifosfamide is widely used in pediatric oncology but its nephrotoxicity may become a significant issue in survivors. This study is aimed at evaluating the incidence of late renal toxicity of ifosfamide and its risk factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Of the 183 patients prospectively investigated for renal function, 77 treated for rhabdomyosarcoma, 39 for other soft tissue sarcoma, 39 for Ewing's sarcoma, and 28 for osteosarcoma were investigated at least 5 years after treatment. No patients had received cisplatin and/or carboplatin. Glomerular and tubular functions were graded according to the Skinner system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median dose of ifosfamide was 54 g/m<sup>2</sup> (range, 18 to 117 g/m<sup>2</sup>). After a median follow-up of 10 years, 89.5% of patients had normal tubular function, and 78.5% had normal glomerular function rate (GFR). Serum bicarbonate and calcium were normal in all patients. Hypomagnesemia was observed in 1.2% and hypophosphatemia in 1%. The tubular threshold for phosphate was reduced in 24% of the patients (grade 1 in 15%, grade 2 in 8%, and grade 3 in 0.5%). Glycosuria was detected in 37% of the patients but was more than 0.5 g/24 hours in only 5%. Proteinuria was observed in 12%. Ifosfamide dose and interval from therapy to investigations were predictors of tubulopathy in univariate and multivariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, an older age at diagnosis and the length of interval since treatment had independent impacts on the risk of abnormal GFR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Renal toxicity is moderate with a moderate dose of ifosfamide. However, since it can be permanent and can get worse with time, repeated long-term evaluations are important, and this risk should be balanced against efficacy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oberlin, Fawaz, Rey, Niaudet, Ridola, Orbach, Bergeron, Defachelles, Gentet, Schmitt, Rubie, Munzer, Plantaz, Deville, Minard, Corradini, Leverger, de Vathaire]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Long Term Survival & Late Effects, Osteosarcoma & Ewing Sarcomas:, Chemotherapy, Rhabdo & Other Soft Tissue Sarcomas:, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5257</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Evaluation of Ifosfamide-Related Nephrotoxicity in Children [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Longitudinal Cohort Study of Risk Factors in Cancer Patients of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The reported incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) ranges from 0.94% to 18.6%. This cohort study aimed to calculate the incidence of and identify the risk factors for ONJ in patients with cancer treated with intravenous zoledronate, ibandronate, and pamidronate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Data analyzed included age, sex, smoking status, underlying disease, medical and dental history, bisphosphonates (BP) type, and doses administered. Relative risks, crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs), and cumulative hazard ratios for ONJ development were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 1,621 patients who received 29,006 intravenous doses of BP, given monthly. Crude ONJ incidence was 8.5%, 3.1%, and 4.9% in patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, respectively. Patients with breast cancer demonstrated a reduced risk for ONJ development, which turned out to be nonsignificant after adjustment for other variables. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that use of dentures (aOR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.96), history of dental extraction (aOR = 32.97; 95% CI, 18.02 to 60.31), having ever received zoledronate (aOR = 28.09; 95% CI, 5.74 to 137.43), and each zoledronate dose (aOR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.56) were associated with increased risk for ONJ development. Smoking, periodontitis, and root canal treatment did not increase risk for ONJ in patients receiving BP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The conclusions of this study validated dental extractions and use of dentures as risk factors for ONJ development. Ibandronate and pamidronate at the dosages and frequency used in this study seem to exhibit a safer drug profile concerning ONJ complication; however, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these results. Before initiation of a bisphosphonate, patients should have a comprehensive dental examination. Patients with a challenging dental situation should have dental care attended to before initiation of these drugs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vahtsevanos, Kyrgidis, Verrou, Katodritou, Triaridis, Andreadis, Boukovinas, Koloutsos, Teleioudis, Kitikidou, Paraskevopoulos, Zervas, Antoniades]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Paraneoplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis & Staging, Incidence trends, Causality, Risk factors, Combined Modality, Combined Modality, Quality of Care, Cost of Cancer Care, Pain Control, Supportive Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9584</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal Cohort Study of Risk Factors in Cancer Patients of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw [Treatment-Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5362</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Treatment-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase III Trial of Casopitant, a Novel Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist, for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy [Supportive Care]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The purpose of this phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regimens containing casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the first cycle in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Predominantly female patients (98%) diagnosed with breast cancer (96%) who were chemotherapy-na&iuml;ve and scheduled to receive an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) &ndash;based regimen were enrolled onto this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 and oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3. Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm (placebo), a single oral dose casopitant arm (150 mg orally [PO] on day 1), a 3-day oral casopitant arm (150 mg PO on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3), or a 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm (90 mg IV on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting/retching or rescue medications) in the first 120 hours after the initiation of MEC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A significantly greater proportion of patients in the single-dose oral casopitant arm, 3-day oral casopitant arm, and 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm achieved complete response (73%, 73%, and 74%, respectively) versus control (59%; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The study did not demonstrate a reduced proportion of patients with nausea or significant nausea in those receiving casopitant. Adverse events were balanced among study arms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>All casopitant regimens studied were more effective than the control regimen. Casopitant was generally well tolerated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herrstedt, Apornwirat, Shaharyar, Aziz, Roila, Van Belle, Russo, Levin, Ranganathan, Guckert, Grunberg]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Emesis, Supportive Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase III Trial of Casopitant, a Novel Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist, for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy [Supportive Care]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5369</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Costs and Cost Effectiveness of a Health Care Provider-Directed Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized in the United States. Prior studies reporting the cost effectiveness of randomized interventions to improve CRC screening have not been replicated in the setting of small physician practices. We recently conducted a randomized trial evaluating an academic detailing intervention in 264 small practices in geographically diverse New York City communities. The objective of this secondary analysis is to assess the cost effectiveness of this intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 264 physician offices were randomly assigned to usual care or to a series of visits from trained physician educators. CRC screening rates were measured at baseline and 12 months. The intervention costs were measured and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was derived. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying cost and effectiveness estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Academic detailing was associated with a 7% increase in CRC screening with colonoscopy. The total intervention cost was $147,865, and the ICER was $21,124 per percentage point increase in CRC screening rate. Sensitivity analyses that varied the costs of the intervention and the average medical practice size were associated with ICERs ranging from $13,631 to $36,109 per percentage point increase in CRC screening rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A comprehensive, multicomponent academic detailing intervention conducted in small practices in metropolitan New York was clinically effective in improving CRC screening rates, but was not cost effective.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shankaran, Luu, Nonzee, Richey, McKoy, Graff Zivin, Ashford, Lantigua, Frucht, Scoppettone, Bennett, Sheinfeld Gorin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Cost Effectiveness, Cost of Cancer Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6458</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Costs and Cost Effectiveness of a Health Care Provider-Directed Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival Disparities in Patients With Lymphoma According to Place of Residence and Treatment Provider: A Population-Based Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Health disparities exist according to an individual's place of residence. We evaluated the association between primary area of residence (urban <I>v</I> rural) according to treatment provider (university based <I>v</I> community based) and overall survival in patients with lymphoma and determined whether there are patient groups that could benefit from better coordination of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Population-based, retrospective cohort study of 2,330 patients with centrally confirmed lymphoma from Nebraska and surrounding states and treated by university-based or community-based oncologists from 1982 to 2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among urban residents, 321 (14%) were treated by university-based providers (UUB) and 816 (35%) were treated by community-based providers (UCB). Among rural residents, 332 (14%) were treated by university-based providers (RUB), and 861 (37%) were treated by community-based providers (RCB). The relative risk (RR) of death among UUB, UCB, and RUB were not statistically different. However, RCB had a higher risk of death (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.65; <I>P</I> = .01; and RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.49; <I>P</I> = .01) when compared with UUB and RUB, respectively. This association was true in both low- and intermediate-risk patients. Among high-risk patients, UCB, RUB, and RCB were all at higher risk of death when compared with UUB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Survival outcomes of patients with lymphoma may be associated with place of residence and treatment provider. High-risk patients from rural areas may benefit from better coordination of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loberiza, Cannon, Weisenburger, Vose, Moehr, Bast, Bierman, Bociek, Armitage]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Quality of Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival Disparities in Patients With Lymphoma According to Place of Residence and Treatment Provider: A Population-Based Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5382</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost Effectiveness and Screening Interval of Lipid Screening in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) who received mediastinal irradiation have an increased risk of coronary heart disease. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of lipid screening in survivors of HL and compared different screening intervals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We developed a decision-analytic model to evaluate lipid screening in a hypothetical cohort of 30-year-old survivors of HL who survived 5 years after mediastinal irradiation. We compared the following strategies: no screening, and screening at 1-, 3-, 5-, or 7-year intervals. Screen-positive patients were treated with statins. Markov models were used to calculate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime costs. Baseline probabilities, transition probabilities, and utilities were derived from published studies and US population data. Costs were estimated from Medicare fee schedules and the medical literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved, lipid screening at every interval was cost effective relative to a strategy of no screening. When comparing screening intervals, a 3-year interval was cost effective relative to a 5-year interval, but annual screening, relative to screening every 3 years, had an ICER of more than $100,000/QALY saved. Factors with the most influence on the results included risk of cardiac events/death after HL, efficacy of statins in reducing cardiac events/death, and costs of statins.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Lipid screening in survivors of HL, with statin therapy for screen-positive patients, improves survival and is cost effective. A screening interval of 3 years seems reasonable in the long-term follow-up of survivors of HL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Punglia, Kuntz, Mauch, Ng]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiation, Cost Effectiveness, Outcomes Research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8460</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost Effectiveness and Screening Interval of Lipid Screening in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5389</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Comparison of the Stanford V Regimen and ABVD in the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients had stage IIB, III, or IV disease or had stages I to IIA disease with bulky disease or other adverse features. Radiotherapy was administered in both arms to sites of previous bulk (&gt; 5 cm) and to splenic deposits, although this was omitted in the latter part of the trial for patients achieving complete remission (CR) in the ABVD arm. A total of 520 patients were randomly assigned and were assessed for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival (PFS). Five hundred patients received protocol treatment, and radiotherapy was administered to 73% in the Stanford V arm and to 53% in the ABVD arm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall response rates after completion of all treatment were 91% for Stanford V and 92% for ABVD. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, there was no evidence of a difference in projected 5-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates (76% and 90%, respectively, for ABVD; 74% and 92%, respectively, for Stanford V). More pulmonary toxicity was reported for ABVD, whereas other toxicities were more frequent with Stanford V.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In a large, randomized trial, the efficacies of Stanford V and ABVD were comparable when given in combination with appropriate radiotherapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoskin, Lowry, Horwich, Jack, Mead, Hancock, Smith, Qian, Patrick, Popova, Pettitt, Cunningham, Pettengell, Sweetenham, Linch, Johnson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3239</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Comparison of the Stanford V Regimen and ABVD in the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5396</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5397?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Daunorubicin Versus Mitoxantrone Versus Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5397?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To compare the antitumor efficacy of three different anthracyclines in combination with cytarabine and etoposide in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We randomly assigned 2,157 patients (age range, 15 to 60 years) to receive intensive induction-consolidation chemotherapy containing either daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone. After achieving complete remission (CR), patients were assigned to undergo either allogeneic or autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT), depending on the availability of a sibling donor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall CR rate (69%) was similar in the three groups. Autologous SCT was performed in 37% of cases in the daunorubicin arm versus only 29% and 31% in mitoxantrone and idarubicin, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). However, the disease-free survival (DFS) and survival from CR were significantly shorter in the daunorubicin arm: the 5-year DFS was 29% versus 37% and 37% in mitoxantrone and idarubicin, respectively. The proportion of patients who underwent allogeneic SCT (22%) was equivalent in the three treatment groups, and the outcome was similar as well: the 5-year overall survival rates were 34%, 34%, and 31%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In adult patients with AML who do not receive an allogeneic SCT, the use of mitoxantrone or idarubicin instead of daunorubicin enhances the long-term efficacy of chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mandelli, Vignetti, Suciu, Stasi, Petti, Meloni, Muus, Marmont, Marie, Labar, Thomas, Di Raimondo, Willemze, Liso, Ferrara, Baila, Fazi, Zittoun, Amadori, de Witte]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Leukemia, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6490</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Daunorubicin Versus Mitoxantrone Versus Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10 [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5403</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5397</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5404?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lenalidomide Oral Monotherapy Produces Durable Responses in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5404?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Lenalidomide is a novel immunomodulatory agent with antiproliferative activities. Given its efficacy in a wide range of hematologic malignancies, we conducted a phase II trial (NHL-001) of single-agent lenalidomide in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL were eligible, with no limit on the number of previous therapies. Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1 to 21 of every 28-day cycle for up to 52 weeks as tolerated, or until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end points of duration of response (DR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty-three enrolled patients were assessable for response and safety. Patients received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1 to 17) and half were refractory to last therapy. ORR was 23% (10 of 43), including a 7% complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR rate. Twenty-seven percent (six of 22) of patients with follicular lymphoma grade 1 or 2, and 22% (four of 18) with small lymphocytic lymphoma responded to therapy. Median DR was not reached, but was longer than 16.5 months with seven of 10 responses ongoing at 15 to 28 months. Median PFS for the whole group was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10.4 months). Adverse events were predictable and manageable; the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30% and 16%, respectively) and thrombocytopenia (14% and 5%, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Oral lenalidomide monotherapy produces durable responses with manageable adverse events in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL, warranting further investigation of treatment for indolent NHL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Witzig, Wiernik, Moore, Reeder, Cole, Justice, Kaplan, Voralia, Pietronigro, Takeshita, Ervin-Haynes, Zeldis, Vose]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lenalidomide Oral Monotherapy Produces Durable Responses in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5409</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5404</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5410?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Multi-Institutional Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Romidepsin As Monotherapy for Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5410?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Romidepsin (depsipeptide or FK228) is a member of a new class of antineoplastic agents active in T-cell lymphoma, the histone deacetylase inhibitors. On the basis of observed responses in a phase I trial, a phase II trial of romidepsin in patients with T-cell lymphoma was initiated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>The initial cohort was limited to patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), or subtypes mycosis fungoides or S&eacute;zary syndrome, who had received no more than two prior cytotoxic regimens. There were no limits on other types of therapy. Subsequently, the protocol was expanded to enroll patients who had received more than two prior cytotoxic regimens.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-seven patients were enrolled onto the first cohort, and a total of 71 patients are included in this analysis. These patients had undergone a median of four prior treatments, and 62 patients (87%) had advanced-stage disease (stage IIB, n = 15; stage III, n= 6; or stage IV, n = 41). Toxicities included nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and transient thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated with the first administration of romidepsin. Complete responses were observed in four patients, and partial responses were observed in 20 patients for an overall response rate of 34% (95% CI, 23% to 46%). The median duration of response was 13.7 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin has single-agent clinical activity with significant and durable responses in patients with CTCL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piekarz, Frye, Turner, Wright, Allen, Kirschbaum, Zain, Prince, Leonard, Geskin, Reeder, Joske, Figg, Gardner, Steinberg, Jaffe, Stetler-Stevenson, Lade, Fojo, Bates]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Multi-Institutional Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Romidepsin As Monotherapy for Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5417</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5410</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5418?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Yields High Rates of Hematologic and Molecular Response in Patients With Advanced Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5418?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>We conducted a phase II study of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN--2a) in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Seventy-nine patients (40 with PV and 39 with ET) have been treated. Median time from diagnosis to PEG-IFN--2a was 54 months in patients with PV and 33 months in patients with ET. Eighty-one percent of patients had received prior therapy. The first three patients received PEG-IFN--2a at 450 &micro;g weekly. As a result of poor tolerance, this dose was decreased in a stepwise manner to a current starting dose of 90 &micro;g weekly. Seventy-seven patients are evaluable and have been observed for a median of 21 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall hematologic response rate was 80% in PV and 81% in ET (complete in 70% and 76% of patients, respectively). The <I>JAK2<sup>V617F</sup></I> mutation was detected in 18 patients with ET and 38 patients with PV; sequential measurements by a pyrosequencing assay were available in 16 patients with ET and 35 patients with PV. The molecular response rate was 38% in ET and 54% in PV, being complete (undetectable <I>JAK2<sup>V617F</sup></I>) in 6% and 14%, respectively. The <I>JAK2<sup>V617F</sup></I> mutant allele burden continued to decrease with no clear evidence for a plateau. The tolerability of PEG-IFN--2a at 90 &micro;g weekly was excellent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>PEG-IFN--2a resulted in remarkable clinical activity, high rates of molecular response, and acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced ET or PV. The ability of PEG-IFN--2a to induce complete molecular responses suggests selective targeting of the malignant clone.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quintas-Cardama, Kantarjian, Manshouri, Luthra, Estrov, Pierce, Richie, Borthakur, Konopleva, Cortes, Verstovsek]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Leukemia, Biological Therapy, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Yields High Rates of Hematologic and Molecular Response in Patients With Advanced Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5424</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5418</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5425?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Alemtuzumab in Combination With Pentostatin in Patients With T-Cell Neoplasms [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5425?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To examine the efficacy and safety of the combination of alemtuzumab and pentostatin in patients with T-cell neoplasms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We treated 24 patients with a variety of T-cell leukemias and lymphomas with a combination of alemtuzumab 30 mg intravenously (IV) three times weekly for up to 3 months and pentostatin 4 mg/m<sup>2</sup> IV weekly for 4 weeks followed by alternate weekly administration for up to 6 months. Prophylactic antibiotics including antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial agents were administered during the treatment and for 2 months after its completion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median age of patients was 57 years (range, 21 to 79 years). Eight patients were previously untreated, and 16 had a median of two prior therapies (range, one to six regimens). Thirteen patients responded to treatment (11 complete responses [CRs] and two partial responses), for an overall response rate of 54%. The median response duration was 19.5 months. Monoclonal T-cell receptor chain gene rearrangements were detected by polymerase chain reaction in bone marrow of 20 of 22 evaluable patients and became negative in five of seven evaluable patients in CR. Opportunistic infections caused by pathogens associated with severe T-cell dysfunction were common.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The combination of alemtuzumab and pentostatin is feasible and effective in T-cell neoplasms. Although infections, including cytomegalovirus reactivation, are a concern, they may be minimized with adequate prophylactic antibiotic therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravandi, Aribi, O'Brien, Faderl, Jones, Ferrajoli, Huang, York, Pierce, Wierda, Kontoyiannis, Verstovsek, Pro, Fayad, Keating, Kantarjian]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6688</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Alemtuzumab in Combination With Pentostatin in Patients With T-Cell Neoplasms [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5430</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5425</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5431?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multinational, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Prednisone and Either Satraplatin or Placebo in Patients With Castrate-Refractory Prostate Cancer Progressing After Prior Chemotherapy: The SPARC Trial [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5431?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the oral platinum analog satraplatin in patients with metastatic castrate-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) experiencing progression after one prior chemotherapy regimen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Nine hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral satraplatin (n = 635) 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 to 5 of a 35-day cycle and prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo (n = 315) and prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was time to pain progression (TPP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A 33% reduction (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.77; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) was observed in the risk of progression or death with satraplatin versus placebo. This effect was maintained irrespective of prior docetaxel treatment. No difference in OS was seen between the satraplatin and placebo arms (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; <I>P</I> = .80). Compared with placebo, satraplatin significantly reduced TPP (HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.79; <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Satraplatin was generally well tolerated, although myelosuppression and GI disorders occurred more frequently with satraplatin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Oral satraplatin delayed progression of disease and pain in patients with metastatic CRPC experiencing progression after initial chemotherapy but did not provide a significant OS benefit. Satraplatin was generally well tolerated. These results suggest activity for satraplatin in patients with CRPC who experience progression after initial chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sternberg, Petrylak, Sartor, Witjes, Demkow, Ferrero, Eymard, Falcon, Calabro, James, Bodrogi, Harper, Wirth, Berry, Petrone, McKearn, Noursalehi, George, Rozencweig]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1228</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multinational, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Prednisone and Either Satraplatin or Placebo in Patients With Castrate-Refractory Prostate Cancer Progressing After Prior Chemotherapy: The SPARC Trial [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5438</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5431</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels Are Associated With Breslow Thickness at Presentation and Survival From Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>A cohort study was carried out to test the hypothesis that higher vitamin D levels reduce the risk of relapse from melanoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A pilot retrospective study of 271 patients with melanoma suggested that vitamin D may protect against recurrence of melanoma. We tested these findings in a survival analysis in a cohort of 872 patients recruited to the Leeds Melanoma Cohort (median follow-up, 4.7 years).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the retrospective study, self-reports of taking vitamin D supplements were nonsignificantly correlated with a reduced risk of melanoma relapse (odds ratio = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.1; <I>P</I> = .09). Nonrelapsers had higher mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D<SUB>3</SUB> levels than relapsers (49 <I>v</I> 46 nmol/L; <I>P</I> = .3; not statistically significant). In the cohort (prospective) study, higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D<SUB>3</SUB> levels were associated with lower Breslow thickness at diagnosis (<I>P</I> = .002) and were independently protective of relapse and death: the hazard ratio for relapse-free survival (RFS) was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96; <I>P</I> = .01) for a 20 nmol/L increase in serum level. There was evidence of interaction between the vitamin D receptor (<I>VDR</I>) BsmI genotype and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D<SUB>3</SUB> levels on RFS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Results from the retrospective study were consistent with a role for vitamin D in melanoma outcome. The cohort study tests this hypothesis, providing evidence that higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D<SUB>3</SUB> levels, at diagnosis, are associated with both thinner tumors and better survival from melanoma, independent of Breslow thickness. Patients with melanoma, and those at high risk of melanoma, should seek to ensure vitamin D sufficiency. Additional studies are needed to establish optimal serum levels for patients with melanoma.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newton-Bishop, Beswick, Randerson-Moor, Chang, Affleck, Elliott, Chan, Leake, Karpavicius, Haynes, Kukalizch, Whitaker, Jackson, Gerry, Nolan, Bertram, Marsden, Elder, Barrett, Bishop]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels Are Associated With Breslow Thickness at Presentation and Survival From Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5444</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[National Assessment of Melanoma Care Using Formally Developed Quality Indicators [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>There is considerable variation in the quality of cancer care delivered in the United States. Assessing care by using quality indicators could help decrease this variability. The objectives of this study were to formally develop valid quality indicators for melanoma and to assess hospital-level adherence with these measures in the United States.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Quality indicators were identified from available literature, consensus guidelines, and melanoma experts. Thirteen experts ranked potential measures for validity on the basis of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology. Adherence with individual valid indicators and a composite measure of all indicators were assessed at 1,249 Commission on Cancer hospitals by using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB; 2004 through 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 55 proposed quality indicators, 26 measures (47%) were rated as valid. These indicators assessed structure (n = 1), process (n = 24), and outcome (n = 1). Of the 26 measures, 10 are readily assessable by using cancer registry data. Adherence with valid indicators ranged from 11.8% to 96.5% at the patient level and 3.7% to 83.0% at the hospital level. (Adherence required that &ge; 90% of patients at a hospital receive concordant care.) Most hospitals were adherent with 50% or fewer of the individual indicators (median composite score, five; interquartile range, four to seven). Adherence was higher for diagnosis and staging measures and was lower for treatment indicators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There is considerable variation in the quality of melanoma care in the United States. By using these formally developed quality indicators, hospitals can assess their adherence with current melanoma care guidelines through feedback mechanisms from the NCDB and can better direct quality improvement efforts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilimoria, Raval, Bentrem, Wayne, Balch, Ko]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Non-ASCO Guidelines, Diagnosis & Staging, Surgery, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9965</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[National Assessment of Melanoma Care Using Formally Developed Quality Indicators [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5451</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial of Weekly Elesclomol Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel Alone for Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Elesclomol is a novel, small-molecule, oxidative stress inducer believed to exert selective cytotoxicity by increasing intracellular concentrations of reactive oxygen species, which results in cell death via mitochondrial apoptosis. We evaluated whether the addition of elesclomol to weekly paclitaxel could improve efficacy in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We randomly assigned patients with metastatic melanoma, measurable disease, and one or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens to elesclomol 213 mg/m<sup>2</sup> plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (E + P) or to paclitaxel 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> alone at a 2:1 ratio; regimens were given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly, during 3 of every 4 weeks until disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or death occurred. Patients who experienced progression were unblended, and patients on paclitaxel alone were permitted to cross over to E + P. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were response rate (RR), toxicity, and overall survival (OS; analyzed post hoc).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At 21 US sites, 53 patients were randomly assigned to E + P, and 28 patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel. The addition of elesclomol to paclitaxel yielded a doubling of median PFS (112 <I>v</I> 56 days) and a 41.7% risk reduction for disease progression/death (hazard ratio, 0.583; <I>P</I> = .035). Respective RRs for the E + P and paclitaxel groups were 15% and 3%; median OS was 11.9 <I>v</I> 7.8 months. Of patients on paclitaxel alone, 19 (68%) of 28 crossed over to E + P after they experienced progression. Weekly E + P was well tolerated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>E + P resulted in a statistically significant doubling of median PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging OS. A multinational, phase III trial (SYMMETRY) of E + P compared with paclitaxel alone in metastatic melanoma has closed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Day, Gonzalez, Lawson, Weber, Hutchins, Anderson, Haddad, Kong, Williams, Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1579</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial of Weekly Elesclomol Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel Alone for Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5458</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Epigenetic processes are implicated in cancer causation and progression. The acetylation status of histones regulates access of transcription factors to DNA and influences levels of gene expression. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity diminishes acetylation of histones, causing compaction of the DNA/histone complex. This compaction blocks gene transcription and inhibits differentiation, providing a rationale for developing HDAC inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In this review, we explore the biology of the HDAC enzymes, summarize the pharmacologic properties of HDAC inhibitors, and examine results of selected clinical trials. We consider the potential of these inhibitors in combination therapy with targeted drugs and with cytotoxic chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>HDAC inhibitors promote growth arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis of tumor cells, with minimal effects on normal tissue. In addition to decompaction of the histone/DNA complex, HDAC inhibition also affects acetylation status and function of nonhistone proteins. HDAC inhibitors have demonstrated antitumor activity in clinical trials, and one drug of this class, vorinostat, is US Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Other inhibitors in advanced stages of clinical development, including depsipeptide and MGCD0103, differ from vorinostat in structure and isoenzyme specificity, and have shown activity against lymphoma, leukemia, and solid tumors. Promising preclinical activity in combination with cytotoxics, inhibitors of heat shock protein 90, and inhibitors of proteasome function have led to combination therapy trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>HDAC inhibitors are an important emerging therapy with single-agent activity against multiple cancers, and have significant potential in combination use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane, Chabner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1291</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5468</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5469?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society Chemotherapy Administration Safety Standards [ASCO SPECIAL ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5469?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Standardization of care can reduce the risk of errors, increase efficiency, and provide a framework for best practice. In 2008, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) invited a broad range of stakeholders to create a set of standards for the administration of chemotherapy to adult patients in the outpatient setting. At the close of a full-day structured workshop, 64 draft standards were proposed. After a formal process of electronic voting and conference calls, 29 draft standards were eliminated, resulting in a final list of 35 draft measures. The proposed set of standards was posted for 6 weeks of open public comment. Three hundred twenty-two comments were reviewed by the Steering Group and used as the basis for final editing to a final set of standards. The final list includes 31 standards encompassing seven domains, which include the following: review of clinical information and selection of a treatment regimen; treatment planning and informed consent; ordering of treatment; drug preparation; assessment of treatment compliance; administration and monitoring; and assessment of response and toxicity monitoring. Adherence to ASCO and ONS standards for safe chemotherapy administration should be a goal of all providers of adult cancer care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobson, Polovich, McNiff, LeFebvre, Cummings, Galioto, Bonelli, McCorkle]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1264</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society Chemotherapy Administration Safety Standards [ASCO SPECIAL ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5475</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5469</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ASCO SPECIAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5476?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving the Methodologic and Ethical Validity of Best Supportive Care Studies in Oncology: Lessons From a Systematic Review [SPECIAL ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/32/5476?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To systematically review the best supportive care (BSC) literature and to evaluate the ethical and methodologic validity issues by using widely acknowledged criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two search strings that included both cancer and supportive as terms (with random article type, or review or meta-analysis) explored databases from 1966 to 2008. Citations, abstracts, and papers were reviewed for inclusion criteria, and relevant data were extracted by two independent researchers. Data were validated for accuracy. Ethical and methodologic validity were evaluated by using the criteria derived from the Helsinki Requirements of the WMA; CONSORT statements for the evaluation of reports of randomized, controlled trials; and the universal requirements for ethical clinical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty-three published papers were identified that described 32 studies, 20 of which incorporated the design of treatment plus supportive care (SC) versus SC alone, and 12 of which incorporated the design of treatment versus SC. Most of the studies had poor compliance to critical Helsinki requirements, to methodologic precautions derived from the CONSORT statement for studies involving a nonpharmacologic arm, and to four of seven universal requirements for ethical clinical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Lack of rigor in BSC studies has contributed to a generation of research with widespread ethical and methodologic shortcomings. Ad hoc SC and lack of standardization of SC delivery may be sources of systematic bias or error in BSC trials. Rectifying these shortcomings in future studies demands greater vigilance toward these issues by researchers, institutional review boards, editors, and peer reviewers. Given the prevalence of overlooked problems that are later identified, currently open BSC studies should be reevaluated by institutional review boards and researchers to check for ethical and methodologic validity, and identified shortcomings should be addressed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cherny, Abernethy, Strasser, Sapir, Currow, Zafar]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Pain Control, Supportive Care, Ethics, Outcomes Research, Quality of Care, Pain Control, Supportive Care, Palliative Care, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving the Methodologic and Ethical Validity of Best Supportive Care Studies in Oncology: Lessons From a Systematic Review [SPECIAL ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>32</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5486</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5476</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Granuloma Annulare Heralding Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma in a Patient With a History of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated B-Cell Lymphoma [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, Wagner, Murphy, Pinkus, Wang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0409</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Granuloma Annulare Heralding Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma in a Patient With a History of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated B-Cell Lymphoma [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e171</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Internal Mammary Node Radiation: A Proposed Technique to Spare Cardiac Toxicity [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh, Buchholz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2787</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Internal Mammary Node Radiation: A Proposed Technique to Spare Cardiac Toxicity [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to J.L. Oh et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Harris, Bellon]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to J.L. Oh et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Classification of Philadelphia Translocation-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Its Impact on Data From Clinical Trials [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naresh]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Classification of Philadelphia Translocation-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Its Impact on Data From Clinical Trials [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e176</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e177?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to K.N. Naresh [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e177?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, Bareford, Erber, Wilkins, Wright, Buck, Wheatley, Harrison, Green]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7776</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to K.N. Naresh [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e178</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Locoregional Therapy Improves Survival for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients? Benefit Remains Questionable! [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, Lin, Lu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9962</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Locoregional Therapy Improves Survival for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients? Benefit Remains Questionable! [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e179</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e180?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to D.-Y. Chang et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/e180?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Scodan, Brain, Stevens]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0895</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to D.-Y. Chang et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e180</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Still the Treatment of Choice for Rectal Cancer? [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minsky]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9112</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Still the Treatment of Choice for Rectal Cancer? [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combined Hormone Therapy at Menopause and Breast Cancer: A Warning--Short-Term Use Increases Risk [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernstein]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9988</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combined Hormone Therapy at Menopause and Breast Cancer: A Warning--Short-Term Use Increases Risk [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the Impact of the Hormonal Milieu on Cognitive Functioning [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellon, Ganz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3329</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the Impact of the Hormonal Milieu on Cognitive Functioning [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward a Total Cure for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pui]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Combined Therapy, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward a Total Cure for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoperative Multimodality Therapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-03 [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Although chemoradiotherapy plus resection is considered standard treatment for operable rectal carcinoma, the optimal time to administer this therapy is not clear. The NSABP R-03 (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-03) trial compared neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal carcinoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with clinical T3 or T4 or node-positive rectal cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of fluorouracil and leucovorin with 45 Gy in 25 fractions with a 5.40-Gy boost within the original margins of treatment. In the preoperative group, surgery was performed within 8 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. In the postoperative group, chemotherapy began after recovery from surgery but no later than 4 weeks after surgery. The primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From August 1993 to June 1999, 267 patients were randomly assigned to NSABP R-03. The intended sample size was 900 patients. Excluding 11 ineligible and two eligible patients without follow-up data, the analysis used data on 123 patients randomly assigned to preoperative and 131 to postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Surviving patients were observed for a median of 8.4 years. The 5-year DFS for preoperative patients was 64.7% <I>v</I> 53.4% for postoperative patients (<I>P</I> = .011). The 5-year OS for preoperative patients was 74.5% <I>v</I> 65.6% for postoperative patients (<I>P</I> = .065). A complete pathologic response was achieved in 15% of preoperative patients. No preoperative patient with a complete pathologic response has had a recurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, compared with postoperative chemoradiotherapy, significantly improved DFS and showed a trend toward improved OS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roh, Colangelo, O'Connell, Yothers, Deutsch, Allegra, Kahlenberg, Baez-Diaz, Ursiny, Petrelli, Wolmark]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoperative Multimodality Therapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-03 [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perineural Invasion Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Perineural invasion (PNI) is associated with decreased survival in several malignancies, but its significance in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains to be clearly defined. We evaluated PNI as a potential prognostic indicator in CRC, focusing on its significance in node-negative patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We identified 269 consecutive patients who had CRC resected at our institution. Tumors were rereviewed for PNI by a pathologist blinded to the patients' outcomes. Overall and disease-free survivals were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences determined by multivariate analysis using the Cox multiple hazards model. Results were compared using the log-rank test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PNI was identified in less than 0.5% of the initial pathology reports. On rereview, 22% of tumors in our series were found to be PNI positive. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was four-fold greater for patients with PNI-negative tumors versus those with PNI-positive tumors (65% <I>v</I> 16%, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The 5-year overall survival rate was 72% for PNI-negative tumors versus 25% for PNI-positive tumors. On multivariate analysis, PNI was an independent prognostic factor for both cancer-specific overall and disease-free survival. In a subset analysis comparing patients with node-negative disease with patients with stage III disease, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 56% for stage III patients versus 29% for patients with node-negative, PNI-positive tumors (<I>P</I> = .0002). Similar results were seen for overall survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>PNI is grossly underreported in CRC and could serve as an independent prognostic factor of outcomes in these patients. PNI should be considered when stratifying CRC patients for adjuvant treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liebig, Ayala, Wilks, Verstovsek, Liu, Agarwal, Berger, Albo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prognostic Studies, Diagnosis & Staging, Outcomes Research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4949</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perineural Invasion Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in Colorectal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estrogen-Progestagen Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer: Does Delay From Menopause Onset to Treatment Initiation Influence Risks? [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To investigate whether the relation between estrogen-progestagen menopausal hormone therapy (EP-MHT) and breast cancer risk varies according to the delay between menopause onset and treatment initiation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and Methods</st>
<p>Between 1992 and 2005, 1,726 invasive breast cancers were identified among 53,310 postmenopausal women from the French E3N cohort (mean duration of follow-up, 8.1 years). Hazard ratios (HRs) and CIs were estimated using Cox models, with MHT never users as the reference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among recent users of EP-MHT, the risk of breast cancer varied according to the timing of treatment initiation. This variation was confined to short durations of use (&le; 2 years): the HR was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.28 to 1.86) for short treatments initiated in the 3-year period following menopause onset and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.47) for short treatments initiated later (<I>P</I> = .04 for homogeneity). However, this pattern of risks was not observed in users of EP-MHT containing progesterone, among whom there was no significantly increased risk associated with short duration of use (HR was 0.87 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.32] for treatments initiated &le; 3 years after menopause, and HR was 0.90 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.81] for treatments initiated later). Longer durations of EP-MHT use were generally associated with increases in breast cancer risk, whatever the gap time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our results suggest that, for some EP-MHT, the timing of treatment initiation transiently modulates the risk of breast cancer and that, when initiated close to menopause, even short durations of use are associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Estrogen + progesterone combinations might be an exception in this regard.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fournier, Mesrine, Boutron-Ruault, Clavel-Chapelon]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Behavioral and Lifestyle Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6432</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estrogen-Progestagen Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer: Does Delay From Menopause Onset to Treatment Initiation Influence Risks? [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5144?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene on Memory and Other Cognitive Abilities: Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5144?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To compare the effects of two selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen and raloxifene, on global and domain-specific cognitive function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) study was a randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen 20 mg/d or raloxifene 60 mg/d in healthy postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer. The 1,498 women who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial, beginning 18 months after STAR enrollment started. A cognitive test battery modeled after the one used in the Women's Health Initiative Study of Cognitive Aging (WHISCA) was administered. Technicians were centrally trained to administer the battery and recertified every 6 months. Analyses were conducted on all participants and on 273 women who completed the first cognitive battery before they started taking their medications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, there were no significant differences in adjusted mean cognitive scores between the two treatment groups across visits. There were significant time effects across the three visits for some of the cognitive measures. Similar results were obtained for the subset of women with true baseline measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Tamoxifen and raloxifene are associated with similar patterns of cognitive function in postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer. Future comparisons between these findings and patterns of cognitive function in hormone therapy and placebo groups in WHISCA should provide additional insights into the effects of tamoxifen and raloxifene on cognitive function in older women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legault, Maki, Resnick, Coker, Hogan, Bevers, Shumaker]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.0716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene on Memory and Other Cognitive Abilities: Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5144</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating Tumor Cells: A Useful Predictor of Treatment Efficacy in Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Five or more circulating tumor cells (CTCs) per 7.5 mL of blood predicts for poorer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a prospective study to demonstrate that CTC results correlate strongly with radiographic disease progression at the time of and in advance of imaging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Serial CTC levels were obtained in patients starting a new treatment regimen for progressive, radiographically measurable MBC. Peripheral blood was collected for CTC enumeration at baseline and at 3- to 4-week intervals. Clinical outcomes were based on radiographic studies performed in 9- to 12-week intervals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty-eight patients were evaluable for the CTC-imaging correlations, and 74 patients were evaluable for the PFS analysis. Median follow-up was 13.3 months. A statistically significant correlation was demonstrated between CTC levels and radiographic disease progression in patients receiving chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. This correlation applied to CTC results obtained at the time of imaging (odds ratio [OR], 6.3), 3 to 5 weeks before imaging (OR, 3.1), and 7 to 9 weeks before imaging (OR, 4.9). Results from analyses stratified by type of therapy remained statistically significant. Shorter PFS was observed for patients with five or more CTCs at 3 to 5 weeks and at 7 to 9 weeks after the start of treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence of a strong correlation between CTC results and radiographic disease progression in patients receiving chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for MBC. These findings support the role of CTC enumeration as an adjunct to standard methods of monitoring disease status in MBC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, Shields, Warren, Cohen, Wilkinson, Ottaviano, Rao, Eng-Wong, Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, Noone, Isaacs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6664</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating Tumor Cells: A Useful Predictor of Treatment Efficacy in Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5159</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5160?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Underuse of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Medical Mistrust [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5160?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Little is known about why women with breast cancer who have surgery do not receive proven effective postsurgical adjuvant treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We surveyed 258 women who recently underwent surgical treatment at six New York City hospitals for early-stage breast cancer about their care, knowledge, and beliefs about breast cancer and its treatment. As per national guidelines, all women should have received adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatment data were obtained from inpatient and outpatient charts. Factor analysis was used to create scales scored to 100 of treatment beliefs and knowledge, medical mistrust, and physician communication about treatment. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed differences between treated and untreated women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with treated women, untreated women were less likely to know that adjuvant therapies increase survival (on a 100-point scale; 66 <I>v</I> 75; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001), had greater mistrust (64 <I>v</I> 53; <I>P</I> = .001), and had less self-efficacy (92 <I>v</I> 97; <I>P</I> &lt; .05); physician communication about treatment did not affect patient knowledge of treatment benefits (<I>r</I> = 0.8; <I>P</I> = .21). Multivariate analysis found that untreated women were more likely to be 70 years or older (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13), to have comorbidities (aRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.12), and to express mistrust in the medical delivery system (aRR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.007), even though they were more likely to believe adjuvant treatments were beneficial (aRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99; model c, 0.84; <I>P</I> &le; .0001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patient knowledge and beliefs about treatment and medical mistrust are mutable factors associated with underuse of effective adjuvant therapies. Physicians may improve cancer care by ensuring that discussions about adjuvant therapy include a clear presentation of the benefits, not just the risks of treatment, and by addressing patient trust in and concerns about the medical system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bickell, Weidmann, Fei, Lin, Leventhal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Hormonal Therapy, Quality of Care, Outcomes Research, Quality of Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9773</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Underuse of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Medical Mistrust [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk of Relapse of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Predicted By Flow Cytometric Measurement of Residual Disease on Day 15 Bone Marrow [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Speed of blast clearance is an indicator of outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Availability of measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) at an early time point with a reduced-cost method is of clinical relevance. In the AIEOP-BFM-ALL (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica and Berlin-Frankfurt-M&uuml;nster Study Group) 2000 trial, patients were stratified by levels of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) MRD at day +33 and +78. AIEOP studied the prognostic impact of MRD measured by flow cytometry (FCM) at day 15 of induction therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Bone marrow samples from 830 Italian patients were collected on day 15, after 14 days of steroids, and one dose of intrathecal methotrexate, vincristine, daunorubicine, and asparaginase. Cells were analyzed by four-color FCM for detection of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three patient risk groups were identified by FCM: standard (&lt; 0.1% blast cells; 42% of the total), intermediate (0.1 to &lt; 10%; 47%), and high (&ge; 10%; 11%). Their 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 7.5% (SE, 1.5), 17.5% (SE, 2.1), and 47.2% (SE, 5.9), respectively. In multivariate analysis, FCM was the most important prognostic factor among those available by day 15, with two-fold and five-fold increase in the risk of relapse compared with patients with less than 0.1%. PCR MRD, when added to the model, had significant prognostic impact; yet high levels of FCM MRD retained an independent ability to detect a significantly higher risk of relapse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Measurement of FCM MRD in day 15 bone marrow was the most powerful early predictor of relapse, applicable to virtually all patients; it may complement PCR MRD&ndash;based stratification including later time points, thus allowing additional treatment tailoring.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Basso, Veltroni, Valsecchi, Dworzak, Ratei, Silvestri, Benetello, Buldini, Maglia, Masera, Conter, Arico, Biondi, Gaipa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8934</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk of Relapse of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Predicted By Flow Cytometric Measurement of Residual Disease on Day 15 Bone Marrow [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improved Early Event-Free Survival With Imatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent that may be used against Philadelphia chromosome&ndash;positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), one of the highest risk pediatric ALL groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated whether imatinib (340 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) with an intensive chemotherapy regimen improved outcome in children ages 1 to 21 years with Ph+ ALL (N = 92) and compared toxicities to Ph&ndash; ALL patients (N = 65) given the same chemotherapy without imatinib. Exposure to imatinib was increased progressively in five patient cohorts that received imatinib from 42 (cohort 1; n = 7) to 280 continuous days (cohort 5; n = 50) before maintenance therapy. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) &ndash;identical sibling donors underwent blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) with imatinib given for 6 months following BMT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Continuous imatinib exposure improved outcome in cohort 5 patients with a 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 80% &plusmn; 11% (95% CI, 64% to 90%), more than twice historical controls (35% &plusmn; 4%; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Three-year EFS was similar for patients in cohort 5 treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib (88% &plusmn; 11%; 95% CI, 66% to 96%) or sibling donor BMT (57% &plusmn; 22%; 95% CI, 30.4% to 76.1%). There were no significant toxicities associated with adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy. The higher imatinib dosing in cohort 5 appears to improve survival by having an impact on the outcome of children with a higher burden of minimal residual disease after induction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy improved 3-year EFS in children and adolescents with Ph+ ALL, with no appreciable increase in toxicity. BMT plus imatinib offered no advantage over BMT alone. Additional follow-up is required to determine the impact of this treatment on long-term EFS and determine whether chemotherapy plus imatinib can replace BMT.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schultz, Bowman, Aledo, Slayton, Sather, Devidas, Wang, Davies, Gaynon, Trigg, Rutledge, Burden, Jorstad, Carroll, Heerema, Winick, Borowitz, Hunger, Carroll, Camitta]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improved Early Event-Free Survival With Imatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5181</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5182?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vincristine, Actinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Vincristine, Actinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Alternating With Vincristine, Topotecan, and Cyclophosphamide for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Children's Oncology Group Study D9803 [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5182?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with standard VAC (vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy to that of patients treated with VAC alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide (VAC/VTC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients were randomly assigned to 39 weeks of VAC versus VAC/VTC; local therapy began after week 12. Patients with parameningeal RMS with intracranial extension (PME) were treated with VAC and immediate x-ray therapy. The primary study end point was failure-free survival (FFS). The study was designed with 80% power (5% two-sided  level) to detect an increase in 5-year FFS from 64% to 75% with VAC/VTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 617 eligible patients were entered onto the study: 264 were randomly assigned to VAC and 252 to VAC/VTC; 101 PME patients were nonrandomly treated with VAC. Treatment strata were embryonal RMS, stage 2/3, group III (33%); embryonal RMS, group IV, less than age 10 years (7%); alveolar RMS or undifferentiated sarcoma (UDS), stage 1 or group I (17%); alveolar RMS/UDS (27%); and PME (16%). At a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 4-year FFS was 73% with VAC and 68% with VAC/VTC (<I>P</I> = .3). There was no difference in effect of VAC versus VAC/VTC across risk groups. The frequency of second malignancies was similar between the two treatment groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>For intermediate-risk RMS, VAC/VTC does not significantly improve FFS compared with VAC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arndt, Stoner, Hawkins, Rodeberg, Hayes-Jordan, Paidas, Parham, Teot, Wharam, Breneman, Donaldson, Anderson, Meyer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Rhabdo & Other Soft Tissue Sarcomas:]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3768</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vincristine, Actinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Vincristine, Actinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Alternating With Vincristine, Topotecan, and Cyclophosphamide for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Children's Oncology Group Study D9803 [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Have an Excellent Outcome With Chemotherapy Alone and Benefit From Intensive Postinduction Treatment: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Patients 16 to 21 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have an inferior outcome compared with younger children, leading some medical oncologists to advocate allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in first remission for these patients. We examined outcome for young adults with ALL enrolled onto the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1961 study between 1996 and 2002.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>CCG 1961 entered patients with ALL 1 to 21 years of age with initial WBC count &ge; 50,000/&micro;L and/or age &ge; 10 years. Randomly assigned therapies evaluated the impact of postinduction treatment intensification on outcome. We examined outcome and prognostic factors for 262 young adults with ALL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five-year event-free and overall survival rates for young adult patients are 71.5% (SE, 3.6%) and 77.5% (SE, 3.3%), respectively. Rapid responder patients (&lt; 25% bone marrow blasts on day 7) randomly assigned to augmented therapy had 5-year event-free survival of 81.8% (SE, 7%), as compared with 66.8% (SE, 6.7%) for patients receiving standard therapy (<I>P</I> = .07). One versus two interim maintenance and delayed intensification courses had no significant impact on event-free survival. WBC count more than 50,000/&micro;L was an adverse prognostic factor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Young adult patients with ALL showing a rapid response to induction chemotherapy benefit from early intensive postinduction therapy but do not benefit from a second interim maintenance and delayed intensification phase. Given the excellent outcome with this chemotherapy, there seems to be no role for the routine use of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in first remission for young adults with ALL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nachman, La, Hunger, Heerema, Gaynon, Hastings, Mattano, Sather, Devidas, Freyer, Steinherz, Seibel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Leukemia, Lymphoma, Solid Tumors (Pediatric)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8959</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Have an Excellent Outcome With Chemotherapy Alone and Benefit From Intensive Postinduction Treatment: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5194</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Minimal Residual Disease by Standardized WT1 Assay to Enhance Risk Stratification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A European LeukemiaNet Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is currently based on pretreatment characteristics. It remains to be established whether relapse risk can be better predicted through assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). One proposed marker is the Wilms tumor gene <I>WT1</I>, which is overexpressed in most patients with AML, thus providing a putative target for immunotherapy, although in the absence of a standardized assay, its utility for MRD monitoring remains controversial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Nine published and in-house real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction <I>WT1</I> assays were systematically evaluated within the European LeukemiaNet; the best-performing assay was applied to diagnostic AML samples (n = 620), follow-up samples from 129 patients treated with intensive combination chemotherapy, and 204 normal peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Considering relative levels of expression detected in normal PB and BM, <I>WT1</I> was sufficiently overexpressed to discriminate &ge; 2-log reduction in transcripts in 46% and 13% of AML patients, according to the respective follow-up sample source. In this informative group, greater <I>WT1</I> transcript reduction after induction predicted reduced relapse risk (hazard ratio, 0.54 per log reduction; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.83; <I>P</I> = .004) that remained significant when adjusted for age, WBC count, and cytogenetics. Failure to reduce <I>WT1</I> transcripts below the threshold limits defined in normal controls by the end of consolidation also predicted increased relapse risk (<I>P</I> = .004).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Application of a standardized <I>WT1</I> assay provides independent prognostic information in AML, lending support to incorporation of early assessment of MRD to develop more robust risk scores, to enhance risk stratification, and to identify patients who may benefit from allogeneic transplantation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cilloni, Renneville, Hermitte, Hills, Daly, Jovanovic, Gottardi, Fava, Schnittger, Weiss, Izzo, Nomdedeu, van der Heijden, van der Reijden, Jansen, van der Velden, Ommen, Preudhomme, Saglio, Grimwade]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prognostic Studies, Diagnosis & Staging, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4865</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Minimal Residual Disease by Standardized WT1 Assay to Enhance Risk Stratification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A European LeukemiaNet Study [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5201</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IKZF1 (Ikaros) Deletions in BCR-ABL1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Are Associated With Short Disease-Free Survival and High Rate of Cumulative Incidence of Relapse: A GIMEMA AL WP Report [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The causes of the aggressive nature of <I>BCR-ABL1</I>&ndash;positive adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are unknown. To identify, at the submicroscopic level, oncogenic lesions that cooperate with <I>BCR-ABL1</I> to induce ALL, we performed an investigation of genomic copy number alterations using single nucleotide polymorphism array, genomic polymerase chain reaction, and sequencing of candidate genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Eighty-three patients with de novo adult Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) &ndash;positive ALL were enrolled onto institutional (n = 17) or Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Working Party delle Leucemia Acute (n = 66) clinical trials. Treatments included tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alone, conventional chemotherapy, or a combination of TKI and chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A 7p12 deletion of <I>IKZF1</I> (Ikaros) was identified in 52 (63%) of 83 patients. The pattern of deletion varied among different patients, but the two most common deletion types were loss of exons 4 to 7 in 31 (37%) of 83 patients and loss of exons 2 to 7 in 17 (20%) of 83 patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in patients with <I>IKZF1</I> deletion versus patients with <I>IKZF1</I> wild type (10 <I>v</I> 32 months, respectively; <I>P</I> = .02). Furthermore, a significantly shorter cumulative incidence of relapse was recorded in patients with <I>IKZF1</I> deletion versus patients with <I>IKZF1</I> wild type (10.1 <I>v</I> 56.1 months, respectively; <I>P</I> = .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the negative prognostic impact of <I>IKZF1</I> deletion on DFS (<I>P</I> = .04).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We conclude that <I>IKZF1</I> deletions are likely to be a genomic alteration that significantly affects the prognosis of Ph-positive ALL in adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinelli, Iacobucci, Storlazzi, Vignetti, Paoloni, Cilloni, Soverini, Vitale, Chiaretti, Cimino, Papayannidis, Paolini, Elia, Fazi, Meloni, Amadori, Saglio, Pane, Baccarani, Foa]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Leukemia, Risk factors, Biology & Immunology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6408</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IKZF1 (Ikaros) Deletions in BCR-ABL1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Are Associated With Short Disease-Free Survival and High Rate of Cumulative Incidence of Relapse: A GIMEMA AL WP Report [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5207</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5-Year Survival in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in a Randomized, Phase III Trial of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide With or Without Oblimersen [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>A randomized trial of oblimersen plus fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (OBL-FC; n = 120) versus FC (n = 121) was conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The primary end point was met: the complete response (CR) rate, defined as complete or nodular partial response, was significantly greater with OBL-FC than with FC (17% <I>v</I> 7%; <I>P</I> = .025). Among patients with CR, response duration was significantly longer with OBL-FC than with FC (median not reached; &gt; 36 months <I>v</I> 22 months; <I>P</I> = .03). Maximum benefit with OBL-FC, including a four-fold increase in CR rate and a survival benefit with 3 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.53; <I>P</I> = .05), was observed in patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease. We evaluated long-term survival and poststudy CLL therapy among all randomly assigned patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Poststudy CLL treatment information was collected. Patients were observed for survival for up to 5 years from the date of random assignment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Poststudy CLL treatment was balanced between arms. Intent-to-treat analysis of 5-year survival showed no significant between-treatment difference (hazard ratio, 0.87; <I>P</I> = .34). Among the greater than 40% of patients with complete or partial remission, a significant 5-year survival benefit was observed with OBL-FC (hazard ratio, 0.60; <I>P</I> = .038). Among patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease who had previously demonstrated maximum benefit with OBL-FC, the previously observed survival benefit improved: a 50% reduction in the risk of death was observed (<I>P</I> = .004).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In relapsed/refractory CLL, OBL combined with FC offers patients who achieve complete or partial remission, as well as those who have fludarabine-sensitive disease, a significant survival benefit.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Brien, Moore, Boyd, Larratt, Skotnicki, Koziner, Chanan-Khan, Seymour, Gribben, Itri, Rai]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5748</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5-Year Survival in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in a Randomized, Phase III Trial of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide With or Without Oblimersen [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Yttrium-90-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 (<sup>90</sup>Y)&ndash;ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with relapsed or refractory MCL were eligible for the study if they had adequate major organ function and performance status. Those with CNS disease, pleural effusion, circulating lymphoma cells &ge; 5,000/&micro;L, or history of stem-cell transplant were ineligible. Patients with a platelet count &ge; 150,000/&micro;L received a dose of 0.4 mCi/kg of <sup>90</sup>Y&ndash;ibritumomab tiuxetan, whereas those with a platelet count less than 150,000/&micro;L received a dose of 0.3 mCi/kg.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirty-four patients with a median age of 68 years (range, 52 to 79 years) received the therapeutic dose. The patients had received a median of three prior treatment regimens (range, one to six treatment regimens), including those that contained rituximab (n = 32) and bortezomib (n = 7). Of the 32 patients with measurable disease, 10 (31%) achieved complete or partial remission. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 2 to 72+ months), an intent-to-treat analysis revealed a median event-free survival (EFS) duration of 6 months and an overall survival duration of 21 months. The median EFS for those who achieved partial or complete remission was 28 months, while it was 3 months for those whose disease did not respond (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001); it was 9 months for patients whose tumor measured less than 5 cm in the largest diameter before treatment and 3 months for those whose tumor measured &ge; 5 cm (<I>P</I> = .015).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The single-agent activity of <sup>90</sup>Y&ndash;ibritumomab tiuxetan and its favorable safety profile warrant its further development for the treatment of MCL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Oki, Pro, Romaguera, Rodriguez, Samaniego, McLaughlin, Hagemeister, Neelapu, Copeland, Samuels, Loyer, Ji, Younes]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Biologic Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Yttrium-90-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5218</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New Lesions Detected by Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array-Based Chromosomal Analysis Have Important Clinical Impact in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Cytogenetics is the primary outcome predictor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Metaphase cytogenetics (MC) detects an abnormal karyotype in only half of patients with AML, however. Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP-A) can detect acquired somatic uniparental disomy (UPD) and other cryptic defects, even in samples deemed normal by MC. We hypothesized that SNP-A will improve detection of chromosomal defects in AML and that this would enhance the prognostic value of MC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We performed 250K and 6.0 SNP-A analyses on 140 patients with primary (p) and secondary (s) AML and correlated the results with clinical outcomes and <I>Flt-3</I>/nucleophosmin (<I>NPM-1</I>) status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>SNP-A is more sensitive than MC in detecting unbalanced lesions (pAML, 65% <I>v</I> 39%, <I>P</I> = .002; and sAML, 78% <I>v</I> 51%, <I>P</I> = .003). Acquired somatic UPD, not detectable by MC, was common in our AML cohort (29% in pAML and 35% in sAML). Patients with SNP-A lesions including acquired somatic UPD exhibited worse overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in pAML with normal MC and in pAML/sAML with abnormal MC. SNP-A improved the predictive value of <I>Flt-3</I> internal tandem duplication/<I>NPM-1</I> status, with inferior survival seen in patients with additional SNP-A defects. Multivariate analyses confirmed the independent predictive value of SNP-A defects for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.52; 95% CI, 1.29 to 5.22; <I>P</I> = .006) and EFS (HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.48; <I>P</I> = .04).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>SNP-A analysis allows enhanced detection of chromosomal abnormalities and provides important prognostic impact in AML.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiu, Gondek, O'Keefe, Huh, Sekeres, Elson, McDevitt, Wang, Levis, Karp, Advani, Maciejewski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9840</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New Lesions Detected by Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array-Based Chromosomal Analysis Have Important Clinical Impact in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5226</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary Testicular Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Study on the Incidence, Natural History, and Survival Comparison With Primary Nodal Counterpart Before and After the Introduction of Rituximab [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>We performed a population-based study of primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the United States to determine its incidence and survival trends, prognostic factors, and clinical outcome compared with males with nodal DLBCL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was reviewed to identify patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2005. To study the potential impact of the introduction of rituximab on survival, we used the year 2000 as cutoff point.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 769 patients with testicular DLBCL. The median age at diagnosis was 68.0 years. The incidence of DLBCL increased over time, with the highest rate among whites (twice that of blacks). The median overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 4.6 years, whereas the disease-specific survival (DSS) rates at 3, 5, and 15 years were 71.5%, 62.4%, and 43.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of worse DSS were older age, diagnosis before 1986, advanced stage, left testicular involvement, and not having surgery and radiation. The use of radiation did not change significantly over time. When testicular and nodal DLBCL patients were analyzed together, testicular primary was an independent predictor of better OS and DSS. Unlike nodal DLBCL, DSS did not improve in the patients with testicular DLBCL diagnosed after the year 2000.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The incidence of testicular DLBCL is increasing. Compared with nodal DLBCL, testicular DLBCL patients have a better overall prognosis but are at higher risk of late disease-related deaths. The introduction of rituximab in clinical practice does not seem to improve their early outcome.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gundrum, Mathiason, Moore, Go]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality, Biologic Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5896</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary Testicular Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Study on the Incidence, Natural History, and Survival Comparison With Primary Nodal Counterpart Before and After the Introduction of Rituximab [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence, Natural Course, and Risk Factors of Insomnia Comorbid With Cancer Over a 2-Month Period [Cancer-Related Complications]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence, natural course, and risk factors of insomnia comorbid with cancer over a 2-month period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>All patients scheduled to receive a curative surgery for a first diagnosis of nonmetastatic cancer were approached to participate in the study on the day of their preoperative visit. As part of a larger population-based longitudinal study, 991 cancer patients completed various self-report scales and an insomnia diagnostic interview at the perioperative phase (T1) and 2 months later (T2).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At T1, 28.5% of the patients met the diagnostic criteria for an insomnia syndrome, and 31.0% had insomnia symptoms; these rates decreased to 26.2% and 22.2%, respectively, at T2. The highest rates of insomnia were found in breast cancer patients, whereas the lowest rates were obtained in prostate cancer patients. Findings indicated an incidence rate of 18.6%, a persistence rate of 68.0%, and a remission rate of 32.0%. Female sex and the presence of an arousability trait (predisposing factors), a diagnosis of head and neck cancer, the administration of surgery, and an increase in anxiety symptoms between T1 and T2 (precipitating factors), and higher baseline levels and increases between T1 and T2 in dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, sleep monitoring, and maladaptive sleep behaviors (maintenance factors) were all associated with an increased risk for insomnia incidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study confirms the high prevalence of insomnia comorbid with cancer during the 2 months after the perioperative visit and identifies several factors that might be involved in its development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savard, Villa, Ivers, Simard, Morin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Life]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6333</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence, Natural Course, and Risk Factors of Insomnia Comorbid With Cancer Over a 2-Month Period [Cancer-Related Complications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer-Related Complications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5240?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identification and Validation of a Gene Expression Signature That Predicts Outcome in Adult Men With Germ Cell Tumors [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5240?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Germ cell tumor (GCT) is the most common malignancy in young adult men. Currently, patients are risk-stratified on the basis of clinical presentation and serum tumor markers. The introduction of molecular markers could improve outcome prediction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Expression profiling was performed on 74 nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs) from cisplatin-treated patients (ie, training set) and on 34 similarly treated patients with NSGCTs (ie, validation set). A gene classifier was developed by using prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM) for the binary end point of 5-year overall survival (OS). A predictive score was developed for OS by using the univariate Cox model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the training set, PAM identified 140 genes that predicted 5-year OS (cross-validated classification rate, 60%). The PAM model correctly classified 90% of patients in the validation set. Patients predicted to have good outcome had significantly longer survival than those with poor predicted outcome (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). For the OS end point, a 10-gene model had a predictive accuracy (ie, concordance index) of 0.66 in the training set and a concordance index of 0.83 in the validation set. Dichotomization of the samples on the basis of the median score resulted in significant differences in survival (<I>P</I> = .002). For both end points, the gene-based predictor was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate model that included clinical risk stratification (<I>P</I> &lt; .01 for both).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We have identified gene expression signatures that accurately predict outcome in patients with GCTs. These predictive genes should be useful for the prediction of patient outcome and could provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Korkola, Houldsworth, Feldman, Olshen, Qin, Patil, Reuter, Bosl, Chaganti]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prognostic Studies, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0386</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identification and Validation of a Gene Expression Signature That Predicts Outcome in Adult Men With Germ Cell Tumors [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thalidomide in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Cancers rely on angiogenesis for their growth and dissemination. We hypothesized that thalidomide, an oral antiangiogenic agent, when combined with chemotherapy, and as maintenance treatment, would improve survival in patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Seven hundred twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or thalidomide capsules 100 to 200 mg daily for up to 2 years. All patients received gemcitabine and carboplatin every 3 weeks for up to four cycles. End points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, grade 3/4 toxicity, and quality of life (QoL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median OS rates were 8.9 months (placebo) and 8.5 months (thalidomide). The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.32; <I>P</I> = .12). The 2-year survival rate was 16% and 12% in the placebo and thalidomide arms, respectively. The PFS results were consistent with those for OS. The risk of having a thrombotic event was increased by 74% in the thalidomide group: HR of 1.74 (95% CI, 1.20 to 2.52; <I>P</I> = .003). There were no differences in hematologic toxicities, but a slight excess of rash and neuropathy in the thalidomide group. QoL scores were similar but thalidomide was associated with less insomnia, and more constipation and peripheral neuropathy. In a retrospective analysis, patients with nonsquamous histology in the thalidomide group had a poorer survival: 2-year risk difference of 10% (95% CI, 4% to 16%; <I>P</I> &lt; .001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this large trial of patients with NSCLC, thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy did not improve survival overall, but increased the risk of thrombotic events. Unexpectedly, survival was significantly worse in patients with nonsquamous histology.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, Rudd, Woll, Ottensmeier, Gilligan, Price, Spiro, Gower, Jitlal, Hackshaw]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality, Angiogenesis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9733</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thalidomide in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety of Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Patients with non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases have previously been excluded from trials of bevacizumab because of suspected risk of CNS hemorrhage. This phase II trial, AVF3752g (PASSPORT), specifically addressed bevacizumab safety (incidence of grade &ge; 2 CNS hemorrhage) in patients with NSCLC and previously treated brain metastases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>This open-label multicenter trial for first- and second-line treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC enrolled patients with treated brain metastases. First-line patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks with platinum-based doublet therapy or erlotinib (at physician's decision), and second-line patients received bevacizumab with single-agent chemotherapy or erlotinib, until disease progression or death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 115 enrolled patients, 66 of 76 first-line patients received carboplatin-based chemotherapy; 22 of 39 second-line patients received pemetrexed, and nine of 39 received erlotinib. As of the June 23, 2008 data cut, among 106 safety-evaluable patients, median on-study duration was 6.3 months (range, 0 to 22 months), with a median of five bevacizumab cycles (range, one to 17), and no reported episodes of grade &ge; 2 CNS hemorrhage (95% CI, 0.0% to 3.3%). Of the bevacizumab-targeted adverse events reported, two were grade 5. Both were pulmonary hemorrhages, one occurring during treatment and the other occurring 6 weeks after the data cut; there was also one grade 4, nonpulmonary/non-CNS hemorrhage. Twenty-six patients (24.5%) discontinued study treatment as a result of an adverse event, and 37 (34.9%) discontinued because of disease progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Addition of bevacizumab to various chemotherapy agents or erlotinib in patients with NSCLC and treated brain metastases seems to be safe and is associated with a low incidence of CNS hemorrhage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Socinski, Langer, Huang, Kolb, Compton, Wang, Akerley]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0616</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety of Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5261</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5262?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Oral CP-868,596, a Highly Specific Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Cancers [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5262?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This phase I, first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of an oral platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, CP-868,596.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible. Dose escalations were performed in three groups with two formulations: uncoated on an empty stomach (UES), uncoated with food (UFED), and film-coated (FC) without food. Initial dose escalation in the UES group was followed by parallel escalations in the UFED and FC groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fifty-nine patients enrolled. CP-868,596 was escalated from 100 mg to 340 mg daily in the UES group, from 60 mg to 100 mg twice daily in the UFED group, and from 100 mg once daily to 140 mg twice daily in the FC group. MTDs were 200 mg daily in the UES group and 100 mg twice daily in the FC group; MTD was not reached at 100 mg twice daily in the UFED group. Dose-limiting toxicities included hematuria, increased -glutamyltransferase or ALT, insomnia, and nausea/vomiting. Most treatment-related AEs were of grades 1 to 2 severity; nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were reported most frequently. Administration with food generally improved tolerability. CP-868,596 was absorbed slowly; systemic exposure parameters appeared to increase greater than proportionally with dose. Mean serum concentrations exceeded the preclinically predicted minimal efficacious concentration (ie, 16 ng/mL) at all dosages. Food and film coating apparently increased interpatient variability of the maximum observed plasma concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve. No objective responses were reported, and eight patients achieved stable disease (mean duration, 5.7 months).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CP-868,596 potentially demonstrated greater than dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. The recommended dosage of 100 mg twice daily with food was well tolerated. Additional development as a single agent in selected populations or in combination with chemotherapy in broader populations is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis, Lewis, Eder, Reddy, Guo, Pierce, Olszanski, Cohen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8487</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Oral CP-868,596, a Highly Specific Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Cancers [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I Active Immunotherapy With Combination of Two Chimeric, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2, B-Cell Epitopes Fused to a Promiscuous T-Cell Epitope in Patients With Metastatic and/or Recurrent Solid Tumors [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety profile, and immunogenicity of two chimeric, B-cell epitopes derived from the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) extracellular domain in a combination vaccine with a promiscuous T-cell epitope (ie, MVF) and <I>nor</I>-muramyl-dipeptide as adjuvant emulsified in SEPPIC ISA 720.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Eligible patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors received three inoculations on days 1, 22, and 43 at doses of total peptide that ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 mg. Immunogenicity was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, flow cytometry, and HER2 signaling assays.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-four patients received three inoculations at the intended dose levels, which elicited antibodies able to recognize native HER2 receptor and inhibited both the proliferation of HER2-expressing cell lines and phosphorylation of the HER2 protein. The MTD was determined to be the highest dose level of 3.0 mg of the combination vaccine. There was a significant increase from dose level 1 (0.5 mg) to dose level 4 (3.0 mg) in HER2-specific antibodies. Four patients (one each with adrenal, colon, ovarian, and squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary) were judged to have stable disease; two patients (one each with endometrial and ovarian cancer) had partial responses; and 11 patients had progressive disease. Patients with stable disease received 6-month boosts, and one patient received a 20-month boost.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The combination vaccines were safe and effective in eliciting antibody responses in a subset of patients (62.5%) and were associated with no serious adverse events, autoimmune disease, or cardiotoxicity. There was preliminary evidence of clinical activity in several patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaumaya, Foy, Garrett, Rawale, Vicari, Thurmond, Lamb, Mani, Kane, Balint, Chalupa, Otterson, Shapiro, Fowler, Grever, Bekaii-Saab, Carson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology, Translational Oncology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3883</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I Active Immunotherapy With Combination of Two Chimeric, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2, B-Cell Epitopes Fused to a Promiscuous T-Cell Epitope in Patients With Metastatic and/or Recurrent Solid Tumors [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Central Nervous System Metastases [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To determine the incidence, outcomes, and current strategies for management of brain metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)&ndash;positive breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A literature review was performed to obtain data on central nervous system metastases in patients with breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>HER2 amplification/overexpression is a prognostic and predictive factor for the development of CNS metastases. Autopsy data show that the incidence rate for CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer is approximately 30%; this may be higher (ie, 30% to 50%) in patients with HER2-positive disease. Treatment with trastuzumab is not associated with an increased incidence of CNS metastases. Data from three phase III adjuvant trials showed the incidence was similar between patients who received trastuzumab and those who did not. Furthermore, trastuzumab can significantly improve overall survival in HER2-positive patients who already have CNS metastases compared with patients who do not receive trastuzumab or those who have HER2-negative brain metastases. This survival advantage is conferred via systemic control of the disease. The current standard of care for patients with CNS metastases is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), with or without surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery. In the future, novel therapies or combinations of therapies may additionally improve survival in these patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The incidence of CNS metastases in trastuzumab-treated patients is similar to that in all patients with HER2-positive disease. Trastuzumab can improve survival in patients with HER2-positive disease with CNS metastases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leyland-Jones]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8481</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Central Nervous System Metastases [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Matrix Metalloproteinases As Novel Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Human Cancer [BIOLOGY OF NEOPLASIA]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family of enzymes is comprised of critically important extracellular matrix remodeling proteases whose activity has been implicated in a number of key normal and pathologic processes. The latter include tumor growth, progression, and metastasis as well as the dysregulated angiogenesis that is associated with these events. As a result, these proteases have come to represent important therapeutic and diagnostic targets for the treatment and detection of human cancers. In this review, we summarize the literature that establishes these enzymes as important clinical targets, discuss the complexity surrounding their choice as such, and chronicle the development strategies and outcomes of their clinical testing to date. The status of the MMP inhibitors currently in US Food and Drug Administration approved clinical trials is presented and reviewed. We also discuss the more recent and successful targeting of this enzyme family as diagnostic and prognostic predictors of human cancer, its status, and its stage. This analysis includes a wide variety of human cancers and a number of human sample types including tissue, plasma, serum, and urine.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy, Yang, Moses]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5556</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Matrix Metalloproteinases As Novel Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Human Cancer [BIOLOGY OF NEOPLASIA]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5297</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BIOLOGY OF NEOPLASIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5298?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Good Life [ART OF ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/31/5298?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fisher]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5854</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Good Life [ART OF ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>31</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5298</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ART OF ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fatal Cystic Change of Brain Metastasis After Response to Gefitinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zee, Chin, Wong]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4501</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fatal Cystic Change of Brain Metastasis After Response to Gefitinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e146</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Graft-Versus-Host Disease of the CNS After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saad, Alyea, Wen, DeGirolami, Kesari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.7919</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Graft-Versus-Host Disease of the CNS After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation [DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e149</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DIAGNOSIS IN ONCOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e150?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lymph Node Ratio Better Predicts Disease-Free Survival in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Than the Number of Positive Lymph Nodes [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e150?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Belle, Van Calster, Wildiers, Van Huffel, Neven]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lymph Node Ratio Better Predicts Disease-Free Survival in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Than the Number of Positive Lymph Nodes [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e152?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Van Belle et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e152?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinh-Hung, Verkooijen, Fioretta, Vlastos, Rapiti, Bouchardy]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0937</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to V. Van Belle et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to G. Sauter et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hammond, Wolff, Hayes, Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0366</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to G. Sauter et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e154</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to E.H. Hammond et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sauter, Lee, Slamon, Press]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1463</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to E.H. Hammond et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e157</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e158?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consenting the Patient With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: "Informed" Only After Multi-Discliplinary Evaluation [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e158?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohiuddin, Regine]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6332</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consenting the Patient With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: "Informed" Only After Multi-Discliplinary Evaluation [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e159</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e160?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to M.M. Mohiuddin et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e160?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throckmorton, Esserman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to M.M. Mohiuddin et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e161</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to M.M. Mohiuddin et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, Moore, Clay, Kearing, O'Connor, Llewellyn-Thomas, Barth, Sepucha]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6951</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to M.M. Mohiuddin et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e164?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Guideline for 5-{alpha}-Reductase Inhibitors in the Prevention of Prostate Cancer Is Premature [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e164?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankel, Twardowski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1167</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Guideline for 5-{alpha}-Reductase Inhibitors in the Prevention of Prostate Cancer Is Premature [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e164</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to P.H. Frankel et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kramer, Hagerty, Somerfield, Schellhammer]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0886</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to P.H. Frankel et al [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical Points When Using Vectors [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Detterbeck]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8519</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical Points When Using Vectors [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e166</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e167?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to F.C. Detterbeck [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/e167?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rong, Zhu]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0929</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to F.C. Detterbeck [CORRESPONDENCE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4929?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Factors for Local Control After Breast Conservation: Does Margin Status Still Matter? [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4929?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacDonald, Taghian]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Factors for Local Control After Breast Conservation: Does Margin Status Still Matter? [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4930</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4929</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4930?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: How Often Is the Nipple Involved? [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4930?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edge]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9996</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: How Often Is the Nipple Involved? [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4932</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4930</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4932?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4932?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chlebowski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3270</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4934</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4932</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4935?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence-Based Medicine, Conscience-Based Medicine, and the Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4935?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zietman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4533</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence-Based Medicine, Conscience-Based Medicine, and the Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4936</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4935</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4937?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Informative Clinical Investigation: A Demanding Taskmaster [EDITORIALS]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4937?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Efstathiou, Kim, Logothetis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Informative Clinical Investigation: A Demanding Taskmaster [EDITORIALS]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4938</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4937</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4939?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Pathological Characteristics on Local Relapse After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Subgroup Analysis of the EORTC Boost Versus No Boost Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4939?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To investigate the long-term impact of pathologic characteristics and an extra boost dose of 16 Gy on local relapse, for stage I and II invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer boost versus no boost trial, after whole breast irradiation, patients with microscopically complete excision of invasive tumor, were randomly assigned to receive or not an extra boost dose of 16 Gy. For a subset of 1,616 patients central pathology review was performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The 10-year cumulative risk of local breast cancer relapse as a first event was not significantly influenced if the margin was scored negative, close or positive for invasive tumor or ductal carcinoma in situ according to central pathology review (log-rank <I>P</I> = .45 and <I>P</I> = .57, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma was associated with an increased risk of local relapse (<I>P</I> = .026; hazard ratio [HR], 1.67), as was age younger than 50 years (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001; HR, 2.38). The boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the local relapse rate (<I>P</I> = .0006; HR, 0.47). For patients younger than 50 years old and in patients with high grade invasive ductal carcinoma, the boost dose reduced the local relapse from 19.4% to 11.4% (<I>P</I> = .0046; HR, 0.51) and from 18.9% to 8.6% (<I>P</I> = .01; HR, 0.42), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Young age and high-grade invasive ductal cancer were the most important risk factors for local relapse, while margin status had no significant influence. A boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the negative effects of both young age and high-grade invasive cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, Antonini, Hart, Peterse, Horiot, Collin, Poortmans, Oei, Collette, Struikmans, Van den Bogaert, Fourquet, Jager, Schinagl, Warlam-Rodenhuis, Bartelink]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Radiation, Prognostic Studies, Radiation Oncology, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5764</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Pathological Characteristics on Local Relapse After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Subgroup Analysis of the EORTC Boost Versus No Boost Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4947</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4939</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4948?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: Clinicopathologic Findings in 316 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4948?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Although breast-conserving surgery is a standard approach for patients with breast cancer, mastectomy often becomes necessary. Surgical options now include nipple-sparing mastectomy but its oncological safety is still controversial. This study evaluates frequency and patterns of occult nipple involvement in a large contemporary cohort of patients with the retroareolar margin as possible indicator of nipple involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Three hundred sixteen consecutive mastectomy specimens (232 therapeutic, 84 prophylactic) with grossly unremarkable nipples were evaluated by coronal sections through the entire nipple and subareolar tissue. Extent and location of nipple involvement by carcinoma was assessed with the tissue deep to the skin as potential retroareolar en-face resection margin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seventy-one percent of nipples from therapeutic mastectomies showed no pathologic abnormality, 21% had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive carcinoma (IC), or lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 8% lobular neoplasia (lobular carcinoma in situ). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification, tumor size, and tumor-nipple distance were associated with nipple involvement by multivariate analysis (<I>P</I> = .0047, .0126, and .0176); histologic grade of both DCIS (<I>P</I> = .002) and IC (<I>P</I> = .03), LVI (<I>P</I> = .03), and lymph node involvement (<I>P</I> = .02) by univariate analysis. Nipple involvement by IC or DCIS was identified in the retroareolar margin with a sensitivity of 0.8 and a negative predictive value of 0.96. None of the 84 prophylactic mastectomies showed nipple involvement by IC or DCIS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Nipple-sparing mastectomy may be suitable for selected cases of breast carcinoma with low probability of nipple involvement by carcinoma and prophylactic procedures. A retroareolar en-face margin may be used to test for occult involvement in patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brachtel, Rusby, Michaelson, Chen, Muzikansky, Smith, Koerner]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8785</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: Clinicopathologic Findings in 316 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4954</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4948</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4955?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sonographic and Electrodiagnostic Evaluations in Patients With Aromatase Inhibitor-Related Arthralgia [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4955?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To investigate the prevalence of arthralgia in breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and perform a detailed rheumatologic assessment including autoimmune serology, musculoskeletal sonography, and electromyography (EMG) in these patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Postmenopausal patients with stage I to III breast cancer who were taking adjuvant AIs were enrolled (n = 92). Patients who were not receiving hormone treatment were included as a control group (n = 28). Musculoskeletal sonography and EMG were applied to the patients and the controls along with markers of autoimmunity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirty patients (32.6%) reported to have AI-related new-onset or worsening arthralgia. The most commonly affected joints were knee (70%), wrist (70%), and small joints of the hand (63%). Patients taking AIs had increased tendon thicknesses compared with those who never received AIs (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). Patients with AI-related arthralgia had higher rates of effusion in hand joints/tendons than those without arthralgia (<I>P</I> = .033). More patients with AI-related arthralgia had EMG findings consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) than those without arthralgia (<I>P</I> = .024). No significant difference was observed in erythrocyte sedimentation rates, C-reactive protein, antinuclear antibody, antidouble stranded DNA antibody, rheumatoid factor, or anticyclic citrullinated peptide levels between patients and controls or between those with and without arthralgia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients with AI-related arthralgia often show tenosynovial changes suggesting tenosynovitis, exerting local problems but lacking a systemic inflammatory component. Our finding of increased CTS frequency also supports this hypothesis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dizdar, Ozcakar, Malas, Harputluoglu, Bulut, Aksoy, Ozisik, Altundag]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hormonal Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5435</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sonographic and Electrodiagnostic Evaluations in Patients With Aromatase Inhibitor-Related Arthralgia [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4960</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4955</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4961?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Results From the ATAC Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4961?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition in which the median nerve is compressed, leading to pain and muscle weakness in the fingers and hand. Aromatase inhibitors lead to profound estrogen suppression and may be expected to increase the risk of CTS in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>The current analyses were based on the 100-month median follow-up data in postmenopausal women in the two monotherapy arms (anastrozole, n = 3,092; tamoxifen, n = 3,094). Here, we investigate the natural history of patients who presented with CTS during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer and the relative importance of a range of known risk factors for CTS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After 100 months of follow-up, 80 cases (2.6%) of CTS were reported in the anastrozole arm, compared with 23 cases (0.7%) in the tamoxifen arm (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The majority of CTS cases were reported as mild to moderate intensity and occurred early. None of the women stopped treatment medication as a result of CTS. CTS was significantly increased for women who used prior hormone replacement therapy (<I>P</I> = .007) or received prior chemotherapy (<I>P</I> = .01). Those who were 60 years of age or older at entry were at lower risk of CTS compared with their counterparts (<I>P</I> = .002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Although the use of anastrozole is associated with a greater incidence of CTS, it is rare, and most cases were of mild to moderate intensity and short duration. CTS has little impact on the overall risk-to-benefit ratio for the use of anastrozole in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sestak, Sapunar, Cuzick]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Chemoprevention studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0236</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Results From the ATAC Trial [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4965</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4961</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4966?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Independent Review of E2100: A Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4966?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>E2100, an open-label, randomized, phase III trial conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel alone as initial chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An independent, blinded review of radiologic and clinical data was performed, assessing progression and response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. In addition, ECOG's investigator assessments were reanalyzed using the same methods applied to the independent review. The primary end point was PFS as assessed by an independent review facility (IRF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel resulted in a statistically significant improvement in PFS using both the IRF and investigator assessments. Hazard ratios for PFS (0.48, 95% CI, 0.385 to 0.607; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001 for the IRF <I>v</I> 0.42, 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.52; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001 for ECOG investigators) and the improvement in median PFS (11.3 <I>v</I> 5.8 months for the IRF <I>v</I> 11.4 <I>v</I> 5.8 months for ECOG investigators) were similar. Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, the IRF-assessed ORR was significantly higher in patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (48.9% <I>v</I> 22.2%; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The risk of progression was reduced by more than half and the ORR more than doubled with the addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel in both analyses, confirming a substantial and robust bevacizumab treatment effect. The consistency between the IRF and ECOG analyses validates the original data previously reported by ECOG in this open-label trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gray, Bhattacharya, Bowden, Miller, Comis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6630</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Independent Review of E2100: A Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4972</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4966</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4973?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Myeloperoxidase Genotypes and Enhanced Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in SWOG-8897 [Breast Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4973?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Myeloperoxidase (MPO) generates reactive oxygen species and also activates <inter-ref locator="jco_glossary;1353" locator-type="hw-glossary">xenobiotics</inter-ref>. In a rigorous clinical trial (Southwest Oncology Group SWOG-8897), we examined relationships between genotypes and disease-free survival (DFS) among women treated for breast cancer, as well as those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients were assigned to risk groups according to standard prognostic features; the low-risk group (n = 753 genotyped) received follow-up only, and the high-risk group (n = 401 genotyped) was randomly assigned to adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF), with or without tamoxifen. DNA from archived normal lymph node tissue was genotyped, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate DFS associated with <I>MPO</I> genotypes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among women in the treatment arm, those with <I>MPO</I> G alleles had more than a two-fold reduction in hazard of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for GA genotypes, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.99; HR for GG genotypes, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.77). Effects were greatest among women who were further randomly assigned to tamoxifen (HR for GA genotypes, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.69; HR for GG genotypes, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.45). There were no significant associations between genotypes and DFS among women in the untreated arm, and relationships between genotypes and DFS did not differ by CAF or CMF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These results, observed in two independent study populations, indicate that high-activity <I>MPO</I> genotypes are associated with better survival among women receiving cyclophosphamide-containing therapy, particularly when followed by tamoxifen therapy. MPO can be inhibited and/or upregulated by commonly used drugs; thus, our findings merit further investigation for optimization of therapeutics for breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ambrosone, Barlow, Reynolds, Livingston, Yeh, Choi, Davis, Rae, Tang, Hutchins, Ravdin, Martino, Osborne, Lyss, Hayes, Albain]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8669</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Myeloperoxidase Genotypes and Enhanced Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in SWOG-8897 [Breast Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4979</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4973</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4980?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Determinants and Outcomes of Deferred Treatment or Watchful Waiting Among Men With Prostate Cancer in a Nationwide Cohort [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4980?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To examine consequences of deferred treatment (DT) as initial management of prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary, prospective cohort of American men diagnosed with PCa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated deferred treatment for PCa in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, a prospective study of 51,529 men. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for time to eventual treatment among men who deferred treatment for more than 1 year after diagnosis. HRs for time to metastasis or death as a result of PCa were compared between patients who deferred treatment and those who underwent immediate treatment within 1 year of diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From among 3,331 cohort participants diagnosed with PCa from 1986 to 2007, 342 (10.3%) initially deferred treatment. Of these, 174 (51%) remained untreated throughout follow-up (mean 7.7 years); the remainder were treated an average of 3.9 years after diagnosis. Factors associated with progression to treatment among DT patients included younger age, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason score, and higher prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis. We observed similar rates for development of metastases (n = 20 and n = 199; 7.2 <I>v</I> 8.1 per 1,000 person-years; <I>P</I> = .68) and death as a result of PCa (n = 8 and n = 80; 2.4 <I>v</I> 2.6 per 1,000 person-years; <I>P</I> = .99) for DT and immediate treatment, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this nationwide cohort, more than half the men who opted for DT remained without treatment for 7.7 years after diagnosis. Older men and men with lesser cancer severity at diagnosis were more likely to remain untreated. PCa mortality did not differ between DT and active treatment patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shappley, Kenfield, Kasperzyk, Qiu, Stampfer, Sanda, Chan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Diagnosis & Staging, Surgery, Radiation, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2613</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Determinants and Outcomes of Deferred Treatment or Watchful Waiting Among Men With Prostate Cancer in a Nationwide Cohort [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4985</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4980</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4986?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Neoadjuvant Celecoxib in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug-Specific Biomarkers [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4986?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is a potential pharmacologic target for the prevention of various malignancies, including prostate cancer. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to examine the effect of celecoxib on drug-specific biomarkers from prostate tissue obtained at prostatectomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with localized prostate cancer and Gleason sum &ge; 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) &ge; 15 ng/mL, clinical stage T2b or greater, or any combination with greater than 45% risk of capsular penetration were randomly assigned to celecoxib 400 mg by mouth twice daily or placebo for 4 to 6 weeks before prostatectomy. The primary end point was the difference in prostatic prostaglandin levels between the two groups. Secondary end points were differences in COX-1 and -2 expressions; oxidized DNA bases; and markers of proliferation, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Tissue celecoxib concentrations also were measured. Tertiary end points were drug safety and compliance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seventy-three patients consented, and 64 were randomly assigned and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no treatment differences in any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Multivariable regression revealed that tumor tissue had significantly lower COX-2 expression than benign prostatic tissue (<I>P</I> = .01) and significantly higher levels of the proliferation marker Ki-67 (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001). Celecoxib was measurable in prostate tissue of patients on treatment, demonstrating that celecoxib reached its target. Celecoxib was safe and resulted in only grade 1 toxicities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Treatment with 4 to 6 weeks of celecoxib had no effect on intermediate biomarkers of prostate carcinogenesis, despite the achievement of measurable tissue levels. We caution against using celecoxib 400 mg twice daily as a preventive agent for prostate cancer in additional studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonarakis, Heath, Walczak, Nelson, Fedor, De Marzo, Zahurak, Piantadosi, Dannenberg, Gurganus, Baker, Parnes, DeWeese, Partin, Carducci]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemoprevention studies, Surgery, Genitourinary]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9410</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Neoadjuvant Celecoxib in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug-Specific Biomarkers [Genitourinary Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4993</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4986</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4994?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rotterdam Criteria for Sentinel Node (SN) Tumor Burden and the Accuracy of Ultrasound (US) -Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC): Can US-Guided FNAC Replace SN Staging in Patients With Melanoma? [Melanoma]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/4994?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Sentinel node (SN) status is the most important prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) for patients with stage I/II melanoma, and the role of the SN procedure as a staging procedure has long been established. However, a less invasive procedure, such as ultrasound (US) -guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), would be preferred. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of US-guided FNAC and compare the results with histology after SN surgery was performed in all patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Four hundred consecutive patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy subsequently underwent a US examination before the SN procedure. When the US examination showed a suspicious or malignant pattern, patients underwent an FNAC. Median Breslow thickness was 1.8 mm; mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 4 to 82 months). We considered the US-guided FNAC positive if either US and/or FNAC were positive. If US was suggestive of abnormality, but FNAC was negative, the US-guided FNAC was considered negative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>US-guided FNAC identified 51 (65%) of 79 SN metastases. Specificity was 99% (317 of 321), with a positive predictive value of 93% and negative predictive value of 92%. SN-positive identification rate by US-guided FNAC increased from 40% in stage pT1a/b disease to 79% in stage pT4a/b disease. US-guided FNAC detected SN tumors more than 1.0 mm in 86% of cases, SN tumors of 0.1 to 1.0 mm in 46% of cases, and SN tumors less than 0.1 mm in 23% of cases. Estimated 5-year OS rates were 92% for patients with negative US-guided FNAC results and 51% for patients with positive results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>US-guided FNAC of SNs is highly accurate. Up to 65% of the patients with SN-positive results in our institution could have been spared an SN procedure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voit, van Akkooi, Schafer-Hesterberg, Schoengen, Schmitz, Sterry, Eggermont]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Surgery, Ultrasound]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.0033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rotterdam Criteria for Sentinel Node (SN) Tumor Burden and the Accuracy of Ultrasound (US) -Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC): Can US-Guided FNAC Replace SN Staging in Patients With Melanoma? [Melanoma]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5000</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4994</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5001?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short-Term Thalidomide Incorporated Into Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Comparison With Double Autotransplantation for Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5001?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To assess potential benefits with thalidomide incorporated into double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>One hundred thirty-five patients who received thalidomide from induction until the second ASCT were retrospectively analyzed in comparison with an equal number of pair mates treated with double ASCT not including thalidomide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>On an intention-to-treat basis, the addition of thalidomide to double ASCT effected a significant improvement in the rate (68% <I>v</I> 49%; <I>P</I> = .001) and duration (62% <I>v</I> 33% at 4 years; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) of at least very good partial response (VGPR), time to progression (TTP; 61% <I>v</I> 41% at 4 years; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; 51% <I>v</I> 31% at 4 years; <I>P</I> = .001). A trend was also noted for extended overall survival (OS) among thalidomide-treated patients (69% at 5 years <I>v</I> 53% for the control group), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<I>P</I> = .07). Benefits with thalidomide in increasing the rate of VGPR or better response, TTP, and PFS were confirmed in a multivariate analysis. Median OS after relapse was 24 months for patients receiving thalidomide added to double ASCT and 25 months for the control group. Overall, 17% of patients discontinued thalidomide, including 8% because of drug-related adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In comparison with double ASCT, the addition of first-line thalidomide to double ASCT improved clinical outcomes. Short-term thalidomide was generally well tolerated and had no adverse impact on postrelapse survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cavo, Di Raimondo, Zamagni, Patriarca, Tacchetti, Casulli, Volpe, Perrone, Ledda, Ceccolini, Califano, Bigazzi, Offidani, Stefani, Ballerini, Fiacchini, de Vivo, Brioli, Tosi, Baccarani]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Myeloma, Chemotherapy, Biological Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7389</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short-Term Thalidomide Incorporated Into Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Comparison With Double Autotransplantation for Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5007</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5001</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5008?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pomalidomide (CC4047) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone As Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5008?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Thalidomide and lenalidomide are immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) that produce high remission rates in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Pomalidomide is a new IMiD with high in vitro potency. We report, to our knowledge, the first phase II trial of pomalidomide administered in combination with low-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Pomalidomide was administered orally at a dose of 2 mg daily on days 1 through 28 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone 40 mg daily was administered orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Responses were recorded using the criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty patients were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients (63%) achieved confirmed response including complete response in three patients (5%), very good partial response in 17 patients (28%), and partial response in 18 patients (30%). Responses were seen in 40% of lenalidomide-refractory patients, 37% of thalidomide-refractory patients, and 60% of bortezomib-refractory patients. Responses were seen in 74% of patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular markers. Toxicity consisted primarily of myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity consisted of anemia (5%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and neutropenia (32%). One patient (1.6%) had a thromboembolic event. The median progression-free survival time was 11.6 months and was not significantly different in patients with high-risk disease compared with patients with standard-risk disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The combination of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone is extremely active in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma, including high response rates in patients refractory to other novel agents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lacy, Hayman, Gertz, Dispenzieri, Buadi, Kumar, Greipp, Lust, Russell, Dingli, Kyle, Fonseca, Bergsagel, Roy, Mikhael, Stewart, Laumann, Allred, Mandrekar, Rajkumar]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6802</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pomalidomide (CC4047) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone As Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5014</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5008</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5015?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Combination Therapy With Bortezomib, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5015?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This single-center, open-label, phase II trial evaluated the bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), and dexamethasone combination regimen (VDD) as initial treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Enrolled patients (N = 40) received up to six 3-week cycles of treatment with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; PLD 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> IV on day 4; and dexamethasone 20 to 40 mg daily as specified in the study design. The primary end point was the complete/near-complete response (CR/nCR) rate after six cycles. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The impact of VDD on stem-cell mobilization and collection also was evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After six cycles, the ORR was 85.0% (CR/nCR, 37.5%; very good partial response [VGPR] or better, 57.5%). Patients who underwent stem-cell transplantation (SCT) after VDD (n = 30) experienced increased rates of VGPR or better (53.3% to 76.6% after SCT). Overall, 1-year PFS and OS rates were 92.5% and 97.5%, respectively. Those who achieved VGPR or better after treatment with VDD showed a significantly greater 1-year PFS versus those who achieved less than VGPR (100% <I>v</I> 82%, respectively; <I>P</I> = .03). Similar results were observed in patients who underwent SCT. Grades 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities occurred in &le; 10% of patients; grade 2 painful neuropathy occurred in 7.5%; and grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred in 2.5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>VDD is highly effective for initial treatment of MM followed by SCT in appropriate patients, and it has a reasonable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or better with this initial therapy predicted longer PFS, regardless of the consolidation therapy given.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakubowiak, Kendall, Al-Zoubi, Khaled, Mineishi, Ahmed, Campagnaro, Brozo, Braun, Talpaz, Kaminski]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5370</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Trial of Combination Therapy With Bortezomib, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5022</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5015</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5023?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Weekly or Twice-Weekly Bortezomib Plus Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular or Marginal-Zone B-Cell Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5023?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To determine overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and duration of response (DOR) with twice-weekly/weekly bortezomib plus rituximab, and evaluate safety/tolerability, in patients with relapsed or refractory CD20<sup>+</sup> follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal-zone lymphoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients were randomly assigned (minimization method) to bortezomib 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, and 11; 21-day cycle, five cycles; arm A) or bortezomib 1.6 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly (days 1, 8, 15, and 22; 35-day cycle, three cycles; arm B) plus rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly for 4 weeks (both arms). Response/progression was determined by International Workshop Response Criteria using oncologist/radiologist-adjudicated data from independent radiology review and investigator assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eighty-one patients (arm A, n = 41; arm B, n = 40) were enrolled. Dose-intensity was higher in arm A; mean total bortezomib received was similar between arms (18.5 and 17.1 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). In arm A, ORR was 49% (14% complete response [CR]/CR unconfirmed [CRu]), median TTP was 7.0 months, and median DOR was not reached. In arm B, ORR was 43% (10% CR/CRu), and median TTP/DOR were 10.0/9.3 months. The weekly combination regimen seemed better tolerated. Grade 3 or worse adverse events seemed more common in arm A (54%) versus arm B (35%), including thrombocytopenia (10% <I>v</I> 0%) and peripheral neuropathy (10% <I>v</I> 5%), but diarrhea seemed less frequent (7% <I>v</I> 15%). No grade 4 toxicities were reported in arm B.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Both bortezomib plus rituximab regimens seem feasible in relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas. The more convenient weekly combination regimen is being compared with single-agent rituximab in an ongoing phase III study in relapsed FL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Vos, Goy, Dakhil, Saleh, McLaughlin, Belt, Flowers, Knapp, Hart, Patel-Donnelly, Glenn, Gregory, Holladay, Zhang, Boral]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Biologic Therapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7980</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Weekly or Twice-Weekly Bortezomib Plus Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular or Marginal-Zone B-Cell Lymphoma [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5030</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5023</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ERG Expression Is an Independent Prognostic Factor and Allows Refined Risk Stratification in Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comprehensive Analysis of ERG, MN1, and BAALC Transcript Levels Using Oligonucleotide Microarrays [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Recently, several novel molecular prognostic markers were identified in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). In addition to the well-known influence of <I>FLT3, NPM1</I>, and <I>CEBPA</I> mutations, high transcript levels of the <I>ERG, BAALC</I>, and <I>MN1</I> genes have been associated with inferior outcomes, but the relative importance of these risk markers remains to be defined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We analyzed <I>ERG</I>, <I>BAALC</I>, and <I>MN1</I> expression levels in a cohort of 210 patients with CN-AML who received intensive chemotherapy. Expression levels of <I>ERG</I>, <I>BAALC</I>, and <I>MN1</I> were determined in bone marrow samples by using oligonucleotide microarrays.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>High transcript levels of <I>ERG</I>, <I>BAALC</I>, and <I>MN1</I> were predictors for inferior overall survival (OS) and a lower rate of complete remissions (CRs). There were significant positive correlations between the expression levels of all three genes. <I>ERG</I> expression levels predicted OS in elderly patients (ie, age 60 years or older) with CN-AML (<I>P</I> = .006) as well as in younger patients (<I>P</I> = .013). In multivariate analyses, high <I>ERG</I> expression was independently associated with a lower CR rate (<I>P</I> = .013), shorter event-free survival (<I>P</I> = .008), and shorter OS (<I>P</I> = .005). Patients who had low <I>ERG</I> levels and absent <I>FLT3</I> internal tandem duplication (ITD) had a 5-year OS of 44%, and patients who had high <I>ERG</I> expression and <I>FLT3</I> ITD had a 5-year OS of only 5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We analyzed a comprehensive set of molecular risk factors in a large, homogeneous CN-AML patient cohort. In this study, high <I>ERG</I> expression levels emerged as a strong negative prognostic factor and provided prognostic information in addition to established molecular markers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Metzeler, Dufour, Benthaus, Hummel, Sauerland, Heinecke, Berdel, Buchner, Wormann, Mansmann, Braess, Spiekermann, Hiddemann, Buske, Bohlander]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5328</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ERG Expression Is an Independent Prognostic Factor and Allows Refined Risk Stratification in Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comprehensive Analysis of ERG, MN1, and BAALC Transcript Levels Using Oligonucleotide Microarrays [Hematologic Malignancies]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5038</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hematologic Malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5039?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immunophenotypic Analysis of AIDS-Related Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Clinical Implications in Patients From AIDS Malignancies Consortium Clinical Trials 010 and 034 [AIDS-Related Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5039?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents a clinically heterogeneous disease. Models based on immunohistochemistry predict clinical outcome. These include subdivision into germinal center (GC) versus non-GC subtypes; proliferation index (measured by expression of Ki-67), and expression of BCL-2, FOXP1, or B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein (Blimp-1)/PRDM1. We sought to determine whether immunohistochemical analyses of biopsies from patients with DLBCL having HIV infection are similarly relevant for prognosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We examined 81 DLBCLs from patients with AIDS in AMC010 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP] <I>v</I> CHOP-rituximab) and AMC034 (etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and dose-adjusted cyclophosphamide plus rituximab concurrent <I>v</I> sequential) clinical trials and compared the immunophenotype with survival data, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity, and CD4 counts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The GC and non-GC subtypes of DLBCL did not differ significantly with respect to overall survival or CD4 count at cancer presentation. EBV could be found in both subtypes of DLBCL, although less frequently in the GC subtype, and did not affect survival. Expression of FOXP1, Blimp-1/PRDM1, or BCL-2 was not correlated with the outcome in patients with AIDS-related DLBCL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These data indicate that with current treatment strategies for lymphoma and control of HIV infection, commonly used immunohistochemical markers may not be clinically relevant in HIV-infected patients with DLBCL. The only predictive immunohistochemical marker was found to be Ki-67, where a higher proliferation index was associated with better survival, suggesting a better response to therapy in patients whose tumors had higher proliferation rates.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chadburn, Chiu, Lee, Chen, Hyjek, Banham, Noy, Kaplan, Sparano, Bhatia, Cesarman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prognostic Studies, Lymphoma, Biology & Immunology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5450</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immunophenotypic Analysis of AIDS-Related Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Clinical Implications in Patients From AIDS Malignancies Consortium Clinical Trials 010 and 034 [AIDS-Related Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5048</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5039</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>AIDS-Related Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5049?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Serum Adiponectin As a Predictor of Childhood Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Nationwide Case-Control Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5049?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring the association of childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with serum adiponectin and leptin levels in a nationwide case-control series. In addition, expression of adiponectin receptors in NHL specimens was assessed, and the association between adipokines and childhood NHL survival and prognosis was examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We studied 121 incident childhood (0 to 14 years) NHL cases registered in the Nationwide Registry for Childhood Hematological Malignancies (1996 to 2006) and an equal number of matched controls, for whom sociodemographic, lifestyle, prenatal characteristics, and fasting blood serums were collected. Serum adiponectin and leptin levels were determined. Immunohistochemisty for adiponectin receptors expression was performed on commercially available adult NHL specimens (n = 30) and in a subset of childhood NHL cases (n = 6) that were available. Summary statistics, multiple conditional logistic regression analyses, and survival analysis were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Higher serum adiponectin, but not leptin, levels were independently associated with childhood NHL (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.56), after adjusting for obesity and established risk factors. Higher adiponectin levels at diagnosis were positively associated with relapse and poor survival, but hormone levels did not differ among NHL subtypes. Adiponectin receptors 1 and 2 were present in 90% and 57% of adult samples and in 83% and 100% of childhood NHL samples, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Elevated serum adiponectin, but not leptin, levels are independently associated with childhood NHL and poor prognosis. Adiponectin receptors are expressed in NHL, suggesting that adiponectin may represent not only a potential clinically significant diagnostic and prognostic marker but also a molecule that may be implicated in NHL pathogenesis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petridou, Sergentanis, Dessypris, Vlachantoni, Tseleni-Balafouta, Pourtsidis, Moschovi, Polychronopoulou, Athanasiadou-Piperopoulou, Kalmanti, Mantzoros]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cancer Etiology, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7525</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Serum Adiponectin As a Predictor of Childhood Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Nationwide Case-Control Study [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5055</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5049</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Single-Drug Vinblastine As Salvage Treatment for Refractory or Relapsed Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma: A Report From the French Society of Pediatric Oncology [Pediatric Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To evaluate the efficacy of vinblastine for relapsed/refractory anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Data were reviewed on all 36 patients included prospectively in the French database for pediatric ALCL who were treated with vinblastine (6 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/wk) for resistant primary disease (one), a first relapse (15), or subsequent relapses (20). Fifteen patients had undergone hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for a previous relapse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six patients were not evaluable for response, 25 (83%) of 30 evaluable patients achieved a complete remission (CR), and five experienced progressive disease. Among the 31 patients who achieved a CR with vinblastine or before its initiation, six patients were treated with HSCT and 25 with vinblastine alone (median duration, 14 months). Overall, nine of 25 patients treated with vinblastine alone have remained in CR (median, 7 years since the end of treatment), and 16 patients have relapsed. Vinblastine was still efficient for subsequent relapses. With a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 12 patients have died (four as a result of toxicity after HSCT and eight as a result of disease), and 24 patients are alive (15 following treatment with single-agent vinblastine for the last event). Five-year overall survival is 65% (95% CI, 48% to 79%), and 5-year event-free survival is 30% (95% CI, 17% to 47%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Vinblastine is highly efficient in relapsed ALCL and may produce durable remissions. The optimal treatment duration still has to be assessed. These results should be borne in mind when designing future phase II studies with the targeted therapies directed against anaplastic lymphoma kinase.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brugieres, Pacquement, Le Deley, Leverger, Lutz, Paillard, Baruchel, Frappaz, Nelken, Lamant, Patte]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1764</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Single-Drug Vinblastine As Salvage Treatment for Refractory or Relapsed Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma: A Report From the French Society of Pediatric Oncology [Pediatric Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5061</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pediatric Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5062?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial of Surgery With or Without Preoperative Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5062?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>OEO2 is a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy in patients undergoing radical surgery for esophageal cancer. Random assignment was to surgery alone (S) or to two cycles of combination cisplatin and fluorouracil before surgery (CS). Initial results reported in 2002 demonstrated an advantage for both disease-free and overall survival in the CS group. The analysis has now been updated after a median follow-up of 6 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>OEO2 recruited 802 patients, 400 on CS and 402 on S. The nature of the first recurrence event and cause of death are detailed. Survival has been determined from Kaplan-Meier curves and treatment comparisons made with the log-rank test. Survival by extent of resection is presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 655 deaths, 335 for S and 320 for CS. The survival benefit has been maintained with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98; <I>P</I> = .03) which in absolute terms is a 5-year survival of 23.0% for CS compared with 17.1% for S. The treatment effect is consistent in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The first disease-free survival event was macroscopic residual disease from incomplete resection (R2) or no resection in 26.4% of the S group versus 14.3% of the CS <I>P</I> &lt; .001. Three-year survival by type of resection was R0 42.4%, R1 was 18.0%, and R2 was 8.6%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Long-term follow-up confirms that preoperative chemotherapy improves survival in operable esophageal cancer and should be considered as a standard of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allum, Stenning, Bancewicz, Clark, Langley]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial of Surgery With or Without Preoperative Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5067</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5062</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5068?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Amphiregulin and Epiregulin mRNA Expression in Primary Tumors Predicts Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5068?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To study the power of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) epiregulin (EREG) and amphiregulin (AREG) ligands' expression in primary tumors to predict the outcome in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (cmCRC) treated with the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Gene expression measurements and <I>KRAS</I> mutation analysis were performed on archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumors of 220 cmCRC patients. Response was measured using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. The relation between ligand expression levels and outcome was evaluated using logistic regression for response and Cox regression for survival data. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed for response and survival data. CIs for the performance indices were obtained with a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Findings were externally validated on a series of 67 samples treated in a similar setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In <I>KRAS</I> wild type (WT) patients, there was a significant association between log-transformed ligand expression and response for EREG (odds ratio for objective response, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.83; <I>P</I> = .0005; concordance index [c-index], 0.681) and for AREG (odds ratio for objective response, 1.862; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.72; <I>P</I> = .0017; c-index, 0.673). In a Cox regression model, dichotomized ligand expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). EREG PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.274 to 0.609; <I>P</I> &lt; .001; time-dependent c-index [C index], 0.640), and AREG PFS HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.64; <I>P</I> &lt; .001; C index, 0.627). EREG OS HR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.63; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001; C index, 0.639), and AREG OS HR was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.64; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001; C index, 0.625). There was no predictive power of ligand expression in patients with <I>KRAS</I> mutation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Expression of EGFR ligands in primary tumors significantly predicts outcome in <I>KRAS</I> WT cmCRC treated with cetuximab and irinotecan.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobs, De Roock, Piessevaux, Van Oirbeek, Biesmans, De Schutter, Fieuws, Vandesompele, Peeters, Van Laethem, Humblet, Penault-Llorca, De Hertogh, Laurent-Puig, Van Cutsem, Tejpar]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Gastrointestinal, Cancer Biomarkers, Gene Expression and Profiling, Growth Factors & Receptor]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3744</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Amphiregulin and Epiregulin mRNA Expression in Primary Tumors Predicts Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab [Gastrointestinal Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5074</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5068</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5075?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk of Fracture After Single Fraction Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy to Spinal Metastases [Radiation Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5075?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Single-fraction image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) allows for tumoricidal treatment of traditionally radioresistant cancers while sparing critical adjacent structures. Risk of vertebral fracture after IG-IMRT for spinal metastases has not been defined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated 62 consecutive patients undergoing single fraction IG-IMRT at 71 sites for solid organ metastases. A neuroradiologist and three spine surgeons evaluated prospectively obtained magnetic resonance/computed tomography (CT) imaging studies for post-treatment fracture development and tumor recurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fracture progression was noted in 27 vertebrae (39%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that CT appearance, lesion location, and percent vertebral body involvement independently predicted fracture progression. Lesions located between T10 and the sacrum were 4.6 times more likely to fracture than were lesions above T10 (95% CI, 1.1 to 19.7). Lytic lesions were 6.8 times more likely to fracture than were sclerotic and mixed lesions (95% CI, 1.4 to 33.3). As percent vertebral body involvement increased, odds of fracture also increased. Patients with fracture progression had significantly higher narcotic use, change in Karnofsky performance score, and a strong trend toward higher pain scores. Local tumor progression occurred in seven patients and contributed to one fracture. Obesity, posterior element involvement, bisphosphonate use, and local kyphosis did not confer increased risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Vertebral fracture is common after single fraction IG-IMRT for metastatic spine lesions. Lytic disease involving more than 40% of the vertebral body and location at or below T10 confer a high risk of fracture, the presence of which yields significantly poorer clinical outcomes. These results may help clinicians identify high-risk patients who would benefit from prophylactic vertebro- or kyphoplasty.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rose, Laufer, Boland, Hanover, Bilsky, Yamada, Lis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Risk factors, Radiation Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3508</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk of Fracture After Single Fraction Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy to Spinal Metastases [Radiation Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5079</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5075</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Radiation Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5080?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of Sequential Erlotinib and Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5080?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This study investigated whether sequential administration of erlotinib and chemotherapy improves clinical outcomes versus chemotherapy alone in unselected, chemotherapy-na&iuml;ve patients with advanced non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Previously untreated patients (n = 154) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib (150 mg/d) or placebo on days 15 to 28 of a 4-week cycle that included gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1 and 8) and either cisplatin (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1) or carboplatin (5 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> area under the serum concentration-time curve, day 1). The primary end point was nonprogression rate (NPR) at 8 weeks. Secondary end points included tumor response rate, NPR at 16 weeks, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The NPR at 8 weeks was 80.3% in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin (GC) -erlotinib arm (n = 76) and 76.9% in the GC-placebo arm (n = 78). At 16 weeks, the NPR was 64.5% for GC-erlotinib versus 53.8% for GC-placebo. The response rate was 35.5% for GC-erlotinib versus 24.4% for GC-placebo. PFS was significantly longer with GC-erlotinib than with GC-placebo (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.47; log-rank <I>P</I> = .0002; median, 29.4 <I>v</I> 23.4 weeks); this benefit was consistent across all clinical subgroups. There was no significant difference in OS. The addition of erlotinib to chemotherapy was well tolerated, with no increase in hematologic toxicity, and no treatment-related interstitial lung disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Sequential administration of erlotinib following gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in PFS. This treatment approach warrants further investigation in a phase III study.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mok, Wu, Yu, Zhou, Chen, Zhang, Ignacio, Liao, Srimuninnimit, Boyer, Chua-Tan, Sriuranpong, Sudoyo, Jin, Johnston, Chui, Lee]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5541</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of Sequential Erlotinib and Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [Thoracic Oncology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5087</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5080</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5088?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Low Initial Human Papilloma Viral Load Implicates Worse Prognosis in Patients With Uterine Cervical Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5088?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To evaluate whether human papillomavirus (HPV) viral load measured in cervical smear and HPV type 18 are associated with radiotherapy outcomes in uterine cervical cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>HPV DNA was semiquantitatively measured in the cervical smears of 169 radiotherapy patients. HPV viral load was classified as low or high according to median HPV DNA titer and examined for its prognostic value. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for covariates. A relapse-predicting model was constructed to classify three risk groups for disease-free survival (DFS), which were used for internal validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients with lower HPV viral load showed worse DFS in univariate analysis. HPV type 18, younger patient age, stage group, nodal status, histologic grade, and histologic type were other prognostic factors for poor DFS. Among these factors, all except stage group were associated with HPV viral load. Multivariate analysis showed the strong influence of HPV viral load for poor DFS. The prognostic model developed using our outcome data performed well in predicting the risk of relapse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our data suggest that HPV viral load is a strong independent prognostic factor for DFS. HPV type 18 showed a significant relationship with poor radiotherapy outcome in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, Park, Nam, Roh, Lee, Kim, Shin, Lee, Kong, Seong, Han, Lee, Cho, Park]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiation, Translational Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Gynecologic, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4659</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Low Initial Human Papilloma Viral Load Implicates Worse Prognosis in Patients With Uterine Cervical Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy [Gynecologic Cancer]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5093</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5088</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gynecologic Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5094?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Aurora Kinase Inhibitor Danusertib in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5094?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Danusertib (PHA-739358) is a small-molecule pan-aurora kinase inhibitor. This phase I dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate safety and tolerability of danusertib with additional pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and efficacy assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or with no standard therapy available were enrolled. Danusertib was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in 6-hour or 3-hour infusion schedules (ie, 6-hour IVS or 3-hour IVS). Dose levels from 45 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in the 6-hour IVS, and from 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in the 3-hour IVS, were studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fifty patients were treated. For the 6-hour IVS, the most frequently reported adverse effects were neutropenia (55%), nausea (25%), anorexia (23%), fatigue (20%), and diarrhea (18%). In the 3-hour IVS, fatigue (70%), neutropenia (60%), diarrhea (50%), and nausea (30%) were seen. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild to moderate. Neutropenia was dose limiting. The maximum-tolerated dose was 330 mg/m<sup>2</sup> for the 6-hour IVS and was not identified for the 3-hour IVS. The systemic exposure to danusertib increased linearly with dose. The infusion rate did not appear to remarkably influence the pharmacokinetics of danusertib. Biomarker analysis showed inhibition of histone H3 phosphorylation, indicative of aurora B inhibition, at doses of 190 mg/m<sup>2</sup> or greater. Stable disease was observed in 23.7% of evaluable patients, and disease stabilization occurred in 6 or more months in five patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Dose-limiting toxicity of danusertib is neutropenia, which was short lasting and generally uncomplicated; danusertib administration had limited nonhematologic toxicity. The recommended dose of danusertib for phase II studies is 330 mg/m<sup>2</sup> infused over 6 hours on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeghs, Eskens, Gelderblom, Verweij, Nortier, Ouwerkerk, van Noort, Mariani, Spinelli, Carpinelli, Laffranchi, de Jonge]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Aurora Kinase Inhibitor Danusertib in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5094</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Study of the Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutic Investigators' Consortium [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To determine the dose of cetuximab that can be safely combined with irinotecan for treatment of pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and Methods</st>
<p>This open-label, phase I study enrolled patients ages 1 to 18 years with advanced refractory solid tumors, including tumors of the CNS. Patient cohorts by age group (children, ages 1 to 12 years; adolescents, ages 13 to 18 years) received escalating weekly doses of cetuximab (75, 150, 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) in a 3 + 3 design, plus irinotecan (16 or 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days. The primary end points were establishing the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RPIID), and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Preliminary safety and efficacy data were also collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-seven children and 19 adolescents received a median of 7.1 and 6.0 weeks of cetuximab therapy, respectively. Cetuximab 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly plus irinotecan 16 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d (pediatric) or 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d (adolescent) have been established as the MTD/RPIID. Dose-limiting toxicities included diarrhea and neutropenia. Mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) acneiform rash occurred in a majority of patients; no grade 3 to 4 rashes were observed. Cetuximab demonstrated dose-dependent clearance in both children and adolescents, similar to that in adults. There were two confirmed partial responses, both in patients with CNS tumors. Stable disease was achieved in 18 patients overall, including 10 patients with CNS tumors (38.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The cetuximab/irinotecan combination can be given safely to children and adolescents with cancer. Promising activity, particularly in CNS tumors, warrants phase II evaluation of this regimen.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trippett, Herzog, Whitlock, Wolff, Kuttesch, Bagatell, Hunger, Boklan, Smith, Arceci, Katzenstein, Harbison, Zhou, Lu, Langer, Weber, Gore]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8975</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Study of the Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutic Investigators' Consortium [Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving Cancer Outcomes Through International Collaboration in Academic Cancer Treatment Trials [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/30/5109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The need for international collaboration in cancer clinical trials has grown stronger as we have made progress both in cancer treatment and screening. We sought to identify those efforts already underway which facilitate such collaboration, as well as barriers to greater collaboration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We reviewed the collective experiences of many cooperative groups, governmental organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and academic investigators in their work to build international collaboration in cancer clinical trials across multiple disease sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>More than a decade of work has led to effective global harmonization for many of the elements critical to cancer clinical trials. Many barriers remain, but effective international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials should become the norm, rather than the exception.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our ability to strengthen international collaborations will result in maximization of our resources and patients, permitting us to change practice by establishing more effective therapeutic strategies. Regulatory, logistical, and financial hurdles, however, often hamper the conduct of joint trials. We must work together as a global community to overcome these barriers so that we may continue to improve cancer treatment for patients around the world.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trimble, Abrams, Meyer, Calvo, Cazap, Deye, Eisenhauer, Fitzgerald, Lacombe, Parmar, Seibel, Shankar, Swart, Therasse, Vikram, von Frenckell, Friedlander, Fujiwara, Kaplan, Meunier]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5771</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving Cancer Outcomes Through International Collaboration in Academic Cancer Treatment Trials [REVIEW ARTICLE]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>30</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>